REVIEW 4 cited by
Observational constraints on noncold dark matter and phenomenological emergent dark energy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
It is well known that there are several long-standing problems implying the discordance of the $\Lambda$CDM model. Although most of the models proposed to resolve these problems assume that dark matter is pressureless, it is still possible that dark matter is not cold, as current observations have not ruled out this possibility yet. Therefore, in this article, we treat the dark matter equation of state parameter as a free parameter, and apply observational data to investigate the non-coldness of dark matter. Impressing by the simplicity of the phenomenological emergent dark energy (PEDE) and its ability to relieve the Hubble tension, we propose the PEDE+$w_{\rm dm}$ model based on PEDE and non-cold dark matter. We then place constraints on this model in light of the Planck 2018 Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropies, baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements, and the Pantheon compilation of Type Ia supernovae. The results indicate a preference for a negative dark matter equation of state parameter at $95\%$ CL for all data sets except CMB alone and CMB+BAO, which suggests that the non-coldness assumption of dark matter worth to be investigated further in order to understand the nature of dark matter. The Hubble tension is alleviated in this scenario compared to the $\Lambda$CDM model, with a significance below 3$\sigma$ level for all data sets except CMB+Pantheon. However, from the analysis based on Bayesian evidence, we clearly see that the data sets favor $\Lambda$CDM over the PEDE+$w_{\rm dm}$ model.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Is Dark Matter Really Matter?
Using DESI DR2, DES supernovae, and two CMB likelihoods, the authors find wDM about 0.001 and wDE about -0.94 when varied jointly, a roughly 2-sigma joint preference away from Lambda-CDM, with a non-phantom Pade-w plu...
-
Accelerating scaling solutions from dark matter particle creation
Accelerating scaling attractors without dark energy appear only when the interaction is controlled by DM density and energy flows from DM to a barotropic fluid.
-
Exploring non-cold dark matter in a scenario of dynamical dark energy with DESI DR2 data
Using DESI DR2, Planck, and supernova data, a nonzero dark matter equation of state is preferred at 2.8 to 3.3 sigma only when dark energy is assumed to have a constant equation of state.
-
Alleviating the $H_0$ tension through the interacting dark energy model from quantum gravitational field theory in light of DESI DR2
With DESI DR2 BAO plus CMB and a SH0ES prior, the two-parameter eeΛCDM model gives δΛ=-0.41±0.14 and H0=71.9±1.0, easing the Hubble tension to 0.8σ, but SN datasets erase the signal.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.