pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.05898 · v7 · pith:PE2KXY27new · submitted 2024-10-08 · 📊 stat.ML · cs.LG

Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusion

classification 📊 stat.ML cs.LG
keywords manifolddiffusiongenerativegapsmodelsphasespectraldifferent
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper, we investigate the latent geometry of generative diffusion models under the manifold hypothesis. For this purpose, we analyze the spectrum of eigenvalues (and singular values) of the Jacobian of the score function, whose discontinuities (gaps) reveal the presence and dimensionality of distinct sub-manifolds. Using a statistical physics approach, we derive the spectral distributions and formulas for the spectral gaps under several distributional assumptions, and we compare these theoretical predictions with the spectra estimated from trained networks. Our analysis reveals the existence of three distinct qualitative phases during the generative process: a trivial phase; a manifold coverage phase where the diffusion process fits the distribution internal to the manifold; a consolidation phase where the score becomes orthogonal to the manifold and all particles are projected on the support of the data. This `division of labor' between different timescales provides an elegant explanation of why generative diffusion models are not affected by the manifold overfitting phenomenon that plagues likelihood-based models, since the internal distribution and the manifold geometry are produced at different time points during generation.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Diffusion Models Memorize in Training -- and Generalize in Inference

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Diffusion models overfit denoising loss at intermediate noise but generalize in inference as model error smooths the flow field and sampling paths avoid memorized noisy training data.