Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 26 references

Star-forming and active galaxies reverse densities at z=1–3, revealing a quasar life cycle.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 15:25 UTC pith:PA7NGO3S

load-bearing objection A clear synthesis of known trends, but the crossover claim and evolutionary model rest on selection effects, a fixed BPT boundary, and circular fitting. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.19428 v1 pith:PA7NGO3S submitted 2026-07-20 astro-ph.GA

Clarifying Dead Quasars and Downsizing through the Evolution of Star-Forming Galaxies and Active Galactic Nuclei

Shingo Sumie This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords star-forming galaxiesactive galactic nucleiBPT diagramquasar evolutiondead quasar problemdownsizinggas depletionredshift number density
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper uses emission-line classification (BPT diagrams) of galaxies across redshifts 0.8–6.6 to claim that star-forming galaxies (SFGs) dominate the low-redshift universe while active galactic nuclei (AGNs) dominate high redshifts, with the two number densities crossing between z=1 and z=3. It pairs this with a monotonic decline of galaxy luminosity with cosmic age, fit by an exponential time constant, and interprets both as evidence that gas depletion around supermassive black holes, not only mergers, drives AGN fading. The author proposes a cyclic evolutionary sequence: early SFGs merge into quasars, quasar activity weakens as their fuel depletes and they become SFGs again, and nearby SFGs merge into Seyferts. If correct, this explains the dead quasar problem — old supermassive black holes are still present but dormant for lack of gas — and the downsizing pattern of bright galaxies peaking at high redshift.

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the abundance of star-forming galaxies and active galactic nuclei crosses between z≈1 and z≈3: SFGs dominate at low redshift and AGNs dominate at higher redshift. Combined with a monotonic decrease of galaxy luminosity with cosmic age, fit by exponential decay timescales τ1≈0.9 Gyr and τ2≈1.7 Gyr, the author interprets the crossing as evidence that gas depletion at the galactic center — not mergers alone — is the dominant process limiting AGN activity. The resulting evolutionary sequence is SFG → quasar → SFG → Seyfert, which resolves the dead-quasar problem (the black hole persists, the fuel is gone) and downsizing (bright AGNs peak early

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the BPT (emission-line ratio) diagram, which sorts galaxies into SFGs and AGNs by comparing [OIII]/Hβ with [NII]/Hα; the author applies it to ground-based near-infrared spectrograph surveys at z=0.8–2.6 and to JWST/NIRSpec and MIRI samples up to z≈6.6, converting counts into number densities using comoving volumes. The interpretive engine is Equation (3), an exponential gas-depletion law M(t)=A exp(−t/τ) in which the AGN luminosity decays with a characteristic time τ; the two fitted slopes (τ1, τ2) plus the derived τx≈1.9 Gyr for SFG-to-AGN conversion organize the three-phase model: quasar birth, rapid decline, slow decline with renewed Seyfert activity.

Load-bearing premise

The argument's load-bearing premise is that the observed decline of median galaxy luminosity with cosmic age is the exponential gas-depletion curve of Equation (3); if that decline reflects survey flux limits, stellar-population aging, or a changing galaxy-mass mix rather than central gas exhaustion, the derived timescales and the phase decomposition collapse.

What would settle it

Measure the molecular-gas mass and Eddington ratio for a luminosity-matched sample of quasars at z≈2–3 and active galaxies at z≈0.5. If low-redshift, low-luminosity AGNs still have substantial gas but weak accretion, gas depletion is not the main dimming mechanism; if gas mass and AGN luminosity decay together with an e-folding time of about 1 Gyr, the model is supported. Also, recompute the luminosity–age relation within a single fixed stellar-mass bin with flux-limit corrections to see whether the monotonic decline survives selection effects.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Dead quasars are not dead black holes: supermassive black holes persist while their gas supply runs out, so dormant quasars should appear as ordinary or star-forming galaxies in the local universe.
  • The number-density crossing at z≈1–3 gives a concrete epoch marker: surveys above z≈3 should find AGN fractions increasing with redshift, while lower-z surveys should see SFG dominance.
  • Downsizing becomes a luminosity-decline effect: bright AGNs peak early because they consume their fuel fast, and fainter AGNs and SFGs peak later.
  • Mergers still matter, but at two separate stages: major mergers make high-redshift quasars and minor mergers make low-redshift Seyferts.
  • The two fitted fading timescales, τ1≈0.9 Gyr and τ2≈1.7 Gyr, predict distinct rates of decline for the AGN population after peak activity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A uniform, volume-limited survey at z=1–3 with identical line-sensitivity cuts would test whether the density crossing is an evolutionary signal or a selection effect; the current data pool several instruments with different S/N thresholds.
  • The model implies that the same gas that feeds the quasar also ends star formation in the host; one could look for a suppression of star-formation rate in z≈2 quasars relative to SFGs of the same stellar mass.
  • If the cycle is real, the local universe should contain a population of re-ignited Seyferts whose hosts show recent minor-merger morphologies, and their space density should correlate with the merger rate over the last one to two billion years.
  • The crossing redshift may shift with AGN luminosity: more luminous quasars should cross at higher z because they exhaust gas faster, which would reconcile the z≈1–3 band with the bright end peaking at z≈2–3.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper compiles emission-line measurements from Subaru-FMOS, Keck-MOSFIRE, and JWST/NIRSpec and MIRI, classifies galaxies as star-forming or AGN using a fixed BPT-diagram boundary, and derives number densities versus redshift. It claims that SFGs dominate at low redshift, AGNs at high redshift, with a crossover at z≈1–3 (Trends 1 and 2), and that galaxy luminosity declines monotonically with cosmic age. It then interprets these trends through an evolutionary sequence SFG→quasar→SFG→Seyfert, arguing that gas depletion (Factor B) dominates over merger-induced AGN formation (Factor A), and uses this to explain the dead-quasar problem and downsizing.

Significance. If the claimed empirical trends were robust, the proposed sequence would offer a simple and pedagogically attractive resolution of two longstanding problems in galaxy/AGN co-evolution. The paper is also commendable for attempting to use multiple public spectroscopic datasets and for making its BPT classifications explicit. However, the central observational claim rests on a fixed classification boundary applied to very different surveys and on raw counts with no completeness corrections, both of which are known to bias high-redshift samples toward AGN-like classifications. The theoretical inference is additionally circular: the same luminosity-age data are used both to argue that Factor (B) dominates and to fit the time constants that are then used as supporting evidence. The paper therefore currently provides a plausible qualitative scenario rather than a quantitatively supported result; its evidentiary basis is insufficient for a claim of this scope.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.1, §4.5, Eqs. (1)–(2)] The fixed BPT boundary (Brinchmann et al. 2004) is applied at redshifts up to z≈6.5, but rest-frame optical line ratios of star-forming galaxies evolve strongly with redshift: lower metallicity and higher ionization shift SFGs toward the AGN region in the [OIII]/Hβ versus [NII]/Hα plane. The paper itself states in §4.5 that at 2.7≤z<4.0 SFGs move closer to the SFG/AGN boundary and that at higher redshift [NII] and [SII] approach the detection limit, biasing the sample toward AGN-like objects. This is exactly the regime where the claimed SFG/AGN reversal occurs. Because the central Trend (1) and the crossover z≈1–3 are based entirely on these classifications, this systematic redshift-dependent misclassification can produce the claimed reversal even if the intrinsic AGN fraction is constant. The manuscript dismisses the difference between fixed and variable boundaries without quantificatio
  2. [§4.1–§4.4, Figures 3, 5, 7, 9, 11] The number densities compared across surveys are raw counts divided by comoving volume, with no corrections for survey area differences, flux limits, S/N thresholds, or spectroscopic incompleteness. The FMOS-COSMOS (1.7 deg²), MOSFIRE-KBSS, MOSFIRE-MOSDEF (0.13 deg²), and JWST/MIRI (9 arcmin²) samples have very different depths and selection functions; the S/N threshold also changes the apparent SFG/AGN distribution (§4.2, §4.4). Without a common completeness model, the apparent increase in AGN number density with redshift and the crossover at z≈1–3 may be entirely due to selection effects. This is load-bearing: the evolutionary sequence is motivated by the redshift-dependent density trends.
  3. [§5, Figure 13, Eq. (3)] The argument that Factor (B), gas depletion, dominates over Factor (A) is circular. The time constants τ1=0.9 Gyr and τ2=1.7 Gyr are fitted to the same luminosity-age data in Figure 13 that are then interpreted as evidence for Factor (B) dominance. Moreover, the exponential decay model in Eq. (3) assumes the galaxy luminosity decline is driven by SMBH gas accretion with constant efficiency and time constant; the observed monotonic decline in median galaxy IR luminosity with cosmic age is equally consistent with flux-limit effects, evolving stellar populations, and varied star-formation histories. The paper provides no uncertainties on τ1, τ2, or τm, and no model comparison. This step is central because the phase decomposition in §5.2–§5.3 and the derived τx depend on it.
  4. [§5.3, Eq. (4)] Equation (4) is referenced in the text but no equation numbered (4) appears in the manuscript, so the derivation of τx = −1.9 Gyr cannot be checked. The sign is then ignored and the absolute value is compared with a merger timescale of ~3 Gyr. Since τx is obtained from τ1 and τ2, which themselves are unconstrained fits, this consistency claim carries little evidential weight. The missing equation and error propagation should be supplied, or the claim should be removed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors and inconsistent spellings (e.g., 'Sandars et al.' for Sanders et al.; 'valuous' for valuable; 'Charlon' for Charlot; 'Kauffman' for Kauffmann). The equations and tables are also poorly typeset; for example, the BPT boundary equations in §4.1 contain broken symbols. A thorough editorial pass is needed.
  2. [§2.2 / §4.1] The statement that there is 'little difference' between the fixed and variable BPT boundary methods is unsupported. Given that the variable-boundary method (Kewley et al. 2013a) was developed specifically for high-redshift galaxies, the paper should justify this claim with a quantitative comparison, especially because the fixed boundary is used across the entire redshift range.
  3. [Figure 12] Figure 12 is described as the 'Overall survey trend' but the construction of this combined trend from heterogeneous data is not defined. It is unclear whether the plotted densities are normalized, what survey volume is used, and whether overlapping redshift bins are averaged or simply overplotted. The map from Figures 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 to Figure 12 should be made explicit.
  4. [§5.1] The early-universe scenario (runaway mergers of massive stars forming SMBHs by z≈7) is presented without citations to current simulations and without quantitative connection to the data analyzed in this paper. This is a speculative narrative, not a derived result, and should be labeled as such.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Empirical SFG/AGN reversal is independent, but the Factor (B) dominance argument fits the gas-depletion model to the luminosity decline and then uses that fit as evidence for the model, a partially circular inference.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Section 5 Discussion, Equation (3) and Figure 13; also Section 5.3]
    "If the gas with mass M near the center of a galaxy undergoes mass accretion onto the accretion disk due to the gravity of the supermassive black hole (SMBH), and its energy is emitted as electromagnetic radiation (luminosity LQ), then the mass accretion time constant is τ ... the relationship can be expressed as: dM/dt = -M/τ, M = A exp(-t/τ). LQ = η(-dM/dt)c² = ... (3) ... Both the 'period of rapid decay' and the 'period of slow decay' show a monotonic decrease in galaxy luminosity, indicating that Factor (B) is more dominant than Factor (A)."

    Equation (3) is explicitly a gas-depletion model, which is exactly Factor (B): AGN activity decreases because gas is consumed. The paper fits this exponential-decay form to the observed luminosity-age trend and then takes the resulting monotonic decline as evidence that Factor (B) dominates. But the association of the luminosity decline with gas depletion is already assumed by adopting Equation (3); the fit cannot independently confirm the mechanism. The fitted time constants τ1 and τ2 are then used in Section 5.3 to derive τx, so the model's timescales are grounded in the same assumption they are meant to support.

full rationale

The paper's central empirical claim—that SFGs are more numerous at low redshift and AGNs at high redshift, with a crossover at z=1–3—is an observational result obtained by applying a fixed BPT boundary to external catalogs (Kartaltepe 2015, FMOS-COSMOS, MOSFIRE-KBSS/MOSDEF, JWST). This trend does not reduce to the fitted parameters; it is a direct classification and counting exercise. The paper itself flags a serious limitation in §4.5, noting that at high redshift [NII]6585 and [SII]6718 approach the detection limit and the proportion of objects in the AGN region increases, which could bias the trend. That is a correctness/robustness concern, not a circularity. The circularity is confined to the interpretation: Equation (3) is a gas-depletion model (Factor B), and the paper fits it to the luminosity-age data, then uses the fit to assert that Factor (B) dominates and to derive τx. That step is fitting dressed as inference, since the model's form already encodes the conclusion. However, the evolutionary scenario is an interpretation layered on top of the empirical trends, not a derivation forced by those trends, so the circularity is only partial. No load-bearing self-citations were found; the Taniguchi references are mentor citations, not self-citations, and no uniqueness or ansatz is imported from the author's own prior work. Overall score 4 reflects the partial circularity in the physical interpretation while acknowledging the independence of the central observational claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on several assumptions: BPT classification is reliable across heterogeneous surveys, the observed luminosity decline is caused by gas depletion, the surveys can be combined without completeness corrections, and the missing Equation (4) yields a meaningful τx. The fitted τ values are real free parameters and should not be treated as independent measurements.

free parameters (4)
  • τ1 (rapid luminosity-decay time constant) = 0.9 Gyr
    Fitted to the slope of median IR luminosity versus cosmic age between 1.6 and 2.8 Gyr (Figure 13, Equation 3).
  • τ2 (slow luminosity-decay time constant) = 1.7 Gyr
    Fitted to the slope between 4.4 Gyr and the present (Figure 13, Equation 3).
  • τm (average luminosity-decay time constant) = ≈1.5 Gyr
    Averaged over the full 1.6-13.8 Gyr range from the same luminosity-age data.
  • τx (SFG→AGN transformation time constant) = -1.9 Gyr (sign unexplained)
    Derived from Equation (4), which is never shown; the negative value is reinterpreted as 1.9 Gyr but no physical explanation is given.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Exponential gas-depletion law dM/dt = -M/τ and L = η c² |dM/dt| (Equation 3)
    Used to convert observed luminosity decline into a mass-accretion time constant; assumes the luminosity decrease is governed solely by gas depletion in the nucleus.
  • domain assumption Fixed BPT boundary from Brinchmann et al. 2004 is valid across z=0.8-6.6
    Applied to all surveys without correcting for metallicity or ionization evolution, which can shift high-redshift galaxies on the BPT diagram.
  • domain assumption The different surveys are comparable without completeness corrections
    Number densities from FMOS, MOSFIRE, and JWST fields with different areas, depths, and S/N thresholds are combined into Figure 12 without accounting for selection functions.
  • ad hoc to paper Galaxies can be modeled as born at a common epoch and then monotonically fading
    Underlies Trend (3) and Figure 13; this is a simplifying assumption not derived from the data.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 10787 in / 10464 out tokens · 186361 ms · 2026-08-01T15:25:04.948492+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

From the catalogs of visible emission lines of galaxies measured by the Subaru Fiber Multi-Object Spectrograph (Subaru-FMOS) and the KECK Multi-Object Spectrograph For InfraRed Exploration (KECK-MOSFIRE), galaxies were classified into Star-Forming Galaxies (SFGs) and Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) based on the Baldwin-Phillips-Terlevich (BPT) diagram. In the redshift (z) range 0.8 <= z <= 2.6, z dependence of their number densities was examined, and it was found that SFGs dominate at lower redshifts, whereas AGNs are distributed at higher redshifts. Infrared analyses using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) NIRSpec and MIRI for galaxies up to z ~ 6.6 show similar trends, and the number densities of SFGs and AGNs were found to cross at z ~ 1-3. Combined with the fact that the luminosity of galaxies decreases monotonically with the age of the universe, these phenomena can be interpreted by an evolutionary scenario in which SFGs merged to form quasars in the early universe, whose activity weakened and they changed into SFGs later, and SFGs merged again to form Seyferts in the nearby universe. Within this framework, the longstanding issues of "dead quasars" and "downsizing" can be naturally explained.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19428 by Shingo Sumie.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Dependence of number density of galaxies on redshift z for each absolute magnitude (Ikeda et al. 2012 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: BPT diagrams for five redshift ranges. blue: SFG, gray: CMP, red: AGN. (Kartaltepe et al. 2015 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Dependence of SFG and AGN number density on redshift (Kartaltepe et al. 2015 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: BPT diagrams for three redshift ranges with S/N ≥ 5 (FMOS-COSMOS-CATALOG-2019) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Redshift dependence of SFG and AGN number density with S/N ≥ 5 (FMOS-COSMOS-CATALOG-2019) 4.3 Analysis of MOSFIRE-KBSS (KECK-MOSFIRE) From the 251 celestial objects listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Redshift Dependence of Number Density for SFGs and AGNs (MOSFIRE-KBSS) From [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: BPT diagrams for three redshift ranges (MOSFIRE-KBSS) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: BPT Diagrams of seven redshift ranges for S/N ≥ 10 (MOSFIRE-MOSDEF) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Redshift Dependence of Number Density of SFGs and AGNs for S/N ≥ 10 (MOSFIRE-MOSDEF) 4.5 Analysis of High-Redshift Region Measurement Papers Using JWST/NIRSpec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Dependence of SFG and AGN number density on redshift z, obtained from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Redshift dependence of the number density of SFGs and AGNs observed using Subaru-FMOS, KECK￾MOSFIRE, and JWST (Overall survey trend). From [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Dependence of galaxy IR luminosity on cosmic age. Time constants are calculated using equation (3) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Model illustrating the transformation of SFGs into quasars, Seyfert galaxies, and LINERs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Schematic graph of the model showing the number density of AGNs and SFGs as a function of redshift (z). a certain proportion of the process. Both the "period of rapid decay" and the "period of slow decay" show a monotonic decrease in galaxy luminosity, indicating that Factor (B) is more dominant than Factor (A). However, during the "period of rapid decay," Factor (A) is less significant, resulting in a sm… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    INTRODUCTION SuperMassive Black Holes (SMBHs) with masses ranging from one million to over one billion times the mass of the Sun (10⁶ M☉ to over 10⁹ M☉) are present at the centers of almost all galaxies, excluding dwarf galaxies like the Magellanic Clouds. The radiation of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs), such as quasars (Quasi-Stellar Objects: QSOs), Seyfe...

    1969

  2. [2]

    blue: SFG, gray: CMP, red: AGN

    BPT diagrams for five redshift ranges. blue: SFG, gray: CMP, red: AGN. (Kartaltepe et al. 2015 Table

    2015

  3. [3]

    SAMPLES When the redshift exceeds 0.5, the Balmer emission lines shift to the near-infrared region, making it necessary to perform spectroscopic observations in the near-infrared region to create BPT diagrams for the Hα–Hβ region. Due to the high redshift, the apparent brightness of galaxies becomes dimmer, and the sensitivity of detectors in the near-inf...

    2021

  4. [4]

    2012 Figure

    Dependence of number density of galaxies on redshift z for each absolute magnitude (Ikeda et al. 2012 Figure

    2012

  5. [5]

    2014, which are in the redshift range of 2.0 < z ≤ 2.6, 168 objects with measurable fluxes for the four emission lines [OIII]5008, [NII]6585, Hα, and Hβ were selected

    Redshift dependence of SFG and AGN number density with S/N ≥ 5 (FMOS-COSMOS-CATALOG-2019) 4.3 Analysis of MOSFIRE-KBSS (KECK-MOSFIRE) From the 251 celestial objects listed in Table 1 of Steidel et al. 2014, which are in the redshift range of 2.0 < z ≤ 2.6, 168 objects with measurable fluxes for the four emission lines [OIII]5008, [NII]6585, Hα, and Hβ wer...

    2019

  6. [6]

    Electromagnetic Radiation SFG AGN Notes Type 1 Type 2 Continuous Light Black Body Radiation Synchrotron Radiation AGN radiation follows a power law

    Characteristics of continuous light, hydrogen atom recombination lines, and higher-order ionization lines emitted by SFG and AGN (Type 1, Type 2). Electromagnetic Radiation SFG AGN Notes Type 1 Type 2 Continuous Light Black Body Radiation Synchrotron Radiation AGN radiation follows a power law. Broad Line Hydrogen Atom Recomb. Line None (slow) Hβ, etc. No...

    1909

  7. [8]

    2015 (Subaru-FMOS) The methods for setting the boundary between SFGs and AGNs in the BPT diagram include the fixed boundary method (Brinchmann et al

    RESULTS 4.1 Boundary Settings in BPT Diagram and Analysis of Kartaltepe et al. 2015 (Subaru-FMOS) The methods for setting the boundary between SFGs and AGNs in the BPT diagram include the fixed boundary method (Brinchmann et al

    2015

  8. [9]

    2015, BPT diagrams were created for each redshift range, and the numbers of SFGs and AGNs were determined (Figure 2)

    As a result, the boundary line (blue) between SFGs and CMP (Composite) was determined as follows: logቀ[ைூூூ]ହ଴଴଼ ுఉ ቁ= ଴.଺ଵ ୪୭୥ቀ[ಿ಺಺]లఱఴఱ ಹഀ ቁି଴.଴଻+ 1.30 (1) CMP and AGN boundary line (red): logቀ[ைூூூ]ହ଴଴଼ ுఉ ቁ= ଴.଺ଵ ୪୭୥ቀ[ಿ಺಺]లఱఴఱ ಹഀ ቁି଴.ସ଼+ 1.24 (2) Using Table 2 from Kartaltepe et al. 2015, BPT diagrams were created for each redshift range, and the numb...

    2015

  9. [11]

    2015 Table

    Dependence of SFG and AGN number density on redshift (Kartaltepe et al. 2015 Table

    2015

  10. [12]

    5 4.2 FMOS-COSMOS-CATALOG-2019 Analysis (Subaru-FMOS) In this catalog, the flux (erg s-1 cm-2) and flux error (erg s-1 cm-2) for four emission lines are recorded, so to understand the distribution trends of SFGs and AGNs depending on the S/N (flux/flux error), analyses were conducted for three cases: S/N ≥ 3, S/N ≥ 5, and S/N ≥

    2019

  11. [13]

    BPT diagrams for three redshift ranges with S/N ≥ 5 (FMOS-COSMOS-CATALOG-2019) Figure

    2019

  12. [15]

    2023 includes BPT diagrams based on various emission line luminosity ratios for 164 celestial objects in the redshift range of z=2.0–9.3

    Redshift Dependence of Number Density of SFGs and AGNs for S/N ≥ 10 (MOSFIRE-MOSDEF) 4.5 Analysis of High-Redshift Region Measurement Papers Using JWST/NIRSpec Figure 3 of Sanders et al. 2023 includes BPT diagrams based on various emission line luminosity ratios for 164 celestial objects in the redshift range of z=2.0–9.3. This study focuses on the [NII]6...

    2023

  13. [17]

    SFGs are distributed at low redshifts, while AGNs are distributed at high redshifts (z < 6.5)

    Redshift dependence of the number density of SFGs and AGNs observed using Subaru-FMOS, KECK-MOSFIRE, and JWST (Overall survey trend). From Figure 12, the following trends in density evolution can be observed: Trend (1): "SFGs are distributed at low redshifts, while AGNs are distributed at high redshifts (z < 6.5)." Trend (2): "The number density of SFGs a...

    2015

  14. [18]

    runaway mergers,

    to the formation of the first SMBHs and massive quasars (z=7, 800 million years after the Big Bang). During this period, massive stars with masses around 1000 M☉ were likely formed, leading to the creation of star clusters in regions of high number density. These clusters underwent "runaway mergers," resulting in the formation of supermassive stars. These...

    2007

  15. [19]

    Similarly in Figure 1, corresponds to the period around z~2 when the number of dim galaxies increased. 5.3 Phase ③: Gradual Decline of AGNs (Factor (A) < Factor (B)) In Phase ③, the gradual decline of AGNs, the process of AGNs losing their activity and transforming into low-luminosity galaxies continues, but the decrease in AGNs becomes more moderate due ...

    2012

  16. [20]

    dead quasar problem

    SUMMARY Using the BPT diagram with a fixed boundary method, by classifying active galactic nuclei (AGNs), which emit strong electromagnetic radiation from the central regions of galaxies, and star-forming galaxies (SFGs), which do not exhibit such activity, it was found that SFGs are distributed at low redshifts (z), while AGNs are distributed at high red...

    2026

  17. [23]

    G., Frank, M., et al

    Kriek, M., van Dokkum, P. G., Frank, M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 669, 776 Kriek, M., Shapley, A. E., Reddy, N. A., et al. 2015, ApJS, 218, 15 Li, Y., Hernquist, L., Robertson, B., et al. 2007, ApJ, 665, 187 Lynden-Bell, D. 1969, Nature, 223, 690 Magorrian, J., Tremaine, S., Richstone, D., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 2285 NASA Hubble Mission Team, 2012, https://scienc...

    2007

  18. [26]

    CEERS Key Paper VI: JWST/MIRI Uncovers a Large Population of Obscured AGN at High Redshifts

    Ueda, Y., Akiyama, M., Ohta, K., et al. 2003, ApJ, 598, 886 Wang, F., Yang, J., Fan, X., et al. 2021, Ap J, 907, L1 Yang, G., Caputi, K. I., Papovich, C, et al., “CEERS Key Paper VI: JWST/MIRI Uncovers a Large Population of Obscured AGN at High Redshifts”, arXiv:2303.11736v1 [astro-ph.GA] 21 Mar 2023 Paper VI: JWST/MIRI Uncovers a Large Population of Obsc...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  19. [285]

    J., Dopita, M

    (In Japanese) Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., et al. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121 Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., e t a l. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 961 Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Leitherer, C., et al. 2013a, ApJ, 774, 100 (September

    2001

  20. [325]

    Excitation and Ionization Properties of Star-forming Galaxies at z=2.0-9.3 with JWST/NIRSpec

    74 Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Topping, M. W, et al., “Excitation and Ionization Properties of Star-forming Galaxies at z=2.0-9.3 with JWST/NIRSpec”, arXiv: 2301.06696v1 [astro-ph.GA] 17 Jan 2023 Shapley, A. E., Reddy, N. A., Kriek, M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 88 Shapley, A. E., Sanders, R. L., Shao, P., et al. 2019, ApJL, 881, L35 Steidel, C. C., Rudi...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [406]

    2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055 Kawakatsu, N., Wada, K

    (In Japanese) Kauffman, G., Heckman, Tremonti, C., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055 Kawakatsu, N., Wada, K. 2011, Toward Understanding the Formation of Supermassive Black Holes at Galactic Centers: The Importance of Constructing Multi-Scale Models, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 66(4),

    2003

  22. [744]

    (eds.) 2018, Galaxies I: Galaxies and the hierarchical structure of the Universe, Tokyo: Nihon Hyōronsha

    (In Japanese) 13 Taniguchi, Y., Okamura, S., & Sofue, Y. (eds.) 2018, Galaxies I: Galaxies and the hierarchical structure of the Universe, Tokyo: Nihon Hyōronsha. (In Japanese; Series: Modern Astronomy, Vol

    2018

  23. [1998]

    Two major unresolved issues in galaxy evolution have been highlighted (Taniguchi et al

    remain unresolved (Taniguchi 2014). Two major unresolved issues in galaxy evolution have been highlighted (Taniguchi et al. 2012): The Dead Quasar Problem: Quasars, the brightest type of AGN, were abundant in the distant universe 2–3 billion years after the Big Bang (redshift z=2–3) but are almost absent in the nearby universe (z < 0.1) after 10 billion y...

    2014

  24. [2004]

    SFGs merge and transform into AGNs

    Factor (A): "SFGs merge and transform into AGNs." Major mergers: Collisions of massive spiral galaxies causes intense ultra-starbursts as interstellar gas collides, and the resulting massive stars heat the gas, forming ultra-luminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) that emit strong infrared radiation. The gas dispersion from supernova explosions gives rise to ...

    1977

  25. [2005]

    larger galaxies formed earlier,

    reveal that quasars peaked at z=2–3 and have since declined, becoming nearly absent in the nearby universe (Figure 1). The Downsizing Phenomenon: Contrary to the natural expectation that smaller galaxies merge to form larger ones during galaxy evolution, observations indicate that the number density of brighter (larger) galaxies peaked earlier in the univ...

    2007

  26. [2023]

    2023 observed the Extended Groth Strip (EGS) region located between the constellations Ursa Major and Boötes using JWST's MIRI instrument

    4.6 Analysis of High-Redshift Region Measurement Papers Using JWST/MIRI Yang et al. 2023 observed the Extended Groth Strip (EGS) region located between the constellations Ursa Major and Boötes using JWST's MIRI instrument. The results were analyzed using SED fitting/modeling with CIGALE, classifying galaxies into SFGs (referred to as SF in the paper), mix...

    2023