pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.00409 · v1 · pith:PKXRYO4Tnew · submitted 2026-05-29 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · physics.app-ph

Data-Driven Discovery of Unconventional Antiferromagnets

Qirui Cui , Chenxu Liu , Anna Delin , Kaiyou Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 21:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-ph
keywords altermagnetsLuttinger-compensated ferrimagnetscollinear antiferromagnetsspintronicshigh-throughput screeningsymmetry analysismagnetic ground states
0
0 comments X

The pith

A computational screen of 37,000 magnets identifies 36 altermagnets and 11 Luttinger-compensated ferrimagnets, 31 of them previously unknown.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to convert a large structural database into a curated list of compensated magnets that combine zero net magnetization with spin-split bands. It applies physics-informed filters, high-throughput exchange calculations, and Luttinger-Tisza analysis to reduce 37,163 entries to 189 collinear antiferromagnets. Symmetry classification then flags 36 altermagnets and 11 Luttinger-compensated ferrimagnets. The resulting compounds are predicted to host nonrelativistic spin Hall effects and doping-tunable spin transport with switchable polarization.

Core claim

Symmetry analysis of 189 collinear antiferromagnets obtained via prescreening, exchange calculations and Luttinger-Tisza analysis yields 36 altermagnets and 11 Luttinger-compensated ferrimagnets, of which 22 altermagnets and 9 LCFs have not been reported before.

What carries the argument

The end-to-end screening pipeline that narrows a materials database to collinear antiferromagnets and applies symmetry analysis to classify them as altermagnets or Luttinger-compensated ferrimagnets.

If this is right

  • The identified compounds can support nonrelativistic spin Hall effects.
  • Doping can produce switchable spin polarization and giant anisotropy in transport.
  • The same pipeline supplies a scalable route to additional compensated spin-split magnets beyond the current 189.
  • 22 new altermagnets and 9 new LCFs become immediate targets for synthesis and measurement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the same filters to non-collinear or incommensurate structures could enlarge the candidate pool.
  • Machine-learning surrogates for the exchange calculations would reduce computational cost for even larger databases.
  • Device-level modeling of the predicted spin Hall and transport effects would quantify performance gains over conventional antiferromagnets.
  • Cross-checking the new candidates against independent magnetic-structure databases would provide an immediate consistency test.

Load-bearing premise

The combination of physics-informed prescreening, high-throughput exchange calculations, and Luttinger-Tisza analysis correctly resolves the magnetic ground states across the screened portion of the Materials Project database.

What would settle it

Experimental measurement of magnetic order or spin-split bands without net magnetization in any one of the 31 newly predicted compounds would test the classification.

read the original abstract

Unconventional antiferromagnets combine zero net magnetization with spin-split electronic bands, offering a distinct, important platform for spintronics. Their discovery, however, has so far depended largely on case-by-case studies and on a limited number of compounds with experimentally resolved magnetic structures. Here, we overcome these bottlenecks by resolving magnetic ground states across a broad materials database. We narrow down 37163 magnets from the Materials Project to 189 collinear antiferromagnets by combining physics-informed prescreening, high-throughput exchange calculations and Luttinger-Tisza analysis. Among these, symmetry analysis identifies 36 altermagnets and 11 Luttinger-compensated ferrimagnets (LCFs), including 22 altermagnets and 9 LCFs that have not been reported previously. The identified unconventional antiferromagnets can support nonrelativistic spin Hall effects and doping-tunable spin transport with switchable polarization and giant anisotropy. Our framework converts broad structural databases into a curated, symmetry-classified set of experimentally testable compensated spin-split magnets, establishing a scalable route for the efficient discovery of functional antiferromagnets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes a computational workflow that screens the Materials Project database of 37,163 magnets to identify 189 collinear antiferromagnets using physics-informed prescreening, high-throughput exchange calculations, and Luttinger-Tisza analysis. Symmetry analysis then classifies 36 of these as altermagnets and 11 as Luttinger-compensated ferrimagnets (LCFs), with 22 and 9 respectively claimed to be previously unreported. The work positions this as a scalable route for discovering unconventional antiferromagnets suitable for spintronics applications.

Significance. If the pipeline is accurate, the approach offers a systematic, database-driven method to expand the known set of compensated spin-split magnets beyond case-by-case studies, potentially accelerating the identification of materials with nonrelativistic spin Hall effects and tunable spin transport. The provision of a curated list of candidates is a practical contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The reduction from 37,163 to 189 collinear antiferromagnets relies on high-throughput DFT exchange parameters and Luttinger-Tisza ground-state search, yet no benchmarks against experimentally known magnetic structures, no sensitivity tests on U values or functionals, and no error estimates are provided; this directly affects the reliability of the headline counts of 36 altermagnets and 11 LCFs.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The Luttinger-Tisza analysis assumes classical spins and may miss non-collinear minima or biquadratic interactions; without validation on known compounds, it is unclear whether the 189 structures are correctly classified as collinear antiferromagnets.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would benefit from a brief mention of the specific exchange-correlation functional and Hubbard U scheme used in the high-throughput calculations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and outline the revisions we will make to improve the clarity and reliability of our findings.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The reduction from 37,163 to 189 collinear antiferromagnets relies on high-throughput DFT exchange parameters and Luttinger-Tisza ground-state search, yet no benchmarks against experimentally known magnetic structures, no sensitivity tests on U values or functionals, and no error estimates are provided; this directly affects the reliability of the headline counts of 36 altermagnets and 11 LCFs.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of validation for the high-throughput workflow. Our approach builds on established protocols from the Materials Project, where DFT+U parameters are standardized and have been benchmarked in prior literature for magnetic properties. The Luttinger-Tisza method has been applied successfully in several studies to predict collinear antiferromagnetic orders. To strengthen the manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection on methodological validation, including references to experimental agreements in similar systems and a brief sensitivity analysis for a representative subset of compounds. This will provide better context for the reliability of the 189 collinear antiferromagnets identified. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The Luttinger-Tisza analysis assumes classical spins and may miss non-collinear minima or biquadratic interactions; without validation on known compounds, it is unclear whether the 189 structures are correctly classified as collinear antiferromagnets.

    Authors: The focus of our study is on collinear antiferromagnets, for which the classical Luttinger-Tisza approximation is particularly suitable as it efficiently identifies the ground state among collinear configurations. Non-collinear effects and biquadratic terms are beyond the scope of this high-throughput screening but could be investigated in follow-up studies on promising candidates. We will revise the methods section to explicitly state these assumptions and include citations to works validating LT predictions against experiments for known collinear antiferromagnets, thereby supporting the classification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies external database and standard methods

full rationale

The paper narrows 37163 magnets from the external Materials Project database to 189 collinear antiferromagnets via physics-informed prescreening, high-throughput exchange calculations, and Luttinger-Tisza analysis, then applies symmetry analysis to identify 36 altermagnets and 11 LCFs. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations reduce the final counts to inputs by construction. The pipeline is self-contained against the public database and does not rename or smuggle results internally.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review limits visibility into specific parameters or assumptions; the workflow relies on standard domain methods whose accuracy is taken as given.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Luttinger-Tisza analysis and high-throughput exchange calculations correctly identify collinear antiferromagnetic ground states
    Invoked to reduce 37163 magnets to 189 collinear antiferromagnets
  • domain assumption Symmetry analysis correctly classifies altermagnets and LCFs
    Used to obtain the counts of 36 and 11

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5734 in / 1382 out tokens · 24859 ms · 2026-06-28T21:24:52.168327+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Antiferromagnetic Spintronics,

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, “Antiferromagnetic Spintronics,”Nature Nanotechnology11 (2016): 231–241

    2016

  2. [2]

    Antiferromagnetic Spintronics,

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, “Antiferromagnetic Spintronics,”Reviews of Modern Physics90 (2018): 015005

    2018

  3. [3]

    The Multiple Directions of Antiferromagnetic Spintronics,

    T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Manchon, X. Marti, J. Wunderlich, and C. Felser, “The Multiple Directions of Antiferromagnetic Spintronics,”Nature Physics14 (2018): 200–203

    2018

  4. [4]

    Emerging Antiferromagnets for Spintronics,

    H. Chen, L. Liu, X. Zhou, Z. Meng, X. Wang, Z. Duan, G. Zhao, H. Yan, P. Qin, and Z. Liu, “Emerging Antiferromagnets for Spintronics,”Advanced Materials36 (2024): 2310379

    2024

  5. [5]

    Electrical Switching of an Antiferromagnet,

    P. Wadley, B. Howells, J. ˇZelezn´ y, C. Andrews, V. Hills, R. P. Campion, V. Nov´ ak, F. Freimuth, Y. Mokrousov, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, B. L. Gallagher, and T. Jungwirth, “Electrical Switching of an Antiferromagnet,”Science351 (2016): 587–590

    2016

  6. [6]

    Terahertz Electrical Writing Speed in an Antiferromagnetic Memory,

    K. Olejn´ ık, T. Seifert, Z. Kaˇ spar, V. Nov´ ak, P. Wadley, R. P. Campion, M. Baumgartner, P. Gam- bardella, P. Nˇ emec, J. Wunderlich, J. Sinova, M. M¨ uller, T. Kampfrath, and T. Jungwirth, “Terahertz Electrical Writing Speed in an Antiferromagnetic Memory,”Science Advances4 (2018): eaar3566

    2018

  7. [7]

    Room-Temperature Antiferromagnetic Memory Resistor,

    X. Marti, I. Fina, C. Frontera, J. Liu, P. Wadley, Q. He, R. J. Paull, J. D. Clarkson, J. Kudrnovsk´ y, I. Turek, J. Kuneˇ s, D. Yi, J.-H. Chu, C. T. Nelson, L. You, E. Arenholz, S. Salahuddin, J. Fontcuberta, T. Jungwirth, and R. Ramesh, “Room-Temperature Antiferromagnetic Memory Resistor,”Nature Materials13 (2014): 367–374

    2014

  8. [8]

    Electrical Manipulation and Detection of Antiferromagnetism in Magnetic Tunnel Junctions,

    A. Du, D. Zhu, K. Cao, Z. Zhang, Z. Guo, K. Shi, D. Xiong, R. Xiao, W. Cai, J. Yin, S. Lu, C. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. Luo, A. Fert, and W. Zhao, “Electrical Manipulation and Detection of Antiferromagnetism in Magnetic Tunnel Junctions,”Nature Electronics6 (2023): 425–433

    2023

  9. [9]

    Antiferromagnetic Spin Seebeck Effect,

    S. M. Wu, W. Zhang, A. KC, P. Borisov, J. E. Pearson, J. S. Jain, D. Lederman, A. Hoffmann, and A. Bhattacharya, “Antiferromagnetic Spin Seebeck Effect,”Physical Review Letters116 (2016): 097204

    2016

  10. [10]

    Spin Colossal Magnetoresistance in an Antiferromagnetic Insulator,

    Z. Qiu, D. Hou, J. Barker, K. Yamamoto, O. Gomonay, and E. Saitoh, “Spin Colossal Magnetoresistance in an Antiferromagnetic Insulator,”Nature Materials17 (2018): 577–580

    2018

  11. [11]

    Observation of the Antiferromagnetic Spin Hall Effect,

    X. Chen, S. Shi, G. Shi, X. Fan, C. Song, X. Zhou, H. Bai, L. Liao, Y. Zhou, H. Zhang, A. Li, Y. Chen, X. Han, S. Jiang, Z. Zhu, H. Wu, X. Wang, D. Xue, H. Yang, and F. Pan, “Observation of the Antiferromagnetic Spin Hall Effect,”Nature Materials20 (2021): 800–804

    2021

  12. [12]

    Spin Pumping During the Antiferromagnetic–Ferromagnetic Phase Transition of Iron–Rhodium,

    K. Tanaka, T. Moriyama, T. Usami, T. Taniyama, and T. Ono, “Spin Pumping During the Antiferromagnetic–Ferromagnetic Phase Transition of Iron–Rhodium,”Nature Communications11 (2020): 275

    2020

  13. [13]

    Spin-Polarized Antiferromagnets for Spintronics,

    Z. Guo, X. Wang, W. Wang, G. Zhang, X. Zhou, and Z. Cheng, “Spin-Polarized Antiferromagnets for Spintronics,”Advanced Materials37 (2025): 2505779

    2025

  14. [14]

    Symmetry-Enhanced Unconventional Spin Current Anisotropy in a Collinear Antiferromag- net,

    P. Gupta, K. I. A. Khan, A. Kumar, R. Agarwal, N. Kandwal, R. S. Yadav, J. ˚Akerman, and P. K. Muduli, “Symmetry-Enhanced Unconventional Spin Current Anisotropy in a Collinear Antiferromag- net,”Advanced Functional Materials35 (2025): 2506816

    2025

  15. [15]

    Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromag- netism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry,

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, “Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromag- netism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry,”Physical Review X12 (2022): 031042

    2022

  16. [16]

    Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism,

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, “Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism,”Physical Review X12 (2022): 040501

    2022

  17. [17]

    An Anomalous Hall Effect in Altermagnetic Ruthenium Dioxide,

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. ˇSmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, X. Zhang, H. Wu, H. Chen, Z. Meng, L. Liu, Z. Xia, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and Z. Liu, “An Anomalous Hall Effect in Altermagnetic Ruthenium Dioxide,”Nature Electronics5 (2022): 735–743. 18

    2022

  18. [18]

    Observation of Spin Splitting Torque in a Collinear Antiferromagnet RuO 2,

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Feng, Y. Zhou, R. Su, Q. Wang, L. Liao, W. Zhu, X. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, “Observation of Spin Splitting Torque in a Collinear Antiferromagnet RuO 2,”Physical Review Letters128 (2022): 197202

    2022

  19. [19]

    Altermagnetic Lifting of Kramers Spin Degeneracy,

    J. Kremp´ ask´ y, L.ˇSmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl´ ıˇ rov´ a, F. Alarab, P. C. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, W. R. Pudelko, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, A. Birk Hellenes, Z. Jansa, H. Reichlov´ a, Z.ˇSob´ aˇ n, R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, P. Wadley, J. Sinova, D. Kriegner, J. Min´ ar, J. H. Dil, and T. Jungwirth, “Alterma...

    2024

  20. [20]

    Nanoscale Imaging and Control of Altermagnetism in MnTe,

    O. J. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y. Niu, A. Zakharov, S. C. Fromage, C. J. B. Fields, S. L. Heywood, R. B. Cousins, F. Maccherozzi, J. Kremp´ ask´ y, J. H. Dil, D. Kriegner, B. Kir´ aly, R. P. Campion, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, S. S. Dhesi, L. ˇSmejkal, T. Jungwirth, and P. Wadley, “Nanoscale Imaging and Control of Altermagnetism in MnTe,”Nature63...

    2024

  21. [21]

    Direct Observation of Altermagnetic Band Splitting in CrSb Thin Films,

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, T. Denneulin, W. Shi, R. E. Dunin- Borkowski, S. Das, M. Kl¨ aui, J. Sinova, and M. Jourdan, “Direct Observation of Altermagnetic Band Splitting in CrSb Thin Films,”Nature Communications15 (2024): 2116

    2024

  22. [22]

    Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Altermagnetic Spin Splitting in CrSb,

    G. Yang, Z. Li, S. Yang, J. Li, H. Zheng, W. Zhu, Z. Pan, Y. Xu, S. Cao, W. Zhao, A. Jana, J. Zhang, M. Ye, Y. Song, L.-H. Hu, L. Yang, J. Fujii, I. Vobornik, M. Shi, H. Yuan, Y. Zhang, Y. Xu, and Y. Liu, “Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Altermagnetic Spin Splitting in CrSb,”Nature Communications 16 (2025): 1442

    2025

  23. [23]

    Manipulation of the Altermagnetic Order in CrSb via Crystal Symmetry,

    Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, “Manipulation of the Altermagnetic Order in CrSb via Crystal Symmetry,”Nature638 (2025): 645–650

    2025

  24. [24]

    Revealing the Altermagnetism in Hematite via XMCD Imaging and Anomalous Hall Electrical Transport,

    E. Galindez-Ruales, R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, C. Schmitt, S. Das, F. Fuhrmann, A. Ross, E. Golias, A. Akashdeep, L. L¨ unenb¨ urger, E. Baek, W. Yang, L.ˇSmejkal, V. Krishna, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, J. Sinova, A. Rothschild, C.-Y. You, G. Jakob, and M. Kl¨ aui, “Revealing the Altermagnetism in Hematite via XMCD Imaging and Anomalous Hall Electrical Transport,”A...

    2025

  25. [25]

    Altermagnets as a New Class of Functional Materials,

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, “Altermagnets as a New Class of Functional Materials,”Nature Reviews Materials10 (2025): 473–485

    2025

  26. [26]

    Ferroically Ordered Magnetic Octupoles ind-Wave Altermagnets,

    S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, “Ferroically Ordered Magnetic Octupoles ind-Wave Altermagnets,”Phys. Rev. X14 (2024): 011019

    2024

  27. [27]

    Antiferromagnetism in RuO2 asd-Wave Pomeranchuk Instability,

    K.-H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K.-W. Lee, and J. Kuneˇ s, “Antiferromagnetism in RuO2 asd-Wave Pomeranchuk Instability,”Phys. Rev. B99 (2019): 184432

    2019

  28. [28]

    Momentum-Dependent Band Spin Splitting in Semiconducting MnO2: A Density Functional Calculation,

    Y. Noda, K. Ohno, and S. Nakamura, “Momentum-Dependent Band Spin Splitting in Semiconducting MnO2: A Density Functional Calculation,”Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.18 (2016): 13294–13303

    2016

  29. [29]

    Weakly Spin-Dependent Band Structures of Antiferromagnetic Perovskite LaMO3 (M = Cr, Mn, Fe),

    T. Okugawa, K. Ohno, Y. Noda, and S. Nakamura, “Weakly Spin-Dependent Band Structures of Antiferromagnetic Perovskite LaMO3 (M = Cr, Mn, Fe),”J. Phys.: Condens. Matter30 (2018): 075502

    2018

  30. [30]

    Magnetisation Density in MnF 2,

    M. M. R. Costa and P. J. Brown, “Magnetisation Density in MnF 2,”Physica B156 & 157 (1989): 329

    1989

  31. [31]

    Measurement of the Covalent Spin Distribution in Manganous Fluoride Using Polarized Neutrons,

    R. Nathans, H. A. Alperin, S. J. Pickart, and P. J. Brown, “Measurement of the Covalent Spin Distribution in Manganous Fluoride Using Polarized Neutrons,”J. Appl. Phys.34 (1963): 1182–1186

    1963

  32. [32]

    Editorial: Altermagnetism—A New Punch Line of Fundamental Magnetism,

    I. Mazin (on behalf of the PRX Editors), “Editorial: Altermagnetism—A New Punch Line of Fundamental Magnetism,”Physical Review X12 (2022): 040002

    2022

  33. [33]

    Prediction of Unconventional Magnetism in Doped FeSb 2,

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, and L. ˇSmejkal, “Prediction of Unconventional Magnetism in Doped FeSb 2,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118 (2021): e2108924118

    2021

  34. [34]

    Compensated Ferrimagnets with Colossal Spin Splitting in Organic Compounds,

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, “Compensated Ferrimagnets with Colossal Spin Splitting in Organic Compounds,”Physical Review Letters132 (2024): 156502. 19

    2024

  35. [35]

    Robust Altermag- netism and Compensated Ferrimagnetism in MnPX 3-Based (X = S or Se) Heterostructures,

    Y. Liu, Y. Liu, X. Wang, N. Xia, G. Xu, Y. Wang, H. Wang, W. Gao, and J. Zhao, “Robust Altermag- netism and Compensated Ferrimagnetism in MnPX 3-Based (X = S or Se) Heterostructures,”Physical Review Materials9 (2025): 104406

    2025

  36. [36]

    High-Throughput Search for Metallic Altermagnets by Embedded Dynamical Mean Field Theory,

    X. Wan, S. Mandal, Y. Guo, and K. Haule, “High-Throughput Search for Metallic Altermagnets by Embedded Dynamical Mean Field Theory,”Physical Review Letters135 (2025): 106501

    2025

  37. [37]

    Unconventional Magnons in Collinear Magnets Dictated by Spin Space Groups,

    X. Chen, Y. Liu, P. Liu, Y. Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, “Unconventional Magnons in Collinear Magnets Dictated by Spin Space Groups,”Nature640 (2025): 349–354

    2025

  38. [38]

    High-Throughput Quantification of Altermagnetic Band Splitting,

    A. Sufyan, B. Marfoua, J. A. Larsson, E. van Loon, and R. Armiento, “High-Throughput Quantification of Altermagnetic Band Splitting,” arXiv:2509.14729 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    MAGNDATA: Towards a Database of Magnetic Structures. I. The Commensurate Case,

    S. V. Gallego, J. M. Perez-Mato, L. Elcoro, E. S. Tasci, R. M. Hanson, K. Momma, M. I. Aroyo, and G. Madariaga, “MAGNDATA: Towards a Database of Magnetic Structures. I. The Commensurate Case,” Journal of Applied Crystallography49 (2016): 1750–1776

    2016

  40. [40]

    Commentary: The Materials Project: A Materials Genome Approach to Accelerating Materials Innovation,

    A. Jain, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, W. Chen, W. D. Richards, S. Dacek, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, D. Skinner, G. Ceder, and K. A. Persson, “Commentary: The Materials Project: A Materials Genome Approach to Accelerating Materials Innovation,”APL Materials1 (2013): 011002

    2013

  41. [41]

    High-Throughput Prediction of the Ground-State Collinear Magnetic Order of Inorganic Materials Using Density Functional Theory,

    M. K. Horton, J. H. Montoya, M. Liu, and K. A. Persson, “High-Throughput Prediction of the Ground-State Collinear Magnetic Order of Inorganic Materials Using Density Functional Theory,”npj Computational Materials5 (2019): 64

    2019

  42. [42]

    Materials Project Database, Release v2025.09.25,

    Materials Project, “Materials Project Database, Release v2025.09.25,” 2025, https://materialsproject. org

    2025

  43. [43]

    The Thermodynamic Scale of Inorganic Crystalline Metastability,

    W. Sun, S. T. Dacek, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, A. Jain, W. D. Richards, A. C. Gamst, K. A. Persson, and G. Ceder, “The Thermodynamic Scale of Inorganic Crystalline Metastability,”Science Advances 2 (2016): e1600225

    2016

  44. [44]

    Thermodynamic Limit for Synthesis of Metastable Inorganic Materials,

    M. Aykol, S. S. Dwaraknath, W. Sun, and K. A. Persson, “Thermodynamic Limit for Synthesis of Metastable Inorganic Materials,”Science Advances4 (2018): eaaq0148

    2018

  45. [45]

    Accelerated Discovery of New Magnets in the Heusler Alloy Family,

    S. Sanvito, C. Oses, J. Xue, A. Tiwari, M. Zic, T. Archer, P. Tozman, M. Venkatesan, M. Coey, and S. Curtarolo, “Accelerated Discovery of New Magnets in the Heusler Alloy Family,”Science Advances3 (2017): e1602241

    2017

  46. [46]

    High- Throughput and Data-Mining Approach to Predict New Rare-Earth Free Permanent Magnets,

    A. Vishina, O. Yu. Vekilova, T. Bj¨ orkman, A. Bergman, H. C. Herper, and O. Eriksson, “High- Throughput and Data-Mining Approach to Predict New Rare-Earth Free Permanent Magnets,” Physical Review B101 (2020): 094407

    2020

  47. [47]

    Quantitative Theory of Magnetic Interactions in Solids,

    A. Szilva, Y. Kvashnin, E. A. Stepanov, L. Nordstr¨ om, O. Eriksson, A. I. Lichtenstein, and M. I. Katsnelson, “Quantitative Theory of Magnetic Interactions in Solids,”Reviews of Modern Physics95 (2023): 035004

    2023

  48. [48]

    Controllable Properties and Versatile Dynamics of Meron Topological Magnetism in van der Waals Multiferroic CuCrP 2S6,

    Q. Cui, Y. Ge, X. Bai, Y. Sassa, and A. Delin, “Controllable Properties and Versatile Dynamics of Meron Topological Magnetism in van der Waals Multiferroic CuCrP 2S6,”iScience28 (2025): 113291

    2025

  49. [49]

    Theory of Dipole Interaction in Crystals,

    J. M. Luttinger and L. Tisza, “Theory of Dipole Interaction in Crystals,”Physical Review70 (1946): 954–964

    1946

  50. [50]

    Method for Determining Ground-State Spin Configurations,

    D. H. Lyons and T. A. Kaplan, “Method for Determining Ground-State Spin Configurations,”Physical Review120 (1960): 1580–1585

    1960

  51. [51]

    Magnetic Properties of Cobalt and Nickel Dichalcogenide Compounds with Pyrite Structure,

    K. Adachi, K. Sato, and M. Takeda, “Magnetic Properties of Cobalt and Nickel Dichalcogenide Compounds with Pyrite Structure,”Journal of the Physical Society of Japan26 (1969): 631–638

    1969

  52. [52]

    Magnetic Properties of CoS 2 at High Pressure,

    T. Yomo, “Magnetic Properties of CoS 2 at High Pressure,”Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 47 (1979): 1486–1493. 20

    1979

  53. [53]

    Magnetic Structures in the MnSb–CrSb System,

    W. J. Takei, D. E. Cox, and G. Shirane, “Magnetic Structures in the MnSb–CrSb System,”Physical Review129 (1963): 2008–2018

    1963

  54. [54]

    Neutron Diffraction Investigation of the Atomic Moment Orientation in the Antiferromag- netic Compound CrSb,

    A. I. Snow, “Neutron Diffraction Investigation of the Atomic Moment Orientation in the Antiferromag- netic Compound CrSb,”Physical Review85 (1952): 365–369

    1952

  55. [55]

    G-Type Antiferromag- netic BiFeO3 is a Multiferroic g-Wave Altermagnet,

    A. Urru, D. Seleznev, Y. Teng, S. Y. Park, S. E. Reyes-Lillo, and K. M. Rabe, “G-Type Antiferromag- netic BiFeO3 is a Multiferroic g-Wave Altermagnet,”Physical Review B112 (2025): 104411

    2025

  56. [56]

    Anisotropic Magnon Transport in an Antiferromagnetic Trilayer Heterostructure: Is BiFeO3 an Altermagnet?,

    S. Husain, M. Ramesh, Q. Song, S. Prokhorenko, S. K. Ojha, S. N. Panda, X. Li, Y. Nahas, Y. Kumar, P. Gupta, T. Chang, A. J. Jung, R. de Sousa, J. G. Analytis, L. W. Martin, Z. Yao, S.-W. Cheong, L. Bellaiche, M. Bibes, D. G. Schlom, and R. Ramesh, “Anisotropic Magnon Transport in an Antiferromagnetic Trilayer Heterostructure: Is BiFeO3 an Altermagnet?,”a...

    arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    Electric Field Switching of Altermagnetic Spin-Splitting in Multiferroic Skyrmions,

    G. Wang, Y. Li, B. Li, X. Chen, J. Dong, W. Chen, X. Chen, N. Zheng, M. Guo, A. Tong, H. Bai, H. Zhang, Y. Gao, K. Shen, J. Zhu, J. Han, Y. Wei, H. Jiang, X. Zhang, M. Wang, K. Xu, W. Shi, P. Wang, J. Zhang, Q. Liu, C. Song, Q. Liu, X. Xie, and M. Liu, “Electric Field Switching of Altermagnetic Spin-Splitting in Multiferroic Skyrmions,”arXiv:2601.06738(2026)

    arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    Spin-Split Collinear Antiferromagnets: A Large-Scale Ab-Initio Study,

    Y. Guo, H. Liu, O. Janson, I. C. Fulga, J. van den Brink, and J. I. Facio, “Spin-Split Collinear Antiferromagnets: A Large-Scale Ab-Initio Study,”Materials Today Physics32 (2023): 100991

    2023

  59. [59]

    Prediction of Low-Z Collinear and Noncollinear Antiferromagnetic Compounds Having Momentum-Dependent Spin Splitting Even Without Spin-Orbit Coupling,

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, “Prediction of Low-Z Collinear and Noncollinear Antiferromagnetic Compounds Having Momentum-Dependent Spin Splitting Even Without Spin-Orbit Coupling,”Physical Review Materials5 (2021): 014409

    2021

  60. [60]

    Separating Altermagnetic and Ferromagnetic Effects in X-Ray Magnetic Dichroism of Rutile NiF 2,

    A. Hariki, K. Sakurai, and J. Kuneˇ s, “Separating Altermagnetic and Ferromagnetic Effects in X-Ray Magnetic Dichroism of Rutile NiF 2,”npj Quantum Materials10 (2025): 1–6

    2025

  61. [61]

    Nonrelativistic Spin-Splitting Multiferroic Antiferromagnet and Compensated Ferrimagnet with Zero Net Magnetization,

    J. Dong, K. Wu, M. Zhu, F. Zheng, X. Li, and J. Zhang, “Nonrelativistic Spin-Splitting Multiferroic Antiferromagnet and Compensated Ferrimagnet with Zero Net Magnetization,”Physical Review B112 (2025): 024425

    2025

  62. [62]

    Ruddlesden–Popper and Perovskite Phases as a Material Platform for Altermagnetism,

    F. Bernardini, M. Fiebig, and A. Cano, “Ruddlesden–Popper and Perovskite Phases as a Material Platform for Altermagnetism,”J. Appl. Phys.137 (2024): 103903

    2024

  63. [63]

    Metal-Insulator Transitions,

    M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, “Metal-Insulator Transitions,”Rev. Mod. Phys.70 (1998): 1039–1263

    1998

  64. [64]

    Controlling Magnetism in 2D CrI 3 by Electrostatic Doping,

    S. Jiang, L. Li, Z. Wang, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, “Controlling Magnetism in 2D CrI 3 by Electrostatic Doping,”Nat. Nanotechnol.13 (2018): 549–553

    2018

  65. [65]

    Control of Magnetism by Electric Fields,

    F. Matsukura, Y. Tokura, and H. Ohno, “Control of Magnetism by Electric Fields,”Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 (2015): 209–220

    2015

  66. [66]

    New Approach to the Theory of Superexchange Interactions,

    P. W. Anderson, “New Approach to the Theory of Superexchange Interactions,”Phys. Rev.115 (1959): 2–13

    1959

  67. [67]

    Local Spin Density Func- tional Approach to the Theory of Exchange Interactions in Ferromagnetic Metals and Alloys,

    A. I. Liechtenstein, M. I. Katsnelson, V. P. Antropov, and V. A. Gubanov, “Local Spin Density Func- tional Approach to the Theory of Exchange Interactions in Ferromagnetic Metals and Alloys,”J. Magn. Magn. Mater.67 (1987): 65–74

    1987

  68. [68]

    A Thermodynamic Theory of ‘Weak’ Ferromagnetism of Antiferromagnetics,

    I. Dzyaloshinsky, “A Thermodynamic Theory of ‘Weak’ Ferromagnetism of Antiferromagnetics,”J. Phys. Chem. Solids4 (1958): 241–255

    1958

  69. [69]

    Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism,

    T. Moriya, “Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism,”Phys. Rev.120 (1960): 91–98

    1960

  70. [70]

    Magnetic Properties and Energy- Mapping Analysis,

    H. J. Xiang, C. Lee, H.-J. Koo, X.-G. Gong, and M.-H. Whangbo, “Magnetic Properties and Energy- Mapping Analysis,”Dalton Trans.42 (2013): 823–853

    2013

  71. [71]

    QuantumATK: An Integrated Platform of Electronic and Atomic-Scale Modelling Tools,

    S. Smidstrup, T. Markussen, P. Vancraeyveld, J. Wellendorff, J. Schneider, T. Gunst, B. Verstichel, D. Stradi, P. A. Khomyakov, U. G. Vej-Hansen, D. Bahlke, C. Friis, M. Strange, A. Blom, O. Pizarro, M. 21 Brandbyge, and K. Stokbro, “QuantumATK: An Integrated Platform of Electronic and Atomic-Scale Modelling Tools,”Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter32 (...

    2020

  72. [72]

    Implementation of Constrained DFT for Computing Charge Transfer Rates within the Projector Augmented Wave Method,

    M. Melander, E. ¨O. J´ onsson, J. J. Mortensen, T. Vegge, and J. M. Garc´ ıa Lastra, “Implementation of Constrained DFT for Computing Charge Transfer Rates within the Projector Augmented Wave Method,”Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation12 (2016): 5367–5378

    2016

  73. [73]

    Calculations of Molecules, Clusters, and Solids with a Simplified LCAO-DFT-LDA Scheme,

    G. Seifert, D. Porezag, and T. Frauenheim, “Calculations of Molecules, Clusters, and Solids with a Simplified LCAO-DFT-LDA Scheme,”International Journal of Quantum Chemistry58 (1996): 185– 192

    1996

  74. [74]

    Boumal, SIAM J

    N. Boumal, SIAM J. Optim.2016, 26, 2355–2377

    2016

  75. [75]

    Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics for Liquid Metals,

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, “Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics for Liquid Metals,”Physical Review B47 (1993): 558–561

    1993

  76. [76]

    Efficient Iterative Schemes for Ab Initio Total-Energy Calculations Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set,

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, “Efficient Iterative Schemes for Ab Initio Total-Energy Calculations Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set,”Physical Review B54 (1996): 11169–11186

    1996

  77. [77]

    Efficiency of Ab-Initio Total Energy Calculations for Metals and Semiconductors Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set,

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, “Efficiency of Ab-Initio Total Energy Calculations for Metals and Semiconductors Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set,”Computational Materials Science6 (1996): 15–50

    1996

  78. [78]

    An Updated Version of Wannier90: A Tool for Obtaining Maximally-Localised Wannier Functions,

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, “An Updated Version of Wannier90: A Tool for Obtaining Maximally-Localised Wannier Functions,”Computer Physics Communications185 (2014): 2309–2310. 22

    2014