Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Sharp moment and upper tail asymptotics for the critical $2d$ Stochastic Heat Flow

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that the $h$-th moment of the mass of the critical 2d Stochastic Heat Flow grows at least like $\exp(\exp(c_0 h))$, matching the predicted double-exponential rate and exponentially improving the previous lower bound.

desk verdict Strong new moment lower bound via GFF/spanning trees; tail theorem in Section 6 has a broken step and needs correction. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.22029 v1 pith:PRWLTZZY submitted 2025-07-29 math.PR math-phmath.MP

Shirshendu Ganguly , Kyeongsik Nam This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath-phmath.MP MSC 60H1560K35
keywords stochasticheatflowcriticaldimension2+1directedpolymerFeynmandiagramsGaussianfreefieldKirchhoffmatrix-treetheoremmomentasymptoticsuppertailbounds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that the $h$-th moment of the mass that the critical $2d$ Stochastic Heat Flow assigns to a bounded region grows at least like $\exp(\exp(c_0 h))$, matching the double-exponential rate predicted in the late 1990s and improving the previous lower bound $\exp(c h^2)$ by an exponential factor in $h$. The proof rewrites the $h$-th moment as a sum over Feynman diagrams encoding pairwise collisions of $h$ random walks, then identifies the spatial integral on each diagram with the partition function of a Gaussian free field on a weighted graph. Kirchhoff's matrix-tree theorem turns that partition function into a weighted spanning-tree count, reducing the moment estimate to a combinatorial bound. A new monotonicity property of the correlation kernel, proved via the domain Markov property of the GFF, transfers the estimate from Gaussian to general test functions. As a byproduct, the paper obtains upper tail bounds showing the SHF mass is super-polynomial yet barely so.

What carries the argument

The central object is the moment kernel $K_t^{(h)}(z)$ in the Feynman diagram representation (25), which expresses $E[(Z^\theta_t(\varphi))^h]$ as a sum over pairwise collision patterns of $h$ independent planar walks, weighted by heat kernels and the Dickman renewal density $G_\theta$. The key move is to read each diagram as a weighted graph and recognize its spatial integral as the partition function of a two-component Gaussian free field pinned at an added vertex; this partition function is the inverse of the determinant of the graph Laplacian, and Kirchhoff's matrix-tree theorem converts that determinant into a weighted spanning-tree count. The proof then bounds the moment from below by counting spanning trees of bounded-degree graphs, augmented by a gap-product estimate controlling how far apart successive collisions can be. The transfer from Gaussian to general test functions relies on the monotonicity of $K_t^{(h)}$ under simultaneous scaling of the starting points, proved by the domain Markov property of the GFF.

What would settle it

Numerically evaluate the Gaussian integral (42) for a small collision pattern, say $h=3$, $m=4$, at times satisfying (37)--(38): Lemma 3.4 asserts it is at least the product in (47), so a violation there would refute the spanning-tree estimate that carries Theorem 1.2.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.2: there is an absolute constant $c_0>0$ such that for every fixed $\theta\in\mathbb{R}$ and every smooth non-negative test function $\varphi$ on $\mathbb{R}^2$ with $\varphi(0)>0$, $E[(Z^\theta_1(\varphi))^h]\ge \exp(\exp(c_0 h))$ for all large $h$. This gives the first lower bound that matches the predicted growth $\exp(\exp(\Theta(h)))$ of the SHF moments, and it improves the earlier lower bound $\exp(c h^2)$ from the Gaussian correlation inequality. With the existing upper bound $\exp(\exp(c h^2))$, the paper derives tail estimates $\exp(-(\log z)(\log\log z)^{1+o(1)}) \le P(X_\varphi > z) \le \exp(-\Omega(1)\log z\sqrt{\log\log z})$ for large $z$, showing the upper tail is super-polynomial. Along the way the authors prove Proposition 2.2, that the kernel $K_t^{(h)}(\alpha z_1,\dots,\alpha z_h)$ is non-increasing in $\alpha>0$, a monotonicity that carries the comparison from Gaussian to compactly supported test functions.

Load-bearing premise

The proof inherits the moment representation (25), which expresses the $h$-th moment as a sum over pairwise collision diagrams with the Dickman density $G_\theta$ and omits simultaneous collisions of three or more walks; if that imported formula were incomplete or mis-normalized, the spanning-tree lower bound would not be valid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same double-exponential lower bound holds at any time $t>0$, by the scaling property $Z^\theta_{as,at}(d(\sqrt{a}x),d(\sqrt{a}y)) \stackrel{\text{law}}{=} a Z^{\theta+\log a}_{s,t}(dx,dy)$, with $h$ taken large depending on $t$.
  • The upper tail of $X_\varphi$ satisfies $\exp(-(\log z)(\log\log z)^{1+o(1)}) \le P(X_\varphi>z) \le \exp(-\Omega(1)\log z\sqrt{\log\log z})$ for large $z$, so the tail decays faster than any power but only barely.
  • The correlation kernel $K_t^{(h)}$ is non-increasing under simultaneous scaling of the initial points, a new monotonicity result for the SHF that follows from the domain Markov property of the Gaussian free field.
  • If a matching upper bound $\exp(\exp(c h))$ is ever proved, the tail bounds would sharpen to $\exp(-(\log z)^{O(1)}\log\log\log z) \le P(X_\varphi>z) \le \exp(-\Omega(1)\log z\log\log z)$, as noted in Remark 1.5.
  • The proof shows that configurations with $m\ge 100 h$ collisions, an exponentially large number of collision events, dominate the $h$-th moment, quantifying how intermittency is driven by many-particle collisions rather than independent pair interactions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the GFF/spanning-tree dictionary suggests that sharper upper bounds could come from the spectral side---bounds on the smallest eigenvalue of the weighted Laplacian rather than crude spanning-tree counts---which is a route the paper leaves open.
  • Inference: the monotonicity of $K_t^{(h)}$ likely implies a stochastic monotonicity of the SHF mass when the initial condition is rescaled, which could be tested against the small-ball shrinking problem $X_\varepsilon$ as $\varepsilon\to 0$.
  • Inference: the integral (73), flagged as the obstacle to a matching upper bound, is a natural test object; if it grows faster than exponentially in $m$ for some $h\ge 3$, the true moment growth would outrun the predicted $\exp(\exp(\Theta(h)))$.
  • Inference: because the comparison argument assumes $\varphi(0)>0$, an analogous two-sided version of the kernel could extend the rate to test functions whose mass is concentrated away from the origin, or to joint moments of several observables.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the critical 2D stochastic heat flow (SHF), a random measure constructed by Caravenna–Sun–Zygouras. The main result (Theorem 1.2) establishes that for fixed θ and smooth nonnegative φ with φ(0)>0, the h-th moment of X_φ = Z_1^θ(φ) grows at least as exp(exp(c0 h)), matching the predicted double-exponential growth and improving the previous exp(c h^2) lower bound. The proof expresses moments as sums over Feynman collision diagrams, identifies the spatial integrals as partition functions of the Gaussian free field on the associated weighted graph, applies Kirchhoff's matrix-tree theorem to reduce the estimate to counting spanning trees, and uses a new monotonicity property of the correlation kernel (Proposition 4.1) to pass from Gaussian to compactly supported test functions. The paper also claims sharp upper tail bounds (Theorem 1.4) of the form exp(-(log z)(log log z)^{1+o(1)}) ≤ P(X_φ > z) ≤ exp(-Ω(1) log z √(log log z)).

Significance. If Theorem 1.2 stands, it is a major advance in the quantitative understanding of the 2D critical SHF, confirming the late-1990s prediction of double-exponential moment growth and introducing a promising GFF/spanning-tree method to the area. The matrix-tree reduction and the monotonicity lemma are elegant and likely to be reused. The proof of Theorem 1.2 appears internally consistent; the diagram enumeration, the gap product bound (Lemma 3.5), the time-slice restriction, and the transfer lemma (Lemma 5.1) are all carefully argued. However, the proof of the lower-tail half of Theorem 1.4 contains a serious algebraic error, so that advertised tail bound is not established as written.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 6 (proof of Theorem 1.4)] The step following (81) claims that for L = log log z, M = log L, h = L M^{-10}, Theorem 1.2 gives log E[X^h] ≥ e^{c0 h} ≥ 2(LM-10)e^L = 2 log(z^h). This is incorrect: log(z^h) = h log z = L M^{-10} e^L = exp(L + log L - 10 log M), whereas e^{c0 h} = e^{c0 L M^{-10}} = exp(o(L)). Hence e^{c0 h} is exponentially smaller than 2 log(z^h) for large z, so the conclusion z^h ≤ E[X^h]/3 does not follow, and the subsequent lower bound on P(X ≥ z) collapses.
  2. [Section 6 (proof of Theorem 1.4, final display)] The identity h log w = (log z)(log log z)^{1+o(1)} is false. With w = exp(exp(c L^2 M^2)), h log w = L M^{-10} exp(c L^2 M^2) = exp(c L^2 M^2 + o(L)), whereas (log z)(log log z)^{1+o(1)} = exp(L + (1+o(1)) log L). The ratio is exp(c L^2 M^2 - L - o(L)) → ∞ as z → ∞, so the claimed lower bound on P(X ≥ z) does not match the stated form.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 7, Lemma 7.1] The statement of Lemma 7.1 contains an unused variable k ('for any 1≤k≤n'); the proof actually establishes the bound for the product over all vertices. Please remove the variable or clarify its role.
  2. [Equation (33) and surrounding text] The exponent in the display after (33) contains two identical terms -|x1|^2/a1, which correctly arises from squaring g_{a1/2}(x1), but a short parenthetical would help the reader verify the prefactor (1/(π a1))^2.
  3. [Lemma 3.5 and equation (51)] The notation K(I)_k is introduced after the display (51) and must be compared with the earlier ℓ(I)_k from (45); consider renaming one of the two to avoid confusion.
  4. [Remark 3.7] The phrase 'independent standard Exp(π) variables' is ambiguous; these are exponential random variables with mean 1/π, not rate π. Please clarify the parameterization.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reasoning found: the moment representation is imported from independent prior work, and the GFF/spanning-tree lower bound is a new self-contained computation.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation, Theorem 1.2, starts from the moment representation (25), which is explicitly quoted from prior work by Caravenna–Sun–Zygouras and Gu–Quastel–Tsai ([8, 32]), not derived by the present authors in a way that presupposes the target lower bound. The GFF connection is then established by rewriting the spatial integrals in (33) as Gaussian free field partition functions, and Lemma 3.4 gives an explicit lower bound via Kirchhoff's Matrix-Tree theorem and a spanning-tree count. Proposition 2.2 (monotonicity of the kernel) is proven independently from the domain Markov property of the GFF, and Lemma 5.1 transfers the Gaussian-test-function estimate to compactly supported test functions without any fitted parameter or renaming of the result. No parameter in the paper is fitted to the quantity being predicted; Theorem 1.4 is derived from Theorem 1.2 and the previously known upper bound (7), so the proof chain has independent content. The fact that the moment representation and the negligibility of multi-walk collisions are imported from [8] is a legitimate use of prior independent work, not a self-citation chain or an ansatz smuggled in via citation. Therefore the derivation is self-contained given its explicitly stated inputs, and no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation leans on the SHF construction and moment formulas from prior independent papers, plus standard Gaussian integration and Kirchhoff's theorem. These are stated transparently and are not circular.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of the critical 2d Stochastic Heat Flow Z^theta (Theorem 1.1 from [10]).
    The object under study is defined via this scaling limit; the paper cites [10] and does not rederive it.
  • domain assumption Moment representation E[(Z^theta_t(phi))^h] = 2^{-h} integral phi^otimes h K_t^(h) with K given by the Feynman-diagram sum (25), from [8,32,11].
    The GFF and matrix-tree analysis starts from this exact expression. The paper relies on prior proofs of its validity.
  • domain assumption Dickman subordinator asymptotics G_theta(t) ~ (t (log(1/t))^2)^{-1} (Lemma 2.1 from [7]).
    Used in (58) to get the log m lower bound for the time integrals; the renewal process construction is from [7].
  • domain assumption Scaling covariance (10) of the SHF from [10].
    Used in Remark 1.3 and Remark 3.6 to extend t=1 results to all t>0.
  • standard math Kirchhoff's matrix-tree theorem and standard Gaussian integration.
    Lemma 3.2 and 3.3; the paper states and proves the needed Gaussian identity.
  • standard math Co-area formula for Lipschitz functions (Federer) and Stirling's formula.
    Used in Lemma 5.1 to compare Gaussian and compactly supported test functions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sharp moment and upper tail asymptotics for the critical $2d$ Stochastic Heat Flow." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PRWLTZZY

@misc{pith2026250722029,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sharp moment and upper tail asymptotics for the critical $2d$ Stochastic Heat Flow},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PRWLTZZY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.22029}
}
abstract

While $1+1$ dimensional growth models in the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang universality class have witnessed an explosion of activity, higher dimensional models remain much less explored. The special case of $2+1$ dimensions is particularly interesting as it is, in physics parlance, neither ultraviolet nor infrared super-renormalizable. Canonical examples include the stochastic heat equation (SHE) with multiplicative noise and directed polymers. The models exhibit a weak to strong disorder transition as the inverse temperature, up to a logarithmic (in the system size) scaling, crosses a critical value. While the sub-critical picture has been established in detail, very recently [CSZ '23] constructed a scaling limit of the critical $2+1$ dimensional directed polymer partition function, termed as the critical $2d$ Stochastic Heat Flow (SHF), a random measure on $\mathbb{R}^2.$ The SHF is expected to exhibit a rich intermittent behavior and consequently a rapid growth of its moments. The $h^{th}$ moment was known to grow at least as $\exp(\Omega(h^{2}))$ (a consequence of the Gaussian correlation inequality) and at most as $\exp(\exp (O(h^2)))$. The true growth rate, however, was predicted to be $\exp(\exp (\Theta(h)))$ in the late nineties [R '99]. In this paper we prove a lower bound of the $h^{th}$ moment which matches the predicted value, thereby exponentially improving the previous lower bound. We also obtain rather sharp bounds on its upper tail. The key ingredient in the proof involves establishing a new connection of the SHF and moments thereof to the Gaussian Free Field (GFF) on related Feynman diagrams. This connection opens the door to the rich algebraic structure of the GFF to study the SHF. Along the way we also prove a new monotonicity property of the correlation kernel for the SHF as a consequence of the domain Markov property of the GFF.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.22029 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An illustration of a collision pattern in a Feynman diagram involved in the representation of the moment formula (25) for h = 4. In the diagram, the number of collisions is m = 3 and there are 4 Brownian motions starting from z1, z2, z3, z4. The wiggle/curly lines between points (ar, xr) and (br, yr) are given weight Gθ(br − ar)g br−ar 4 (yr −xr) representing the total collision time of the tilted Brownian motion tr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of the augmented graph Gb obtained from the graph G in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Enhanced noise sensitivity, 2D directed polymers and Stochastic Heat Flow

    math.PR 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A general, rate-optimal BKS noise-sensitivity criterion is proven, and it yields the independence of the critical 2D Stochastic Heat Flow from the disorder white noise.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Fundamental solution of the heat and schrödinger equations with point interaction.Journal of Functional Analysis, 130(1):220–254, 1995

    S Albeverio, Z Brzezniak, and Ludwik Dabrowski. Fundamental solution of the heat and schrödinger equations with point interaction.Journal of Functional Analysis, 130(1):220–254, 1995

    work page 1995

  2. [2]

    American Mathematical Soc., 2017

    Antonio Auffinger, Michael Damron, and Jack Hanson.50 years of first-passage percolation, volume 68. American Mathematical Soc., 2017

    2017

  3. [3]

    Gaussian free field and liouville quantum gravity.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16642, 2024

    Nathanaël Berestycki and Ellen Powell. Gaussian free field and liouville quantum gravity.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16642, 2024. 28 SHIRSHENDU GANGULY, KYEONGSIK NAM

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    The two-dimensional stochastic heat equation: renormalizing a multi- plicative noise.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 31(2):615, 1998

    Lorenzo Bertini and Nicoletta Cancrini. The two-dimensional stochastic heat equation: renormalizing a multi- plicative noise.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 31(2):615, 1998

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    Lectures on integrable probability

    Alexei Borodin and Vadim Gorin. Lectures on integrable probability. probability and statistical physics in st. petersburg, 155–214. InProc. Sympos. Pure Math, volume 91

    work page

  6. [6]

    Universality in marginally relevant disordered systems

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras. Universality in marginally relevant disordered systems. The Annals of Applied Probability, 27(5):3050–3112, 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    The dickman subordinator, renewal theorems, and disordered systems.Electron

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras. The dickman subordinator, renewal theorems, and disordered systems.Electron. J. Probab, 24(101):1–40, 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    On the moments of the (2+ 1)-dimensional di- rected polymer and stochastic heat equation in the critical window.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 372(2):385–440, 2019

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras. On the moments of the (2+ 1)-dimensional di- rected polymer and stochastic heat equation in the critical window.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 372(2):385–440, 2019

    work page 2019

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    The two-dimensional kpz equation in the entire subcritical regime.The Annals of Probability, 48(3):1086–1127, 2020

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras. The two-dimensional kpz equation in the entire subcritical regime.The Annals of Probability, 48(3):1086–1127, 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    The critical 2d stochastic heat flow.Inventiones mathematicae, 233(1):325–460, 2023

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras. The critical 2d stochastic heat flow.Inventiones mathematicae, 233(1):325–460, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    The critical 2d stochastic heat flow is not a gaussian multiplicative chaos.The Annals of Probability, 51(6):2265–2300, 2023

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras. The critical 2d stochastic heat flow is not a gaussian multiplicative chaos.The Annals of Probability, 51(6):2265–2300, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    The critical 2d stochastic heat flow and related models

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras. The critical 2d stochastic heat flow and related models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10311, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Singularity and regularity of the critical 2d stochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06128, 2025

    Francesco Caravenna, Rongfeng Sun, and Nikos Zygouras. Singularity and regularity of the critical 2d stochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06128, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Constructing a solution of the(2 + 1)-dimensional kpz equation.The Annals of Probability, 48(2):1014, 2020

    Sourav Chatterjee and Alexander Dunlap. Constructing a solution of the(2 + 1)-dimensional kpz equation.The Annals of Probability, 48(2):1014, 2020

    2020

  7. [15]

    Precise intermittency for the parabolic anderson equation with an(1 + 1)-dimensional time–space white noise

    Xia Chen. Precise intermittency for the parabolic anderson equation with an(1 + 1)-dimensional time–space white noise. InAnnales de l’IHP Probabilités et statistiques, volume 51, pages 1486–1499, 2015

    2015

  8. [16]

    Two-dimensional delta-bose gas: skew-product relative motion and exact non-gaussianity for the stochastic heat equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.06331, 2022

    Yu-Ting Chen. Two-dimensional delta-bose gas: skew-product relative motion and exact non-gaussianity for the stochastic heat equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.06331, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Delta-bose gas from the viewpoint of the two-dimensional stochastic heat equation.The Annals of Probability, 52(1):127–187, 2024

    Yu-Ting Chen. Delta-bose gas from the viewpoint of the two-dimensional stochastic heat equation.The Annals of Probability, 52(1):127–187, 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    Stochastic motions of the two-dimensional many-body delta-bose gas.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.17243, 2024

    Yu-Ting Chen. Stochastic motions of the two-dimensional many-body delta-bose gas.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.17243, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Continuum polymer measures corresponding to the critical 2d stochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.01510, 2024

    Jeremy Clark and Barkat Mian. Continuum polymer measures corresponding to the critical 2d stochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.01510, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Conditional gmc within the stochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.16056, 2025

    Jeremy Clark and Li-Cheng Tsai. Conditional gmc within the stochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.16056, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Directed polymers in random environments: École d’été de probabilités de saint-flour xlvi–2016, vol

    Francis Comets. Directed polymers in random environments: École d’été de probabilités de saint-flour xlvi–2016, vol. 2175.Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer International Publishing, page 1, 2017

    2016

  14. [22]

    Moments of partition functions of 2d gaussian polymers in the weak disorder regime-i.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 403(1):417–450, 2023

    Clément Cosco and Ofer Zeitouni. Moments of partition functions of 2d gaussian polymers in the weak disorder regime-i.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 403(1):417–450, 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    Law of iterated logarithms and fractal properties of the kpz equation.The Annals of Probability, 51(3):930–986, 2023

    Sayan Das and Promit Ghosal. Law of iterated logarithms and fractal properties of the kpz equation.The Annals of Probability, 51(3):930–986, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    Some problems concerning the structure of random walk paths.Acta Math

    Paul Erdos and S James Taylor. Some problems concerning the structure of random walk paths.Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar, 11:137–162, 1960

    1960

  17. [25]

    Curvature measures.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 93(3):418–491, 1959

    Herbert Federer. Curvature measures.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 93(3):418–491, 1959

    1959

  18. [26]

    Intermittence and nonlinear parabolic stochastic partial differ- ential equations.Electronic Journal of Probability, 14:548, 2009

    Mohammud Foondun and Davar Khoshnevisan. Intermittence and nonlinear parabolic stochastic partial differ- ential equations.Electronic Journal of Probability, 14:548, 2009

    2009

  19. [27]

    Random metric geometries on the plane and kardar-parisi-zhang universality.Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 69(1), 2022

    Shirshendu Ganguly. Random metric geometries on the plane and kardar-parisi-zhang universality.Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 69(1), 2022

    2022

  20. [28]

    Fractal structure in the directed landscape

    Shirshendu Ganguly and Milind Hegde. Fractal structure in the directed landscape. InProbability and Stochastic Processes: A Volume in Honour of Rajeeva L. Karandikar, pages 129–147. Springer, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Fractal geometry of the valleys of the parabolic anderson equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.03810, 2021

    Promit Ghosal and Jaeyun Yi. Fractal geometry of the valleys of the parabolic anderson equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.03810, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Fractal geometry of the pam in 2d and 3d with white noise potential.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16063, 2023

    Promit Ghosal and Jaeyun Yi. Fractal geometry of the pam in 2d and 3d with white noise potential.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16063, 2023. SHARP MOMENT AND UPPER TAIL ASYMPTOTICS FOR THE CRITICAL 2D STOCHASTIC HEAT FLOW 29

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Gaussian fluctuations from the 2d kpz equation.Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations, 8:150–185, 2020

    Yu Gu. Gaussian fluctuations from the 2d kpz equation.Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations, 8:150–185, 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Moments of the 2d she at criticality.Probability and Mathematical Physics, 2(1):179–219, 2021

    Yu Gu, Jeremy Quastel, and Li-Cheng Tsai. Moments of the 2d she at criticality.Probability and Mathematical Physics, 2(1):179–219, 2021

    2021

  25. [33]

    The tail distribution of the partition function for directed polymer in the weak disorder phase.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04335, 2024

    Stefan Junk and Hubert Lacoin. The tail distribution of the partition function for directed polymer in the weak disorder phase.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04335, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    American Mathematical Soc., 2014

    Davar Khoshnevisan.Analysis of stochastic partial differential equations, volume 119. American Mathematical Soc., 2014

    2014

  27. [35]

    Linear algebraic techniques for weighted spanning tree enumeration.Linear Algebra and its Applications, 582:391–402, 2019

    Steven Klee and Matthew T Stamps. Linear algebraic techniques for weighted spanning tree enumeration.Linear Algebra and its Applications, 582:391–402, 2019

    2019

  28. [36]

    Longtime asymptotics of the two-dimensional parabolic anderson model with white-noise potential

    Wolfgang König, Nicolas Perkowski, and Willem Van Zuijlen. Longtime asymptotics of the two-dimensional parabolic anderson model with white-noise potential. InAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincare (B) Probabilites et statistiques, volume 58, pages 1351–1384. Institut Henri Poinc...

    2022

  29. [37]

    Royen’s proof of the gaussian correlation inequality

    Rafał Latała and Dariusz Matlak. Royen’s proof of the gaussian correlation inequality. InGeometric Aspects of Functional Analysis: Israel Seminar (GAFA) 2014–2016, pages 265–275. Springer, 2017

    2014

  30. [38]

    On the moments of the mass of shrinking balls under the critical2dstochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.14601, 2024

    Ziyang Liu and Nikos Zygouras. On the moments of the mass of shrinking balls under the critical2dstochastic heat flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.14601, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    A multivariate extension of the erdős–taylor theorem.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 189(1):179–227, 2024

    Dimitris Lygkonis and Nikos Zygouras. A multivariate extension of the erdős–taylor theorem.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 189(1):179–227, 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    The scaling limit of the kpz equation in space dimension 3 and higher

    Jacques Magnen and Jérémie Unterberger. The scaling limit of the kpz equation in space dimension 3 and higher. Journal of Statistical Physics, 171:543–598, 2018

    2018

  33. [41]

    A condensation of interacting bosons in two dimensional space.arXiv preprint hep-th/9905120, 1999

    SG Rajeev. A condensation of interacting bosons in two dimensional space.arXiv preprint hep-th/9905120, 1999

    1999 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Gaussian multiplicative chaos and applications: A review.Probability Surveys, 11, 2014

    Rémi Rhodes, Vincent Vargas, et al. Gaussian multiplicative chaos and applications: A review.Probability Surveys, 11, 2014

    2014

  35. [43]

    A simple proof of the gaussian correlation conjecture extended to multivariate gamma distribu- tions.arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.1028, 2014

    Thomas Royen. A simple proof of the gaussian correlation conjecture extended to multivariate gamma distribu- tions.arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.1028, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Stochastic heat flow by moments.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.14657, 2024

    Li-Cheng Tsai. Stochastic heat flow by moments.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.14657, 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    Directed polymers in a random environment: a review of the phase transitions.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, page 104431, 2024

    Nikos Zygouras. Directed polymers in a random environment: a review of the phase transitions.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, page 104431, 2024. Department of Statistics, UC Berkeley, USA Email address:sganguly@berkeley.edu Department of Mathematical Sciences, KAIS...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.