Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Statistics of the epoch of reionization (EoR) 21-cm signal -- II. The evolution of the power spectrum error-covariance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1606.03874 v4 pith:PPLTKUPG submitted 2016-06-13 astro-ph.CO

Statistics of the epoch of reionization (EoR) 21-cm signal -- II. The evolution of the power spectrum error-covariance

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords binserrorsgaussianreionizationdifferenterrorerror-covariancepower
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The EoR 21-cm signal is expected to become highly non-Gaussian as reionization progresses. This severely affects the error-covariance of the EoR 21-cm power spectrum which is important for predicting the prospects of a detection with ongoing and future experiments. Most earlier works have assumed that the EoR 21-cm signal is a Gaussian random field where (1) the error variance depends only on the power spectrum and the number of Fourier modes in the particular $k$ bin, and (2) the errors in the different $k$ bins are uncorrelated. Here we use an ensemble of simulated 21-cm maps to analyze the error-covariance at various stages of reionization. We find that even at the very early stages of reionization ($\bar{x}_{\rm HI} \sim 0.9 $) the error variance significantly exceeds the Gaussian predictions at small length-scales ($k > 0.5 \,{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$) while they are consistent at larger scales. The errors in most $k$ bins (both large and small scales), are however found to be correlated. Considering the later stages ($\bar{x}_{\rm HI} = 0.15$), the error variance shows an excess in all $k$ bins within $k \ge 0.1 \, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$, and it is around $200$ times larger than the Gaussian prediction at $k \sim 1 \, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$. The errors in the different $k$ bins are all also highly correlated, barring the two smallest $k$ bins which are anti-correlated with the other bins. Our results imply that the predictions for different 21-cm experiments based on the Gaussian assumption underestimate the errors, and it is necessary to incorporate the non-Gaussianity for more realistic predictions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CosmoUiT: A Vision Transformer-UNet Hybrid for Fast and Accurate Emulation of 21-cm Maps from the Epoch of Reionization

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    A Vision Transformer-UNet hybrid emulates 3D EoR 21-cm cubes conditioned on reionization parameters, matching simulated large-scale power spectra with mild small-scale suppression.

  2. Inferring Cosmology and Astrophysics from the High-redshift 21cm Signal with SKA-Low

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    A review chapter on tools for inferring galaxy and IGM properties from the 21 cm signal using the initial SKA-Low array configuration.

  3. Overview of 21cm Experiments at high redshift with SKAO

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    Overview of SKA-Low 21cm experiments for high-redshift cosmology, covering power spectra, tomography, 21cm forest, cross-correlations, and key telescope features.

  4. Overview of 21cm Experiments at high redshift with SKAO

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted

    An overview summarizing SKA-Low 21cm experiments for power spectrum, tomography, 21-cm forest, and cross-correlations, plus critical telescope features, building on the 2015 SKA Science Book.