Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 41 references

3D Deep-learning-based Segmentation of Human Skin Sweat Glands and Their 3D Morphological Response to Temperature Variations

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Human eccrine sweat glands measurably change their 3D shape with skin temperature: smaller at 10°C and larger at 43°C in OCT scans.

desk verdict The segmentation pipeline is credible and the temperature-response observation is genuinely new, but the paper's central physiological claim currently rests on unvalidated segmentation at 10°C and 43°C and on pseudo-replicated statistics. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.17255 v1 pith:PHH7FU6U submitted 2025-04-24 eess.IV cs.AIphysics.optics

Shaoyu Pei , Renxiong Wu , Hao Zheng , Lang Qin , Shuaichen Lin , Yuxing Gan , Wenjing Huang , Zhixuan Wang
show 3 more authors
Mohan Qin Yong Liu Guangming Ni
This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.IVcs.AIphysics.optics
keywords opticalcoherencetomographysweatglandsegmentation3Ddeeplearningtemperatureresponseskinthermoregulationtransformermorphometricanalysiseccrineglands
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that human eccrine sweat glands change their three-dimensional shape measurably when skin temperature changes, and that this change can be seen live and non-invasively with optical coherence tomography (OCT). The authors build a transformer-based 3D segmentation network that isolates coiled sweat glands from OCT skin volumes, then apply it to scans of the same skin regions at 10°C, 33°C, and 43°C. They report that gland volume, surface area, and length increase significantly with temperature (for example, volume rises from $2.5776\pm 0.4617$ to $3.6605\pm 0.5395$ ($\times10^{-4}\,\mathrm{mm}^3$)), while the surface-to-volume ratio falls. A sympathetic reader would care because, if true, this makes sweat-gland 3D morphology a real-time, non-invasive readout of thermoregulatory state and a quantitative benchmark for studying dermatological conditions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the segmentation network itself: a 3D transformer-based encoder-decoder that processes OCT volumes with a sliding window, uses shifted-window self-attention for long-range context, and adds a channel-attention block at skip connections and dynamic large-kernel and feature-fusion blocks in the deep decoder layers. It produces the binary masks of coiled eccrine glands from which volume, surface area, length, and surface-to-volume ratio are computed. The temperature-response claim rides entirely on this mask quality being unbiased across 10°C, 33°C, and 43°C images.

What would settle it

Re-run the temperature protocol with manual annotations or an independent high-resolution imaging modality on the same physical glands across sessions, with explicit 3D registration. If the volume and length differences between 10°C and 43°C disappear, or if they track segmentation-artifact proxies such as contrast or false-positive mask volume rather than true gland boundaries, then the morphological-response claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that short-term temperature variation changes the 3D morphology of human eccrine sweat glands in a statistically significant, directionally consistent way. The segmentation model, evaluated by 4-fold cross-validation, reaches a Dice coefficient of $0.8925\pm0.0355$, exceeding the compared 3D baselines, and produces masks whose volume and surface-area measurements agree with manual annotations in Bland-Altman analysis. Applied to 180 sweat-gland samples at three temperatures, the model reports that at 10°C glands are constricted (volume $2.5776\pm0.4617\times10^{-4}\,\mathrm{mm}^3$), at 33°C intermediate ($3.2046\pm0.4034$), and at 43°C dilated ($3.6605\pm0.5395$); surface area and length follow the same ordering, and the surface-to-volume ratio decreases. The authors interpret this as a morphological adaptation favoring sweating efficiency at high temperature and metabolic exchange at low temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the segmentation network, trained on OCT volumes collected without controlled temperature variation, segments glands just as accurately in scans taken at 10°C, 33°C, and 43°C, so the reported group differences are biological shape changes rather than temperature-dependent segmentation artifacts; the paper does not report a separate validation of segmentation accuracy on the temperature-conditioned images or a registration step proving the same physical glands are compared across sessions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Gland morphometry becomes a real-time, non-invasive readout of thermoregulatory state rather than a biopsy-only assessment.
  • The reported parameter ranges give a quantitative baseline for normal glands, letting pathological states such as bromhidrosis and hypohidrosis be compared numerically.
  • OCT-based fingerprint and sweat-pore systems will need to control for skin temperature, because gland size affects the 3D pore and ridge geometry.
  • The surface-to-volume trend provides a concrete quantitative target for models of sweat gland function under thermal stress.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Separating the gland lumen from the glandular wall in the 3D masks would attribute the observed volume increase to lumen dilation rather than tissue expansion; the paper's masks do not distinguish the two.
  • Repeated temperature cycles (for example 33°C to 43°C and back) with explicit gland registration could reveal whether the morphological change is fully reversible or shows hysteresis.
  • Applying the same protocol to pathological glands, such as those in bromhidrosis, could turn the method into a diagnostic or treatment-monitoring tool.
  • Adding more temperature levels would test whether the volume response is monotonic or saturating, linking gland geometry to thermoregulatory dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 3D transformer-based deep-learning framework for segmenting human skin sweat glands in optical coherence tomography (OCT) volumes, using a Swin-UNETR backbone with added ECA channel attention, DLK and DFF blocks in the decoder, and a hybrid BCE-Dice loss. The authors report strong segmentation performance in 4-fold cross-validation (Dice 0.8925, IoU 0.8062) and compare favorably with several state-of-the-art 3D segmentation methods. The main novelty claimed is the application of the trained model to OCT images acquired at 10°C, 33°C, and 43°C, reporting statistically significant changes in sweat gland volume, surface area, length, and surface-to-volume ratio, interpreted as a 3D morphological response to temperature. The paper concludes that the method enables real-time, non-invasive quantification of sweat gland morphology and could serve as a clinical tool for thermoregulation studies and dermatological diagnosis.

Significance. If the temperature-response results are valid, this work would provide the first non-invasive, quantitative 3D characterization of sweat gland morphological adaptation to thermal stimuli, with potential value for studying thermoregulatory disorders and for clinical OCT-based skin assessment. The segmentation contribution is competently evaluated: the authors use a standard cross-validation protocol, compare against multiple baselines, provide Bland-Altman agreement analysis for volume and surface area, and release a public data link. However, the central temperature claim rests on two unvalidated assumptions: that the segmentation model remains unbiased across temperature conditions, and that the same physical glands are compared across sessions. These assumptions are not tested in the manuscript, and the statistical analysis further inflates significance by treating glands within the same subjects as independent. The segmentation results alone are solid, but the headline finding of temperature-dependent morphology is not yet supported at the same standard.

major comments (3)
  1. [§IV-D (Temperature study)] The segmentation model trained on twelve OCT volumes acquired without controlled temperature variation is applied directly to OCT volumes collected at 10°C, 33°C, and 43°C, but no validation of segmentation accuracy on these temperature-condition images is reported. Temperature changes can alter OCT image contrast, speckle statistics, tissue motion, and gland lumen appearance, potentially causing systematic under- or over-segmentation that varies with temperature. Since every morphological metric in Table II is derived from model predictions, the temperature comparison is only valid under the untested assumption that segmentation bias is temperature-invariant. Please provide manual annotation of a subset of temperature-condition volumes and report segmentation Dice/IoU per temperature, or otherwise demonstrate that the model's performance does not systematically differ across conditions.
  2. [§IV-D (Same-gland matching)] The text states that OCT images of 'the same skin region' were acquired and that quantitative analyses were performed on 'the same glands' across conditions, but no registration or gland-matching procedure is described. Without a demonstrable spatial correspondence of individual glands between the 10°C, 33°C, and 43°C sessions, the reported differences could simply reflect comparing different gland populations sampled at each temperature. Please describe the co-registration method (e.g., landmark-based alignment, B-scan matching, or 3D volume registration) and how individual glands were traced across sessions, or alternatively present an analysis that explicitly accounts for gland identity, such as paired comparisons on matched glands.
  3. [Table II and §IV-D (Statistical analysis)] The statistical analysis reports p-values computed from 60 samples per temperature condition, but the data are nested: the 180 samples come from only five subjects, so multiple glands within a subject are not independent observations. Treating them as independent is a form of pseudo-replication that inflates significance; for example, the reported p = 2.56e-7 for volume would not survive a proper mixed-effects analysis with subject as a random effect. Please re-analyze the data using a linear mixed model or summarize at the subject level (n = 5 per condition), and report the adjusted p-values. The current Table II header (n=5) is also inconsistent with the text's '60 samples per condition'; clarify the exact structure of the data and what the reported statistics are computed over.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (1) and §II-D] The hybrid loss weights (α = 0.9, β = 0.1) are stated without justification or sensitivity analysis; a small ablation study over these weights would strengthen the claim that the chosen balance is appropriate for the class-imbalance problem.
  2. [Table II] The table header reports n=5 for each temperature condition, while the text reports 60 samples per condition; please clarify whether n refers to subjects and how the 60 gland samples are distributed across subjects and sessions, and specify the unit of analysis for the p-values.
  3. [Fig. 9 and §IV-D] The figure caption mentions the Kruskal-Wallis test, but the text does not state which statistical test produced the p-values in Table II; specify the test used for pairwise comparisons and whether any multiple-comparison correction was applied.
  4. [§IV-B] The external testing section presents two datasets without quantitative evaluation (e.g., Dice or IoU) because no manual ground truth is reported; state this limitation explicitly or provide qualitative-quantitative metrics if any annotations exist.
  5. [Data availability] The data link is a Tianchi notebook URL without a persistent identifier; consider depositing the dataset in a permanent repository (e.g., Zenodo) to ensure long-term accessibility and reproducibility.
  6. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase 'for the first time' is used twice; given the prior OCT-based sweat gland segmentation works cited (e.g., refs [14-16]), the claim should be hedged and the specific novelty (quantitative temperature-response measurement) stated more precisely to avoid overclaiming.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the segmentation validation is independent, and the temperature-response morphology metrics are new measurements, not fitted outputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs. The 3D segmentation model is trained on manually annotated OCT volumes (Section III-A) and independently validated with 4-fold cross-validation, Bland-Altman analysis, and correlation against manual annotations (Section IV-A), giving external evidence of segmentation accuracy. The morphological parameters in Table II (volume, surface area, length, S/V ratio) are computed directly from segmentation masks using standard geometric definitions, and the temperature comparisons in Section IV-D are new measurements on OCT volumes acquired at 10°C, 33°C, and 43°C. No parameter is fitted to the temperature data; the only hand-set values are fixed loss weights (alpha=0.9, beta=0.1) and ordinary network hyperparameters, none of which encode the temperature result. The self-citations that appear, such as the GT-OCT enhancement method [39], are used as a preprocessing tool for improving training-image quality and as background references; they are independent prior results and are not used to justify the central morphological-response claim. The possible lack of validation of segmentation accuracy on the temperature-condition images and the absence of a described registration step are validity risks about whether the observed differences are biological rather than artifacts, but they are not circularity: the reported differences are not equivalent by construction to any fitted variable or to a self-cited theorem.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on three domain assumptions: annotation validity, enhancement neutrality, and cross-temperature segmentation generalization. The only hand-set free parameters are the loss weights and subblock size, neither of which is fitted to force the temperature result. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Loss balance weights = α=0.9, β=0.1
    Set by hand in Section II-D to balance BCE and Dice losses for class imbalance; not tuned to the temperature outcome, but they affect segmentation quality.
  • Subblock size = 288×288×64
    Chosen by hand in Section III-A to fit GPU memory and training budget; affects the context available to the network and therefore segmentation accuracy.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Manual annotations by dermatologists are a valid ground truth for sweat gland structure in OCT volumes.
    The entire evaluation and all derived morphological parameters rest on the correctness of human labeling (Section III-A). Mislabeling would propagate to every morphometric result.
  • domain assumption The tGT-OCT enhancement does not systematically distort sweat gland morphology.
    All training and test volumes are enhanced with tGT-OCT [39] before segmentation (Section III-A); if the enhancement changes gland shape, the quantified morphology would be biased.
  • ad hoc to paper The segmentation model trained at one temperature regime generalizes without bias to OCT volumes acquired at 10°C and 43°C.
    Section IV-D applies the model to temperature-condition images without validating segmentation accuracy on those images. This is load-bearing for the claimed temperature response.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of 3D Deep-learning-based Segmentation of Human Skin Sweat Glands and Their 3D Morphological Response to Temperature Variations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PHH7FU6U

@misc{pith2026250417255,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: 3D Deep-learning-based Segmentation of Human Skin Sweat Glands and Their 3D Morphological Response to Temperature Variations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PHH7FU6U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.17255}
}
read the original abstract

Skin, the primary regulator of heat exchange, relies on sweat glands for thermoregulation. Alterations in sweat gland morphology play a crucial role in various pathological conditions and clinical diagnoses. Current methods for observing sweat gland morphology are limited by their two-dimensional, in vitro, and destructive nature, underscoring the urgent need for real-time, non-invasive, quantifiable technologies. We proposed a novel three-dimensional (3D) transformer-based multi-object segmentation framework, integrating a sliding window approach, joint spatial-channel attention mechanism, and architectural heterogeneity between shallow and deep layers. Our proposed network enables precise 3D sweat gland segmentation from skin volume data captured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). For the first time, subtle variations of sweat gland 3D morphology in response to temperature changes, have been visualized and quantified. Our approach establishes a benchmark for normal sweat gland morphology and provides a real-time, non-invasive tool for quantifying 3D structural parameters. This enables the study of individual variability and pathological changes in sweat gland structure, advancing dermatological research and clinical applications, including thermoregulation and bromhidrosis treatment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Skin barrier function and the microbiome,

    H.-J. Lee and M. Kim, "Skin barrier function and the microbiome," International journal of molecular sciences, vol. 23, no. 21, p. 13071, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    The skin's role in human thermoregulation and comfort,

    E. A. Arens and H. Zhang, "The skin's role in human thermoregulation and comfort," 2006

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    Regional and individual variations in the function of the human eccrine sweat gland,

    K. Sato and R. L. Dobson, "Regional and individual variations in the function of the human eccrine sweat gland," Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 443-449, 1970

    work page 1970

  4. [4]

    Biology of sweat glands and their disorders. I. Normal sweat gland function,

    K. Sato, W. Kang, K. Saga, and K. Sato, "Biology of sweat glands and their disorders. I. Normal sweat gland function," Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 537-563, 1989

    work page 1989

  5. [5]

    Biology of sweat glands and their disorders. II. Disorders of sweat gland function,

    K. Sato, W. Kang, K. Saga, and K. Sato, "Biology of sweat glands and their disorders. II. Disorders of sweat gland function," Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 713-726, 1989

    work page 1989

  6. [6]

    Individual variations in structure and function of human eccrine sweat gland,

    K. Sato and F. Sato, "Individual variations in structure and function of human eccrine sweat gland," American Journal of Physiology -Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 245, no. 2, pp. R203 -R208, 1983

    work page 1983

  7. [7]

    Hyperhidrosis, bromhidrosis, and chromhidrosis: Fold (intertriginous) dermatoses,

    K. Semkova, M. Gergovska, J. Kazandjieva, and N. Tsankov, "Hyperhidrosis, bromhidrosis, and chromhidrosis: Fold (intertriginous) dermatoses," Clinics in Dermatology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 483-491, 2015

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Cause of axillary bromidrosis,

    G.-Y. Mao, S. -L. Yang, and J. -H. Zheng, "Cause of axillary bromidrosis," Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 81e-82e, 2009

    work page 2009

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Disorders of Sw eat Glands,

    J. Berth-Jones and V. M. Tebbs, "Disorders of Sw eat Glands," in Atlas of Dermatology, Dermatopathology and Venereology: Inflammatory Dermatoses, B. Smoller and N. Bagherani Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 295-312

    2022

  2. [10]

    Sweat -gland carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation (SCAND): a clinicopathologic study of 13 cases with genetic analysis,

    K. Goto et al. , "Sweat -gland carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation (SCAND): a clinicopathologic study of 13 cases with genetic analysis," Modern Pathology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 33-43, 2022

    2022

  3. [11]

    Optical coherence tomography in biomedicine,

    G. Ni, Z. Wang, and C. Zhou, "Optical coherence tomography in biomedicine," Biomedical optical imaging: From nanoscopy to tomography, J. Xia and R. Choe Eds.: AIP Publishing LLC, p. 0, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    Use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in aesthetic skin assessment—a short review,

    M. Kislevitz, Y. Akgul, C. Wamsley, J. Hoopman, and J. Kenkel, "Use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in aesthetic skin assessment—a short review," Lasers in surgery and medicine, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 699-704, 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    Sweat glands extraction in optical coherence tomography fingerprints,

    S. Sun and Z. Guo, "Sweat glands extraction in optical coherence tomography fingerprints," in 2017 International Conference on Security, Pattern Analysis, and Cybernetics (SPAC), 2017: IEEE, pp. 579-584

    2017

  6. [14]

    Surface and internal fingerprint reconstruction from optical coherence tomography through convolutional neural network,

    B. Ding et al. , "Surface and internal fingerprint reconstruction from optical coherence tomography through convolutional neural network," IEEE Transactions on Information forensics and security, vol. 16, pp. 685 -700, 2020

    2020

  7. [15]

    Sweat gland extraction from optical coherence tomography using convolutional neural network,

    Y. Zhang, X. Li, H. Wang, R. Wang, P. Chen, and R. Liang, "Sweat gland extraction from optical coherence tomography using convolutional neural network," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 72, pp. 1-16, 2022

    2022

  8. [16]

    End -to-end subcutaneous sweat pore extraction from optical coherence tomography with depth compression network,

    J. Zh ou, H. Wang, H. Sun, Y. Zhang, and P. Chen, "End -to-end subcutaneous sweat pore extraction from optical coherence tomography with depth compression network," Optics and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 186, p. 108760, 2025

    2025

  9. [17]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition,

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, "Deep residual learning for image recognition," in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, pp. 770-778

    2016

  10. [18]

    U -net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,

    O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, "U -net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation," in Medical image computing and computer -assisted intervention –MICCAI 2015: 18th international conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, proceedings, part III 18...

    2015

  11. [19]

    Deeplab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs,

    L.-C. Chen, G. Papandreou, I. Kokkinos, K . Murphy, and A. L. Yuille, "Deeplab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs," IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 834-848, 2017

    2017

  12. [20]

    Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation,

    V. Badrin arayanan, A. Kendall, and R. Cipolla, "Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation," IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 2481-2495, 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    Encoder- decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation,

    L.-C. Chen, Y. Zhu, G. Papandreou, F. Schroff, and H. Adam, "Encoder- decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation," in Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), 2018, pp. 801-818

    2018

  14. [22]

    U -segnet: fully convolutional neural network based automated brain tissue segmentation tool,

    P. Kumar, P. Naga r, C. Arora, and A. Gupta, "U -segnet: fully convolutional neural network based automated brain tissue segmentation tool," in 2018 25th IEEE International conference on image processing (ICIP), 2018: IEEE, pp. 3503-3507

    2018

  15. [23]

    Unet++: A nested u -net architecture for medical image segmentation,

    Z. Zhou, M. M. Rahman Siddiquee, N. Tajbakhsh, and J. Liang, "Unet++: A nested u -net architecture for medical image segmentation," in Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support: 4th International Workshop, DLMIA 2018, and 8th...

    2018

  16. [24]

    Wider or deeper: Revisiting the resnet model for visual recognition ,

    Z. Wu, C. Shen, and A. Van Den Hengel, "Wider or deeper: Revisiting the resnet model for visual recognition ," Pattern recognition, vol. 90, pp. 119-133, 2019

    2019

  17. [25]

    Unet 3+: A full-scale connected unet for medical image segmentation,

    H. Huang et al., "Unet 3+: A full-scale connected unet for medical image segmentation," in ICASSP 2020 -2020 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP) , 2020: IE EE, pp. 1055 - 1059

    2020

  18. [26]

    AM-SegNet for additive manufacturing in situ X-ray image segmentation and feature quantification,

    W. Li et al., "AM-SegNet for additive manufacturing in situ X-ray image segmentation and feature quantification," Virtual and Physical Prototyping, vol. 19, no. 1, p. e2325572, 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, "Attention is all you need," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017

    2017

  20. [28]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,

    A. Dosovitskiy, "An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale," arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020

    2010 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Rethinking semantic segmentation from a sequence-to- sequence perspective with transformers,

    S. Zheng et al., "Rethinking semantic segmentation from a sequence-to- sequence perspective with transformers," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2021, pp. 6881-6890

    2021

  22. [30]

    Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows,

    Z. Liu et al., "Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 10012-10022

    2021

  23. [31]

    Transunet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation,

    J. Chen et al. , "Transunet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation," arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04306, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  24. [32]

    V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation,

    F. Milletari, N. Navab, and S. -A. Ahmadi, "V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation," in 2016 fourth international conference on 3D vision (3DV), 2016: Ieee, pp. 565-571

    2016

  25. [33]

    Swin unetr: Swin transformers for semantic segmentation of brain tumors in mri images,

    A. Hatamizadeh, V. Nath, Y. Tang, D. Yang, H. R . Roth, and D. Xu, "Swin unetr: Swin transformers for semantic segmentation of brain tumors in mri images," in International MICCAI brainlesion workshop, 2021: Springer, pp. 272-284

    2021

  26. [34]

    ECA-Net: Efficient channel attention for deep convolutional neural networks,

    Q. Wang, B. Wu, P. Zhu, P. Li, W. Zuo, and Q. Hu, "ECA-Net: Efficient channel attention for deep convolutional neural networks," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 11534-11542

    2020

  27. [35]

    D-net: Dynamic large kernel with dynamic feature fusion for volumetric medical image segmentation,

    J. Yang, P. Qiu, Y. Zhang, D. S. Marcus, and A. Sotiras, "D-net: Dynamic large kernel with dynamic feature fusion for volumetric medical image segmentation," arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.10674, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Squeeze -and-excitation networks,

    J. Hu, L. Shen, and G. Sun, "Squeeze -and-excitation networks," in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 7132-7141

    2018

  29. [37]

    Goodfellow, Deep learning

    I. Goodfellow, Deep learning. MIT press, 2016

    2016

  30. [38]

    Dice loss for data - imbalanced NLP tasks,

    X. Li, X. Sun, Y. Meng, J. Liang, F. Wu, and J. Li, "Dice loss for data - imbalanced NLP tasks," arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.02855, 2019

    1911 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Toward grou nd-truth optical coherence tomography via three-dimensional unsupervised deep learning processing and data,

    R. Wu et al., "Toward grou nd-truth optical coherence tomography via three-dimensional unsupervised deep learning processing and data," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    Unetr: Transformers for 3d medical image segmentation,

    A. Hatamizadeh et al. , "Unetr: Transformers for 3d medical image segmentation," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, 2022, pp. 574-584

    2022

  33. [41]

    nnU-Net: a self -configuring method for deep learning -based biom edical image segmentation,

    F. Isensee, P. F. Jaeger, S. A. Kohl, J. Petersen, and K. H. Maier -Hein, "nnU-Net: a self -configuring method for deep learning -based biom edical image segmentation," Nature methods, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 203-211, 2021

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.