Pith. sign in

REVIEW

An equivalent formulation of chromatic quasi-polynomials

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1803.08649 v1 pith:PINGQ6Y7 submitted 2018-03-23 math.CO

An equivalent formulation of chromatic quasi-polynomials

classification math.CO
keywords arrangementquasi-polynomialchromaticmathbbquasi-polynomialscardinalitychen-wangcomplement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Given a central integral arrangement, the reduction of the arrangement modulo positive integers $q$ gives rise to a subgroup arrangement in $(\mathbb{Z}/q\mathbb{Z})^\ell$. Kamiya-Takemura-Terao (2008) introduced the notion of characteristic quasi-polynomials, which uses to evaluate the cardinality of the complement of the subgroup arrangement. Chen-Wang (2012) found a similar but more general setting that replacing the integral arrangement by its restriction to a subspace of $\mathbb{R}^\ell$, and evaluating the cardinality of the $q$-reduction complement will also lead to a quasi-polynomial in $q$. On an independent study, Br\"and\'en-Moci (2014) defined the so-called chromatic quasi-polynomial, and initiated the study of $q$-colorings on a finite list of elements in a finitely generated abelian group. The main purpose of this paper is to verify that the Chen-Wang's quasi-polynomial and the Br\"and\'en-Moci's chromatic quasi-polynomial are equivalent in the sense that the quasi-polynomials enumerate the cardinalities of isomorphic sets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.