Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks -- Robustness Included?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.04268 v1 pith:PPCSYRKJ submitted 2020-11-09 cs.LG cs.NAmath.NA

classification cs.LGcs.NAmath.NA
keywords deepadversarialinversemeasurementsnetworksproblemssolvingimage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the past five years, deep learning methods have become state-of-the-art in solving various inverse problems. Before such approaches can find application in safety-critical fields, a verification of their reliability appears mandatory. Recent works have pointed out instabilities of deep neural networks for several image reconstruction tasks. In analogy to adversarial attacks in classification, it was shown that slight distortions in the input domain may cause severe artifacts. The present article sheds new light on this concern, by conducting an extensive study of the robustness of deep-learning-based algorithms for solving underdetermined inverse problems. This covers compressed sensing with Gaussian measurements as well as image recovery from Fourier and Radon measurements, including a real-world scenario for magnetic resonance imaging (using the NYU-fastMRI dataset). Our main focus is on computing adversarial perturbations of the measurements that maximize the reconstruction error. A distinctive feature of our approach is the quantitative and qualitative comparison with total-variation minimization, which serves as a provably robust reference method. In contrast to previous findings, our results reveal that standard end-to-end network architectures are not only resilient against statistical noise, but also against adversarial perturbations. All considered networks are trained by common deep learning techniques, without sophisticated defense strategies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimization Landscapes Learned: Proxy Networks Boost Convergence in Physics-based Inverse Problems

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A proxy neural network, regularized by noise and a loss penalty, approximates the inverse-problem loss landscape and, in a two-step BFGS scheme, recovers unknown parameters more accurately than direct optimization on ...

Pith tools