pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27494 · v1 · pith:PUARPGLTnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Ultrafast non-thermal suppression of ferroelectricity by carrier screening in LiNbO3

Man Tou Wong , Zhuquan Zhang , Zi-Jie Liu , Keith A. Nelson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 01:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords LiNbO3ferroelectricitycarrier screeningultrafast spectroscopysecond harmonic generationRaman scatteringnonthermal effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Even dilute photoexcited carriers suppress ferroelectric polarization in lithium niobate through transient screening.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that liberating a small number of trapped charges with a fast laser pulse quickly reduces the material's built-in electric polarization and its response to Raman light scattering. This reduction lasts after the pulse and happens without significant heating of the crystal lattice. A reader might care because it points to a fast, reversible method for turning down ferroelectric effects that does not rely on temperature changes or breaking the crystal symmetry.

Core claim

Femtosecond laser pulses liberate trapped carriers in LiNbO3. Time-resolved second-harmonic generation and stimulated Raman scattering then show a rapid yet enduring drop in polarization and Raman susceptibility. Fluence- and temperature-dependent measurements establish that the effect is non-thermal and caused by screening from the photoexcited carriers.

What carries the argument

Transient carrier screening that reduces the ferroelectric polarization and susceptibility.

If this is right

  • This provides an efficient way to modulate ferroelectricity on ultrafast timescales.
  • The suppression is reversible and preserves crystal symmetry.
  • It offers a route to control ferroic and competing quantum phases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such carrier screening might be used to switch between ferroelectric and paraelectric states in devices.
  • Applications in optical modulators or memory could benefit from this non-thermal control.
  • Testing in other ferroelectrics would show if the effect is general.

Load-bearing premise

The fluence and temperature dependent measurements are enough to prove that heating or other structural changes are not causing the observed suppression.

What would settle it

Detecting no suppression when the number of photoexcited carriers is zero, or finding that the suppression disappears immediately after carrier recombination, would challenge the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27494 by Keith A. Nelson, Man Tou Wong, Zhuquan Zhang, Zi-Jie Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Crystal structure and equilibrium characterization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Time-resolved SHG polarimetry of LiNbO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Ultrafast Raman response of LiNbO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Fluence and temperature dependence of ferroelec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ferroelectric materials are key to energy-efficient electronics, memory, and optical applications. While charge carriers typically screen and suppress ferroelectricity, their role under nonequilibrium conditions remains elusive. Here, we use femtosecond laser pulses to liberate trapped carriers in LiNbO3 and track the response using time-resolved second-harmonic generation and stimulated Raman scattering. Even dilute photoexcited carriers induce a rapid yet enduring suppression of polarization and Raman susceptibility. Fluence- and temperature-dependent analyses confirm the suppression is non-thermal and arises from transient carrier screening. These findings reveal an efficient, reversible, and symmetry-preserving mechanism to modulate ferroelectricity on ultrafast timescales, offering a new route to control ferroic and competing quantum phases.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reports time-resolved second-harmonic generation and stimulated Raman scattering measurements on LiNbO3 following femtosecond laser excitation that liberates trapped carriers. It claims that even dilute photoexcited carriers produce rapid yet enduring suppression of polarization and Raman susceptibility, and that fluence- and temperature-dependent analyses establish this suppression as non-thermal and arising specifically from transient carrier screening, thereby identifying a reversible, symmetry-preserving route to ultrafast ferroelectric control.

Significance. If the fluence- and temperature-dependent analyses convincingly isolate carrier screening from thermal and structural alternatives, the result would establish an efficient nonequilibrium mechanism for modulating ferroelectric order on ultrafast timescales. This would be of interest for applications in energy-efficient electronics and optical control of ferroic phases.

major comments (1)
  1. [Fluence- and temperature-dependent analyses] The attribution of the observed signal drop to transient carrier screening (rather than heating or photo-induced lattice changes) is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the fluence- and temperature-dependent analyses are presented without quantitative detail. No explicit comparison is shown between modeled screening length and the magnitude of the SHG/Raman drop, nor is there a subtraction of calculated lattice heating ΔT (from absorbed fluence) against the time-dependent signal. This omission prevents evaluation of whether thermal contributions are adequately excluded.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract summarizes the experimental approach and conclusion but contains no quantitative results, error estimates, or key analysis outputs, which reduces the standalone utility of the summary.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review. The concern about quantitative support for excluding thermal contributions is valid and directly addresses a load-bearing aspect of our interpretation. We will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested modeling and comparisons.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Fluence- and temperature-dependent analyses] The attribution of the observed signal drop to transient carrier screening (rather than heating or photo-induced lattice changes) is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the fluence- and temperature-dependent analyses are presented without quantitative detail. No explicit comparison is shown between modeled screening length and the magnitude of the SHG/Raman drop, nor is there a subtraction of calculated lattice heating ΔT (from absorbed fluence) against the time-dependent signal. This omission prevents evaluation of whether thermal contributions are adequately excluded.

    Authors: We agree that the current presentation would benefit from explicit quantitative comparisons. In the revised manuscript we will add: (i) calculation of the expected screening length (Debye or Thomas-Fermi) using the photo-generated carrier density estimated from the absorbed fluence and the known absorption coefficient of LiNbO3, followed by a direct comparison of this length scale to the fractional suppression observed in both SHG and Raman signals; (ii) estimation of the lattice temperature rise ΔT from the absorbed energy density divided by the volumetric heat capacity, together with a time-dependent subtraction or overlay of the expected thermal contribution on the measured traces. These additions will be placed in the main text or a dedicated supplementary section and will also include the relevant material parameters and assumptions used. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental measurements and analyses

full rationale

The paper reports time-resolved SHG and Raman measurements on LiNbO3 after photoexcitation, using fluence- and temperature-dependent data to attribute signal suppression to non-thermal carrier screening. No derivation chain, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional relations, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The central claim rests on independent experimental observables rather than reducing to its own inputs by construction. This is the expected outcome for a measurement-focused study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental study; central claim rests on standard interpretation that SHG intensity tracks polarization and SRS tracks susceptibility, with no free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or new entities introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5661 in / 976 out tokens · 39391 ms · 2026-06-29T01:41:52.684508+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Tokura and N

    Y. Tokura and N. Nagaosa, Nonreciprocal responses from non-centrosymmetric quantum materials, Nat. Commun. 9, 3740 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Su´ arez-Rodr´ ıguez, F

    M. Su´ arez-Rodr´ ıguez, F. De Juan, I. Souza, M. Gobbi, F. Casanova, and L. E. Hueso, Nonlinear transport in non-centrosymmetric systems, Nat. Mater.24, 1005 (2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    J. F. Scott, Applications of modern ferroelectrics, Science 315, 954 (2007)

    2007

  4. [4]

    Miyata and X.-Y

    K. Miyata and X.-Y. Zhu, Ferroelectric large polarons, Nat. Mater.17, 379 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    Franchini, M

    C. Franchini, M. Reticcioli, M. Setvin, and U. Diebold, Polarons in materials, Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 560 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    ferroelectric

    P. W. Anderson and E. Blount, Symmetry considerations on martensitic transformations: “ferroelectric” metals?, Phys. Rev. Lett.14, 217 (1965)

    1965

  7. [7]

    Y. Shi, Y. Guo, X. Wang, A. J. Princep, D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, Y. Michiue, A. Sato, K. Tsuda, S. Yu,et al., A ferroelectric-like structural transition in a metal, Nat. Mater.12, 1024 (2013)

    2013

  8. [8]

    Bhowal and N

    S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Polar metals: principles and prospects, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.53, 53 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    C. W. Rischau, X. Lin, C. P. Grams, D. Finck, S. Harms, J. Engelmayer, T. Lorenz, Y. Gallais, B. Fauque, J. Hem- berger,et al., A ferroelectric quantum phase transition inside the superconducting dome of Sr 1−xCaxTiO3−δ, Nat. Phys.13, 643 (2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    Hameed, D

    S. Hameed, D. Pelc, Z. W. Anderson, A. Klein, R. Spieker, L. Yue, B. Das, J. Ramberger, M. Lukas, Y. Liu,et al., Enhanced superconductivity and ferroelec- tric quantum criticality in plastically deformed strontium titanate, Nat. Mater.21, 54 (2022)

    2022

  11. [11]

    Jindal, A

    A. Jindal, A. Saha, Z. Li, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. C. Hone, T. Birol, R. M. Fernandes, C. R. Dean, A. N. Pasupathy,et al., Coupled ferroelectricity and supercon- ductivity in bilayer T d-MoTe2, Nature613, 48 (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    Raghavan, J

    S. Raghavan, J. Y. Zhang, O. F. Shoron, and S. Stemmer, Probing the metal-insulator transition in BaTiO3 by elec- trostatic doping, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 037602 (2016)

    2016

  13. [13]

    V. F. Michel, T. Esswein, and N. A. Spaldin, Interplay between ferroelectricity and metallicity in BaTiO 3, J. Mater. Chem. C9, 8640 (2021)

    2021

  14. [14]

    Li and T

    S. Li and T. Birol, Free-carrier-induced ferroelectricity in layered perovskites, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 087601 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    F. Gu, ´E. Murray, and P. Tangney, Carrier-mediated con- trol over the soft mode and ferroelectricity in BaTiO 3, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 034414 (2021)

    2021

  16. [16]

    G. Li, S. Yan, Y. Liu, W. Zhang, Y. Xiao, Q. Yang, M. Tang, J. Li, and Z. Long, Unraveling the origins of ferroelectricity in doped hafnia through carrier-mediated phase transitions, npj Comput. Mater.11, 34 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    Daranciang, M

    D. Daranciang, M. J. Highland, H. Wen, S. M. Young, N. C. Brandt, H. Y. Hwang, M. Vattilana, M. Nicoul, F. Quirin, J. Goodfellow,et al., Ultrafast photovoltaic re- sponse in ferroelectric nanolayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 087601 (2012)

    2012

  18. [18]

    Schick, M

    D. Schick, M. Herzog, H. Wen, P. Chen, C. Adamo, P. Gaal, D. G. Schlom, P. G. Evans, Y. Li, and M. Bargheer, Localized excited charge carriers gener- ate ultrafast inhomogeneous strain in the multiferroic BiFeO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 097602 (2014)

    2014

  19. [19]

    M. P. Jiang, M. Trigo, I. Savi´ c, S. Fahy, ´E. D. Murray, C. Bray, J. Clark, T. Henighan, M. Kozina, M. Chol- let,et al., The origin of incipient ferroelectricity in lead telluride, Nat. Commun.7, 12291 (2016)

    2016

  20. [20]

    Iwano, Y

    K. Iwano, Y. Shimoi, T. Miyamoto, D. Hata, M. So- tome, N. Kida, S. Horiuchi, and H. Okamoto, Ultra- fast photoinduced electric-polarization switching in a hydrogen-bonded ferroelectric crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 107404 (2017)

    2017

  21. [21]

    C. Lian, Z. A. Ali, H. Kwon, and B. M. Wong, Indirect but efficient: laser-excited electrons can drive ultrafast polarization switching in ferroelectric materials, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.10, 3402 (2019)

    2019

  22. [22]

    H. J. Lee, Y. Ahn, S. D. Marks, E. C. Landahl, S. Zhuang, M. H. Yusuf, M. Dawber, J. Y. Lee, T. Y. Kim, S. Unithrattil,et al., Structural evidence for ultrafast po- larization rotation in ferroelectric/dielectric superlattice nanodomains, Phys. Rev. X11, 031031 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    H. Yu, Y. Fukada, G. Nishida, K. Takubo, T. Ishikawa, S. Koshihara, N. Ikeda, and Y. Okimoto, Ultrafast anisotropic polarization dynamics of electronic ferroelec- tric LuFe2O4, Phys. Rev. Materials8, 064402 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Gao and L

    L. Gao and L. Bellaiche, Large photoinduced tuning of ferroelectricity in sliding ferroelectrics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 196801 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Yang and S

    Q. Yang and S. Meng, Light-induced complete reversal of ferroelectric polarization in sliding ferroelectrics, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 136902 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    Krapivin, M

    V. Krapivin, M. Gu, D. Hickox-Young, S. W. Teitelbaum, Y. Huang, G. De La Pe˜ na, D. Zhu, N. Sirica, M.-C. Lee, R. P. Prasankumar,et al., Ultrafast suppression of the ferroelectric instability in KTaO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 127601 (2022). 6

    2022

  27. [27]

    Paillard, E

    C. Paillard, E. Torun, L. Wirtz, J. ´I˜ niguez, and L. Bel- laiche, Photoinduced phase transitions in ferroelectrics, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 087601 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    Takahashi, N

    K. Takahashi, N. Kida, and M. Tonouchi, Terahertz ra- diation by an ultrafast spontaneous polarization modu- lation of multiferroic BiFeO3 thin films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 117402 (2006)

    2006

  29. [29]

    D. S. Rana, I. Kawayama, K. Mavani, K. Takahashi, H. Murakami, and M. Tonouchi, Understanding the na- ture of ultrafast polarization dynamics of ferroelectric memory in the multiferroic BiFeO3, Adv. Mater.21, 2881 (2009)

    2009

  30. [30]

    Y.-M. Sheu, S. A. Trugman, Y.-S. Park, S. Lee, H. Yi, S.- W. Cheong, Q. Jia, A. J. Taylor, and R. P. Prasankumar, Ultrafast carrier dynamics and radiative recombination in multiferroic BiFeO3, Appl. Phys. Lett.100(2012)

    2012

  31. [31]

    Zhang, J

    Y. Zhang, J. Dai, X. Zhong, D. Zhang, G. Zhong, and J. Li, Probing ultrafast dynamics of ferroelectrics by time-resolved pump-probe spectroscopy, Adv. Sci.8, 2102488 (2021)

    2021

  32. [32]

    L. P. Hoang, D. Pesquera, G. N. Hinsley, R. Car- ley, L. Mercadier, M. Teichmann, E. M. Unterleutner, D. Knez, M. Dienstleder, S. Ganguly,et al., Ultra- fast decoupling of polarization and strain in ferroelectric BaTiO3, Nat. Commun.16, 7966 (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    He, K.-j

    X. He, K.-j. Jin, H.-z. Guo, and C. Ge, Evolution of the electronic and lattice structure with carrier injection in BiFeO3, Phys. Rev. B93, 174110 (2016)

    2016

  34. [34]

    L. Y. Chen, J. C. Yang, C.-W. Luo, C. W. Laing, K.-H. Wu, J.-Y. Lin, T. M. Uen, J.-Y. Juang, Y. H. Chu, and T. Kobayashi, Ultrafast photoinduced mechanical strain in epitaxial BiFeO 3 thin films, Appl. Phys. Lett.101 (2012)

    2012

  35. [35]

    J. Chen, L. Hong, B. Huang, and H. Xiang, Ferroelectric switching assisted by laser illumination, Phys. Rev. B 109, 094102 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    Bernhardt, L

    F. Bernhardt, L. M. Verhoff, N. A. Sch¨ afer, A. Kapp, C. Fink, W. A. Nachwati, U. Bashir, D. Klimm, F. E. Azzouzi, U. Yakhnevych, Y. Suhak, H. Schmidt, K.-D. Becker, S. Ganschow, H. Fritze, and S. Sanna, Ferroelec- tric to paraelectric structural transition in LiTaO 3 and LiNbO3, Phys. Rev. Materials8, 054406 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Mankowsky, A

    R. Mankowsky, A. Von Hoegen, M. F¨ orst, and A. Caval- leri, Ultrafast Reversal of the Ferroelectric Polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 197601 (2017)

    2017

  38. [38]

    C. B. Uzundal, S. Jamnuch, E. Berger, C. Woodahl, P. Manset, Y. Hirata, T. Sumi, A. Amado, H. Akai, Y. Kubota,et al., Polarization-resolved extreme- ultraviolet second-harmonic generation from LiNbO 3, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 237402 (2021)

    2021

  39. [39]

    R. Zu, B. Wang, J. He, J.-J. Wang, L. Weber, L.-Q. Chen, and V. Gopalan, Analytical and numerical model- ing of optical second harmonic generation in anisotropic crystals using♯SHAARP package, npj Comput. Mater. 8, 246 (2022)

    2022

  40. [40]

    R. F. Schaufele and M. J. Weber, Raman Scattering by Lithium Niobate, Phys. Rev.152, 705 (1966)

    1966

  41. [41]

    A. S. Barker and R. Loudon, Dielectric Properties and Optical Phonons in LiNbO3, Phys. Rev.158, 433 (1967)

    1967

  42. [42]

    Servoin and F

    J. Servoin and F. Gervais, Soft vibrational mode in LiNbO3 and LiTaO 3, Solid State Commun.31, 387 (1979)

    1979

  43. [43]

    Sanna, S

    S. Sanna, S. Neufeld, M. R¨ using, G. Berth, A. Zren- ner, and W. G. Schmidt, Raman scattering efficiency in LiTaO3 and LiNbO 3 crystals, Phys. Rev. B91, 224302 (2015)

    2015

  44. [44]

    Henstridge, M

    M. Henstridge, M. F¨ orst, E. Rowe, M. Fechner, and A. Cavalleri, Nonlocal nonlinear phononics, Nat. Phys. 18, 457 (2022)

    2022

  45. [45]

    Sakamoto, K

    A. Sakamoto, K. Yoshino, U. Kubo, and Y. Inuishi, Tem- perature Dependence of Raman Scattering of LiNbO 3, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.15, 2487 (1976)

    1976

  46. [46]

    Ridah, M

    A. Ridah, M. D. Fontana, and P. Bourson, Temperature dependence of the Raman modes in LiNbO 3 and mech- anism of the phase transition, Phys. Rev. B56, 5967 (1997)

    1997

  47. [47]

    W. D. Johnston Jr and I. P. Kaminow, Temperature de- pendence of Raman and Rayleigh scattering in LiNbO 3 and LiTaO3, Phys. Rev.168, 1045 (1968)

    1968

  48. [48]

    R. C. Miller and A. Savage, Temperature dependence of the optical properties of ferroelectric LiNbO 3 and LiTaO3, Appl. Phys. Lett.9, 169 (1966)

    1966

  49. [49]

    J. G. Bergman, Molecular mechanics of the ferroelectric to paraelectric phase transition in LiNbO 3 via optical second harmonic generation, Chem. Phys. Lett.38, 230 (1976)

    1976

  50. [50]

    Batignani, E

    G. Batignani, E. Mai, M. Martinati, M. M. Neethish, S. Mukamel, and T. Scopigno, Temperature dependence of coherent versus spontaneous Raman scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206902 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    K. L. Sweeney and L. E. Halliburton, Oxygen vacancies in lithium niobate, Appl. Phys. Lett.43, 336 (1983)

    1983

  52. [52]

    Dhar and A

    A. Dhar and A. Mansingh, Optical properties of reduced lithium niobate single crystals, J. Appl. Phys.68, 5804 (1990)

    1990

  53. [53]

    Beyer, D

    O. Beyer, D. Maxein, K. Buse, B. Sturman, H. T. Hsieh, and D. Psaltis, Investigation of nonlinear absorption pro- cesses with femtosecond light pulses in lithium niobate crystals, Phys. Rev. E71, 056603 (2005)

    2005

  54. [54]

    S.-Y. Lee, D. Zhang, D. W. McCamant, P. Kukura, and R. A. Mathies, Theory of femtosecond stimulated Raman spectroscopy, J. Chem. Phys.121, 3632 (2004)

    2004

  55. [55]

    D. R. Dietze and R. A. Mathies, Femtosecond Stimulated Raman Spectroscopy, ChemPhysChem17, 1224 (2016)

    2016

  56. [56]

    Batignani, C

    G. Batignani, C. Ferrante, G. Fumero, M. Martinati, and T. Scopigno, Femtosecond stimulated Raman spec- troscopy, Nat. Rev. Methods Primers4, 34 (2024)

    2024

  57. [57]

    G. E. Peterson, A. A. Ballman, P. V. Lenzo, and P. M. Bridenbaugh, ELECTRO-OPTIC PROPERTIES OF LiNbO3, Appl. Phys. Lett.5, 62 (1964)

    1964

  58. [58]

    I. P. Kaminow and W. D. Johnston, Quantitative De- termination of Sources of the Electro-Optic Effect in LiNbO3 and LiTaO3, Phys. Rev.160, 519 (1967)

    1967

  59. [59]

    A. Mann, E. Baldini, A. Odeh, A. Magrez, H. Berger, and F. Carbone, Probing the coupling between a dou- blon excitation and the charge-density wave in TaS 2 by ultrafast optical spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B94, 115122 (2016)

    2016

  60. [60]

    F. Y. Gao, Z. Zhang, Z. Sun, L. Ye, Y.-H. Cheng, Z.- J. Liu, J. G. Checkelsky, E. Baldini, and K. A. Nelson, Snapshots of a light-induced metastable hidden phase driven by the collapse of charge order, Sci. Adv.8, eabp9076 (2022)

    2022

  61. [61]

    B¨ uhlmann, E

    S. B¨ uhlmann, E. Colla, and P. Muralt, Polarization re- versal due to charge injection in ferroelectric films, Phys. Rev. B72, 214120 (2005)

    2005

  62. [62]

    Rault, T

    J. Rault, T. Mente¸ s, A. Locatelli, and N. Barrett, Re- versible switching of in-plane polarized ferroelectric do- 7 mains in BaTiO 3 (001) with very low energy electrons, Sci. Rep.4, 6792 (2014)

    2014

  63. [63]

    A. A. Grekov, A. A. Adonin, and N. P. Protsenko, Encountering domains in SbSI, Ferroelectrics13, 483 (1976)

    1976

  64. [64]

    Maksymovych, S

    P. Maksymovych, S. Jesse, P. Yu, R. Ramesh, A. P. Bad- dorf, and S. V. Kalinin, Polarization Control of Electron Tunneling into Ferroelectric Surfaces, Science324, 1421 (2009)

    2009

  65. [65]

    Y. Wang, X. Liu, J. D. Burton, S. S. Jaswal, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Ferroelectric Instability Under Screened Coulomb Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 247601 (2012)

    2012

  66. [66]

    Maksymovych, A

    P. Maksymovych, A. N. Morozovska, P. Yu, E. A. Eliseev, Y.-H. Chu, R. Ramesh, A. P. Baddorf, and S. V. Kalinin, Tunable Metallic Conductance in Ferroelectric Nanodomains, Nano Lett.12, 209 (2012)

    2012

  67. [67]

    Crassous, T

    A. Crassous, T. Sluka, A. K. Tagantsev, and N. Setter, Polarization charge as a reconfigurable quasi-dopant in ferroelectric thin films, Nat. Nanotechnol.10, 614 (2015)

    2015

  68. [68]

    L. Zhu, Y. Lu, and L. Wang, Tuning ferroelectricity by charge doping in two-dimensional SnSe, J. Appl. Phys. 127, 014101 (2020)

    2020

  69. [69]

    Zheng, Q

    Z. Zheng, Q. Ma, Z. Bi, S. de La Barrera, M.-H. Liu, N. Mao, Y. Zhang, N. Kiper, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, et al., Unconventional ferroelectricity in moir´ e het- erostructures, Nature588, 71 (2020)

    2020

  70. [70]

    Q. Song, C. A. Occhialini, E. Erge¸ cen, B. Ilyas, D. Amoroso, P. Barone, J. Kapeghian, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. S. Botana,et al., Evidence for a single- layer van der waals multiferroic, Nature602, 601 (2022)

    2022

  71. [71]

    B. S. Dastrup, Z. Zhang, P. R. Miedaner, Y.-C. Chien, Y. Sun, Y. Wu, H. Cao, E. Baldini, and K. A. Nelson, Electromagnon signatures of a metastable multiferroic state, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 086706 (2025)

    2025

  72. [72]

    D. A. Bustamante Lopez, D. M. Juraschek, M. Fechner, X. Xu, S.-W. Cheong, and W. Hu, Ultrafast simultaneous manipulation of multiple ferroic orders through nonlinear phonon excitation, npj Quantum Mater.10, 24 (2025)

    2025