pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30731 · v1 · pith:PHORANOXnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · ✦ hep-th

Half-BPS Boundaries and the RG-Wall of mathcal{N}=2 SU(N) SYM

Riccardo Comi , Simone Rota This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 01:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords RG-wallhalf-BPS boundariesN=2 SYMT[SU(N)]Seiberg-Wittenhalf-index3d-4d interfacemassive deformation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A massive deformation of the T[SU(N)] theory realizes the RG-wall interface of 4d N=2 SU(N) SYM.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a 3d N=2 SCFT obtained by massive deformation of the T[SU(N)] theory serves as the RG-wall interface for 4d N=2 SU(N) super Yang-Mills, bridging the ultraviolet Lagrangian description to the infrared Seiberg-Witten effective theory. The identical 3d theory also encodes the low-energy behavior of half-BPS Dirichlet boundary conditions applied directly in the 4d Lagrangian. Validation rests on explicit half-index matching together with consistency checks under collisions of multiple interfaces. A reader cares because the construction supplies a concrete 3d microscopic model for an otherwise abstract interpolation between UV and IR regimes in four-dimensional gauge theory.

Core claim

We identify the 3d theory that realizes the RG-wall interface of 4d N=2 SU(N) Super-Yang-Mills, interpolating between the UV Lagrangian and the IR Seiberg-Witten effective description. The same theory also describes the low-energy boundary condition that corresponds to giving half-BPS Dirichlet boundary condition in the Lagrangian description of 4d N=2 SU(N) SYM. The theory is a 3d N=2 SCFT that can be obtained as a massive deformation of the T[SU(N)] theory, which is the S-duality interface of 4d N=4 SU(N) SYM. As the main validating tests, we match half-indices and discuss non-trivial consistency conditions when colliding such interfaces.

What carries the argument

The massive deformation of the T[SU(N)] theory, which functions as both the RG-wall interface and the low-energy half-BPS Dirichlet boundary condition.

If this is right

  • The 3d SCFT interpolates between the UV Lagrangian and the IR Seiberg-Witten description of the 4d theory.
  • It reproduces the low-energy limit of half-BPS Dirichlet boundary conditions in the 4d Lagrangian.
  • Half-index matching confirms the proposed 3d-4d correspondence.
  • Non-trivial consistency conditions are satisfied when multiple RG-wall interfaces collide.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Analogous massive deformations of T[G] theories may realize RG-walls for other 4d N=2 gauge groups or different choices of boundary conditions.
  • The same 3d construction could be used to study domain walls or line defects by varying the deformation parameters.
  • Half-index techniques developed here might yield new computational tools for extracting 4d observables from 3d reductions.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen massive deformation of T[SU(N)] produces precisely the RG-wall interface that interpolates between the UV Lagrangian and IR Seiberg-Witten descriptions, with half-index agreement counting as sufficient confirmation.

What would settle it

A direct half-index computation for any fixed N that fails to agree with the expected value for the RG-wall of 4d N=2 SU(N) SYM would disprove the identification.

read the original abstract

We identify the 3d theory that realizes the RG-wall interface of 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ $SU(N)$ Super-Yang-Mills, interpolating between the UV Lagrangian and the IR Seiberg-Witten effective description. The same theory also describes the low-energy boundary condition that corresponds to giving half-BPS Dirichlet boundary condition in the Lagrangian description of 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ $SU(N)$ SYM. The theory is a 3d $\mathcal{N}=2$ SCFT that can be obtained as a massive deformation of the $T[SU(N)]$ theory, which is the S-duality interface of 4d $\mathcal{N}=4$ $SU(N)$ SYM. As the main validating tests, we match half-indices and discuss non-trivial consistency conditions when colliding such interfaces.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript identifies a specific massive deformation of the T[SU(N)] theory as the 3d N=2 SCFT realizing the RG-wall interface of 4d N=2 SU(N) SYM. This interface is claimed to interpolate between the UV Lagrangian description and the IR Seiberg-Witten effective theory. The same 3d theory is asserted to describe the low-energy boundary condition corresponding to half-BPS Dirichlet boundary conditions in the 4d Lagrangian theory. The primary validating tests presented are matching of half-indices and consistency conditions under collisions of such interfaces.

Significance. If the identification holds, the result supplies an explicit 3d N=2 SCFT description for an important class of interfaces and boundary conditions in 4d N=2 gauge theories, which could enable systematic computations of protected quantities and further analysis of RG flows between Lagrangian and Seiberg-Witten regimes. The reliance on half-index matching leverages a protected observable, but the overall significance is limited by the extent to which this observable uniquely pins down the claimed physical interpretation.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / Introduction] Abstract and introduction: the central claim that the chosen massive deformation of T[SU(N)] realizes the RG-wall (rather than another interface sharing the same protected data) rests on half-index matching plus collision consistency. Because distinct 3d N=2 theories or deformations can produce identical half-indices while differing in moduli spaces or non-protected spectra, this evidence is insufficient to establish the specific UV-to-IR interpolation asserted; an independent check (e.g., explicit matching of the Coulomb branch or relevant operator dimensions) is required for the identification to be load-bearing.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive criticism. We address the major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Introduction] Abstract and introduction: the central claim that the chosen massive deformation of T[SU(N)] realizes the RG-wall (rather than another interface sharing the same protected data) rests on half-index matching plus collision consistency. Because distinct 3d N=2 theories or deformations can produce identical half-indices while differing in moduli spaces or non-protected spectra, this evidence is insufficient to establish the specific UV-to-IR interpolation asserted; an independent check (e.g., explicit matching of the Coulomb branch or relevant operator dimensions) is required for the identification to be load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree that half-index matching, while protected, does not by itself uniquely determine a 3d N=2 theory. Our identification of the specific massive deformation of T[SU(N)] is motivated by its origin as the S-duality interface of the parent N=4 theory and by the requirement that it interpolate between the UV Lagrangian and IR Seiberg-Witten regimes. The collision consistency conditions supply an additional non-trivial constraint. Nevertheless, the referee's point is well taken, and we will strengthen the manuscript by adding an explicit discussion of the Coulomb-branch spectrum (including operator dimensions) of the proposed 3d SCFT and its matching to expectations from the 4d side. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; identification rests on external matching tests

full rationale

The paper proposes identifying a particular massive deformation of the pre-existing T[SU(N)] theory as the RG-wall interface, then validates the proposal via half-index computations and interface-collision consistency conditions. These checks are independent of the identification itself and do not reduce the claimed result to a fit, self-definition, or self-citation chain. No load-bearing step equates a prediction to its own input by construction; the derivation chain remains self-contained against the reported external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the established properties of the T[SU(N)] theory as an S-duality interface and on standard assumptions about massive deformations and half-index computations in supersymmetric theories; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption T[SU(N)] is the S-duality interface of 4d N=4 SU(N) SYM
    The paper starts from this known theory and deforms it; invoked in the abstract description of the construction.
  • domain assumption Half-index matching is a valid test for the identification of the interface theory
    The abstract presents matching half-indices as the main validating test.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5678 in / 1461 out tokens · 40211 ms · 2026-07-01T01:48:19.231865+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 61 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Gaiotto and E

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten,Supersymmetric Boundary Conditions in N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,J. Statist. Phys.135(2009) 789 [0804.2902]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  2. [2]

    Gaiotto and E

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten,S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.13(2009) 721 [0807.3720]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    Hosomichi, S

    K. Hosomichi, S. Lee and J. Park,AGT on the S-duality Wall,JHEP12(2010) 079 [1009.0340]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  4. [4]

    Gaiotto,Domain Walls for Two-Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows,JHEP12 (2012) 103 [1201.0767]

    D. Gaiotto,Domain Walls for Two-Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows,JHEP12 (2012) 103 [1201.0767]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    Dimofte, D

    T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto and R. van der Veen,RG Domain Walls and Hybrid Triangulations, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.19(2015) 137 [1304.6721]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten,Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B426(1994) 19 [hep-th/9407087]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  7. [7]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten,Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD,Nucl. Phys. B431(1994) 484 [hep-th/9408099]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  8. [8]

    Benvenuti, R

    S. Benvenuti, R. Comi, S. Pasquetti, G. Pedde Ungureanu, S. Rota and A. Shri,Planar Abelian Mirror Duals ofN= 2SQCD 3,2411.05620

    arXiv

  9. [9]

    Benvenuti, R

    S. Benvenuti, R. Comi, S. Pasquetti, G. Pedde Ungureanu, S. Rota and A. Shri,A chiral-planar dualization algorithm for 3dN= 2 Chern-Simons-matter theories,JHEP10 (2025) 211 [2505.02913]

    arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    E. Witten,SL(2,Z) action on three-dimensional conformal field theories with Abelian symmetry, inFrom Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics: A Conference in Tribute to Ian Kogan, pp. 1173–1200, 7, 2003 [hep-th/0307041]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  11. [11]

    D. Gang, E. Koh and K. Lee,Superconformal Index with Duality Domain Wall,JHEP10 (2012) 187 [1205.0069]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  12. [12]

    Dimofte, D

    T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto and S. Gukov,3-Manifolds and 3d Indices,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 17(2013) 975 [1112.5179]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  13. [13]

    Cordova, D

    C. Cordova, D. Gaiotto and S.-H. Shao,Infrared Computations of Defect Schur Indices, JHEP11(2016) 106 [1606.08429]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Gaiotto and T

    D. Gaiotto and T. Okazaki,Dualities of Corner Configurations and Supersymmetric Indices, JHEP11(2019) 056 [1902.05175]

    arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Pasquetti,Factorisation of N = 2 Theories on the Squashed 3-Sphere,JHEP04(2012) 120 [1111.6905]

    S. Pasquetti,Factorisation of N = 2 Theories on the Squashed 3-Sphere,JHEP04(2012) 120 [1111.6905]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  16. [16]

    Benini and S

    F. Benini and S. Cremonesi,Partition Functions ofN= (2,2)Gauge Theories on S 2 and Vortices,Commun. Math. Phys.334(2015) 1483 [1206.2356]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    Nieri and S

    F. Nieri and S. Pasquetti,Factorisation and holomorphic blocks in 4d,JHEP11(2015) 155 [1507.00261]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  18. [18]

    Doroud, J

    N. Doroud, J. Gomis, B. Le Floch and S. Lee,Exact Results in D=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories,JHEP05(2013) 093 [1206.2606]. – 93 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  19. [19]

    C. Beem, T. Dimofte and S. Pasquetti,Holomorphic Blocks in Three Dimensions,JHEP12 (2014) 177 [1211.1986]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    Cordova and S.-H

    C. Cordova and S.-H. Shao,Schur Indices, BPS Particles, and Argyres-Douglas Theories, JHEP01(2016) 040 [1506.00265]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    Cecotti, J

    S. Cecotti, J. Song, C. Vafa and W. Yan,Superconformal Index, BPS Monodromy and Chiral Algebras,JHEP11(2017) 013 [1511.01516]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    Kontsevich and Y

    M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman,Stability structures, motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants and cluster transformations,0811.2435

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Gaiotto, G.W

    D. Gaiotto, G.W. Moore and A. Neitzke,Four-dimensional wall-crossing via three-dimensional field theory,Commun. Math. Phys.299(2010) 163 [0807.4723]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  24. [24]

    Dimofte and S

    T. Dimofte and S. Gukov,Refined, Motivic, and Quantum,Lett. Math. Phys.91(2010) 1 [0904.1420]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  25. [25]

    Dimofte, S

    T. Dimofte, S. Gukov and Y. Soibelman,Quantum Wall Crossing in N=2 Gauge Theories, Lett. Math. Phys.95(2011) 1 [0912.1346]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  26. [26]

    Pestun,Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops, Commun

    V. Pestun,Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops, Commun. Math. Phys.313(2012) 71 [0712.2824]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    Gava, K.S

    E. Gava, K.S. Narain, M.N. Muteeb and V.I. Giraldo-Rivera,N= 2gauge theories on the hemisphereHS 4,Nucl. Phys. B920(2017) 256 [1611.04804]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    Gaiotto, G.W

    D. Gaiotto, G.W. Moore and A. Neitzke,Framed BPS States,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.17 (2013) 241 [1006.0146]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  29. [29]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries,JHEP 02(2015) 172 [1412.5148]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    Aharony, N

    O. Aharony, N. Seiberg and Y. Tachikawa,Reading between the lines of four-dimensional gauge theories,JHEP08(2013) 115 [1305.0318]

    arXiv 2013

  31. [31]

    Del Zotto and I

    M. Del Zotto and I. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria,Global structures from the infrared,JHEP11(2023) 058 [2204.06495]

    arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Argyres, M

    P.C. Argyres, M. Martone and M. Ray,Dirac pairings, one-form symmetries and Seiberg-Witten geometries,JHEP09(2022) 020 [2204.09682]

    arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Closset and H

    C. Closset and H. Magureanu,Reading between the rational sections: Global structures of 4d N= 2KK theories,SciPost Phys.16(2024) 137 [2308.10225]

    arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    G˚ arding,Defect groups of classStheories from the Coulomb branch,JHEP01(2025) 148 [2311.16224]

    E.R. G˚ arding,Defect groups of classStheories from the Coulomb branch,JHEP01(2025) 148 [2311.16224]

    arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Arias-Tamargo and M

    G. Arias-Tamargo and M. De Marco,Disconnected gauge groups in the infrared,JHEP06 (2024) 050 [2312.13360]

    arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Le Floch,S-duality wall of SQCD from Toda braiding,JHEP10(2020) 152 [1512.09128]

    B. Le Floch,S-duality wall of SQCD from Toda braiding,JHEP10(2020) 152 [1512.09128]

    arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Garozzo, N

    I. Garozzo, N. Mekareeya and M. Sacchi,Duality walls in the 4dN= 2 SU(N) gauge theory with2Nflavours,JHEP11(2019) 053 [1909.02832]

    arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Bason and R

    D. Bason and R. Valandro,A class of half-BPS boundary conditions forA K−1 circular quivers,2606.03339

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Cecotti, C

    S. Cecotti, C. Cordova and C. Vafa,Braids, Walls, and Mirrors,1110.2115. – 94 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Acharya and C

    B.S. Acharya and C. Vafa,On domain walls of N=1 supersymmetric Yang-Mills in four-dimensions,hep-th/0103011

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Dimofte, D

    T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto and S. Gukov,Gauge Theories Labelled by Three-Manifolds, Commun. Math. Phys.325(2014) 367 [1108.4389]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  42. [42]

    Dimofte, M

    T. Dimofte, M. Gabella and A.B. Goncharov,K-Decompositions and 3d Gauge Theories, JHEP11(2016) 151 [1301.0192]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  43. [43]

    Benvenuti, R

    S. Benvenuti, R. Comi, G. Pedde Ungureanu, S. Rota and A. Shri,Universal Planar Abelian Duals for 3dN= 2Unitary CS-SQCD,2603.08842

    arXiv

  44. [44]

    Benvenuti, V

    S. Benvenuti, V. Cagioni, S. Rota and A. Shri,Universal Planar Abelian Duals for 3dN= 2 Symplectic CS-SQCD,2605.06776

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Hashimoto, P

    A. Hashimoto, P. Ouyang and M. Yamazaki,Boundaries and defects ofN= 4SYM with 4 supercharges. Part II: Brane constructions and 3dN= 2field theories,JHEP10(2014) 108 [1406.5501]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  46. [46]

    Bason,Boundary conditions of four-dimensional N=2 gauge theories, Ph.D

    D. Bason,Boundary conditions of four-dimensional N=2 gauge theories, Ph.D. thesis, Trieste U, 2025

    2025

  47. [47]

    Bason, C

    D. Bason, C. Copetti, L. Di Pietro and Z. Ji,N= 2Super Yang-Mills in AdS 4 and FAdS-maximization,2506.05162

    arXiv

  48. [48]

    Bason, C

    D. Bason, C. Copetti, L. Di Pietro, Z. Ji and S. Komatsu,F-theorem for Quantum Field Theories in Anti-de Sitter Space,2512.18392

    arXiv

  49. [49]

    Erdmenger, Z

    J. Erdmenger, Z. Guralnik and I. Kirsch,Four-dimensional superconformal theories with interacting boundaries or defects,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 025020 [hep-th/0203020]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  50. [50]

    Cordova, T.T

    C. Cordova, T.T. Dumitrescu and K. Intriligator,Multiplets of Superconformal Symmetry in Diverse Dimensions,JHEP03(2019) 163 [1612.00809]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Argyres and M.R

    P.C. Argyres and M.R. Douglas,New phenomena in SU(3) supersymmetric gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B448(1995) 93 [hep-th/9505062]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  52. [52]

    Hanany and E

    A. Hanany and E. Witten,Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and three-dimensional gauge dynamics,Nucl. Phys. B492(1997) 152 [hep-th/9611230]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  53. [53]

    Closset, W

    C. Closset, W. Gu, O. Khlaif, E. Sharpe, H. Zhang and H. Zou,Schubert line defects in 3d GLSMs. Part I. Complete flag manifolds and quantum Grothendieck polynomials,JHEP04 (2026) 074 [2512.19802]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    Closset, W

    C. Closset, W. Gu, O. Khlaif, E. Sharpe, H. Zhang and H. Zou,Schubert line defects in 3d GLSMs. Part II. Partial flag manifolds and parabolic quantum polynomials,JHEP04(2026) 075 [2601.18881]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Argyres and A.E

    P.C. Argyres and A.E. Faraggi,The vacuum structure and spectrum of N=2 supersymmetric SU(n) gauge theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.74(1995) 3931 [hep-th/9411057]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  56. [56]

    Douglas and S.H

    M.R. Douglas and S.H. Shenker,Dynamics of SU(N) supersymmetric gauge theory,Nucl. Phys. B447(1995) 271 [hep-th/9503163]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  57. [57]

    M. Alim, S. Cecotti, C. Cordova, S. Espahbodi, A. Rastogi and C. Vafa,N= 2quantum field theories and their BPS quivers,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.18(2014) 27 [1112.3984]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  58. [58]

    Aharony,IR duality in d = 3 N=2 supersymmetric USp(2N(c)) and U(N(c)) gauge theories,Phys

    O. Aharony,IR duality in d = 3 N=2 supersymmetric USp(2N(c)) and U(N(c)) gauge theories,Phys. Lett. B404(1997) 71 [hep-th/9703215]. – 95 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  59. [59]

    Aharony and D

    O. Aharony and D. Fleischer,IR Dualities in General 3d Supersymmetric SU(N) QCD Theories,JHEP02(2015) 162 [1411.5475]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  60. [60]

    Benini, C

    F. Benini, C. Closset and S. Cremonesi,Comments on 3d Seiberg-like dualities,JHEP10 (2011) 075 [1108.5373]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  61. [61]

    Closset and O

    C. Closset and O. Khlaif,Twisted indices, Bethe ideals and 3dN= 2 infrared dualities, JHEP05(2023) 148 [2301.10753]

    arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Spiridonov and G.S

    V.P. Spiridonov and G.S. Vartanov,Vanishing superconformal indices and the chiral symmetry breaking,JHEP06(2014) 062 [1402.2312]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  63. [63]

    Giacomelli, C

    S. Giacomelli, C. Hwang, F. Marino, S. Pasquetti and M. Sacchi,Probing bad theories with the dualization algorithm. Part I,JHEP04(2024) 008 [2309.05326]

    arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    R. Comi, S. Garavaglia, S. Giacomelli, S. Pasquetti and P. Singh,Breaking bad theories of classS,JHEP05(2026) 075 [2508.21071]

    arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    Kapustin and M.J

    A. Kapustin and M.J. Strassler,On mirror symmetry in three-dimensional Abelian gauge theories,JHEP04(1999) [hep-th/9902033]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  66. [66]

    Benini, Y

    F. Benini, Y. Tachikawa and D. Xie,Mirrors of 3d Sicilian theories,JHEP09(2010) 063 [1007.0992]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  67. [67]

    Bottini, C

    L.E. Bottini, C. Hwang, S. Pasquetti and M. Sacchi,4d S-duality wall and SL(2,Z) relations,JHEP03(2022) 035 [2110.08001]

    arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    Hwang, S

    C. Hwang, S. Pasquetti and M. Sacchi,Rethinking mirror symmetry as a local duality on fields,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) [2110.11362]

    arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    R. Comi, C. Hwang, F. Marino, S. Pasquetti and M. Sacchi,The SL(2,Z) dualization algorithm at work,JHEP06(2023) 119 [2212.10571]

    arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Giveon and D

    A. Giveon and D. Kutasov,Seiberg Duality in Chern-Simons Theory,Nucl. Phys. B812 (2009) 1 [0808.0360]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  71. [71]

    Okazaki,Mirror symmetry of 3DN= 4gauge theories and supersymmetric indices,Phys

    T. Okazaki,Mirror symmetry of 3DN= 4gauge theories and supersymmetric indices,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 066031 [1905.04608]

    arXiv 2019

  72. [72]

    Hatsuda and T

    Y. Hatsuda and T. Okazaki,S-duality of boundary lines inN= 4 SYM theories and supersymmetric indices,JHEP08(2025) 127 [2505.14962]

    arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Hatsuda and T

    Y. Hatsuda and T. Okazaki,Interface line operators inN= 4SYM theories and supersymmetric indices,JHEP02(2026) 104 [2510.25168]

    arXiv 2026

  74. [74]

    Hatsuda and T

    Y. Hatsuda and T. Okazaki,Quarter-indices for basic ortho-symplectic corners,2604.26418

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [75]

    Imamura and S

    Y. Imamura and S. Yokoyama,Index for three dimensional superconformal field theories with general R-charge assignments,JHEP04(2011) 007 [1101.0557]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  76. [76]

    Kapustin and B

    A. Kapustin and B. Willett,Generalized Superconformal Index for Three Dimensional Field Theories,1106.2484

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [77]

    Gadde, L

    A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S.S. Razamat and W. Yan,Gauge Theories and Macdonald Polynomials,Commun. Math. Phys.319(2013) 147 [1110.3740]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  78. [78]

    Kinney, J.M

    J. Kinney, J.M. Maldacena, S. Minwalla and S. Raju,An Index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories,Commun. Math. Phys.275(2007) 209 [hep-th/0510251]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  79. [79]

    Romelsberger,Calculating the Superconformal Index and Seiberg Duality,0707.3702

    C. Romelsberger,Calculating the Superconformal Index and Seiberg Duality,0707.3702. – 96 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [80]

    M. Alim, S. Cecotti, C. Cordova, S. Espahbodi, A. Rastogi and C. Vafa,BPS Quivers and Spectra of Complete N=2 Quantum Field Theories,Commun. Math. Phys.323(2013) 1185 [1109.4941]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

Showing first 80 references.