The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2208.14558 · v2 · pith:PI4XQEZM · submitted 2022-08-30 · cs.CV

Augraphy: A Data Augmentation Library for Document Images

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:PI4XQEZMrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CV
keywords datadocumentaugmentationaugraphyimageimageslibraryproduce
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper introduces Augraphy, a Python library for constructing data augmentation pipelines which produce distortions commonly seen in real-world document image datasets. Augraphy stands apart from other data augmentation tools by providing many different strategies to produce augmented versions of clean document images that appear as if they have been altered by standard office operations, such as printing, scanning, and faxing through old or dirty machines, degradation of ink over time, and handwritten markings. This paper discusses the Augraphy tool, and shows how it can be used both as a data augmentation tool for producing diverse training data for tasks such as document denoising, and also for generating challenging test data to evaluate model robustness on document image modeling tasks.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GlotOCR Bench: OCR Models Still Struggle Beyond a Handful of Unicode Scripts

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GlotOCR Bench shows that OCR models perform well on fewer than 10 scripts and fail to generalize beyond about 30, with results tracking pretraining coverage and models hallucinating from known scripts on unfamiliar ones.

  2. Transcoda: End-to-End Zero-Shot Optical Music Recognition via Data-Centric Synthetic Training

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Transcoda achieves state-of-the-art zero-shot OMR with an 18.46% OMR-NED error rate on synthetic scores and 63.97% on historical Polish scans using a 59M model trained in 6 hours via synthetic data, kern normalization...