Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Limitations of optimization algorithms on noisy quantum devices

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.05532 v1 pith:PEC7QND5 submitted 2020-09-11 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumproblemsclassicalnoiseoptimizationdevicesstatealgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent technological developments have focused the interest of the quantum computing community on investigating how near-term devices could outperform classical computers for practical applications. A central question that remains open is whether their noise can be overcome or it fundamentally restricts any potential quantum advantage. We present a transparent way of comparing classical algorithms to quantum ones running on near-term quantum devices for a large family of problems that include optimization problems and approximations to the ground state energy of Hamiltonians. Our approach is based on the combination of entropic inequalities that determine how fast the quantum computation state converges to the fixed point of the noise model, together with established classical methods of Gibbs state sampling. The approach is extremely versatile and allows for its application to a large variety of problems, noise models and quantum computing architectures. We use our result to provide estimates for a variety of problems and architectures that have been the focus of recent experiments, such as quantum annealers, variational quantum eigensolvers, and quantum approximate optimization. The bounds we obtain indicate that substantial quantum advantages are unlikely for classical optimization unless the current noise rates are decreased by orders of magnitude or the topology of the problem matches that of the device. This is the case even if the number of qubits increases substantially. We reach similar but less stringent conclusions for quantum Hamiltonian problems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum-informed surrogate sampling for combinatorial optimization

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    QISS classically samples a pairwise model built from O(N) low-weight QAOA correlators and outperforms standard QAOA at larger depths on MaxCut and MIS benchmarks.

  2. QUBO-based training for VQAs on Quantum Annealers

    quant-ph 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A QUBO-based annealer training scheme with recursive refinement is tested on Iris, Heart Disease, and Diabetes, but the QUBO derivation has a critical gap.

Pith tools