Neural Garment Dynamic Super-Resolution

Jun Li; Meng Zhang

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 5 references

Neural Garment Dynamic Super-Resolution

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single lightweight network upscales low-resolution cloth simulation into detailed, wrinkled garments.

desk verdict Solid, well-written garment super-resolution method with released code; the generalization claims outrun the quantitative evidence, but it deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06285 v1 pith:POGL2JWU submitted 2024-12-09 cs.CV cs.GR

Meng Zhang , Jun Li This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CVcs.GR

keywords garmentsimulationdynamicsuper-resolutionwrinklesynthesisgraphneuralnetworkshyper-networksimplicitfieldsclothanimationgeneralization

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that fine-grained garment wrinkles can be synthesized from cheap, low-resolution cloth simulation by a single lightweight network, turning garment detail enhancement into a dynamic super-resolution problem. The method, GDSR, learns local 'super-resolution features' from coarse mesh dynamics and garment-body contacts, then uses a hyper-network to build a continuous implicit field of wrinkle residuals for each coarse triangle while simultaneously correcting the coarse shape. The authors report that, despite training on only two dance sequences and five outfits with one body shape and fabric, the network generalizes to unseen motions, body shapes, and garment types, and that iterative roll-out prediction keeps long 1500-frame sequences stable. If correct, this would make high-fidelity garment animation practical on smartphones and cut the cost of detailed cloth content.

What carries the argument

The central object is the per-triangle implicit wrinkle field built by a hyper-network: for each coarse mesh triangle, the hyper-network takes the graph-learned super-resolution features at the triangle's three vertices and outputs the weights of a small MLP, whose Gabor-wavelet ('WIRE') activation is chosen to represent high-frequency detail; that MLP maps barycentric coordinates to a wrinkle residual vector. The mesh-graph-net that supplies the features, and the decoder that corrects the coarse shape, are supporting mechanisms that make the field reflect dynamics and garment-body interaction.

What would settle it

Run the released network, without fine-tuning, on a low-resolution simulation of a garment made of a very different fabric (e.g., stiff denim) in an unseen motion, and compare the normal maps of the synthesized high-resolution geometry against a full high-resolution simulation; if the SSIM drops to the level of simple up-sampling from the coarse mesh, the learned mapping does not transfer across materials, which the paper's claims require it to do.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

GDSR reconstructs high-resolution garment geometry from low-resolution simulation by predicting two things at once: a corrected coarse garment shape and a per-triangle residual field that adds high-frequency wrinkles. The super-resolution features come from a mesh graph network operating on the coarse garment vertices, edges, and inter-layer edges, augmented with garment-body interaction vectors. A decoder maps part of these features to vertex displacements that fix the coarse shape, and a hyper-network maps the remaining features to the weights of a small implicit MLP per triangle; evaluating that MLP at barycentric coordinates yields wrinkle residuals that are added to the up-sampled corrected mesh. The architecture's key bet is that these local, topology-agnostic features and continuous fields let the same trained network handle garment types, body shapes, and motions it never saw, while the roll-out loop keeps details temporally coherent.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the assumption that a mapping from low-resolution to high-resolution garment geometry can be learned from a small, homogeneous training set (two dance sequences, five outfits, one body shape, one silk fabric) and still transfers to unseen motions, body shapes, and garment types.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

High-resolution garment animation could run on low-budget devices: simulate a coarse mesh and synthesize details with the 65MB network at about 0.115 s per frame (including coarse simulation), instead of running an expensive fine simulation.
The continuous per-triangle field decouples output resolution from the network, so one trained model can produce geometry at any target mesh density.
Roll-out prediction makes the network usable autoregressively; stretching and shearing energies stay within a small range over 1500 frames, suggesting long sequences do not drift.
The generalization results imply that new garments can be added to a pipeline with only a low-resolution garment simulation and no retraining, as long as the coarse topology semantics match.
Quantitatively, on an unseen motion the method beats the DDE and PhysGraph baselines on normal-map SSIM for three garment types, supporting the claim that it recovers high-frequency detail structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the learned detail function is truly topology-agnostic, the same recipe (graph features plus hyper-network implicit fields) could be applied to other deformable surfaces such as hair, skin, or soft tissue; the paper does not test this.
A natural compression application follows implicitly: store only the low-resolution simulation and reconstruct high-resolution details at playback, cutting storage and transmission for character animation; this is not stated as a result.
Because the paper trains on one fabric and lists fabric friction as a failure mode, a material-conditioned variant (e.g., conditioning the hyper-network on fabric parameters) would be a direct extension to test whether wrinkle residuals are material-agnostic.
The quantitative claims rely on SSIM of normal maps over 300 frames on unseen motion; adding the same metric for unseen body shapes and garment types would directly probe the generalization claim's boundaries.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The bottom line: this is a solid SIGGRAPH Asia paper with a genuinely useful architecture for garment dynamic super-resolution, and the stress-test note gets the main weakness right - the quantitative evidence is thinner than the claims. The method itself is coherent and worth engaging with.

What's new: GDSR casts low-to-high-resolution garment detail synthesis as a mesh-space super-resolution problem, combining a MeshGraphNet-style feature extractor, a hyper-network that generates per-triangle implicit wrinkle fields, and an explicit decoder that corrects the coarse shape before adding details. The components are borrowed - MeshGraphNet, WIRE, hyper-networks - but the joint shape-correction-plus-detail-synthesis design, with iterative roll-out for temporal coherence, is a real combination. The writing is clear, the figures make the qualitative results easy to read, and the code and data are released, which is real evidence. The baselines (DDE and PhysGraph) are handled fairly, including a PhysGraph(-) variant trained on downsampled ground truth. The 0.115 s/frame figure, including the low-res simulation, makes the practical claim credible. The limitations section is honest about friction and collision failures.

The soft spots are real but they are evaluation gaps, not flaws in the method. Table 3's SSIM numbers are the only geometric/perceptual quantitative evidence against baselines, and they cover just three training garment types on an unseen motion, with no error bars. The headline claim - generalization to unseen garment types and body shapes - rests mainly on Figures 6 and 7. The roll-out evaluation (Table 2) reports stretching and shearing energies, which is a stability check (and it does include one unseen garment), but it does not measure how far self-predicted geometry drifts from ground truth. Teacher-forced training with ground-truth history versus self-predicted history at inference is a known autoregressive gap, and the paper does not quantify the resulting error accumulation. Nothing about the architecture or the small-data setup is unsound on its own terms.

This paper is for graphics researchers working on cloth simulation and learned detail synthesis. It deserves a serious referee. My recommendation: send it to review, and expect the authors to add error bars, quantitative results on at least some unseen garment types, and an error-accumulation curve for long roll-out against HR ground truth.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper introduces GDSR, a learning-based method that takes low-resolution garment simulations and body motion as input and produces high-resolution garment geometry with fine wrinkle details. The architecture combines a mesh-graph-net that extracts super-resolution features from coarse garment dynamics and garment-body interactions, a decoder that corrects the coarse garment shape, and a hyper-net that constructs per-triangle implicit functions for wrinkle residuals. The method is trained on two dance sequences with five garment types and one fixed body shape, and the authors claim generalization to unseen motions, body shapes, and garment types, demonstrating results qualitatively and reporting SSIM comparisons on training garment types. The paper also reports a lightweight 65MB network, timing measurements, an explicit collision handling step, and releases code and data.

Significance. If the generalization claims are fully borne out, GDSR would be a practically valuable tool for low-budget high-resolution garment simulation: it is lightweight, fast (about 0.115s per frame including low-resolution simulation), and the released code/data would facilitate adoption. The method's architectural choices — graph-based feature extraction, explicit shape correction, and continuous per-triangle upsampling — are well motivated, and the qualitative results, especially for pleated and laced garments, are visually compelling. However, the current quantitative evidence covers only training garment types on an unseen motion, and the paper's own Section 6 acknowledges limitations such as single-material training and unresolved collisions. Consequently, the strongest claim in the abstract — robust generalization to unseen body shapes, motions, and garment types — is not yet supported by the reported experiments, which tempers the significance of the contribution at this stage.

major comments (3)

[Section 5 and Appendix C, Table 3] The quantitative evaluation (SSIM on normal maps) is computed only for training garment types (A), (C), and (E), tested on an unseen motion sequence. No quantitative result is provided for the five unseen garment types (i)-(v) shown in Figure 6 or for the unseen body shapes in Figure 7, although the abstract and Section 1 explicitly claim generalization along these axes. Since the qualitative figures alone cannot distinguish genuine transfer from interpolation across similar training outfits, the central claim is not yet quantitatively established. The paper itself notes in Section 6 that it is trained on a single fabric material and that friction-dependent details are missed; these are honest limitations, but they make the absence of quantitative cross-garment evidence more conspicuous. I recommend reporting SSIM (or a geometric metric) on the unseen garments and body shapes, with error bars across frames or motion sequences, and ideally over multiple roll-out lengths.
[Section 5 and Appendix B, Table 2] The training procedure uses history states derived from high-resolution ground truth (Section 5, first paragraph), while at inference the network consumes its own predictions in a roll-out. The only quantitative long-roll-out evaluation is stretching/shearing energy (Appendix B, Table 2), which measures deformation stability but not geometric or perceptual fidelity to the high-resolution reference. This gap matters because the self-feeding regime is exactly where accumulation errors would appear. I recommend adding a fidelity metric (SSIM or point-wise error) for roll-outs of increasing length (e.g., 1, 50, 100, 1000, and 1500 frames) and comparing against a one-step oracle that uses ground-truth history.
[Section 5.1 and Table 3] The comparison with DDE and PhysGraph is also restricted to training garment types; no quantitative comparison is reported for unseen garments or body shapes. Given that the paper claims 'significant improvements over state-of-the-art alternatives' and the baselines are trained on the same or similar data, adding such comparisons on the unseen test garments would strengthen the central claim. This can be addressed together with the additional experiments suggested in Major Comment 1.

minor comments (6)

[Section 3] The phrase 'referre to' appears in the descriptions of the Decoder E and Mesh-Hyper-Net A blocks; it should read 'refer to'.
[Related Work] The citation 'Later et al. [2018]' should be 'Lahner et al. [2018]' (the DeepWrinkles paper).
[Section 4.5] The equation defining L_c_def contains mismatched norm bars, e.g., '|| || w_u(Ĉ_t|| - || w_u(Ĉ*_t)|| ||_1'; please fix the parentheses and norm-bar pairing for readability.
[Section 4.3] The notation '|f|' is used both for a triangle and for the number of adjacent triangles; consider using a symbol such as deg(v) or N(v) to avoid ambiguity.
[Table 3 caption] The caption states that SSIM is reported for 'a t-shirt (A), a pleated short skirt (C), and a triple-lace long skirt (E)' but does not say these are training garment types; since the main text's generalization claim concerns unseen garments, the caption should explicitly clarify this point.
[Section 5.2] The timing sentence 'including 0.083 seconds for low-resolution simulation in Marvelous Designer (MD)' could clarify that this 0.083s is the coarse simulation time and that the GDSR network itself accounts for 0.032s (as in Table 4), to avoid confusion about what the 0.115s total includes.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the GDSR result is a supervised super-resolution regression trained against external high-resolution physics simulation, with self-citations confined to baselines and related work.

full rationale

The central mapping in this paper is a supervised regression from low-resolution garment simulation and body motion to high-resolution garment geometry. The high-resolution ground truth is generated externally with Marvelous Designer at a 10mm particle distance, while low-resolution input is simulated at 30mm, and the network is trained with L1 losses on positions, normals, and deformation measures against these external references (Section 4.5, Appendix A). No equation defines the predicted wrinkle residual or coarse correction in terms of the target geometry: the residual r_k is decoded from learned super-resolution features through a per-triangle implicit function W_f, and the corrected coarse mesh is supervised by downsampled high-resolution ground truth. Roll-out prediction is an inference-time architectural choice, not a derivation that presupposes the claimed generalization. The self-citations (Zhang et al. 2021a, 2021b, 2022) appear as prior-work references, a baseline (DDE), and future-work pointers; they are not load-bearing for the core learning objective. External citations (e.g., VGG, MeshGraphNet message passing, Wire activation, Marvelous Designer simulation) provide the architectural and data support. The stated limitations in Section 6 (fabric friction, unresolved collisions) and the Appendix B stability metric (stretching and shearing energies rather than visual fidelity) are evidence gaps, not circular steps. The generalization claims to unseen body shapes and garment types are only qualitatively demonstrated, but insufficient evidence is a support limitation, not circularity. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited from the paper's own equations or citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method is empirical; it relies on several domain-specific assumptions about garment simulation and generalization. The most critical is the sufficiency of the small training set.

free parameters (5)

sigma_b = predefined constant (not specified)
Threshold for detecting garment-body interaction and collision handling (Section 4.1, 4.6).
sigma_l = predefined constant (not specified)
Threshold for layered edge features and inter-layer collision handling (Section 4.1, 4.6).
gamma = predefined constant (not specified)
Distance threshold for resolving collisions between fabric layers (Section 4.6).
lambda_c and lambda_w (loss weights) = initial 1.9 and 0.1, annealed to 1.0
Weights balancing coarse correction and wrinkle detail losses (Section 4.5).
WIRE activation parameters = omega0=5, alpha0=10
Frequency and spread controls for Gabor wavelet activation (Section 4.4).

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The UV parameterization correspondence between low- and high-resolution garment meshes remains fixed and valid across all motion sequences.
Section 4 states this parametrization is established once in canonical space and universally applicable.
domain assumption Garment-body interaction can be effectively captured by a signed distance field through ray casting with a predefined threshold.
Section 4.1 defines the interaction vector using sigma_b and ray casting [Roth 1982].
domain assumption A hyper-network can decode the parameters of an implicit function that represents high-frequency wrinkle residuals for each triangle.
Section 4.4 relies on this to generate detail residuals; no proof is given.
standard math The WIRE activation (complex Gabor wavelet) is suitable for reconstructing high-frequency features in this context.
Section 4.4 cites Sargadam et al. 2023; it is treated as a given.
ad hoc to paper The small training set (two motions, five garments, one body shape, one fabric) is sufficient to learn a generalizable mapping.
This is the core experimental assumption; the paper provides limited quantitative support (Appendix A, Section 5).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Neural Garment Dynamic Super-Resolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/POGL2JWU

@misc{pith2026241206285,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Neural Garment Dynamic Super-Resolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/POGL2JWU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06285}
}

read the original abstract

Achieving efficient, high-fidelity, high-resolution garment simulation is challenging due to its computational demands. Conversely, low-resolution garment simulation is more accessible and ideal for low-budget devices like smartphones. In this paper, we introduce a lightweight, learning-based method for garment dynamic super-resolution, designed to efficiently enhance high-resolution, high-frequency details in low-resolution garment simulations. Starting with low-resolution garment simulation and underlying body motion, we utilize a mesh-graph-net to compute super-resolution features based on coarse garment dynamics and garment-body interactions. These features are then used by a hyper-net to construct an implicit function of detailed wrinkle residuals for each coarse mesh triangle. Considering the influence of coarse garment shapes on detailed wrinkle performance, we correct the coarse garment shape and predict detailed wrinkle residuals using these implicit functions. Finally, we generate detailed high-resolution garment geometry by applying the detailed wrinkle residuals to the corrected coarse garment. Our method enables roll-out prediction by iteratively using its predictions as input for subsequent frames, producing fine-grained wrinkle details to enhance the low-resolution simulation. Despite training on a small dataset, our network robustly generalizes to different body shapes, motions, and garment types not present in the training data. We demonstrate significant improvements over state-of-the-art alternatives, particularly in enhancing the quality of high-frequency, fine-grained wrinkle details.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.06285 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** GDSR overview. With the low-resolution garment dynamics 𝐶𝑡−2, 𝐶𝑡−1 and 𝐶𝑡 , the underlying body motion 𝐵𝑡−1, 𝐵𝑡 , and the previous prediction 𝐶ˆ 𝑡−2, 𝐶ˆ 𝑡−1, our GDSR predicts the displacements 𝐷𝑡 to compute the corrected coarse garment shape 𝐶ˆ 𝑡 , and jointly generates detail wrinkle residual 𝑅 to produce the final high-resolution garment geometry 𝐺𝑡 . We introduce GDSR to predict the displacement 𝐷𝑡 to correct t… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Garment dynamic super-resolution architecture. Our method operates in a roll-out prediction manner. We represent the inputs of low-resolution simulations, body motions, and downsampled previous predictions as a graph with node features 𝑄𝑡 and edge features 𝐸𝑡 . First, we employ Mesh-Graph-Net H to compute super-resolution features 𝑧𝑡 := [𝑧ˆ𝑡 |𝑧˜𝑡 ] for coarse garment mesh. Considering the impact of coarse garment sh… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (11 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Explicit collision handling. We detect the garment collisions with the body and that between the fabric layers at a coarse level of garment geometry, and propagate the detection to efficiently resolve the collisions for high resolution garment. 4.6 Explicit Collision H…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: We run our method by roll-out prediction on both seen (1st row) and unseen (2nd row) motions with the training garment types. For each example, we [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: We evaluate the generalization of our method on motions and garment types that are both out of the training data. Our method can synthesize [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: We evaluate the generalization of our method across different body shapes on out-of-training motions with both seen and unseen garment types. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: We evaluate the robustness of our method under long roll-out predic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: To evaluate the effect of coarse garment correction, we designed two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Given the low-resolution simulation garment geometry, our GDSR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Limitation. Our method fails to capture garment details influenced by friction between fabric layers. Although our explicit collision handling resolves most intersections between fabric layers, some collisions remain because we cannot detect intersections when the dis…

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: We visualize the distribution of motion sequences used for gener [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: We design 5 garment outfits to train the network of our method. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_13.png]

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: We design 5 garment outfits to test the generalization ability of our [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

5 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

[2006]

In Computer graphics forum, Vol

Physically based deformable models in computer graphics. In Computer graphics forum, Vol. 25. Wiley Online Library, 809–836. Xiaoyu Pan, Jiaming Mai, Xinwei Jiang, Dongxue Tang, Jingxiang Li, Tianjia Shao, Kun Zhou, Xiaogang Jin, and Dinesh Manocha. 2022. Predicting Loose-Fitting Garment Deformations Using Bone-Driven Motion Networks. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2022...

work page 2013
[2010]

Towards Multi-Layered 3D Garments Animation

Animation wrinkling: augmenting coarse cloth simulations with realistic- looking wrinkles. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 29, 6 (2010), 1–8. Scott D Roth. 1982. Ray casting for modeling solids. Computer graphics and image processing 18, 2 (1982), 109–144. Mehdi SM Sajjadi, Raviteja Vemulapalli, and Matthew Brown. 2018. Frame-recurrent video super-reso...

work page Pith review arXiv 2010
[2012]

ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 31, 4 (2012), 1–10

Drape: Dressing any person. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 31, 4 (2012), 1–10. Erhan Gundogdu, Victor Constantin, Amrollah Seifoddini, Minh Dang, Mathieu Salz- mann, and Pascal Fua. 2019. Garnet: A two-stream network for fast and accurate 3d cloth draping. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 8739–8748. Fabian Ha...

arXiv 2012
[2014]

ACM Trans

Sensitivity-optimized rigging for example-based real-time clothing synthesis. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 4 (2014), 107–1. Jiayi Eris Zhang, Jérémie Dumas, Yun Fei, Alec Jacobson, Doug L James, and Danny M Kaufman. 2023. Progressive Shell Qasistatics for Unstructured Meshes. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 42, 6 (2023), 1–17. Meng Zhang, Duygu Ceylan, and Ni...

work page 2014
[2023]

In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol

Deep deformation detail synthesis for thin shell models. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 42. Wiley Online Library, e14903. Lan Chen, Juntao Ye, and Xiaopeng Zhang. 2021c. Multi-feature super-resolution network for cloth wrinkle synthesis. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 36, 3 (2021), 478–493. Yinbo Chen, Sifei Liu, and Xiaolong Wang. 2021b. Le...

work page 2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [2006]

In Computer graphics forum, Vol

Physically based deformable models in computer graphics. In Computer graphics forum, Vol. 25. Wiley Online Library, 809–836. Xiaoyu Pan, Jiaming Mai, Xinwei Jiang, Dongxue Tang, Jingxiang Li, Tianjia Shao, Kun Zhou, Xiaogang Jin, and Dinesh Manocha. 2022. Predicting Loose-Fitting Garment Deformations Using Bone-Driven Motion Networks. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2022...

work page 2013

[2] [2010]

Towards Multi-Layered 3D Garments Animation

Animation wrinkling: augmenting coarse cloth simulations with realistic- looking wrinkles. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 29, 6 (2010), 1–8. Scott D Roth. 1982. Ray casting for modeling solids. Computer graphics and image processing 18, 2 (1982), 109–144. Mehdi SM Sajjadi, Raviteja Vemulapalli, and Matthew Brown. 2018. Frame-recurrent video super-reso...

work page Pith review arXiv 2010

[3] [2012]

ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 31, 4 (2012), 1–10

Drape: Dressing any person. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 31, 4 (2012), 1–10. Erhan Gundogdu, Victor Constantin, Amrollah Seifoddini, Minh Dang, Mathieu Salz- mann, and Pascal Fua. 2019. Garnet: A two-stream network for fast and accurate 3d cloth draping. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 8739–8748. Fabian Ha...

arXiv 2012

[4] [2014]

ACM Trans

Sensitivity-optimized rigging for example-based real-time clothing synthesis. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 4 (2014), 107–1. Jiayi Eris Zhang, Jérémie Dumas, Yun Fei, Alec Jacobson, Doug L James, and Danny M Kaufman. 2023. Progressive Shell Qasistatics for Unstructured Meshes. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 42, 6 (2023), 1–17. Meng Zhang, Duygu Ceylan, and Ni...

work page 2014

[5] [2023]

In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol

Deep deformation detail synthesis for thin shell models. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 42. Wiley Online Library, e14903. Lan Chen, Juntao Ye, and Xiaopeng Zhang. 2021c. Multi-feature super-resolution network for cloth wrinkle synthesis. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 36, 3 (2021), 478–493. Yinbo Chen, Sifei Liu, and Xiaolong Wang. 2021b. Le...

work page 2021