pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.07284 · v1 · pith:PS62XBVKnew · submitted 2019-06-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Spitzer Albedos of Near-Earth Objects

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords near-earthalbedoobjectshighdiameterdistributionfindmcneill
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Thermal infrared observations are the most effective way to measure asteroid diameter and albedo for a large number of near-Earth objects. Major surveys like NEOWISE, NEOSurvey, ExploreNEOs, and NEOLegacy find a small fraction of high albedo objects that do not have clear analogs in the current meteorite population. About 8% of Spitzer-observed near-Earth objects have nominal albedo solutions greater than 0.5. This may be a result of lightcurve variability leading to an incorrect estimate of diameter or inaccurate absolute visual magnitudes. For a sample of 23 high albedo NEOs we do not find that their shapes are significantly different from the McNeill et al. (2019) near-Earth object shape distribution. We performed a Monte Carlo analysis on 1505 near-Earth objects observed by Spitzer, sampling the visible and thermal fluxes of all targets to determine the likelihood of obtaining a high albedo erroneously. Implementing the McNeill shape distribution for near-Earth objects, we provide an upper-limit on the geometric albedo of 0.5+/-0.1 for the near-Earth population.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.