Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LexGPT 0.1: pre-trained GPT-J models with Pile of Law

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.05431 v1 pith:PJU2623X submitted 2023-06-05 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelslegalmanuscriptcodedownstreamlanguagelexgptmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This research aims to build generative language models specialized for the legal domain. The manuscript presents the development of LexGPT models based on GPT-J models and pre-trained with Pile of Law. The foundation model built in this manuscript is the initial step for the development of future applications in the legal domain, such as further training with reinforcement learning from human feedback. Another objective of this manuscript is to assist legal professionals in utilizing language models through the ``No Code'' approach. By fine-tuning models with specialized data and without modifying any source code, legal professionals can create custom language models for downstream tasks with minimum effort and technical knowledge. The downstream task in this manuscript is to turn a LexGPT model into a classifier, although the performance is notably lower than the state-of-the-art result. How to enhance downstream task performance without modifying the model or its source code is a research topic for future exploration.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Comprehensive Framework for Reliable Legal AI: Combining Specialized Expert Systems and Adaptive Refinement

    cs.AI 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a hybrid legal AI architecture and claims large accuracy gains, but it presents no numerical evidence, code, or data to support the claim.

Pith tools