Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Neural Quality Estimation with Multiple Hypotheses for Grammatical Error Correction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.04443 v1 pith:PR335IM4 submitted 2021-05-10 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords hypothesesqualityestimationverneterrorevidencegrammaticalmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) aims to correct writing errors and help language learners improve their writing skills. However, existing GEC models tend to produce spurious corrections or fail to detect lots of errors. The quality estimation model is necessary to ensure learners get accurate GEC results and avoid misleading from poorly corrected sentences. Well-trained GEC models can generate several high-quality hypotheses through decoding, such as beam search, which provide valuable GEC evidence and can be used to evaluate GEC quality. However, existing models neglect the possible GEC evidence from different hypotheses. This paper presents the Neural Verification Network (VERNet) for GEC quality estimation with multiple hypotheses. VERNet establishes interactions among hypotheses with a reasoning graph and conducts two kinds of attention mechanisms to propagate GEC evidence to verify the quality of generated hypotheses. Our experiments on four GEC datasets show that VERNet achieves state-of-the-art grammatical error detection performance, achieves the best quality estimation results, and significantly improves GEC performance by reranking hypotheses. All data and source codes are available at https://github.com/thunlp/VERNet.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Enhancing Grammatical Error Detection using BERT with Cleaned Lang-8 Dataset

    cs.CL 2024-11 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning BERT-base-uncased on a hand-cleaned Lang-8 subset yields F1 0.91 on that same distribution, but the result is not benchmarked against standard GED tests.

Pith tools