Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 28 references

Stoichiometry control and epitaxial growth of AgCrSe2 thin films by pulsed-laser deposition

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Phase-pure AgCrSe2 films grown by compensating volatile silver

desk verdict First single-phase epitaxial AgCrSe2 thin film is real and well-characterized; the magnetic transition claim needs a cleaner measurement. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.21867 v1 pith:PTX2AXY3 submitted 2025-05-28 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Yusuke Tajima , Kenshin Inamura , Sebun Masaki , Takumi Yamazaki , Takeshi Seki , Kazutaka Kudo , Jobu Matsuno , Junichi Shiogai This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords AgCrSe2pulsed-laserdepositionepitaxialthinfilmpolarmagneticsemiconductorstoichiometrycontrolyttria-stabilizedzirconiatriangularlatticeantiferromagnetRashbaspin-orbitinteraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

AgCrSe2 is a polar magnetic semiconductor: its silver layers sit off-center between CrSe2 sheets, breaking inversion symmetry and creating spin-split electronic states, while its Cr3+ ions form a magnetically frustrated triangular lattice. The compound has long promised useful surface, thermoelectric, and spintronic behavior, but thin films could not be grown phase-pure because silver is volatile and the film runs silver-deficient, precipitating Cr2Se3. This paper shows that a silver-rich pulsed-laser deposition target on a lattice-matched yttria-stabilized zirconia (111) substrate at 450 °C compensates for the lost silver and suppresses the impurity phase. The resulting epitaxial films are c-axis oriented, stoichiometric, and contain only the expected twisted and polar structural domains. Their optical absorption edge of about 0.84 eV and magnetic transition near 41 K match bulk AgCrSe2, evidence that the film is phase-pure and has bulk-like electronic and magnetic character, which makes it a usable platform for surface and interface experiments.

What carries the argument

Two ingredients carry the argument. The first is stoichiometry compensation: mixing the AgCrSe2 target with Ag2Se in a 2:1 molar ratio supplies excess silver, and at 450 °C that excess balances the silver lost to evaporation, so the film lands at Ag/Cr = 1 instead of precipitating Cr2Se3. The second is lattice matching: the oxygen triangular lattice on YSZ(111) has an O–O spacing of 3.639 Å, only 1.1% smaller than the Se–Se spacing of 3.680 Å in the CrSe2 network, which templates c-axis epitaxial growth. The polar R3m structure itself, with silver occupying tetrahedral sites between CrSe2 layers, is what generates the polarization and the associated spin splitting that motivate the material.

What would settle it

A series of magnetization measurements on the same film at different applied fields, with the YSZ substrate contribution subtracted, would show whether the 41 K hump behaves like an intrinsic antiferromagnetic transition; an equally direct test is a heat-capacity or neutron-diffraction measurement looking for a long-range order transition at that temperature. Finding Cr2Se3 reflections in a film claimed single-phase, or a significant Ag/Cr gradient across the film thickness, would undercut the phase-purity claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that single-phase epitaxial AgCrSe2 films can be grown by pulsed-laser deposition when the target is enriched in silver (Ag/Cr = 2) and the substrate temperature is 450 °C. Under those conditions the film's Ag/Cr ratio is 1, the R3m c-axis-oriented structure appears with no Cr2Se3 or Ag impurity peaks, and atomically resolved STEM shows a sharp, lattice-matched interface with YSZ(111). The films contain two in-plane twisted domains rotated by 60° and both upward and downward polar domains, all consistent with the low-temperature polar structure of bulk AgCrSe2. The bandgap of about 0.84 eV and the magnetization hump at about 41 K, assigned to the antiferromagnetic transition, closely match bulk values; the paper takes that agreement as evidence of stoichiometry and phase purity. The stated purpose is to make AgCrSe2 available as a thin-film platform for exploring thermoelectric, spintronic, and multiferroic functionality at surfaces and heterointerfaces.

Load-bearing premise

The phase-purity and stoichiometry claim rests partly on interpreting the 41 K magnetization hump as the intrinsic antiferromagnetic transition of AgCrSe2 by comparison with a bulk Néel temperature of about 45 K, rather than on an independent magnetic probe; the paper also notes a possibly silver-poor initial layer at the interface, which would complicate the claim that the film is uniform and single-phase throughout.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • AgCrSe2 can now be made into gated devices and heterostructures, so the predicted spin-split surface state on a CrSe2 termination can be tested experimentally.
  • The silver-rich target recipe should carry over to other silver chalcogenides and related ACrX2 compounds that suffer from the same silver-volatility problem.
  • The observed coexistence of twisted and polar domains means the next milestone is single-domain growth, which the paper suggests could be achieved with facet-controlled or polar substrates.
  • The growth window in temperature and target composition is a tool for deliberately making off-stoichiometric AgxCrSe2 films, connecting thin-film work to the known superionic and thermoelectric behavior of the bulk compound.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 41 K feature is the only magnetic signature in the as-grown film, then the antiferromagnetic assignment should be treated as provisional until an independent magnetic probe or a field-dependent susceptibility study is done; this is an editorial caution, not a paper claim.
  • With roughly equal numbers of +Z and −Z polar domains, the macroscopic polarization of an as-grown film is likely to cancel, so any polarization-driven device effect will require polar-domain selection first.
  • The paper itself notes that the silver layer is not clearly visible near the film/substrate interface and could be an Ag-deficient CrSe2 initial layer; if real, that interface layer is a compositionally distinct region whose properties may differ from bulk AgCrSe2.
  • A natural next experiment is to cap the film with a nonmagnetic layer and look for the spin-split state at an engineered interface rather than at a free surface, since the free surface may be chemically unstable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the epitaxial growth of AgCrSe2 thin films on YSZ(111) by pulsed-laser deposition. The authors find that using an Ag-rich PLD target (Ag/Cr = 2) and a substrate temperature of 450 °C suppresses the formation of Ag-deficient Cr2Se3 impurities and yields a c-axis-oriented, single-phase film. Structural characterization by XRD phi-scans and atomic-resolution HAADF-STEM shows epitaxial growth with two 60°-twisted in-plane domains and both polar orientations. The optical absorbance spectrum shows an absorption edge that the authors extrapolate to a bandgap of about 0.84 eV, and magnetization measurements show a hump near 41 K, which they attribute to the Néel temperature of AgCrSe2. The paper uses the agreement of these two quantities with bulk values as supporting evidence that the film is single-phase and stoichiometric. The synthesis and structural characterization are presented in detail, with composition data as a function of substrate temperature and target composition.

Significance. If the growth recipe is reproducible, this is a useful and likely significant contribution: it provides a route to epitaxial thin films of a polar magnetic semiconductor whose bulk properties are of current interest in spintronics and thermoelectrics. The structural evidence is strong: XRD gives a c-axis lattice constant of 21.226 ± 0.005 Å, very close to the bulk value; phi-scans show the expected six-fold in-plane pattern from two twisted domains; STEM-EDX shows uniform elemental distribution and an atomically resolved R3m stacking with Ag monolayers; and the comparison between stoichiometric and Ag-rich targets gives a clear, mechanistic explanation for impurity suppression. The paper is also honest about the limitations of single-domain growth. However, the two physical-property characterizations that are used to claim stoichiometry and single-phase character are not yet established at the same level of rigor as the structural data, and one of them (the magnetic transition) is load-bearing for the paper's conclusion.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III.C, Fig. 4(b)] The assignment of the ~41 K hump to the antiferromagnetic Néel temperature of AgCrSe2 is not independently established. The M(T) curve is described as dominated by the YSZ substrate, with a large diamagnetic high-temperature part and a paramagnetic low-temperature part. The paper states that the hump is absent in a reference substrate, but no directly comparable substrate-subtracted curve is shown, no ZFC/FC comparison is given, and no field-dependent M(H) isotherms or frequency-independent susceptibility data are presented. The only criterion used to label the feature as TN is its proximity to the reported bulk value (~45 K, Ref. [8]). This is a problem because the same agreement is then cited as evidence that the film is stoichiometric and single-phase; without an independent magnetic signature, the argument is partially circular. Please show a subtracted M(T) curve (film minus a bare substrate measured under identical conditions) or, preferably, add ZFC/FC and M(H) data that confirm an intrinsic magnetic transition, and discuss the possible contribution of trace magnetic impurities that would be below XRD detection.
  2. [Sec. III.C, Fig. 4(a)] The optical bandgap is extracted by linear extrapolation of the raw absorbance A(hν) in the range 1.2 eV < hν < 1.7 eV, rather than by a Tauc analysis appropriate for a direct-gap semiconductor. For an allowed direct transition, one normally plots (αhν)^2 versus hν and extrapolates the linear region; this is especially important when comparing to the bulk value of the direct gap (Ref. [8] reports DFT values of 0.7 eV direct and 0.1 eV indirect). As it stands, the value 0.84 eV is presented without an uncertainty estimate and without a demonstration that the linear region in A(hν) corresponds to the onset of an allowed direct transition. Since the close agreement of Eg with bulk is used as evidence of stoichiometry, please provide a Tauc plot from the measured absorption coefficient, or at least justify quantitatively why extrapolation of raw absorbance is equivalent for this film.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'pulsed-layer deposition' should be 'pulsed-laser deposition'; this typo also appears in the Introduction.
  2. [Sec. III.B] In the sentence describing Figure 3(b), 'taken in a few tens µm distance from Fig. 1(a)' appears to be a cross-reference error; the intended reference is likely a panel of Fig. 3, not Fig. 1(a).
  3. [Sec. III.C] The text says 'Previous study of Hall measurement in bulk experiments reported that AgCrSe2 is a p-type semiconductor with bandgap being 0.5 eV [1] while the density-functional theory calculations suggest a direct and indirect bandgap of 0.7 and 0.1 eV, respectively [8].' The discrepancy among these values is not discussed; a brief comment would help the reader understand which 'bulk direct bandgap' the 0.84 eV value is being compared with.
  4. [Sec. III.C, Fig. 4(b)] The inset shows M(T) and its second derivative around TN, but the second-derivative curve is not described quantitatively; please state what feature defines TN and whether the second derivative is taken after any background subtraction.
  5. [Sec. III.A] The composition analysis reports only the Ag/Cr ratio from SEM-EDX; no Se content or absolute accuracy of the EDX measurement is given. Reporting Se/(Cr+Se) or an independent composition probe, even as a supplementary check, would strengthen the stoichiometry claim.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Mild self-definitional loop in the TN assignment, but the epitaxial-growth claim is independently supported.

  1. self definitional [Sec. III.C, Fig. 4(b) (magnetization paragraph)]
    "By considering the reported value of TN ~ 45 K for the bulk AgCrSe2 [8], we ascribed the observed hump in M(T) curve of the AgCrSe2 thin film as a development of antiferromagnetic order. The observation of comparable values of Eg and TN with bulk reflects the single-phase and stoichiometric feature of the obtained AgCrSe2 thin film."

    The hump near 41 K is identified as the Néel transition because it lies near the bulk TN (~45 K); the same near-agreement is then cited as evidence that the film is single-phase and stoichiometric. This is a self-definitional loop: the feature is interpreted using the very bulk value that the agreement is then taken to confirm. The loop is not formally a fit, but it is the same reduction by construction at the level of data interpretation. It is only corroborative, since stoichiometry and single-phase character are already supported by EDX, XRD, and STEM; the magnetic evidence alone would not independently establish the transition.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—epitaxial, c-axis-oriented, single-phase AgCrSe2 on YSZ(111) grown by PLD with an Ag-rich target—is established by self-contained measurements: XRD 2theta-omega and phi-scans show the c-axis orientation, in-plane epitaxy, and absence of Cr2Se3; EDX shows Ag/Cr ~1; HAADF-STEM directly images the R3m layered structure and epitaxial interface. These do not reduce to the bulk values they are compared with. The optical bandgap extraction (linear-region extrapolation of A(hν)) is a standard measurement with a substrate reference validating the setup; although the linear window is chosen to give a gap near the literature value, there is no evidence of fitting to that value, so it is not a circular derivation. The one genuine self-definitional step is the TN assignment: the 41 K hump is assigned to antiferromagnetic order solely by comparison with the bulk TN (~45 K), and then the same comparison is used as evidence of stoichiometry. This is interpretive circularity, but it is not the load-bearing part of the synthesis claim, which rests on diffraction, microscopy, and composition data. The self-citations (Refs. 12 and 20) are background or substrate motivation and are not load-bearing. Overall score 3 reflects one mild self-definitional loop with the central claim still independently supported.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on a few experimental choices: the Ag-rich target composition and the growth temperature, both tuned empirically. The bandgap value depends on a chosen extrapolation window. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Ag/Cr ratio in PLD target = 2 (Ag-rich) = Ag/Cr = 2
    Chosen to compensate for Ag loss during deposition; the paper shows this composition suppresses Cr2Se3 impurity phases.
  • Substrate temperature Tsub = 450°C = 450°C
    Selected as the optimal growth temperature after a series from 400 to 500°C; it gives the highest AgCrSe2 peak intensity without impurity phases.
  • Absorbance extrapolation window (1.2 eV to 1.7 eV) = Eg = 0.84 eV
    The linear region of the absorbance spectrum over this window is extrapolated to zero to estimate the bandgap; the choice of window affects the resulting value.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The R3m low-temperature structure is the relevant phase for AgCrSe2 at and below room temperature.
    The paper assumes the R3m polar structure based on the reported order-disorder transition near 475 K (ref 3), and interprets XRD and STEM accordingly.
  • domain assumption XRD absence of impurity peaks indicates a single-phase film within detection limits.
    The claim of single-phase growth relies on XRD patterns showing no Cr2Se3 or Ag peaks; this is a standard assumption but is limited by detection sensitivity.
  • domain assumption YSZ(111) provides a suitable lattice-matched substrate (1.1% mismatch) for epitaxial growth of the CrSe2 network.
    The epitaxial relationship is inferred from the lattice match and confirmed by XRD phi-scan and STEM, but the initial choice of substrate relies on prior work (ref 20).
  • domain assumption Linear extrapolation of the absorbance spectrum is a valid way to estimate the bandgap.
    The paper uses a linear fit to the absorbance A(hν) rather than a Tauc plot or absorption-coefficient analysis, which is a simplified approach.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stoichiometry control and epitaxial growth of AgCrSe2 thin films by pulsed-laser deposition." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PTX2AXY3

@misc{pith2026250521867,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stoichiometry control and epitaxial growth of AgCrSe2 thin films by pulsed-laser deposition},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PTX2AXY3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.21867}
}
read the original abstract

We report on epitaxial growth in thin-film synthesis of a polar magnetic semiconductor AgCrSe2 on lattice-matched yttria-stabilized zirconia (111) substrate by pulsed-layer deposition (PLD). By using Ag-rich PLD target to compensate for Ag deficiency in thin films, the nucleation of impurity phases is suppressed, resulting in the c-axis-oriented and single-phase AgCrSe2 thin film. Structural analysis using x-ray diffraction and cross-sectional scanning transmission electron microscopy reveals epitaxial growth with the presence of both twisted and polar domains. Optical absorbance spectrum and magnetization measurements show absorption edge at around 0.84 eV and magnetic transition temperature at 41 K, respectively. These values are consistent with the reported values of direct bandgap and N\'eel temperature of bulk AgCrSe2, reflecting a single-phase and stoichiometric feature of the obtained film. Our demonstration of epitaxial thin-film growth of AgCrSe2 serves as a bedrock for exploration of its potential thermoelectric and spintronic functionalities at surface or heterointerfaces.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [8]

    Kobayashi, H

    S. Kobayashi, H. Ueda, C. Michioka, and K. Yoshimura, Competition between the Direct Exchange Interaction and Superexchange Interaction in Layered Compounds LiCrSe2, LiCrTe2, and NaCrTe 2 with a Triangular Lattice , Inorg. Chem. 55, 7407– 7413 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [1]

    The a-axis length of 3.682 Å extracted 11 from AgCrSe2(101) is consistent with the bulk value (a = 3.680 Å)

    axis of the R3m structure is the C3 symmetry. The a-axis length of 3.682 Å extracted 11 from AgCrSe2(101) is consistent with the bulk value (a = 3.680 Å). From these in-plane XRD pattern, we conclude that the c-axis-oriented AgCrSe2 thin film contains two twisted domains rotated by 60° around the c axis with the e pitaxial relationship in which the a axis...

    work page

  3. [2]

    B. A. Boukamp and G. A. Wiegers, Ionic and electronic processes in AgCrSe2, Solid State Ionics 9-10, 1193 (1983)

    work page 1983

  4. [3]

    P. F. Bongers, C. F. van Bruggen, J. Koopstra, W. P. F. A. M. Omloo, G. A. Wiegers, and F. Jellinek, Structures and magnetic properties of some metal (I) chromium (III) sulfides and selenides, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 29, 977 (1968)

    work page 1968

  5. [4]

    van der Lee and G.A

    A. van der Lee and G.A. Wiegers, Anharmonic thermal motion of Ag in AgCrSe2: A high-temperature single-crystal X-ray diffraction study, J. Solid State Chem. 82, 216 (1989)

    work page 1989

  6. [5]

    B. Li, H. Wang, Y . Kawakita, Q. Zhang, M. Feygenson, H. L. Yu, D. Wu, K. Ohara, T. Kikuchi, K. Shibata, T. Yamada, X. K. Ning, Y . Chen, J. Q. He, D. Vaknin, R. Q. Wu, K. Nakajima , and M. G. Kanatzidis , Liquid-like thermal conduction in intercalated layered crystalline solids, Nature Mater. 17, 226 (2018)

    2018

  7. [6]

    J. Ding, J . L. Niedziela, D . Bansal, J . Wang, X. He, A. F. May, G . Ehlers, D . L. Abernathy, A. Said, A. Alatas, Y. Ren, G. Arya, and O . Delaire, Anharmonic lattice dynamics and superionic transition in AgCrSe 2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 3930 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [7]

    Baenitz, M

    M. Baenitz, M. M. Piva, S. Luther, J. Sichelschmidt, K. M. Ranjith, H. Dawczak - 18 Dȩbicki, M. O. Ajeesh, S. J. Kim, G. Siemann, C. Bigi, P. Manuel, D. Khalyavin, D. A. Sokolov, P. Mokhtari, H. Zhang, H. Yasuoka, P. D. C. King, G. Vinai, V . Polewczyk, P. Torelli, J. Wosnitza, U. Burkhardt, B. Schmidt, H. Rosner, S. Wirth, H. Kühne, M. Nicklas, and M. Sc...

    work page 2021

Show all 28 references
  1. [9]

    Takahashi, T

    H. Takahashi, T. Akiba, A. H. Mayo, K. Akiba, A. Miyake, M. Tokunaga, H. Mori, R. Arita, and S . Ishiwata, Spin-orbit-derived giant magnetoresistance in a layered magnetic semiconductor AgCrSe2, Phys. Rev. Materials 6, 054602 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Takatsu, S

    H. Takatsu, S. Yonezawa, S. Fujimoto, and Y. Maeno, Unconventional Anomalous Hall Effect in the Metallic Triangular -Lattice Magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 137201 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    G. R. Siemann, S . J. Kim, E . A. Morales, P. A. E. Murgatroyd, A . Zivanovic, B . Edwards, I. Marković, F. Mazzola, L. Trzaska, O. J. Clark, C . Bigi, H. Zhang, B. 19 Achinuq, T. Hesjedal, M. D. Watson, T. K. Kim, P. Bencok, G. van der Laan, C . M. Polley, M . Leandersson, H ...

    2023

  4. [12]

    F. M. R. Engelsman, G. A. Wiegers, F. Jellinek, and B. van Laar, Crystal Structures and Magnetic Structures of Some Metal(I) Chrominm(III) Sulfides and Selenides, J. Solid State Chem. 6, 574 (1973)

    1973

  5. [13]

    Tajima, J

    Y . Tajima, J. Shiogai, K. Ueda, H. Suzaki, K. Takaki, T. Seki, K. Kudo, and J. Matsuno, Non-coplanar spin structure in a metallic thin film of triangular lattice antiferromagnet CrSe, APL Mater. 12, 041112 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    D. W. Murphy, H. S. Chen, and B. Tell, Superionic conduction in AgCrS 2 and AgCrSe2, J. Electrochem. Soc. 124, 1268 (1977)

    1977

  7. [15]

    Damay, S

    F. Damay, S. Petit, S. Rols, M. Braendlein, R. Daou, E. Elkaïm, F. Fauth, F. Gascoin, C. Martin, and A. Maignan, Localised Ag+ vibrations at the origin of ultralow thermal conductivity in layered thermoelectric AgCrSe2, Sci. Rep. 6, 23415 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Gascoin and A

    F. Gascoin and A. Maignan, A. Order-disorder transition in AgCrSe2: a new route to efficient thermoelectrics, Chem. Mater. 23, 2510 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    Maignan, E

    A. Maignan, E. Guilmeau, F. Gascoin, Y . Breard, and V . Hardy, Revisiting some 20 chalcogenides for thermoelectricity, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 13, 053003 (2012)

    2012

  10. [18]

    S. J. Kim, J. Zhu, M. M. Piva, M. Schmidt, D. Fartab, A. P. Mackenzie, M. Baenitz, M. Nicklas, H . Rosner, A. M. Cook, R. González-Hernández, L . Šmejkal, and H . Zhang, Observation of the Anomalous Hall Effect in a Layered Polar Semiconductor, Adv. Sci. 11, 2307306 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Z. Sun, Y. Su, A. Zhi, Z. Gao, X. Han, K. Wu, L. Bao, Y. Huang, Y. Shi, X. Bai, P. Cheng, L. Chen, K. Wu, X. Tian, C. Wu, and B. Feng, Evidence for multiferroicity in single-layer CuCrSe2, Nature Commun. 15, 4252 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Nanao, C

    Y . Nanao, C. Bigi, A. Rajan, G. Vinai, D. Dagur, and P. D. C. King, Epitaxial growth of thin films by molecular beam epitaxy, J. Appl. Phys. 135, 045303 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Tajima, J

    Y. Tajima, J. Shiogai, M. Ochi, K. Kudo, and J. Matsuno, Engineered substrates for domain control in CrSe thin -film growth: Single -domain formation on lattice - matched YSZ(111) substrate , Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. In press, 10.35848/1347 - 4065/addb1b

    doi

  14. [22]

    Harada, K

    T. Harada, K. Fujiwara, and A. Tsukazaki, Highly conductive PdCoO2 ultrathin films for transparent electrodes, APL Mater. 6, 046107 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272 (2011). 21

    2011

  16. [24]

    M. Tang, Z. Chen, C. Yin, L. Lin, D. Ren, B. Liu, B. Kang, and R. Ang, Thermoelectric modulation by intrinsic defects in superionic conductor Ag xCrSe2, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 163901 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Konno and R

    J. Konno and R. Sinclair, Metal-mediated crystallization of amorphous germanium in germanium-silver layered systems, Philos. Mag. B, 71, 179 (1995)

    1995

  18. [26]

    N. V . Tarakina, S. Schreyeck, M. Luysberg, S. Grauer, C. Schumacher, G. Karczewski, K. Brunner, C. Gould, H. Buhmann, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, and L. W. Molenkamp, Suppressing Twin Formation in Bi2Se3 Thin Films, Adv. Mater. Interfaces 1, 1400134 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    Fujiwara, H

    K. Fujiwara, H. Minato, J. Shiogai, A. Kumamoto, N. Shibata, A. Tsukazaki, Thin- film stabilization of LiNbO 3-type ZnSnO3 and MgSnO3 by molecular-beam epitaxy, APL Mater. 7, 022505 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    W. S. Choi, D. G. Kim, S. S. A. Seo, S. J. Moon, D. Lee, J. H. Lee, H. S. Lee, D. Y. Cho, Y. S. Lee, P. Murugavel, J. Yu, and T. W. Noh, Electronic structures of hexagonal RMnO3 (R = Gd, Tb, Dy, and Ho) thin films: Optical spectroscopy and first-principles calculations, Phys. ...

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.