REVIEW 2 cited by
Quantum K theory of Grassmannians, Wilson line operators, and Schur bundles
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We prove a `Whitney' presentation, and a `Coulomb branch' presentation, for the torus equivariant quantum K theory of the Grassmann manifold $\mathrm{Gr}(k;n)$, inspired from physics, and stated in an earlier paper. The first presentation is obtained by quantum deforming the product of the Hirzebruch $\lambda_y$ classes of the tautological bundles. In physics, the $\lambda_y$ classes arise as certain Wilson line operators. The second presentation is obtained from the Coulomb branch equations involving the partial derivatives of a twisted superpotential from supersymmetric gauge theory. This is closest to a presentation obtained by Gorbounov and Korff, utilizing integrable systems techniques. Algebraically, we relate the Coulomb and Whitney presentations utilizing transition matrices from the (equivariant) Grothendieck polynomials to the (equivariant) complete homogeneous symmetric polynomials. Along the way, we calculate K-theoretic Gromov-Witten invariants of wedge powers of the tautological bundles on $\mathrm{Gr}(k;n)$, using the `quantum=classical' statement.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Towards small quantum Chern character
A quantum Chern character ring homomorphism is constructed for projective spaces and incidence varieties, and a new presentation of small quantum K-theory of Milnor hypersurfaces is proved.
-
Quantum K-theory levels in physics and math
Chern-Simons levels and Ruan-Zhang levels are identified as the same twisting of quantum K-theory, with Coulomb branch equations matching difference operator symbols and geometric windows matching mirror triviality.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.