Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adversarial Regression for Detecting Attacks in Cyber-Physical Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1804.11022 v1 pith:PDFYFZXT submitted 2018-04-30 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords attacksdefenderreadingssensorsensorsattackercausecyber-physical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Attacks in cyber-physical systems (CPS) which manipulate sensor readings can cause enormous physical damage if undetected. Detection of attacks on sensors is crucial to mitigate this issue. We study supervised regression as a means to detect anomalous sensor readings, where each sensor's measurement is predicted as a function of other sensors. We show that several common learning approaches in this context are still vulnerable to \emph{stealthy attacks}, which carefully modify readings of compromised sensors to cause desired damage while remaining undetected. Next, we model the interaction between the CPS defender and attacker as a Stackelberg game in which the defender chooses detection thresholds, while the attacker deploys a stealthy attack in response. We present a heuristic algorithm for finding an approximately optimal threshold for the defender in this game, and show that it increases system resilience to attacks without significantly increasing the false alarm rate.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning from the Good Ones: Risk Profiling-Based Defenses Against Evasion Attacks on DNNs

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Training anomaly detectors only on instances least vulnerable to a simulated evasion attack increases recall by up to 27.5% over indiscriminate training in a blood glucose management case study.

Pith tools