Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Chain-of-Action: Faithful and Multimodal Question Answering through Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.17359 v2 pith:PIDIHPJD submitted 2024-03-26 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords actionschain-of-actioninformationmultimodalproposequestionreal-timereasoning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a Chain-of-Action (CoA) framework for multimodal and retrieval-augmented Question-Answering (QA). Compared to the literature, CoA overcomes two major challenges of current QA applications: (i) unfaithful hallucination that is inconsistent with real-time or domain facts and (ii) weak reasoning performance over compositional information. Our key contribution is a novel reasoning-retrieval mechanism that decomposes a complex question into a reasoning chain via systematic prompting and pre-designed actions. Methodologically, we propose three types of domain-adaptable `Plug-and-Play' actions for retrieving real-time information from heterogeneous sources. We also propose a multi-reference faith score (MRFS) to verify and resolve conflicts in the answers. Empirically, we exploit both public benchmarks and a Web3 case study to demonstrate the capability of CoA over other methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evo-MARL: Co-Evolutionary Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Internalized Safety

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Evo-MARL jointly trains all task agents with GRPO and an evolutionary attack pool, lowering jailbreak success rates by up to 21 points and modestly raising task accuracy.

  2. FairReason: Balancing Reasoning and Social Bias in MLLMs

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 1:4 debias-to-reasoning training mix under GRPO reinforcement learning yields the best bias-reasoning trade-off in small MLLMs, cutting measured stereotype scores by about 10% while retaining about 88% of reasoning ...

  3. FinRobot: Generative Business Process AI Agents for Enterprise Resource Planning in Finance

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A generative multi-agent framework for ERP dynamically orchestrates financial workflows and claims 40% time and 94% error reductions in two bank case studies, with limited public evidence.

Pith tools