Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 67 references

Octupole deformation properties in the actinides region using Fayans functionals

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fayans energy density functionals, in a first survey of heavy actinides, predict the same cluster of octupole-deformed nuclei as Skyrme-based functionals and reproduce measured charge radii and separation energies.

desk verdict First Fayans octupole survey of the actinides; qualitative conclusion holds, but abstract oversells accuracy and the pairing transfer is untested. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.22005 v2 pith:PCJV24UQ submitted 2026-03-23 nucl-th

Gauthier Danneaux , Markus Kortelainen This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-th MSC 81V3581V70 PACS 21.60.Jz21.10.Gv21.10.Re
keywords FayansenergydensityfunctionaloctupoledeformationactinidesHartree-Fock-BogoliubovchargeradiiseparationenergiesSkyrmefunctionalsnuclear
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first systematic survey of octupole (reflection-asymmetric, 'pear-shaped') deformation in heavy actinide nuclei using Fayans energy density functionals. The authors show that two Fayans parametrizations, Fy(std) and Fy(Δr,HFB), predict a cluster of octupole-deformed nuclei centered around 226U that closely matches the region obtained with Skyrme-based functionals. Including octupole deformation lowers the ground-state energy by up to about 1.25 MeV in the most sensitive isotopes, so it cannot be neglected in high-precision Fayans calculations for actinides. The same calculations reproduce experimental charge radii and neutron separation energies across the region, with Fy(std) being particularly accurate for uranium radii. If correct, this establishes Fayans functionals as a viable alternative for heavy deformed nuclei and for phenomena connected to octupole deformation such as Schiff moments and fission.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Fayans energy density functional, a non-relativistic nuclear functional distinguished by gradient terms in both the normal and pairing energy densities; the (∇x_pair)^2 term mimics effective finite-range effects and is responsible for the functional's enhanced odd-even staggering in charge radii. The calculations are carried out with the HFBTHO program, which solves the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov equations in an axial harmonic-oscillator basis. The survey relies on systematic constrained calculations spanning quadrupole moments from -25 to 35 barns and octupole moments from 0 to 10 barn^{3/2}, followed by unconstrained minimization, to locate the ground-state minimum a

What would settle it

A measurement of the ground-state octupole deformation in a nucleus near the predicted cluster core, such as 226U, could settle the claim: if the nucleus shows no static reflection-asymmetric shape, the Fayans cluster would be ruled out. Alternatively, measuring charge radii along the thorium chain with the precision to see the predicted inverted odd-even staggering would test the pairing-gradient mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated in the paper's conclusion, is that Fayans energy density functionals have octupole deformation properties similar to Skyrme-based functionals in the actinide region, predicting a rather similar cluster of octupole-deformed nuclei. The authors charted ground-state properties of even-even and even-Z isotopes from Z=84 to Z=108 and N=120 to N=150 using constrained Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov calculations on the quadrupole-octupole plane. They found an octupole-deformed island centered near 226U, with deformation energy gains up to ~1.25 MeV, and a smooth bell-shaped evolution along isotopic chains. Both Fayans parametrizations also reproduce the measured trends in charge r

Load-bearing premise

The calculations carry over pairing-strength parameters adjusted to mid-shell palladium isotopes to the entire actinide region without testing how sensitive the results are to that choice, so the predicted octupole minima, radii, and separation energies rely on this calibration transferring across the nuclear chart.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Octupole deformation must be included in Fayans EDF calculations of actinide and trans-actinide ground states; neglecting it misses up to ~1.25 MeV of binding and shifts other observables.
  • Fayans functionals can serve as a cross-check on the pear-shaped landscape mapped by Skyrme functionals, since the two families predict essentially the same octupole cluster and similar deformation energy gains.
  • The Fayans predictions for charge radii, including odd-even staggering, are accurate enough to compare directly with laser-spectroscopy data and to guide future measurements.
  • Because Fayans functionals reproduce separation energies and radii in heavy deformed nuclei, they can be applied to related processes such as Schiff-moment estimates and fission-fragment mass distributions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The predicted inverted odd-even staggering of charge radii in some actinide chains is a distinctive Fayans signature; if confirmed by high-precision laser spectroscopy, it would distinguish this functional family from Skyrme-based models and validate the gradient-pairing mechanism.
  • The octupole cluster shape and the smoother isotopic evolution of octupole moments compared to UNEDF0 hint at different single-particle shell structure; this could be tested through low-lying negative-parity bands or E3 transition strengths in specific isotopes.
  • The pairing-strength parameters were calibrated on mid-shell palladium isotopes and applied to actinides without sensitivity analysis; a deformed-level refit could shift the cluster boundaries and the isotopic trends, so re-optimization at the deformed HFB level is a natural next step.
  • The paper restricts attention to even-Z chains; systematic calculations of odd-Z and odd-odd actinides would extend the survey and could reveal additional octupole-deformed nuclei or shape-coexistence effects.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a systematic constrained-HFB survey of ground-state properties in even-even actinide nuclei (Z=84–108, even N=120–150) and their even-Z odd-A neighbors, using two Fayans energy density functionals, Fy(std) and Fy(Δr,HFB), implemented in HFBTHO. It maps quadrupole and octupole deformation energy surfaces, β2 and β3 values, charge radii, and one-/two-neutron separation energies, and compares the results with UNEDF0 and with experimental radii and AME2020 separation energies. The central claim is that Fayans EDFs produce an octupole-deformed cluster very similar to that predicted by Skyrme-based EDFs, while also giving relatively accurate separation energies and charge radii, including odd-even staggering effects. The authors also emphasize that octupole deformation lowers binding energies by up to about 1 MeV in the center of the cluster and should not be neglected in actinide applications.

Significance. If the claims are supported, this is a useful first systematic map of octupole deformation in the actinide region with Fayans functionals, with direct relevance for future Schiff-moment and fission studies. The computational survey is extensive: 1,040,416 constrained self-consistent calculations, blocked odd-A calculations, comparison with UNEDF0, and an online repository of all figures and unconstrained data. These are concrete strengths and make the dataset a potentially valuable reference. However, the abstract and conclusion overstate the accuracy of the Fayans predictions. The body explicitly reports that several charge radii lie significantly outside experimental error bars and that the two Fayans functionals give opposite odd-even charge-radius staggering in some chains. In addition, the pairing strengths are transferred from a fit to mid-shell Pd isotopes without a sensitivity test. These issues affect the strength of the central claims as currently worded, though the basic survey methodology is sound.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, Sec. IV.B, Figs. 12–15, Conclusion] The claim of 'accurate predictions' is contradicted by the paper's own results. In Sec. IV.B the authors state that 'some calculated charge radii lie significantly far from the experimental measurements range, including the experimental error bars' and that 'these EDFs still require extensive improvements.' Moreover, Fig. 13(c) shows Fy(std) and Fy(Δr,HFB) predicting opposite odd-even staggering in the Thorium chain, and the text says Fy(Δr,HFB) predicts the adequate staggering while Fy(std) predicts an opposite trend. The abstract and conclusion should be reworded to describe the radius predictions as chain-dependent and mixed, with quantitative deviations (e.g., rms differences) provided rather than a blanket 'accurate predictions' statement.
  2. [Sec. III, paragraph 1] The load-bearing pairing-strength transfer is not tested. The authors state that the Fy(std) and Fy(Δr,HFB) pairing strengths are those adjusted to 'empirical pairing gap data of mid-shell Palladium isotopes' and then applied unchanged to all actinide calculations, because the functionals were originally adjusted in coordinate space while HFBTHO uses an oscillator basis. Pairing strength directly affects the depth and location of octupole minima and controls the odd-even staggering that the paper highlights. A sensitivity study varying pairing strengths within a reasonable range for representative nuclei (e.g., 220Th, 226U, 240Pu) is needed to show that the octupole cluster and the radii/separation-energy comparisons are not contingent on this transfer. Without such a test, the quantitative agreement with UNEDF0 could be partly coincidental.
  3. [Sec. IV.A and Sec. IV.C, Figs. 8–11, 16–19] The central claim that the Fayans octupole cluster is 'similar' to the earlier Skyrme-based cluster is supported only visually. The text says the cluster 'appears to coincide' in location, shape, and magnitude, but there is no quantitative measure of overlap, such as a comparison of the β3>0.02 region with the UNEDF0 region, per-nucleus β3 differences, or energy-gain differences. A quantitative delineation of the predicted cluster and a comparison metric would make the main conclusion robust and reproducible.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III.A, step 2] The number '1.040.416' should be formatted as '1,040,416' to avoid confusion with a decimal notation.
  2. [Sec. III, first paragraph] The stated initial region 'Z=82 to Z=100 and N=126 to N=142' is inconsistent with the later cluster 'Z=84 to Z=108 and N=120 to N=150'. Please clarify the mesh actually used.
  3. [Sec. IV.C, final paragraph] Typo: 'UNDEF0' should be 'UNEDF0'.
  4. [Introduction, paragraph 6] Typo: 'octuple-deformed' should be 'octupole-deformed'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Fayans EDF octupole predictions are benchmarked against out-of-sample experimental data and UNEDF0, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a benchmark statement: Fy(std) and Fy(Delta-r,HFB), taken as previously optimized functionals (Refs. [33,35,49]), are used in constrained HFB calculations to map octupole deformation in the actinide region. The resulting beta-3 islands, deformation energies, charge radii, and separation energies are compared with AME2020 masses, experimental radii, and the independent UNEDF0 Skyrme EDF. No parameter is fitted to the actinide observables being predicted in this paper. The only input readjustment is the pairing strength carried over from Ref. [38], fitted to mid-shell Pd pairing-gap data; the paper's target observables—actinide octupole minima, charge radii, and separation energies—lie in a different region and are not forced by construction. This is a transferability assumption rather than a fitted-input-called-prediction or self-definitional reduction. Self-citations appear (UNEDF0 [8], HFBTHO [51], earlier Fayans applications [26,34,37]), but none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole evidence for the octupole predictions; the evidence is the reported constrained HFB calculations and out-of-sample comparisons. The paper's own admission of remaining inaccuracies further supports that the comparison is a genuine test. No circular step is established.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes no new parameters or entities. It relies on existing Fayans parameterizations, a Pd-based pairing-strength transfer, and the standard HFB/axial-shape framework. The main unquantified assumption is the pairing-strength transfer.

free parameters (3)
  • Fayans functional parameters Fy(std) and Fy(Δr,HFB) = from Refs. [33,49]
    All computed observables inherit these prior optimizations; their transferability to actinides is assumed rather than re-tested.
  • Pairing strength parameters = from Ref. [38] (Pd-isotope fit)
    Adopted unchanged for all actinide HFB calculations; central to the charge radii, pairing gaps, and octupole minima.
  • Octupole-significance threshold β3 > 0.02 = 0.02
    Used to define which nuclei are 'significantly impacted' by octupole deformation in Figs. 10-11; chosen by hand without an uncertainty estimate.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The nucleus is described by the HFB equations with an energy density functional and equal-filling quasiparticle blocking (Eqs. 1-3).
    Standard nuclear DFT framework; the paper builds on it without proof.
  • domain assumption Axial symmetry and restriction to Q2-Q3 deformations captures the relevant shape degrees of freedom.
    HFBTHO uses an axially symmetric oscillator basis; triaxial or higher-multipole minima are not explored (Sec. III).
  • ad hoc to paper Pairing strengths readjusted for the oscillator-basis continuum using Pd data transfer to actinide nuclides.
    Stated in Sec. III; no sensitivity analysis is provided, yet pairing affects radii and deformation energies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Octupole deformation properties in the actinides region using Fayans functionals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PCJV24UQ

@misc{pith2026260322005,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Octupole deformation properties in the actinides region using Fayans functionals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PCJV24UQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.22005}
}
read the original abstract

In this first-of-its-kind survey conducted on heavy and deformed nuclei in the actinide region of the nuclear chart, we have charted nuclear ground state properties predicted by Fayans energy density functionals (EDFs), focusing in particularly on octupole deformability. Compared to earlier studies with Skyrme-based EDFs, we found similar region of octupole deformed nuclei. Moreover, Fayans EDFs were found to provide accurate predictions for various ground state properties, when compared to experimental data. Comparison to Skyrme-based EDF shows similar trends in various nuclear properties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.22005 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Calculated ground state deformation energy of 122 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Same plots as in Fig. 1 but using Fy(std). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Same plots as in Fig. 1 but for Uranium isotopes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Deformation energy in MeV (a), rms charge radius in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Octupole deformation parameter of even-Z iso [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Same chart as in Fig. 8 but with Fy(std). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Ground state energy gained from the inclusion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Octupole moment (a), quadrupole moment (b), the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Same plots as in Fig. 12 but for the Thorium isotopic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Same plots as in Fig. 12 but for the Uranium isotopic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Same plots as in Fig. 12 but for the Plutonium [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_15.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Same plots as in Fig. 16 but for the Thorium isotopic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Same plots as in Fig. 16 but for the Uranium isotopic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Same plots as in Fig. 16 but for the Plutonium [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_19.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Comparison plots of two-neutrons separation energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [38]

    Sadoudi, M

    J. Sadoudi, M. Bender, K. Bennaceur, D. Davesne, R. Jodon, and T. Duguet, Skyrme pseudo-potential- based edf parametrization for spuriousity-free mr edf cal- culations, Physica Scripta2013, 014013 (2013)

    2013

  2. [1]

    For every nucleus, we performed a set of constrained calculations, with constrains on quadrupoleQ 2 and octupoleQ 3 moments

    The upper and lower neutron and proton num- bers bounds have been determined to encompass all octupole-deformed nuclei. For every nucleus, we performed a set of constrained calculations, with constrains on quadrupoleQ 2 and octupoleQ 3 moments. Additionally, center-of-mass was con- strained to zero in all calculations

  3. [2]

    The step sizes have been chosen so as to obtain sufficiently pre- cise calculations across theQ 2−Q3-plane

    For each even-even nucleus, we spanned the quadrupole moment fromQ 2 =−25 b toQ 2 = 35 b by steps of 1 b and the octupole moment from Q3 = 0 b 3 2 toQ 3 = 10 b 3 2 by steps of 0.25 b 3 2 through constrained calculations. The step sizes have been chosen so as to obtain sufficiently pre- cise calculations across theQ 2−Q3-plane. Whereas the former moment is...

  4. [3]

    Upon convergence, we obtained the lowest point of the potential energy surface of the specified nucleus

    In order to compute the variational minimum, we performed unconstrained calculation while still keeping constraint on the center-of-mass. Upon convergence, we obtained the lowest point of the potential energy surface of the specified nucleus. Such process was applied to each of the 416 stud- ied isotopes. B. Odd-A nuclei It can be noted that the HFB state...

  5. [4]

    Then, from the set of available neutron quasiparti- cle state blocking candidates, we selected a few of the lowest-lying ones

    In order to get these results for an odd-Anucleus withZ, N+ 1, whereZandNare even, we first utilized the procedure described in previous section to compute neighbor even-even nucleus atZ, N. Then, from the set of available neutron quasiparti- cle state blocking candidates, we selected a few of the lowest-lying ones

  6. [5]

    Afterward, for each blocked Nilsson orbital, we per- formed an unconstrained calculation with the same initial starting values forQ 2 andQ 3 as before

  7. [6]

    Two additional aspects of quasiparticle blockings should be noted

    Finally, for each nucleus, we selected the blocked state which gave the lowest HFB energy, producing complete isotopic chains. Two additional aspects of quasiparticle blockings should be noted. Firstly, that the quasiparticle energy of the orbitals depends strongly on the initial and final de- formation parameters. As such, it appeared to us incon- sisten...

    2020

  8. [7]

    M.-H. Mun, S. Kim, M.-K. Cheoun, W. So, S. Choi, and E. Ha, Odd-even shape staggering and kink structure of charge radii of hg isotopes by the deformed relativistic hartree–bogoliubov theory in continuum, Physics Letters B847, 138298 (2023)

    2023

Show all 67 references
  1. [8]

    Geldhof, M

    S. Geldhof, M. Kortelainen, O. Beliuskina, P. Campbell, L. Caceres, L. Ca˜ nete, B. Cheal, K. Chrysalidis, C. S. De- vlin, R. P. de Groote, A. de Roubin, T. Eronen, Z. Ge, 12 W. Gins, A. Koszorus, S. Kujanp¨ a¨ a, D. Nesterenko, A. Ortiz-Cortes, I. Pohjalainen, I. D. Moore, A....

    2022

  2. [9]

    P. L. Sassarini, J. Dobaczewski, J. Bonnard, and R. F. G. Ruiz, Nuclear dft analysis of electromagnetic moments in odd near doubly magic nuclei, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics49, 11LT01 (2022)

    2022

  3. [10]

    De Kock and P

    P. De Kock and P. Glaudemans, Configuration mixing and effective charges, Physics Letters B34, 280 (1971)

    1971

  4. [11]

    Ring and P

    P. Ring and P. Schuck, The nuclear many-body problem, Springer Verlag (1980)

    1980

  5. [12]

    Schunck, ed.,Energy Density Functional Methods for Atomic Nuclei, 2053-2563 (IOP Publishing, 2019)

    N. Schunck, ed.,Energy Density Functional Methods for Atomic Nuclei, 2053-2563 (IOP Publishing, 2019)

  6. [13]

    de Groote, D

    R. de Groote, D. Nesterenko, A. Kankainen, M. Bis- sell, O. Beliuskina, J. Bonnard, P. Campbell, L. Canete, B. Cheal, C. Delafosse, A. de Roubin, C. Devlin, J. Dobaczewski, T. Eronen, R. Garcia Ruiz, S. Geld- hof, W. Gins, M. Hukkanen, P. Imgram, R. Mathieson, A. Koszor´ us, I...

    2024

  7. [14]

    Kortelainen, T

    M. Kortelainen, T. Lesinski, J. Mor´ e, W. Nazarewicz, J. Sarich, N. Schunck, M. V. Stoitsov, and S. Wild, Nuclear energy density optimization, Phys. Rev. C82, 024313 (2010)

    2010

  8. [15]

    Bonnard, J

    J. Bonnard, J. Dobaczewski, G. Danneaux, and M. Ko- rtelainen, Nuclear dft electromagnetic moments in heavy deformed open-shell odd nuclei, Physics Letters B843, 138014 (2023)

    2023

  9. [16]

    Engel, M

    J. Engel, M. Bender, J. Dobaczewski, J. H. d. Jesus, and P. Olbratowski, Time-reversal violating schiff moment of 225Ra, Phys. Rev. C68, 025501 (2003)

    2003

  10. [17]

    Dobaczewski, J

    J. Dobaczewski, J. Engel, M. Kortelainen, and P. Becker, Correlating schiff moments in the light actinides with oc- tupole moments, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 232501 (2018)

    2018

  11. [18]

    Ebata and T

    S. Ebata and T. Nakatsukasa, Octupole deformation in the nuclear chart based on the 3d skyrme hartree–fock plus bcs model, Physica Scripta92, 064005 (2017)

    2017

  12. [19]

    V. V. Flambaum and A. J. Mansour, Enhanced magnetic quadrupole moments in nuclei with octupole deformation and theircp-violating effects in molecules, Phys. Rev. C 105, 065503 (2022)

    2022

  13. [20]

    H. D. Ramachandran and A. C. Vutha, Nucleart- violation search using octopole-deformed nuclei in a crys- tal, Phys. Rev. A108, 012819 (2023)

    2023

  14. [21]

    P. A. Butler, Pear-shaped atomic nuclei, Proceedings of the Royal Society A476, http://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2020.0202 (2020)

    2020

  15. [22]

    P. A. Butler and W. Nazarewicz, Intrinsic reflection asymmetry in atomic nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 349 (1996)

    1996

  16. [23]

    M. Chen, T. Li, J. Dobaczewski, and W. Nazarewicz, Mi- croscopic origin of reflection-asymmetric nuclear shapes, Phys. Rev. C103, 034303 (2021)

    2021

  17. [24]

    Schunck and L

    N. Schunck and L. M. Robledo, Microscopic theory of nuclear fission: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 116301 (2016)

    2016

  18. [25]

    S. A. Giuliani, G. Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, M.-R. Wu, and L. M. Robledo, Fission and the r-process nucleosynthesis of translead nuclei in neutron star mergers, Physical Re- view C102, 10.1103/physrevc.102.045804 (2020)

    2020 doi

  19. [26]

    Tripathi, S

    R. Tripathi, S. Sodaye, K. Sudarshan, B. K. Nayak, A. Jhingan, P. K. Pujari, K. Mahata, S. Santra, A. Sax- ena, E. T. Mirgule, and R. G. Thomas, Fission fragment mass distributions in 35Cl +144,154 Sm reactions, Phys. Rev. C92, 024610 (2015)

    2015

  20. [27]

    Brewer, E

    N. Brewer, E. Wang, W. Yzaguirre, J. Hamilton, K. No- mura, A. Ramayya, S. Liu, J. Hwang, B. Musangu, J. Eldridge, C. Zachary, Y. Luo, J. Rasmussen, S. Zhu, C. Goodin, G. Ter-Akopian, A. Daniel, and Y. Oganes- sian, Octupole deformation in 143,145,146ba, Nuclear Physics A1039,...

    2023

  21. [28]

    Y. Cao, S. E. Agbemava, A. V. Afanasjev, W. Nazarewicz, and E. Olsen, Landscape of pear- shaped even-even nuclei, Phys. Rev. C102, 024311 (2020)

    2020

  22. [29]

    Verstraelen, A

    E. Verstraelen, A. Teigelh¨ ofer, W. Ryssens, F. Ames, A. Barzakh, M. Bender, R. Ferrer, S. Goriely, P.-H. Hee- nen, M. Huyse, P. Kunz, J. Lassen, V. Manea, S. Raeder, and P. Van Duppen, Search for octupole-deformed ac- tinium isotopes using resonance ionization spectroscopy, ...

    2019

  23. [30]

    Scamps, S

    G. Scamps, S. Goriely, E. Olsen, M. Bender, and W. Ryssens, Skyrme-hartree-fock-bogoliubov mass mod- els on a 3d mesh: effect of triaxial shape, The European Physical Journal A57, 10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00642-1 (2021)

    2021 doi

  24. [31]

    Grams, W

    G. Grams, W. Ryssens, G. Scamps, S. Goriely, and N. Chamel, Skyrme-hartree-fock-bogoliubov mass mod- els on a 3d mesh: Iii. from atomic nuclei to neutron stars, The European Physical Journal A59, 270 (2023)

    2023

  25. [32]

    Kortelainen, Z

    M. Kortelainen, Z. Sun, G. Hagen, W. Nazarewicz, T. Papenbrock, and P.-G. Reinhard, Universal trend of charge radii of even-even ca–zn nuclei, Phys. Rev. C105, L021303 (2022)

    2022

  26. [33]

    R. An, S. Sun, X. Jiang, N. Tang, L.-G. Cao, and F.-S. Zhang, Shell effects in nuclear charge radii based on skyrme density functionals (2025), arXiv:2506.20414 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  27. [34]

    S. Y. Xia, H. Tao, Y. Lu, Z. P. Li, T. Nikˇ si´ c, and D. Vrete- nar, Spectroscopy of reflection-asymmetric nuclei with relativistic energy density functionals, Phys. Rev. C96, 054303 (2017)

    2017

  28. [35]

    Bucher, S

    B. Bucher, S. Zhu, C. Y. Wu, R. V. F. Janssens, D. Cline, A. B. Hayes, M. Albers, A. D. Ayangeakaa, P. A. But- ler, C. M. Campbell, M. P. Carpenter, C. J. Chiara, J. A. Clark, H. L. Crawford, M. Cromaz, H. M. David, C. Dick- erson, E. T. Gregor, J. Harker, C. R. Hoffman, B. P....

    2016

  29. [36]

    L. P. Gaffney, P. A. Butler, M. Scheck, A. B. Hayes, F. Wenander, M. Albers, B. Bastin, C. Bauer, A. Blazhev, S. B¨ onig, N. Bree, J. Cederk¨ all, T. Chupp, D. Cline, T. E. Cocolios, T. Davinson, H. De Witte, J. Diriken, T. Grahn, A. Herzan, M. Huyse, D. G. Jenk- ins, D. T. Jo...

    2013

  30. [37]

    Fayans, S

    S. Fayans, S. Tolokonnikov, E. Trykov, and D. Zawis- cha, Nuclear isotope shifts within the local energy-density functional approach, Nuclear Physics A676, 49 (2000)

    2000

  31. [39]

    Reinhard and W

    P.-G. Reinhard and W. Nazarewicz, Toward a global de- scription of nuclear charge radii: Exploring the fayans en- ergy density functional, Phys. Rev. C95, 064328 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    S. V. Tolokonnikov, I. N. Borzov, M. Kortelainen, Y. S. Lutostansky, and E. E. Saperstein, Alpha-decay energies of superheavy nuclei for the fayans functional, The Euro- pean Physical Journal A53, 10.1140/epja/i2017-12220-y (2017)

    2017 doi

  33. [41]

    S. Wang, A. Kanellakopoulos, X. Yang, S. Bai, J. Bil- lowes, M. Bissell, K. Blaum, B. Cheal, C. Devlin, R. Garcia Ruiz, J. Han, H. Heylen, S. Kaufmann, K. K¨ onig, A. Koszor´ us, S. Lechner, S. Malbrunot- Ettenauer, W. Nazarewicz, R. Neugart, G. Neyens, W. N¨ ortersh¨ auser, T...

    2024

  34. [42]

    K. M. Lynch, S. G. Wilkins, J. Billowes, C. L. Binners- ley, M. L. Bissell, K. Chrysalidis, T. E. Cocolios, T. D. Goodacre, R. P. de Groote, G. J. Farooq-Smith, D. V. Fedorov, V. N. Fedosseev, K. T. Flanagan, S. Franchoo, R. F. Garcia Ruiz, W. Gins, R. Heinke, A. Koszor´ us, B...

    2018

  35. [43]

    Koszor´ us, X

    A. Koszor´ us, X. F. Yang, W. G. Jiang, S. J. Novario, S. W. Bai, J. Billowes, C. L. Binnersley, M. L. Bis- sell, T. E. Cocolios, B. S. Cooper, R. P. de Groote, A. Ekstr¨ om, K. T. Flanagan, C. Forss´ en, S. Franchoo, R. F. G. Ruiz, F. P. Gustafsson, G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, A....

    2021

  36. [44]

    Reponen, R

    M. Reponen, R. P. de Groote, L. Al Ayoubi, O. Be- liuskina, M. L. Bissell, P. Campbell, L. Ca˜ nete, B. Cheal, K. Chrysalidis, C. Delafosse, A. de Roubin, C. S. De- vlin, T. Eronen, R. F. Garcia Ruiz, S. Geldhof, W. Gins, M. Hukkanen, P. Imgram, A. Kankainen, M. Korte- lainen,...

    2021

  37. [45]

    A. J. Miller, K. Minamisono, A. Klose, D. Garand, C. Kujawa, J. D. Lantis, Y. Liu, B. Maaß, P. F. Mantica, W. Nazarewicz, W. N¨ ortersh¨ auser, S. V. Pineda, P.-G. Reinhard, D. M. Rossi, F. Sommer, C. Sumithrarachchi, A. Teigelh¨ ofer, and J. Watkins, Proton superfluidity and ...

    2019

  38. [46]

    Ohayon, R

    B. Ohayon, R. F. G. Ruiz, Z. H. Sun, G. Hagen, T. Pa- penbrock, and B. K. Sahoo, Nuclear charge radii of na isotopes: Interplay of atomic and nuclear theory, Phys. Rev. C105, L031305 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    R. An, X. Jiang, N. Tang, L.-G. Cao, and F.-S. Zhang, Improved description of nuclear charge radii: Global trends beyondn= 28 shell closure, Phys. Rev. C109, 064302 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Dobaczewski, H

    J. Dobaczewski, H. Flocard, and J. Treiner, Hartree-fock- bogolyubov description of nuclei near the neutron-drip line, Nuclear Physics A422, 103 (1984)

    1984

  41. [49]

    Skyrme, The effective nuclear potential, Nuclear Physics9, 615 (1958)

    T. Skyrme, The effective nuclear potential, Nuclear Physics9, 615 (1958)

    1958

  42. [50]

    Decharg´ e and D

    J. Decharg´ e and D. Gogny, Hartree-fock-bogolyubov cal- culations with thed1 effective interaction on spherical nuclei, Phys. Rev. C21, 1568 (1980)

    1980

  43. [51]

    Fayans, S

    S. Fayans, S. Tolokonnikov, E. Trykov, and D. Zawischa, Isotope shifts within the energy-density functional ap- proach with density dependent pairing, Physics Letters B338, 1 (1994)

    1994

  44. [52]

    S. A. Fayans, Towards a universal nuclear density func- tional, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters68, 169 (1998)

    1998

  45. [53]

    Reinhard, J

    P.-G. Reinhard, J. O’Neal, S. M. Wild, and W. Nazarewicz, Extended fayans energy density functional: optimization and analysis, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics51, 105101 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    Shi, X.-B

    H. Shi, X.-B. Wang, G.-X. Dong, and H.-L. Wang, Ab- normal odd-even staggering behavior around 132 sn stud- ied by density functional theory, Chinese Physics C44, 094108 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    Reinhard, W

    P.-G. Reinhard, W. Nazarewicz, and R. F. Garcia Ruiz, Beyond the charge radius: The information content of the fourth radial moment, Phys. Rev. C101, 021301 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    S. V. Tolokonnikov, I. N. Borzov, M. Kortelainen, Y. S. Lutostansky, and E. E. Saperstein, First applications of the fayans functional to deformed nuclei, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics42, 075102 (2015)

    2015

  49. [57]

    Stoitsov, N

    M. Stoitsov, N. Schunck, M. Kortelainen, N. Michel, H. Nam, E. Olsen, J. Sarich, and S. Wild, Axially de- formed solution of the skyrme-hartree–fock–bogoliubov equations using the transformed harmonic oscillator ba- sis (ii) hfbtho v2.00d: A new version of the program, Compute...

    2013

  50. [58]

    Perez-Martin and L

    S. Perez-Martin and L. M. Robledo, Microscopic justifi- cation of the equal filling approximation, Phys. Rev. C 78, 014304 (2008)

    2008

  51. [59]

    L. M. Robledo and P. A. Butler, Quadrupole-octupole coupling in the light actinides, Phys. Rev. C88, 051302 (2013)

    2013

  52. [60]

    S. E. Agbemava, A. V. Afanasjev, and P. Ring, Octupole deformation in the ground states of even-even nuclei: A global analysis within the covariant density functional theory, Phys. Rev. C93, 044304 (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    S. E. Agbemava and A. V. Afanasjev, Octupole deforma- tion in the ground states of even-evenz∼96, n∼196 actinides and superheavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. C96, 024301 (2017). 14

    2017

  54. [62]

    Nomura, R

    K. Nomura, R. Rodr ´ ıguez-Guzm´ an, L. M. Robledo, and J. E. Garc ´ ıa-Ramos, Quadrupole-octupole coupling and the onset of octupole deformation in actinides, Phys. Rev. C103, 044311 (2021)

    2021

  55. [63]

    Nomura, R

    K. Nomura, R. Rodr ´ ıguez-Guzm´ an, L. M. Robledo, J. E. Garc ´ ıa-Ramos, and N. C. Hern´ andez, Evolution of oc- tupole deformation and collectivity in neutron-rich lan- thanides, Phys. Rev. C104, 044324 (2021)

    2021

  56. [64]

    Repository of all the produced figures and uncon- strained calculations data are available at this URL https://nextcloud.jyu.fi/index.php/s/82A6yWe35yTRsa6

  57. [65]

    Angeli and K

    I. Angeli and K. Marinova, Table of experimental nuclear ground state charge radii: An update, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables99, 69 (2013)

    2013

  58. [66]

    Campbell, I

    P. Campbell, I. Moore, and M. Pearson, Laser spec- troscopy for nuclear structure physics, Progress in Parti- cle and Nuclear Physics86, 127 (2016)

    2016

  59. [67]

    M. Wang, W. Huang, F. Kondev, G. Audi, and S. Naimi, The ame 2020 atomic mass evaluation (ii). tables, graphs and references*, Chinese Physics C45, 030003 (2021)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.