pith. sign in

arxiv: 1803.09629 · v1 · pith:PBMMD25Xnew · submitted 2018-03-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Stochastic models of multi-channel particulate transport with blockage

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords channelschannelfluxintensitycapacitycomparecoupledefficient
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Networks of channels conveying particles are often subject to blockages due to the limited carrying capacity of the individual channels. If the channels are coupled, blockage of one causes an increase in the flux entering the remaining open channels leading to a cascade of failures. Once all channels are blocked no additional particle can enter the system. If the blockages are of finite duration, however, the system reaches a steady state with an exiting flux that is reduced compared to the incoming one. We propose a stochastic model consisting of $N_c$ channels each with a blocking threshold of $N$ particles. Particles enter the system according to a Poisson process with the entering flux of intensity $\Lambda$ equally distributed over the open channels. Any particle in an open channel exits at a rate $\mu$ and a blocked channel unblocks at a rate $\mu^*$. We present a method to obtain the exiting flux in the steady state, and other properties, for arbitrary $N_c$ and $N$ and we present explicit solutions for $N_c=2,3$. We apply these results to compare the efficiency of conveying a particulate stream of intensity $\Lambda$ using different channel configurations. We compare a single "robust" channel with a large capacity with multiple "fragile" channels with a proportionately reduced capacity. The "robust" channel is more efficient at low intensity, while multiple, "fragile" channels have a higher throughput at large intensity. We also compare $N_c$ coupled channels with $N_c$ independent channels, both with threshold $N=2$. For $N_c=2$ if $\mu^*/\mu>1/4$, the coupled channels are always more efficient. Otherwise the independent channels are more efficient for sufficiently large $\Lambda$.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.