Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 49 references

All-optical control of antiferromagnetic domains via an inverse optical magnetoelectric effect

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Propagation direction of light, not its polarization, writes antiferromagnetic domains in LiNiPO4.

desk verdict This paper likely demonstrates the first all-optical writing of antiferromagnetic domains via the inverse optical magnetoelectric effect, though an unaddressed thermal-gradient control leaves a crack in the mechanism claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07051 v1 pith:PDL2TAUZ submitted 2025-06-08 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Shingo Toyoda , Vilmos Kocsis , Yusuke Tokunaga , István Kézsmárki , Yasujiro Taguchi , Taka-hisa Arima , Yoshinori Tokura , Naoki Ogawa This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords all-opticalmagneticswitchingantiferromagneticspintronicsopticalmagnetoelectriceffectinversetoroidalmomentferrotoroidicLiNiPO4nonvolatilememory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper demonstrates deterministic all-optical writing of antiferromagnetic domains in the ferrotoroidic antiferromagnet LiNiPO4, using the inverse optical magnetoelectric effect (IOME). Reversing the propagation direction of an intense femtosecond pump pulse — without any polarization change — flips the magnetic toroidal moment between opposite antiferromagnetic domains. The written state is nonvolatile, repeatable, and can be switched isothermally at 5 K, well below the magnetic ordering temperature. This matters because antiferromagnets carry no net magnetization, so the usual polarization-based optical switching mechanisms do not work; here the photon's linear momentum couples to the toroidal moment, a degree of freedom unique to magnetoelectric materials.

What carries the argument

The central object is the magnetic toroidal moment, defined as $\mathbf{T}=\tfrac12\sum_i \mathbf{r}_i\times\mathbf{S}_i$, which is odd under both time reversal and spatial inversion. Because photon linear momentum $\mathbf{k}$ has the same symmetry, of which the cross product $\mathbf{E}^{\omega}\times\mathbf{H}^{\omega}$ is a high-frequency analogue, light propagating along the toroidal axis acts as a directional field that flips the toroidal moment. The material LiNiPO4 (magnetic point group $mm'm$) supports a finite $\mathbf{T}\parallel b$ without net magnetization or polarization, and the effect is read out through the large directional dichroism at 1450 nm ($\mathbf{E}^{\omega}\parallel a$).

What would settle it

A time-resolved measurement of the lattice temperature in the pumped region during the femtosecond pulse at the switching fluence (~22 mJ/cm2): if the local temperature exceeds the Néel temperature (TN1 = 21.7 K), the nonthermal claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors claim that light's linear momentum acts as an effective conjugate field, $\mathbf{E}^{\omega}\times\mathbf{H}^{\omega}$ parallel to the photon wavevector $\mathbf{k}$, which aligns the ferrotoroidic moment along the b-axis of LiNiPO4. They show that laser poling during cooling reproduces the absorption signature obtained by static magnetoelectric poling with $\mathbf{E}\times\mathbf{H}$, that the polarization state of the pump is irrelevant, and that irradiation at 5 K with alternating propagation directions produces a hysteresis loop and repeatable two-way switching. Scanning the beam imprints arbitrary domain patterns with contrast that inverts when imaged from the opposite side, confirming the toroidal origin of the response.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation that switching is caused by the inverse optical magnetoelectric effect hinges on there being no other direction-dependent light-matter interaction at work; the paper excludes dipole-dipole coupling using PT symmetry but does not directly measure the lattice temperature during the pulse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • All-optical switching of antiferromagnetic domains works independently of light polarization, so no polarization optics are needed in a device.
  • The writing is nonvolatile and repeatable at 5 K, establishing a fully optical, isothermal route to two-state magnetic memory.
  • The achievable domain size is limited only by light diffraction (in principle about 1 μm), and near-field techniques could push it to the nanoscale.
  • Because the OME has been observed from microwave to X-ray frequencies and at room temperature in other materials, the IOME mechanism is not intrinsically restricted to the present low-temperature near-infrared case.
  • The analogy between $\mathbf{E}^{\omega}\times\mathbf{H}^{\omega}$ and the static conjugate field $\mathbf{E}\times\mathbf{H}$ gives a general symmetry-based handle for addressing toroidal order in other ferrotoroidics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: If IOME writing is as general as the symmetry principle suggests, the same directional-writing scheme should work in other ferrotoroidics with strong OME, such as LiCoPO4 and CuB2O4, which would extend the result outside the single compound studied.
  • Inference: A direct transient-temperature measurement during the pump pulse would separate the nonthermal IOME contribution from laser heating; such a measurement is not reported here.
  • Inference: The polarization independence suggests that the stored information could be encoded in the toroidal state and read by OME, offering a route to polarization-free optical memory architectures.
  • Inference: The dependence on absolute crystal orientation rather than beam geometry predicts that flipping the sample should invert the writing contrast; the paper's backside imaging is consistent with this, but a systematic sample-rotation test would nail it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the all-optical writing of antiferromagnetic domains in the ferrotoroidic material LiNiPO4 via the inverse optical magnetoelectric effect (IOME). The authors show that irradiating the sample with femtosecond pulses at 1700 nm, with propagation direction along the b-axis, deterministically aligns the magnetic toroidal moment. The resulting domain state is read out through the optical magnetoelectric effect (OME) at 1450 nm. Evidence includes: laser poling during cooling reproduces the absorption signatures of static magnetoelectric poling; reversing the pump propagation direction reverses the sign of the absorption change; the writing is independent of the pump polarization; isothermal switching at 5 K is demonstrated; the process is nonvolatile, repeatable, and locally addressable, with spatially resolved transmission images showing written patterns. The central claim is that the photon linear momentum acts as a conjugate field for the toroidal moment, establishing IOME as a mechanism for optical manipulation of antiferromagnetic order.

Significance. If the mechanism interpretation is correct, this is a significant advance in opto-magnetism: it demonstrates deterministic, nonvolatile, all-optical control of antiferromagnetic domains using photon linear momentum rather than angular momentum, with polarization-independent operation. The paper is well executed in several respects: the OME spectra are reproduced, the laser-poling results are benchmarked against independent ME poling, the readout is validated by reversing the viewing direction (Fig. 4g), and the repeatability and spatial precision of writing are documented. The absence of parameter fitting and the reliance on established symmetry arguments strengthen the interpretation. However, the central claim that the effect is specifically due to IOME, rather than to a thermal-gradient-induced magnetoelectric field, is not uniquely established by the present experiments. The paper's own exclusion of thermal effects is incomplete, leaving a load-bearing alternative mechanism unaddressed.

major comments (2)
  1. [Pump-probe measurements (Methods) and Fig. 4a] The claim that the writing is caused by the inverse optical magnetoelectric effect requires excluding a thermal-gradient mechanism. The paper's discussion on page 9-10 rules out only dipole-dipole interactions with a pre-existing electric polarization, based on PT symmetry. It does not address a transient temperature gradient along the propagation direction. Because the penetration depth of the pump is comparable to the 100 μm sample thickness, the pump pulse can create a front-to-back thermal gradient whose sign follows the propagation direction k. Such a gradient induces a strain gradient, which through flexoelectricity produces a local electric polarization; in a magnetoelectric material this polarization can couple linearly to the magnetic order and act as an effective conjugate field for the toroidal moment. This chain would reproduce the direction-dependent, polarization-independent, nonvolatile, and locally writable behavior reported. The isothermal switching at 5 K in Fig. 4a does not eliminate this possibility because the gradient is present during each pump pulse. Please provide a control experiment that isolates the thermal gradient (for example, a static temperature gradient applied in the absence of light, or a comparison of front versus back illumination under the same propagation direction) or a quantitative estimate showing that the flexoelectric/ME field is negligible compared with the IOME effective field.
  2. [Abstract and Conclusions] The abstract and conclusion state that the writing process is 'non-thermal,' but the manuscript contains no measurement or estimate of the lattice temperature excursion during the pump pulse. The recovery of absorption above TN1 rules out permanent damage, but it does not bound the transient temperature rise or gradient within each pulse. Given the fluence of ~22 mJ/cm2 and the sample thickness of ~100 μm, the absorbed energy density suggests a modest average temperature rise, yet the transient gradient could be substantially larger. The authors should either measure or bound the temperature excursion, or qualify the 'non-thermal' claim to 'not involving heating above the magnetic ordering temperature' or equivalent. This is not a purely semantic issue, as the distinction between IOME and a thermal-gradient-driven magnetoelectric effect is the central scientific claim of the paper.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3b] The fluence dependence is shown for only two propagation directions without error bars; adding multiple measurements or error bars would help assess the saturation threshold and the reproducibility of the single-domain state.
  2. [Fig. 4a caption] The caption describes the absorption curves as '+k (red)' and '-k (blue)', which is consistent with the main text, but the main text on page 10 refers to 'blue' and 'red' without specifying the propagation direction; please unify the color-direction notation throughout.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The definition of Δα/α0 uses the notation 𝛼(+𝐵, +𝐸) and 𝛼(+𝐵, −𝐸) without defining B and E in the caption; please add a sentence specifying that B is the magnetic field along c and E is the electric field along a used during ME poling.
  4. [Abstract and Fig. 3c,d] The abstract claims that writing works with 'arbitrary light polarization,' but Fig. 3c,d shows only a set of polarization states (apparently linear). Either add data for elliptical or circular polarization or qualify the claim to 'various linear polarization states.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claim is an experimental observation validated against an independent ME-poling benchmark.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that femtosecond-laser propagation direction deterministically aligns the ferrotoroidic (antiferromagnetic) moment in LiNiPO4 via the inverse optical magnetoelectric effect. This is an experimental claim, not a derived prediction. The laser-poling results are explicitly benchmarked against conventional magnetoelectric poling with static crossed E and H fields ("The resulting absorption profiles closely match those obtained via laser poling, indicating that IOME-based laser poling is efficient enough to create single-domain ferrotoroidic states"). That external benchmark fixes the sign and meaning of the OME readout independently of the optical-writing hypothesis, so the writing is not being verified solely by a readout that already assumes the effect. The readout uses the ordinary OME at 1450 nm, whose domain-contrast calibration comes from the static E x H poling, not from the pump itself. Several cited prior works involve current authors (e.g., refs. 27, 29, 31, 32, 41), but these are used as supporting examples of OME in other materials or of ME switching in LiCoPO4; the present experiment's key comparison is to its own ME-poling control, and the conjugate-field concept is also cited to independent work (refs. 10 and 40). No parameter is fitted and renamed as a prediction. The possible thermal-gradient or other direction-dependent mechanisms discussed by a skeptic would be a mechanistic ambiguity or correctness risk, not a circularity, because the paper does not derive its conclusion from those mechanisms. Therefore, no circular step can be exhibited with a specific equation or construction, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is an experimental paper with no fitted parameters and no invented entities. The central claim rests on well-established symmetry arguments, prior characterization of LiNiPO4, and the assumption that the effective field from light is the high-frequency analogue of the static E x H conjugate field.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The conjugate field for the magnetic toroidal moment is E x H.
    The paper relies on this established result (refs. 10, 41) to interpret both ME poling and laser poling. It is used in the discussion of Figs. 2e-h and the analogy to the static conjugate field. This is a standard assumption in multiferroic physics.
  • domain assumption LiNiPO4 in its low-temperature phase has magnetic point group mm'm with no net magnetization or electric polarization.
    Based on prior crystallographic and neutron scattering studies (refs. 35-39). This justifies the use of OME readout and the claim that dipole-dipole interactions are inactive. If this were wrong, the interpretation would change.
  • domain assumption The observed absorption change is a faithful, roughly linear measure of the ferrotoroidic domain population.
    The OME readout at 1450 nm is used to infer the toroidal moment direction. The close match between laser poling and ME poling results supports this assumption, but it is not independently calibrated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of All-optical control of antiferromagnetic domains via an inverse optical magnetoelectric effect." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PDL2TAUZ

@misc{pith2026250607051,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: All-optical control of antiferromagnetic domains via an inverse optical magnetoelectric effect},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PDL2TAUZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07051}
}
read the original abstract

Antiferromagnets are a promising platform for next-generation spintronics due to their ultrafast spin dynamics and robustness to external fields. All-optical control of antiferromagnetic order is essential to fully exploit their potential in energy-efficient and high-speed spintronic and memory applications. However, optical writing of antiferromagnetic domains remains a fundamental challenge, as conventional magneto-optical techniques rely on net magnetization, which is absent in antiferromagnets. In certain multiferroic antiferromagnets, the magnetic toroidal moment provides an additional degree of freedom through its inherent magnetoelectric coupling. This coupling at higher frequencies results in the optical magnetoelectric effect (OME), which manifests as a directional asymmetry in light propagation and enables optical probing of antiferromagnetic states. Here, we demonstrate all-optical writing of antiferromagnetic domains using the inverse optical magnetoelectric effect (IOME) in ferrotoroidic LiNiPO4. The writing process is nonvolatile, non-thermal, and deterministic, driven solely by reversing the light propagation direction. This directional control arises from a strong coupling between the photon linear momentum and the magnetic toroidal moment, enabling the repeatable switching between time-reversed domains with arbitrary light polarization. Our findings establish IOME as a distinct mechanism for manipulating antiferromagnetic order, opening a new paradigm in opto-magnetism driven by photon momentum.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Baltz, V . et al. Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    & Wunderlich, J

    Jungwirth, T., Marti, X., Wadley, P. & Wunderlich, J. Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 231–241 (2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    & Kimel, A

    Němec, P., Fiebig, M., Kampfrath, T. & Kimel, A. V . Antiferromagnetic opto-spintronics. Nat. Phys. 14, 229–241 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Manz, S. et al. Reversible optical switching of antiferromagnetism in TbMnO3. Nat. Photonics 10, 653– 656 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    & Fiebig, M

    Tzschaschel, C., Satoh, T. & Fiebig, M. Tracking the ultrafast motion of an antiferromagnetic order parameter. Nat. Commun. 10, 3995 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Qiu, J.-X. et al. Axion optical induction of antiferromagnetic order. Nat. Mater. 22, 583–590 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Satoh, T. et al. Spin Oscillations in Antiferromagnetic NiO Triggered by Circularly Polarized Light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 077402 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    A., Fiebig, M

    Spaldin, N. A., Fiebig, M. & Mostovoy, M. The toroidal moment in condensed -matter physics and its relation to the magnetoelectric effect. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20, 434203 (2008)

    work page 2008

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    B., Rivera, J.-P., Schmid, H

    Van Aken, B. B., Rivera, J.-P., Schmid, H. & Fiebig, M. Observation of ferrotoroidic domains. Nature 449, 702–705 (2007)

    2007

  2. [10]

    S., Meier, D

    Zimmermann, A. S., Meier, D. & Fiebig, M. Ferroic nature of magnetic toroidal order. Nat. Commun. 5, 18 4796 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    & Nagaosa, N

    Tokura, Y . & Nagaosa, N. Nonreciprocal responses from non-centrosymmetric quantum materials. Nat. Commun. 9, 3740 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    & Kimura, T

    Kimura, K. & Kimura, T. Visualization of antiferromagnetic domains by nonreciprocal directional dichroism and related optical responses. APL Mater. 11, 100902 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    & Kimura, T

    Kimura, K. & Kimura, T. Nonvolatile Switching of Large Nonreciprocal Optical Absorption at Shortwave Infrared Wavelengths. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036901 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Magneto-electric optics in non-centrosymmetric ferromagnets

    Arima, T. Magneto-electric optics in non-centrosymmetric ferromagnets. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20, 434211 (2008)

    2008

  7. [15]

    -W., Talbayev, D., Kiryukhin, V

    Cheong, S. -W., Talbayev, D., Kiryukhin, V . & Saxena, A. Broken symmetries, non -reciprocity, and multiferroicity. Npj Quantum Mater. 3, 19 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    Kimel, A. V . & Li, M. Writing magnetic memory with ultrashort light pulses. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 189– 200 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Kirilyuk, A., Kimel, A. V . & Rasing, T. Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2731–2784 (2010)

    2010

  10. [18]

    Pershan, P. S. Nonlinear Optical Properties of Solids: Energy Considerations. Phys. Rev. 130, 919–929 (1963)

    1963

  11. [19]

    P., Pershan, P

    Van Der Ziel, J. P., Pershan, P. S. & Malmstrom, L. D. Optically-Induced Magnetization Resulting from 19 the Inverse Faraday Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 190–193 (1965)

    1965

  12. [20]

    This enables ultrafast and deterministic switching of magnetization without an external magnetic field17,21–23 (Fig. 1a-c). Recent growing demand for faster and more energy-efficient computing has shifted the focus of spintronics from ferromagnets to antiferromagnets, which of...

  13. [21]

    Kimel, A. V . et al. Ultrafast non -thermal control of magnetization by instantaneous photomagnetic pulses. Nature 435, 655–657 (2005)

    2005

  14. [22]

    Stanciu, C. D. et al. All-Optical Magnetic Recording with Circularly Polarized Light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 047601 (2007)

    2007

  15. [23]

    Lambert, C.-H. et al. All-optical control of ferromagnetic thin films and nanostructures. Science 345, 1337–1340 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    Mangin, S. et al. Engineered materials for all-optical helicity-dependent magnetic switching. Nat. Mater. 13, 286–292 (2014)

    2014

  17. [25]

    Higo, T. et al. Large magneto -optical Kerr effect and imaging of magnetic octupole domains in an antiferromagnetic metal. Nat. Photonics 12, 73–78 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    B., Pavlov, V

    Krichevtsov, B. B., Pavlov, V . V ., Pisarev, R. V . & Gridnev, V . N. Magnetoelectric Spectroscopy of Electronic Transitions in Antiferromagnetic Cr2O3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4628–4631 (1996)

    1996

  19. [27]

    & Arima, T

    Saito, M., Taniguchi, K. & Arima, T. Gigantic Optical Magnetoelectric Effect in CuB2O4. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 013705 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    Toyoda, S. et al. One-Way Transparency of Light in Multiferroic CuB2O4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 267207 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    & Ogawa, N

    Toyoda, S., Fiebig, M., Arima, T., Tokura, Y . & Ogawa, N. Nonreciprocal second harmonic generation 20 in a magnetoelectric material. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe2793 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Kézsmárki, I. et al. One-way transparency of four -coloured spin -wave excitations in multiferroic materials. Nat. Commun. 5, 3203 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    Tóth, B. et al. Imaging antiferromagnetic domains in LiCoPO 4 via the optical magnetoelectric effect. Phys. Rev. B 110, L100405 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Kocsis, V . et al. Identification of Antiferromagnetic Domains Via the Optical Magnetoelectric Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 057601 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Akaki, M. et al. Terahertz broadband one-way transparency with spontaneous magnon decay. Sci. Adv. 11, eado6783 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    Kezsmarki, I. et al. Enhanced Directional Dichroism of Terahertz Light in Resonance with Magnetic Excitations of the Multiferroic Ba2CoGe2O7 Oxide Compound. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 057403 (2011)

    2011

  27. [35]

    Jung, J. H. et al. Optical Magnetoelectric Effect in the Polar GaFeO 3 Ferrimagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 037403 (2004)

    2004

  28. [36]

    & Easson, K

    Abrahams, I. & Easson, K. S. Structure of lithium nickel phosphate. Acta Crystallogr. C 49, 925–926 (1993)

    1993

  29. [37]

    & Spaldin, N

    Bhowal, S. & Spaldin, N. A. Revealing hidden magnetoelectric multipoles using Compton scattering. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033185 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    L., Rivera, J.-P

    Vaknin, D., Zarestky, J. L., Rivera, J.-P. & Schmid, H. Commensurate-Incommensurate Magnetic Phase 21 Transition in Magnetoelectric Single Crystal LiNiPO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 207201 (2004)

    2004

  31. [39]

    Li, J. et al. Tweaking the spin-wave dispersion and suppressing the incommensurate phase in LiNiPO 4 by iron substitution. Phys. Rev. B 79, 174435 (2009)

    2009

  32. [40]

    Peedu, L. et al. Spin excitations of magnetoelectric LiNiPO 4 in multiple magnetic phases. Phys. Rev. B 100, 024406 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Aken, B. B. V ., Rivera, J. P., Schmid, H. & Fiebig, M. Anisotropy of Antiferromagnetic 180° Domains in LiCoPO4 and LiNiPO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 157202 (2008)

    2008

  34. [42]

    & Taguchi, Y

    Kocsis, V ., Tokunaga, Y ., Tokura, Y . & Taguchi, Y . Switching of antiferromagnetic states in LiCoPO4 as investigated via the magnetoelectric effect. Phys. Rev. B 104, 054426 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Liu, T.-M. et al. Nanoscale Confinement of All-Optical Magnetic Switching in TbFeCo - Competition with Nanoscale Heterogeneity. Nano Lett. 15, 6862–6868 (2015)

    2015

  36. [44]

    Stipe, B. C. et al. Magnetic recording at 1.5 Pb m−2 using an integrated plasmonic antenna. Nat. Photonics 4, 484–488 (2010)

    2010

  37. [45]

    & Onose, Y

    Iguchi, Y ., Nii, Y . & Onose, Y . Magnetoelectrical control of nonreciprocal microwave response in a multiferroic helimagnet. Nat. Commun. 8, 15252 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    Yokosuk, M. O. et al. Nonreciprocal directional dichroism of a chiral magnet in the visible range. Npj Quantum Mater. 5, 20 (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    Kubota, M. et al. X-Ray Directional Dichroism of a Polar Ferrimagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 137401 22 (2004)

    2004

  40. [48]

    Fishman, R. S. et al. Spin-induced polarizations and nonreciprocal directional dichroism of the room - temperature multiferroic BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. B 92, 094422 (2015)

    2015

  41. [49]

    Baker, P. J. et al. Probing magnetic order in LiMPO 4 ( M = Ni, Co, Fe) and lithium diffusion in Li x FePO 4. Phys. Rev. B 84, 174403 (2011). 23 Acknowledgments S. T. is supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from JSPS, Japan (Grant No. JP18K14154 and JP20H01867). A...

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.