Exact solution for the motion of a rigid particle with $\boldsymbol{S_4}$ and $\boldsymbol{C_{2v}}$ symmetry settling under gravity in a viscous fluid

Maria L. Ekiel-Je\.zewska; Piotr Zdybel

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 57 references

Exact solution for the motion of a rigid particle with $\boldsymbol{S_4}$ and $\boldsymbol{C_{2v}}$ symmetry settling under gravity in a viscous fluid

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A conserved quantity makes S4-symmetric settling particles exactly solvable, with closed-form rosette trajectories and settling speeds.

desk verdict Horizontal rosette solution is genuinely new and checkable, but the defining invariant is misstated and the non-uniform-density claim overreaches; both fixable. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09585 v1 pith:P7SO6CF2 submitted 2026-08-10 physics.flu-dyn cond-mat.softnlin.SI

Piotr Zdybel , Maria L. Ekiel-Jeżewska This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.flu-dyncond-mat.softnlin.SI

keywords Stokesflowlow-Reynolds-numbersedimentationS4roto-reflectionsymmetryC2vJacobiellipticfunctionsintegralsrosettetrajectoriesmobilitytensor

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that for any rigid particle of uniform density whose shape has both C2v and S4 symmetry, the full Stokes-flow settling dynamics under gravity reduces to a closed form: all Euler angles and centre-of-mass coordinates are expressed through Jacobi elliptic functions and elliptic integrals, with no numerical time-stepping. The S4 roto-reflection symmetry forces the translational mobility in the xy-plane to be isotropic and leaves a single independent rotational-translational coupling coefficient, making the orientation dynamics integrable. A single conserved quantity, C = sin 2θ sin 2ψ, labels every orbit. If this is correct, the fluttering class of C2v bodies becomes analytically tractable whenever the added S4 symmetry is present, giving exact benchmark predictions for sedimentation trajectories, mean settling speeds, and trajectory envelope radii.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the S4 roto-reflection symmetry, which forces the mobility tensors evaluated about the centre of mass to depend on only three coefficients μ₁, μ₃, and μ_b, with the rotational-translational block off-diagonal and symmetric. This yields the autonomous two-angle system θ′ = −cos 2ψ sin θ, ψ′ = sin 2ψ cos θ, and the first integral C = sin 2θ sin 2ψ. Substituting u = tan ψ converts the system to an elliptic differential equation solved by squared Jacobi cn functions; the complex characteristic n₊ in the incomplete elliptic integral of the third kind then produces the exact azimuthal drift. The horizontal motion is integrated by a particular solution Ξ_c = K A(τ)$e^{{iφ}}$ with A(τ) algebraic in θ and ψ, giving the rosette and its envelope radii directly.

What would settle it

Measure or compute the full six-by-six mobility tensor of a manufactured S4∩C2v particle; if the rotational-translational block has unequal off-diagonal entries rather than the assumed symmetric form with a single μ_b, the first integral C will not be conserved and the predicted envelope radii will fail. Alternatively, integrate the exact mobility equations numerically with the paper's coefficients: if the horizontal distance from the rosette centre ever leaves the annulus [2|K|√(C(1−C)), 2|K|√(1−C²)], the central claim is contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the orientation dynamics of a body with S4∩C2v symmetry decouples and integrates exactly. With u = tan ψ, the spin equation reduces to an elliptic differential equation whose solution is u(τ) = u_− + δ cn²(Ω(τ − τ₀), k); the tilt θ then follows algebraically from the conserved quantity C. The azimuth φ is an incomplete elliptic integral of the third kind with a genuinely complex characteristic, which splits into a uniform drift plus a T/2-periodic modulation, with closed forms for the orientation period and drift rate. The vertical centre-of-mass displacement is likewise obtained exactly, and the orbit-averaged settling velocity reduces to a single ratio of complete elliptic integrals, giving V_Z = K[−V₀ + 2(1 + √(1 − C²)) E(k²)/K(k²)]. The horizontal centre-of-mass position is algebraic in the three Euler angles and traces rosette-like curves confined between two concentric circles of radii 2|K|√(C(1−C)) and 2|K|√(1−C²), with cusps at the outer envelope.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes the reference point is the particle's centre of mass, so the buoyancy-corrected weight produces no torque; if the density distribution is not uniform, the centres of mass and buoyancy need not coincide, and the angular-velocity equations (2.8)-(2.10) no longer hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every particle in the S4∩C2v class, once its three mobility coefficients are known, has a fully explicit dynamic benchmark: orientation, vertical displacement, mean settling velocity, and horizontal position all come from closed-form expressions rather than time integration.
The orbit-averaged settling velocity lies strictly between −μ₃/μ_b and −μ₁/μ_b for 0 < C < 1, and in dimensional form it is independent of the rotational-translational coupling μ_b.
Horizontal centre-of-mass trajectories are generically quasi-periodic rosettes confined between two circles; sharp cusps occur exactly at the outer envelope at instants θ = π/2, while the inner envelope is reached smoothly at ψ = π/4.
Strictly periodic rosettes exist exactly when the azimuthal drift per orientation period Δφ/(2π) is rational, and the closure time is qT, or qT/2 when the reduced fraction has both numerator and denominator odd.
The rosette size grows without bound as the rotational-translational coupling μ_b tends to zero, so weakly coupled shapes undergo very large horizontal excursions while settling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the S4 symmetry is only approximate, the conserved quantity C is destroyed; a perturbative expansion around this exact solution could describe slow drift between elliptic orbits and classify which near-S4 shapes retain rosette-like motion.
The exact horizontal closed form offers a practical parameter-fitting route: measuring the envelope radii, cusp locations, and drift ratio of an experimental trajectory could recover the three mobility coefficients without full trajectory integration.
Sharp cusps in the horizontal settling path are plausibly an experimental diagnostic for S4 symmetry of the mobility tensor, since generic C2v bodies without the roto-reflection symmetry produce smooth petal-like loops instead.
The same elliptic machinery could serve as a zeroth-order state for weak inertia, where the slow evolution of C under inertial torque would be computable by orbit-averaging the exact solution.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Read for the rosettes. The genuinely new result is the exact horizontal center-of-mass solution (4.20): for S4 and C2v Stokes-settling particles, the CM position is algebraic in the Euler angles, yielding exact envelope radii, a cusp condition, and a commensurability criterion for periodic rosettes. That is a solid, bounded extension of the C2v flutterer line of work, and the 1e-11 agreement against DOP853 integration is credible. The orientation part is not new - the authors admit equivalence to Makino and Doi (2003) - but they bury that admission in Sec. 5; it should be in the introduction. The conserved quantity is borrowed from Joshi and Govindarajan (2025). That is not a flaw per se, but it matters for how novelty is framed. The soft spots are real but fixable. Biggest: Eq. (3.1) states C = sin 2 theta sin 2 psi, which is not a first integral of (2.8)-(2.9). Direct differentiation gives a nonzero result. The correct invariant is sin^2 theta sin 2 psi. The same typo appears in the vertical velocity in (2.11)/(4.5), where the derivation requires sin^2 theta, not sin 2 theta. The good news is the rest of the paper's formulas - (3.15), (3.24), (4.24) - are consistent with the corrected invariant, so this looks like a systematic misprint rather than a fatal error. Still, as written, a reader cannot reconstruct the orbit label C without silently fixing the equations. The authors should correct the typo chain and show the derivative vanishing explicitly. Second: the conclusion claims the exact solution extends to non-uniform density distributions with the same symmetry. That does not follow. The derivation takes the center of mass as the reference point, where the gravitational torque vanishes only for uniform density. For a non-uniform body with the same shape symmetry, the center of buoyancy generally differs from the center of mass, so a torque enters (2.3) and the orientation dynamics (2.8)-(2.10) are no longer the ones solved. That claim should be withdrawn or properly justified. Minor: the Makino and Doi equivalence should be stated up front. It does not reduce the value of the horizontal analysis, but it affects how the novelty is read. Who benefits: people working on shape-dependent Stokesian settling and anyone needing exact benchmarks for numerical microhydrodynamics. The envelope/cusp diagnostics are also a plausible experimental signature of S4 symmetry of the mobility tensor. I would send this to serious referees after the invariant and the non-uniform-density claim are fixed.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims an exact, closed-form solution for the low-Reynolds-number settling dynamics of rigid particles with both C2v and S4 symmetry. Starting from a reduced mobility tensor with three coefficients, the authors reduce the orientation dynamics to two coupled ODEs for the Euler angles θ and ψ, identify a conserved quantity C labeling the orbits, and express θ, ψ as Jacobi elliptic functions, and φ as a drift plus a periodic part involving an incomplete elliptic integral of the third kind with a complex characteristic. The vertical centre-of-mass motion is expressed through elliptic integrals, with the orbit-averaged settling velocity reducing to a ratio of complete elliptic integrals. The horizontal motion is obtained algebraically in terms of the Euler angles, yielding rosette-like trajectories confined between two exactly computed concentric circles, with a commensurability condition for strictly periodic rosettes. The paper includes numerical cross-validation at the 1e-11 level and a table of strictly periodic rosettes.

Significance. If the derivation is correct, this is a valuable benchmark for Stokesian dynamics of a nontrivial symmetry class: it gives parameter-free closed-form predictions for the orientation period, drift rate, settling velocity, envelope radii, cusp formation, and a Fourier description of the co-rotating orbit. The absence of fitted parameters and the systematic comparison with high-accuracy DOP853 integration are strengths, as is the algebraic verification of the particular solution (4.20) and the envelope radii (4.24)-(4.25). The main physical predictions, including the rosette envelopes and the cusp mechanism, are falsifiable experimentally. However, the paper's central definition of the conserved quantity is misstated, which undermines the readability and reproducibility of the derivation as written.

major comments (2)

[Eq. (3.1) and dependent sections] The stated first integral C = sin 2θ sin 2ψ is not conserved by Eqs. (2.8)-(2.9). Direct differentiation gives dC/dτ = 2 sinθ cos2ψ sin2ψ, which is generically nonzero. The actual invariant is C = sin²θ sin 2ψ, for which the derivative vanishes identically. This is not a local typo: the incorrect definition is used to derive (3.15), (3.17), (3.18), (3.24), the bound |C| ≤ sin 2θ ≤ 1 in Sec. 3.1, the range statement sin 2θ ∈ [C,1] in Sec. 4.2, and the envelope derivation around (4.24)-(4.25). Those formulas become correct only after replacing C with sin²θ sin 2ψ and correspondingly reading the vertical velocity in (2.11)/(4.5) as K(−V0 + 2 sin²θ) rather than K(−V0 + 2 sin 2θ). As written, the central derivation cannot be followed without the reader silently applying this correction.
[Sec. 5 (Conclusions) and Abstract] The claim that the exact solution applies also to non-uniform density distributions with the same S4∩C2v symmetry is not established by the manuscript. Section 2 assumes uniform density so that the external torque about the centre of mass vanishes, leading to Eq. (2.3). For a non-uniform density distribution, the centre of buoyancy generally differs from the centre of mass, producing a gravitational torque that is not included in the equations of motion. The authors should either remove this assertion or provide a separate justification and derivation for that case.

minor comments (5)

[Eq. (2.11) and Eq. (4.5)] The vertical component of the centre-of-mass velocity should be K(−V0 + 2 sin²θ), not K(−V0 + 2 sin 2θ). This is confirmed by the C=0 solution in Eqs. (4.2)-(4.4), where differentiating the closed-form Z_cm gives a term proportional to sin²θ.
[Sec. 3.1] The inequalities following Eq. (3.1) should be corrected to reflect the invariant C = sin²θ sin 2ψ, i.e., |C| ≤ sin²θ ≤ 1 and |C| ≤ |sin 2ψ| ≤ 1.
[Sec. 4.2] The sentence "since on a closed orbit with 0<C<1 one has sin 2θ(τ) ∈ [C,1]" should refer to sin²θ(τ), not sin 2θ(τ). The bounds in Eq. (4.6) are correct only for the corrected vertical velocity with sin²θ.
[Sec. 2, Eq. (2.7)] The rotation matrix convention R(φ,θ,ψ)=R_z(ψ)R_x(θ)R_z(φ) is nonstandard and appears inconsistent with the text's definition of φ as the angle from X to the line of nodes. In the usual z-x-z convention the order is R_z(φ)R_x(θ)R_z(ψ). The authors should clarify the relation between the matrix product and the geometric definitions of φ and ψ, since this affects the interpretation of the Euler-angle rates.
[Sec. 5 (Conclusions)] The sentence "the distance from that centre depends on the azimuthal angle alone" is incorrect: the distance ρ(τ) in Eq. (4.24) depends on the nutation angle θ, not on the azimuth φ. This should be corrected to avoid confusing readers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the closed-form dynamics are obtained from the stated Stokes-mobility ODEs with external mobility coefficients as inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain starts from the mobility tensor (2.1), dictated by the S4∩C2v symmetry, and the torque-free settling dynamics (2.3); the Euler-angle equations (2.8)-(2.10) and centre-of-mass kinematics (2.11) follow from these inputs, with μ1, μ3 and μb treated as external shape-dependent parameters. The orbit label C is taken from Joshi & Govindarajan (2025), an external result, and the elliptic solution, the azimuth quadrature, the vertical displacement, the averaged settling velocity, and the horizontal rosette solution are all obtained by explicit algebra and quadrature from those ODEs, then cross-checked against high-accuracy DOP853 numerics. The comparison with Makino & Doi (2003) is presented as cross-validation, not as a premise of the derivation. Self-citations (Ekiel-Jeżewska & Wajnryb 2009; Shekhar et al. 2026) are used only for an Euler-angle convention and for elementary C=0 solutions that are directly checkable by substitution, so they are not load-bearing. The one in-scope anomaly is non-circular: Eq. (3.1) prints C=sin2θ sin2ψ, but direct differentiation of (2.8)-(2.9) shows that quantity is not conserved, while the subsequent algebra in Eqs. (3.15), (3.17), (3.24), (4.7) and (4.24) uses the invariant sin^2θ sin2ψ; this is a correctness/typographical defect affecting verifiability, not a reduction of a prediction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on standard elliptic-function identities and the assumed mobility tensor structure. No free parameters are fitted; the three mobility coefficients are inputs from prior computation. No invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The mobility tensor for an S4∩C2v symmetric body evaluated at its center of mass has the form (2.1) with μ1=μ2 and a single off-diagonal rotational-translational coupling μb.
Invoked in Sec. 2 to derive the evolution equations (2.8)-(2.11). This is a symmetry argument, not proven from first principles in the paper.
domain assumption For uniform density the center of mass coincides with the center of buoyancy, so the external torque about the reference point vanishes and the angular velocity is given by M_rt·F only.
Sec. 2, around Eq. (2.3). This excludes non-uniform density unless an additional torque is included.
standard math The analytic continuation of the incomplete elliptic integral of the third kind Π(n;φ|k²) for complex n and the connection formula (3.31) hold for the parameter values used.
Sec. 3.5 and Appendix A rely on the branch structure of Π for complex characteristic; the authors cite Armitage & Eberlein (2006) and validate numerically to 1e-11.
domain assumption The equations (2.8)-(2.10) are a correct reduction of the full Stokes mobility dynamics for this symmetry class.
Sec. 2, from (2.1)-(2.3). This is standard microhydrodynamics, but the explicit ODEs are asserted, not derived step-by-step.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exact solution for the motion of a rigid particle with $\boldsymbol{S_4}$ and $\boldsymbol{C_{2v}}$ symmetry settling under gravity in a viscous fluid." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P7SO6CF2

@misc{pith2026260809585,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exact solution for the motion of a rigid particle with $\boldsymbolS_4$ and $\boldsymbolC_2v$ symmetry settling under gravity in a viscous fluid},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P7SO6CF2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09585}
}

abstract

We provide an exact and complete solution for the dynamics of a rigid particle of uniform density with $C_{2v}$ and $S_4$ symmetry, settling under gravity in a viscous fluid at a Reynolds number much smaller than unity. The $S_4$ symmetry renders the problem exactly integrable, with all orbits labelled by a single conserved quantity $0\le C\le 1$. We show that, for $0<C<1$, there are two different time scales, which lead to quasi-periodic evolution, with a significant time-dependent horizontal displacement. We obtain the tilt $\theta$ and spin $\psi$ Euler angles as periodic Jacobi elliptic functions of time, and the azimuthal angle $\phi$ through an incomplete elliptic integral of the third kind with a complex characteristic, which splits $\phi$ into a uniform drift and a strictly periodic modulation. The orientation period and the drift rate (corresponding to a constant angular velocity around the gravity direction) follow in a closed form. The vertical centre-of-mass displacement is obtained in terms of periodic in time incomplete elliptic integrals, and the periodic orbit-averaged settling velocity reduces to a single ratio of complete elliptic integrals. The horizontal component of the motion in the laboratory frame of reference is obtained exactly and algebraically in terms of all three Euler angles, so it is quasi-periodic. The horizontal component of the centre-of-mass position traces rosette-like, in general open curves confined by two concentric `envelope' circles. We determine very simple exact expressions for radii of both envelopes and demonstrate that they tend to infinity for a family of shapes with the rotation-translation coupling decreasing to zero. We also explain the origin of cusps at the rosette-like trajectory and provide a commensurability condition selecting strictly periodic rosettes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.09585 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Phase portrait in the (𝜓, 𝜃) plane for the orientation dynamics of a sedimenting 𝑆4- and 𝐶2𝑣-symmetric body. The orbits with arrows indicating the direction of motion show the vector field (𝜓 ′ , 𝜃′ ), coloured by the phase-space speed √︁ 𝜓′ 2 + 𝜃 ′ 2 . Two representative closed orbits are highlighted for 𝐶 = 0.10 (orange) and 𝐶 = 0.74 (blue). Fixed points (centres) are marked by black circles at 𝜃 = 𝜋/2 and 𝜓 = 𝜋 4… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Characteristic time scales 𝑇 and 𝜏drift specified by closed forms in Eqs. (3.23) and (3.33), as functions of the first integral 𝐶 (solid curves). The horizontal dashed and dash-dotted lines indicate the limiting values for 𝐶 →1 − . The time unit is defined in Eq. (2.4). For 0 < 𝐶 < 1, the solution for cos2 𝜃(𝜏) follows from equation (3.1), cos2 𝜃 = 1 − 𝐶(𝑢 2 + 1) 2𝑢 , (3.24) The function 𝜃(𝜏) is periodic with the sa… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (6 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Exact (closed-form) solutions for the Euler angles (solid colour curves) for two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Exact solution for vertical projection of the centre-of-mass dynamics at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Projection of the centre-of-mass trajectories onto the horizontal plane, obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Inner and outer radial envelopes (𝜌in and 𝜌out) of the horizontal component of the centre-of-mass motion. (a) Normalized radii 𝜌in/|K | and 𝜌out/|K | as functions of the first integral 𝐶. (b) Laboratory-frame trajectory (𝑋cm(𝜏), 𝑌cm(𝜏)) over 9 orientation periods 𝑇, fo…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Turning points and cusps of the rosette ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Strictly periodic horizontal projections of the centre-of-mass trajectories [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

[1]

Abramowitz, Milton & Stegun, Irene A. , ed. 1964 Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables\/ . National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series\/ 55. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

work page 1964
[2]

Armitage, J. V. & Eberlein, W. F. 2006 Elliptic Functions\/ . Cambridge Univ. Press

work page 2006
[3]

Arnold, V. I. 1988 Geometrical Methods in the Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations\/ , 2nd edn. Springer

work page 1988
[4]

Chemical Engineering Science 18 (8), 557--595

Brenner, Howard 1963 The S tokes resistance of an arbitrary particle . Chemical Engineering Science 18 (8), 557--595

work page 1963
[5]

an extension

Brenner, Howard 1964 The S tokes resistance of an arbitrary particle - II . an extension . Chemical Engineering Science 19 (9), 599--629

work page 1964
[6]

Brenner, Howard 1974 Rheology of a dilute suspension of axisymmetric B rownian particles . Int. J. Multiph. Flow 1 , 195--341

work page 1974
[7]

& Friedman, Morris D

Byrd, Paul F. & Friedman, Morris D. 1954 Handbook of Elliptic Integrals for Engineers and Physicists\/ . Springer-Verlag

work page 1954
[8]

, Gustavsson, K

Candelier, F. , Gustavsson, K. , Sharma, P. , Sundberg, L. , Pumir, A. , Bagheri, G. & Mehlig, B. 2025 Torques on curved atmospheric fibers . Phys. Rev. Res. 7 (1), 013179

work page 2025

Show all 57 references

[9]

& Mehlig, B

Candelier, F. & Mehlig, B. 2016 Settling of an asymmetric dumbbell in a quiescent fluid . J. Fluid Mech. 802 , 174--211

2016
[10]

Carlson, B. C. 1977 Special Functions of Applied Mathematics\/ . New York: Academic Press

1977
[11]

Carlson, B. C. 1995 Numerical computation of real or complex elliptic integrals . Numerical Algorithms 10 , 13--26

1995
[12]

Carlson, B. C. 2020 Elliptic integrals . In NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions\/ , chap. 19. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology , release date: 2020-12-15

2020
[13]

Chandrasekharan, Komaravolu 1985 Elliptic Functions\/ , Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften , vol. 281 . Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag , based on lectures given at ETH Zürich during the summer semester of 1982

1985
[14]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.00158

Cheng, Wenting , Pernambuco, Tiago , Witten, Thomas A , Diamant, Haim & Burton, Justin C 2026 Stl-to-stokeslet computation of mobility tensors and sedimentation dynamics for shaped particles . arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.00158

2026
[15]

, Grace, J

Clift, R. , Grace, J. R. & Weber, M. E. 1978 Bubbles, Drops, and Particles\/ . New York: Academic Press

1978
[16]

, Candelier, Fabien , Gustavsson, Kristian , Mehlig, Bernhard & Voth, Greg A

Collins, Darci , Hamati, Rami J. , Candelier, Fabien , Gustavsson, Kristian , Mehlig, Bernhard & Voth, Greg A. 2021 Lord K elvin's isotropic helicoid . Physical Review Fluids 6 , 074302

2021
[17]

, Marath, N

Dabade, V. , Marath, N. K. & Subramanian, G. 2015 Effects of inertia and viscoelasticity on sedimenting anisotropic particles . J. Fluid Mech. 778 , 133--188

2015
[18]

Dhont, J. K. G. 1996 An Introduction to Dynamics of Colloids\/ . Elsevier

1996
[19]

Ekiel-Je \.z ewska, M. L. & Wajnryb, E. 2009 Hydrodynamic orienting of asymmetric microobjects under gravity . J. Condens. Matter Phys. 21 (20), 204102

2009
[20]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.05137

Flapper, Mees M , Piumini, Giulia , Verzicco, Roberto , Huisman, Sander G & Lohse, Detlef 2025 Settling dynamics of an oloid: experiments and simulations . arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.05137

2025
[21]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.13826

Gissinger, Jos \'e phine , Voth, G , Mehlig, Bernhard & Candelier, Fabien 2026 Resistance tensors for aggregate particles with stokesian dynamics . arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.13826

2026
[22]

Addison-Wesley

Goldstein, Herbert 1980 Classical Mechanics\/ , 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley

1980
[23]

Gonzalez, O , Graf, ABA & Maddocks, JH 2004 Dynamics of a rigid body in a S tokes fluid . J. Fluid Mech. 519 , 133--160

2004
[24]

Gradshteyn, I. S. & Ryzhik, I. M. 2007 Table of Integrals, Series, and Products\/ , 7th edn. Academic Press

2007
[25]

2018 Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications\/

Graham, Michael D. 2018 Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications\/ . Cambridge University Press

2018
[26]

, Calm \'e , Benjamin , Moldovan, Alexandru C

Greenidge, Nikita J. , Calm \'e , Benjamin , Moldovan, Alexandru C. , Abaravi c ius, Bartas , Martin, James W. , Marahrens, Nils , Woolfrey, Jon , Scaglioni, Bruno , Chathuranga, Damith S. , Mitra, Srinjoy , Cochran, Sandy & Valdastri, Pietro 2025 Harnessing the oloid shape in...

2025
[27]

International Journal of Multiphase Flow p

Gu, Chuan , Li, Heng , Spencer, Kate L & Botto, Lorenzo 2025 Sedimentation and resistance tensor of a river floc from 3d x-ray microtomography . International Journal of Multiphase Flow p. 105586

2025
[28]

, N rsett, S

Hairer, E. , N rsett, S. P. & Wanner, G. 2008 Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I. Nonstiff Problems\/ . Springer-Verlag

2008
[29]

The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers

Happel, John & Brenner, Howard 1983 Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics\/ , 2nd edn. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers

1983
[30]

2025 Helical ribbons: Simple chiral sedimentation

Huseby, Elias , Gissinger, Josephine , Candelier, Fabien , Pujara, Nimish , Verhille, Gautier , Mehlig, Bernhard & Voth, Greg A. 2025 Helical ribbons: Simple chiral sedimentation . Phys. Rev. Fluids 10 (2), 024101

2025
[31]

2026 Bifurcations in stokes flow sedimentation, arXiv:arXiv: 2604.03193

Huseby, Elias , Mathier, Pierre , Das, Meera , Menezes, Arjun , Witkamp, Theo , Wang, Ziqi , Mehlig, Bernhard & Voth, Greg A. 2026 Bifurcations in stokes flow sedimentation, arXiv:arXiv: 2604.03193

2026 arXiv
[32]

Joshi, Harshit & Govindarajan, Rama 2025 Sedimentation dynamics of bodies with two planes of symmetry . Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (1), 014002

2025
[33]

Khayat, R. E. & Cox, R. G. 1989 Inertia effects on the motion of long slender bodies . J. Fluid Mech. 209 , 435--462

1989
[34]

2005 Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications\/

Kim, Sangtae & Karrila, Seppo J. 2005 Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications\/ . Mineola, New York: Dover Publications , first published 1991 by Butterworth-Heinemann

2005
[35]

Cambridge Univ

Lamb, Horace 1932 Hydrodynamics\/ , 6th edn. Cambridge Univ. Press

1932
[36]

1989 Elliptic Functions and Applications\/

Lawden, Derek F. 1989 Elliptic Functions and Applications\/ . Springer-Verlag

1989
[37]

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 72 (11), 2699--2701

Makino, Masato & Doi, Masao 2003 Sedimentation of a particle with translation-rotation coupling . Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 72 (11), 2699--2701

2003
[38]

Physics of Fluids 17 (4), 043601

Makino, Masato & Doi, Masao 2005 Sedimentation of particles of general shape . Physics of Fluids 17 (4), 043601

2005
[39]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.02970

Miara, Tymoteusz , Pihler-Puzovi \'c , Draga , Heil, Matthias & Juel, Anne 2023 Light-scattering reconstruction of transparent shapes using neural networks . arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.02970

2023 arXiv
[40]

, Vaquero-Stainer, C

Miara, T. , Vaquero-Stainer, C. , Pihler-Puzovi \'c , D. , Heil, M. & Juel, A. 2024 Dynamics of inertialess sedimentation of a rigid U -shaped disk . Commun. Phys. 7 (1), 47

2024
[41]

, Sardina, G

Niazi Ardekani, M. , Sardina, G. , Brandt, L. , Karp-Boss, L. & Bearon, R. N. 2017 Sedimentation of inertia-less prolate spheroids in homogeneous isotropic turbulence with application to non-motile phytoplankton . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 831 , 655--674

2017
[42]

Release 1.1

NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions 2020 NIST digital library of mathematical functions. Release 1.1

2020
[43]

Palusa, Martina , de Graaf, Joost , Brown, Aidan & Morozov, Alexander 2018 Sedimentation of a rigid helix in viscous media . Phys. Rev. Fluids 3 (12), 124301

2018
[44]

Physical Review Fluids 8 (6), L062301

Ravichandran, Sandhanakrishnan & Wettlaufer, John S 2023 Orientation dynamics of two-dimensional concavo-convex bodies . Physical Review Fluids 8 (6), L062301

2023
[45]

1989 The F okker-- P lanck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications\/ , 2nd edn

Risken, H. 1989 The F okker-- P lanck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications\/ , 2nd edn. Springer

1989
[46]

Physical Review E 97 (2), 023102

Rizvi, Mohd Suhail , Farutin, Alexander & Misbah, Chaouqi 2018 Three-bead steering microswimmers . Physical Review E 97 (2), 023102

2018
[47]

, Tierney, Lydia , Koch, Donald L

Roy, Anubhab , Hamati, Rami J. , Tierney, Lydia , Koch, Donald L. & Voth, Greg A. 2019 Inertial torques and a symmetry breaking orientational transition in the sedimentation of slender fibres . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 875 , 576--596

2019
[48]

, Zdybel, Piotr , Melikhov, Yevgen & Ekiel-Je \.z ewska, Maria L

Shekhar, Chandra , Mirajkar, Harish N. , Zdybel, Piotr , Melikhov, Yevgen & Ekiel-Je \.z ewska, Maria L. 2026 Experimental and numerical study of rigid particles with two planes of symmetry approaching a stable, stationary orientation while sedimenting . J. Fluid Mech. 1037 , A7

2026
[49]

Spencer, K. L. , Wheatland, J. A. , Carr, S. J. , Manning, A. J. , Bushby, A. J. , Gu, C. , Botto, L. & Lawrence, T. 2022 Quantification of 3-dimensional structure and properties of flocculated natural suspended sediment . Water Research 222 , 118835

2022
[50]

& Koch, Donald L

Subramanian, G. & Koch, Donald L. 2005 Inertial effects on fibre motion in simple shear flow . J. Fluid Mech. 535 , 383--414

2005
[51]

, Candelier, F

Sundberg, L. , Candelier, F. , Fintzi, N. , Voth, G. , Pierson, J. L. , Gustavsson, K. & Mehlig, B. 2026 Fluid-inertia torques from particle-shape symmetry . Physical Review Fluids 11 (6), 064305

2026
[52]

Tatsii, Daria , Bucci, Silvia , Bhowmick, Taraprasad , Guettler, Johannes , Bakels, Lucie , Bagheri, Gholamhossein & Stohl, Andreas 2024 Shape Matters : Long - Range Transport of Microplastic Fibers in the Atmosphere . Environ. Sci. Technol. 58 (1), 671--682

2024
[53]

, Scott, C.T

Tozzi, E.J. , Scott, C.T. , Vahey, D. & Klingenberg, D.J. 2011 Settling dynamics of asymmetric rigid fibers . Phys. Fluids 23 (3), 033301

2011
[54]

Vaquero-Stainer, Christian , Miara, Tymoteusz , Juel, Anne , Heil, Matthias & Pihler-Puzovi \'c , Draga 2026 From fluttering to drifting: Inertialess sedimentation of an achiral particle . Phys. Rev. Fluids 11 , 034102

2026
[55]

Vaquero-Stainer, Christian , Miara, Tymoteusz , Juel, Anne , Pihler-Puzovi \'c , Draga & Heil, Matthias 2024 U-shaped disks in stokes flow: chiral sedimentation of a non-chiral particle . J. Fluid Mech. 999 , A71

2024
[56]

Whittaker, E. T. & Watson, G. N. 1927 A Course of Modern Analysis\/ , 4th edn. Cambridge Univ. Press

1927
[57]

& Diamant, Haim 2020 A review of shaped colloidal particles in fluids: Anisotropy and chirality

Witten, Thomas A. & Diamant, Haim 2020 A review of shaped colloidal particles in fluids: Anisotropy and chirality . Reports on Progress in Physics 83 (11), 116601

2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Abramowitz, Milton & Stegun, Irene A. , ed. 1964 Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables\/ . National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series\/ 55. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

work page 1964

[2] [2]

Armitage, J. V. & Eberlein, W. F. 2006 Elliptic Functions\/ . Cambridge Univ. Press

work page 2006

[3] [3]

Arnold, V. I. 1988 Geometrical Methods in the Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations\/ , 2nd edn. Springer

work page 1988

[4] [4]

Chemical Engineering Science 18 (8), 557--595

Brenner, Howard 1963 The S tokes resistance of an arbitrary particle . Chemical Engineering Science 18 (8), 557--595

work page 1963

[5] [5]

an extension

Brenner, Howard 1964 The S tokes resistance of an arbitrary particle - II . an extension . Chemical Engineering Science 19 (9), 599--629

work page 1964

[6] [6]

Brenner, Howard 1974 Rheology of a dilute suspension of axisymmetric B rownian particles . Int. J. Multiph. Flow 1 , 195--341

work page 1974

[7] [7]

& Friedman, Morris D

Byrd, Paul F. & Friedman, Morris D. 1954 Handbook of Elliptic Integrals for Engineers and Physicists\/ . Springer-Verlag

work page 1954

[8] [8]

, Gustavsson, K

Candelier, F. , Gustavsson, K. , Sharma, P. , Sundberg, L. , Pumir, A. , Bagheri, G. & Mehlig, B. 2025 Torques on curved atmospheric fibers . Phys. Rev. Res. 7 (1), 013179

work page 2025