Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Unwritten Contract of Cloud-based Elastic Solid-State Drives

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.17372 v1 pith:PFRSDTLF submitted 2025-08-24 cs.PF cs.ET

classification cs.PFcs.ET
keywords cloudstorageelasticessdessdsperformanceuserscloud-based
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Elastic block storage (EBS) with the storage-compute disaggregated architecture stands as a pivotal piece in today's cloud. EBS furnishes users with storage capabilities through the elastic solid-state drive (ESSD). Nevertheless, despite the widespread integration into cloud services, the absence of a thorough ESSD performance characterization raises critical doubt: when more and more services are shifted onto the cloud, can ESSD satisfactorily substitute the storage responsibilities of the local SSD and offer comparable performance? In this paper, we for the first time target this question by characterizing two ESSDs from Amazon AWS and Alibaba Cloud. We present an unwritten contract of cloud-based ESSDs, encapsulating four observations and five implications for cloud storage users. Specifically, the observations are counter-intuitive and contrary to the conventional perceptions of what one would expect from the local SSD. The implications we hope could guide users in revisiting the designs of their deployed cloud software, i.e., harnessing the distinct characteristics of ESSDs for better system performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools