pith. sign in

arxiv: 2107.04649 · v2 · pith:PJSJCOA7new · submitted 2021-07-09 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.ML

Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalization

classification 💻 cs.LG stat.ML
keywords out-of-distributionperformanceclassificationcorrelationsdistributionin-distributionstrongcorrelation
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

For machine learning systems to be reliable, we must understand their performance in unseen, out-of-distribution environments. In this paper, we empirically show that out-of-distribution performance is strongly correlated with in-distribution performance for a wide range of models and distribution shifts. Specifically, we demonstrate strong correlations between in-distribution and out-of-distribution performance on variants of CIFAR-10 & ImageNet, a synthetic pose estimation task derived from YCB objects, satellite imagery classification in FMoW-WILDS, and wildlife classification in iWildCam-WILDS. The strong correlations hold across model architectures, hyperparameters, training set size, and training duration, and are more precise than what is expected from existing domain adaptation theory. To complete the picture, we also investigate cases where the correlation is weaker, for instance some synthetic distribution shifts from CIFAR-10-C and the tissue classification dataset Camelyon17-WILDS. Finally, we provide a candidate theory based on a Gaussian data model that shows how changes in the data covariance arising from distribution shift can affect the observed correlations.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LLMs on the Line: Data Determines Loss-to-Loss Scaling Laws

    cs.LG 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Pretraining data determines loss-to-loss scaling laws in LLMs, while model size, optimization, tokenizer, and architecture have limited impact.