pith. sign in

arxiv: 2202.04805 · v2 · pith:PICBPEJXnew · submitted 2022-02-10 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.DC· cs.NE

Understanding Hyperdimensional Computing for Parallel Single-Pass Learning

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.DCcs.NE
keywords limitsbinarygroupvectorsvsasanalysisclasscomputing
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Hyperdimensional computing (HDC) is an emerging learning paradigm that computes with high dimensional binary vectors. It is attractive because of its energy efficiency and low latency, especially on emerging hardware -- but HDC suffers from low model accuracy, with little theoretical understanding of what limits its performance. We propose a new theoretical analysis of the limits of HDC via a consideration of what similarity matrices can be "expressed" by binary vectors, and we show how the limits of HDC can be approached using random Fourier features (RFF). We extend our analysis to the more general class of vector symbolic architectures (VSA), which compute with high-dimensional vectors (hypervectors) that are not necessarily binary. We propose a new class of VSAs, finite group VSAs, which surpass the limits of HDC. Using representation theory, we characterize which similarity matrices can be "expressed" by finite group VSA hypervectors, and we show how these VSAs can be constructed. Experimental results show that our RFF method and group VSA can both outperform the state-of-the-art HDC model by up to 7.6\% while maintaining hardware efficiency.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Efficient and Accurate Graph Classification with Hyperdimensional Computing on FPGA

    cs.AR 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0

    HyperX is the first end-to-end FPGA accelerator for Nyström-based HDC graph classification, delivering 6.85× speedup and 169× energy efficiency over CPU baselines plus 3.4% average accuracy gain on TUDataset benchmarks.