Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 67 references

Quantum Geometric Limits for Non-Abelian Holonomies

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Non-Abelian Wilczek-Zee holonomies obey a universal bound given by the surface integral of the non-Abelian curvature norm.

desk verdict The paper claims a universal surface-integral bound on non-Abelian Wilczek-Zee holonomies by recasting the evolution as effective Stokes-Schrödinger dynamics with transported curvature, but that recasting is the step that needs direct verification. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.28754 v1 pith:PUEY3OZE submitted 2026-05-27 quant-ph

François Impens , David Guéry-Odelin This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords non-AbelianholonomiesWilczek-ZeephasesquantumgeometriclimitBerrycurvaturespeedlimitsStokestheoremSU(2)tripodholonomicevolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that the magnitude of arbitrary non-Abelian holonomies remains limited by an integral of curvature over a surface, even though path ordering blocks the direct Stokes theorem that works for Abelian cases. This quantum geometric limit functions as a geometric version of quantum speed limits, where the cost is measured by integrated curvature rather than elapsed time. The authors recast the evolution in terms of an effective dynamics driven by transported curvature, which turns the search for minimal-cost paths into a variational problem governed by a non-Abelian Lorentz force. They solve this with a brachistochrone-style ansatz of curvature-weighted geodesics and apply it to an SU(2) tripod system, where optimal paths align the curvature along one Lie-algebra direction.

What carries the argument

The quantum geometric limit, a bound on holonomy magnitude set by the surface integral of the non-Abelian curvature norm, obtained by recasting the evolution as effective Stokes-Schrödinger dynamics driven by transported curvature.

What would settle it

A concrete Wilczek-Zee holonomy whose magnitude exceeds the surface integral of the corresponding non-Abelian curvature norm.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Arbitrary Wilczek-Zee holonomies obey a universal quantum geometric limit (QGL), in which the holonomy magnitude is bounded by a surface integral of the non-Abelian curvature norm. Recasting holonomic evolution as an effective Stokes-Schrödinger dynamics driven by transported curvature, the QGL is the geometric counterpart of conventional quantum speed limits, with a time-integrated generator norm replaced by a surface-integrated curvature cost. The induced contour-surface variational problem is governed by a non-Abelian Lorentz force, addressed with a brachistochrone ansatz of curvature-weighted geodesics. Applied to an SU(2) tripod dark subspace, near-optimal protocols spontaneously align

Load-bearing premise

Holonomic evolution can be recast as an effective Stokes-Schrödinger dynamics driven by transported curvature for arbitrary paths.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The magnitude of any non-Abelian holonomy is bounded above by the surface integral of the curvature norm.
  • Minimal-cost paths obey a variational principle governed by a non-Abelian Lorentz force.
  • Curvature-weighted geodesics provide a practical ansatz for approaching the bound.
  • In SU(2) tripod systems, optimal paths align transported curvature along a single Lie-algebra direction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The alignment result suggests that some non-Abelian operations can be approximated by effectively Abelian ones with lower geometric cost.
  • The same surface-integral bound could be tested numerically in other gauge groups or physical platforms that realize Wilczek-Zee holonomies.
  • If the bound is tight, it supplies a practical figure of merit for comparing different holonomic gate implementations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that arbitrary Wilczek-Zee non-Abelian holonomies obey a universal quantum geometric limit (QGL) in which the holonomy magnitude is bounded above by a surface integral of the norm of the non-Abelian curvature 2-form. This bound is obtained by recasting the path-ordered holonomic evolution as an effective Stokes-Schrödinger dynamics whose generator is the curvature pulled back and transported along the path; the QGL is then presented as the geometric counterpart of quantum speed limits. The resulting contour-surface variational problem is governed by a non-Abelian Lorentz force, which is addressed via a brachistochrone ansatz of curvature-weighted geodesics. The framework is illustrated on an SU(2) tripod dark subspace, where near-optimal protocols are reported to align the transported curvature along a single Lie-algebra direction, thereby reducing effective non-Abelianity.

Significance. If the recasting step is rigorously valid, the QGL would furnish a parameter-free geometric bound on non-Abelian holonomies that extends the Stokes-theorem intuition beyond the Abelian case and supplies a concrete optimization principle for geometric quantum control. The analogy to quantum speed limits, the formulation of the non-Abelian variational problem, and the explicit tripod application are conceptually coherent and could influence work on holonomic gates and geometric phases. The claimed universality and absence of fitted parameters would be notable strengths if the derivation holds without additional assumptions.

major comments (2)
  1. [central derivation of the QGL] The central identification of the path-ordered Wilczek-Zee holonomy with the time-evolution operator generated by the transported curvature (the step that converts the surface integral of ||F|| into an operator-norm bound) must be shown explicitly. For non-Abelian connections the parallel transport of F obeys an adjoint action involving the connection itself; any mismatch between this transported generator and the actual path-ordered exponential would invalidate the subsequent inequality. An explicit derivation or counter-example check for a non-trivial non-Abelian path is required.
  2. [SU(2) tripod example] In the SU(2) tripod application, the assertion that near-optimal protocols spontaneously align the transported curvature along a single Lie-algebra direction needs quantitative support: explicit computation of the achieved holonomy operator norm versus the QGL surface integral, together with the deviation from the bound, must be provided to substantiate the claim that non-Abelianity is effectively tamed.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract introduces the acronym QGL without a preceding definition; the introduction should state the precise mathematical statement of the limit before using the acronym.
  2. Notation for the transported curvature and the effective generator should be introduced with an explicit equation in the main text rather than only in the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments. We address each major comment below, agreeing that additional explicit material is needed, and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [central derivation of the QGL] The central identification of the path-ordered Wilczek-Zee holonomy with the time-evolution operator generated by the transported curvature (the step that converts the surface integral of ||F|| into an operator-norm bound) must be shown explicitly. For non-Abelian connections the parallel transport of F obeys an adjoint action involving the connection itself; any mismatch between this transported generator and the actual path-ordered exponential would invalidate the subsequent inequality. An explicit derivation or counter-example check for a non-trivial non-Abelian path is required.

    Authors: We agree that the central identification requires a fully explicit derivation, particularly to handle the adjoint action under parallel transport of the curvature 2-form. The manuscript outlines the recasting of the Wilczek-Zee evolution as Stokes-Schrödinger dynamics but does not expand the adjoint transport step in complete detail. In the revision we will add a dedicated subsection deriving the effective generator, explicitly incorporating the adjoint action, and will include a verification on a non-trivial non-Abelian path to confirm that the operator-norm bound remains valid. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [SU(2) tripod example] In the SU(2) tripod application, the assertion that near-optimal protocols spontaneously align the transported curvature along a single Lie-algebra direction needs quantitative support: explicit computation of the achieved holonomy operator norm versus the QGL surface integral, together with the deviation from the bound, must be provided to substantiate the claim that non-Abelianity is effectively tamed.

    Authors: We concur that quantitative evidence is required to support the claim of spontaneous alignment and effective reduction of non-Abelianity. The manuscript reports the qualitative behavior of the near-optimal protocols but does not supply the explicit norm comparisons. In the revised version we will add explicit numerical results (including tables or plots) of the achieved holonomy operator norm, the corresponding surface-integral QGL value, and the relative deviation for the tripod example. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained via explicit recasting and norm bounds.

full rationale

The paper derives the QGL bound by first recasting arbitrary Wilczek-Zee holonomies as the time-evolution operator of an effective Stokes-Schrödinger equation whose generator is the transported non-Abelian curvature 2-form, then applying operator-norm inequalities to replace the time-integrated generator norm with a surface integral of ||F||. This recasting is presented as a direct mathematical identity (not a fit, ansatz, or self-referential definition), and the subsequent variational problem follows from standard calculus of variations on that effective dynamics. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or an imported uniqueness theorem; the central claim therefore retains independent mathematical content outside its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that holonomic evolution admits an effective Stokes-Schrödinger description; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Holonomic evolution can be recast as an effective Stokes-Schrödinger dynamics driven by transported curvature
    Invoked to identify the QGL as the geometric counterpart of quantum speed limits.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Geometric Limits for Non-Abelian Holonomies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PUEY3OZE

@misc{pith2026260528754,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Geometric Limits for Non-Abelian Holonomies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PUEY3OZE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.28754}
}
read the original abstract

Stokes' theorem turns Abelian Berry phases into curvature fluxes, whereas path ordering precludes such a simple formula for non-Abelian holonomies. We show that a quantitative form of this intuition survives: arbitrary Wilczek--Zee holonomies obey a universal quantum geometric limit~(QGL), in which the holonomy magnitude is bounded by a surface integral of the non-Abelian curvature norm. Recasting holonomic evolution as an effective Stokes--Schr\"odinger dynamics driven by transported curvature, we identify the QGL as the geometric counterpart of conventional quantum speed limits, with a time-integrated generator norm replaced by a surface-integrated curvature cost. The induced contour--surface variational problem is governed by a non-Abelian Lorentz force, which we address with a brachistochrone ansatz of curvature-weighted geodesics. Applied to an SU(2) tripod dark subspace, near-optimal protocols spontaneously align the transported curvature along a single Lie-algebra direction, effectively taming non-Abelianity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28754 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Non-Abelian brachistochrones: Open (red) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. QGL efficiency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pancharatnam, Generalized theory of interference, and its applications

    S. Pancharatnam, Generalized theory of interference, and its applications. part i. coherent pencils, Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences - Section A44, 247 (1956)

    1956

  2. [2]

    Simon, Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and berry’s phase, Phys

    B. Simon, Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and berry’s phase, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 2167 (1983)

    1983

  3. [3]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adia- batic changes, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don A392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  4. [5]

    Nakahara,Geometry, Topology and Physics, 2nd ed

    M. Nakahara,Geometry, Topology and Physics, 2nd ed. (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, 2003)

    2003

  5. [6]

    A. Bohm, A. Mostafazadeh, H. Koizumi, Q. Niu, and J. Zwanziger,The Geometric Phase in Quantum Systems (Springer, Berlin, 2003)

    2003

  6. [7]

    Wilczek and A

    F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Appearance of gauge structure in simple dynamical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 2111 (1984)

    1984

  7. [8]

    quantum holon- omy

    A. Uhlmann, Parallel transport and “quantum holon- omy” along density operators, Reports on Mathematical Physics24, 229 (1986)

    1986

  8. [9]

    Zanardi and M

    P. Zanardi and M. Rasetti, Holonomic quantum compu- tation, Physics Letters A264, 94 (1999)

    1999

Show all 67 references
  1. [10]

    Chru´ sci´ nski and A

    D. Chru´ sci´ nski and A. Jamio lkowski,Geometric Phases in Classical and Quantum Mechanics, Progress in Math- ematical Physics, Vol. 36 (Birkh¨ auser Boston, 2004)

    2004

  2. [11]

    J. Dai, A. Molochkov, A. J. Niemi, and J. Wester- holm, Non-Abelian geometric phases in triangular struc- tures and universal SU(2) control in shape space, e-print arXiv:2512.24798 (2025)

    2025

  3. [12]

    L.-M. Duan, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Geometric manipu- lation of trapped ions for quantum computation, Science 292, 1695 (2001)

    2001

  4. [13]

    Leibfried, B

    D. Leibfried, B. DeMarco, V. Meyer, D. Lucas, M. Bar- rett, J. Britton, W. M. Itano, B. Jelenkovi´ c, C. Langer, T. Rosenband, and D. J. Wineland, Experimental demonstration of a robust, high-fidelity geometric two ion-qubit phase gate, Nature422, 412 (2003)

    2003

  5. [14]

    Ruseckas, G

    J. Ruseckas, G. Juzeli¯ unas, P. ¨Ohberg, and M. Fleis- chhauer, Non-Abelian gauge potentials for ultracold atoms with degenerate dark states, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 010404 (2005)

    2005

  6. [15]

    Leroux, K

    F. Leroux, K. Pandey, R. Rehbi, F. Chevy, C. Miniatura, B. Gr´ emaud, and D. Wilkowski, Non-Abelian adiabatic geometric transformations in a cold strontium gas, Na- ture Communications9, 3580 (2018)

    2018

  7. [16]

    Bharath H. M., M. Boguslawski, M. Barrios, L. Xin, and M. S. Chapman, Exploring Non-Abelian geometric phases in spin-1 ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 173202 (2019)

    2019

  8. [17]

    Sugawa, F

    S. Sugawa, F. Salces-Carcoba, A. R. Perry, Y. Yue, and I. B. Spielman, Second Chern number of a quantum- simulated non-Abelian Yang monopole, Science360, 1429 (2018)

    2018

  9. [18]

    Hasan, C

    M. Hasan, C. S. Madasu, K. D. Rathod, C. C. Kwong, C. Miniatura, F. Chevy, and D. Wilkowski, Wave packet dynamics in synthetic Non-Abelian gauge fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 130402 (2022)

    2022

  10. [19]

    C. S. Madasu, C. Mitra, L. Gabardos, K. D. Rathod, T. Zanon-Willette, C. Miniatura, F. Chevy, C. C. Kwong, and D. Wilkowski, Experimental realization of a SU(3) color–orbit coupling in an ultracold gas, Nature Commu- nications16, 8448 (2025)

    2025

  11. [20]

    A. A. J. Abdumalikov, J. M. Fink, K. Juliusson, M. Pechal, S. Berger, A. Wallraff, and S. Filipp, Experi- 6 mental realization of non-Abelian non-adiabatic geomet- ric gates, Nature496, 482 (2013)

    2013

  12. [21]

    Y. Xu, Z. Hua, T. Chen, X. Pan, X. Li, J. Han, W. Cai, Y. Ma, H. Wang, Y. P. Song, Z.-Y. Xue, and L. Sun, Experimental implementation of universal nonadiabatic geometric quantum gates in a superconducting circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 230503 (2020)

    2020

  13. [22]

    Zu, W.-B

    C. Zu, W.-B. Wang, L. He, W.-G. Zhang, C.-Y. Dai, F. Wang, and L.-M. Duan, Experimental realization of universal geometric quantum gates with solid-state spins, Nature514, 72 (2014)

    2014

  14. [23]

    Arroyo-Camejo, A

    S. Arroyo-Camejo, A. Lazariev, S. W. Hell, and G. Bala- subramanian, Room temperature high-fidelity holonomic single-qubit gate on a solid-state spin, Nature Communi- cations5, 4870 (2014)

    2014

  15. [24]

    C. G. Yale, F. J. Heremans, B. B. Zhou, A. Auer, G. Burkard, and D. D. Awschalom, Optical manipula- tion of the Berry phase in a solid-state spin qubit, Nature Photonics10, 184 (2016)

    2016

  16. [25]

    Iadecola, T

    T. Iadecola, T. Schuster, and C. Chamon, Non-Abelian braiding of light, Physical Review Letters117, 073901 (2016)

    2016

  17. [26]

    Sunet al., Non-Abelian thouless pumping in pho- tonic waveguides, Nature Physics18, 1080 (2022)

    Y.-K. Sunet al., Non-Abelian thouless pumping in pho- tonic waveguides, Nature Physics18, 1080 (2022)

    2022

  18. [27]

    Parto, C

    M. Parto, C. Leefmans, J. Williams, F. Nori, and A. Marandi, Non-Abelian effects in dissipative photonic topological lattices, Nature Communications14, 1440 (2023)

    2023

  19. [28]

    Y. Chen, Y. Fan, G. Larsonneur, J. Xiang, A. He, G. Wang, X.-L. Zhang, G. Ma, Q. Zhou, G. Guo, Y. Su, and X. Guo, High-dimensional non-Abelian holonomy in integrated photonics, Nature Communications16, 3650 (2025)

    2025

  20. [29]

    Guillot, C

    M. Guillot, C. Blanchard, M. Morassi, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, L. Le Gratiet, A. Harouri, I. Sagnes, R.-J. Slager, F. N. ¨Unal, J. Bloch, and S. Ravets, Measuring non-Abelian quantum geometry and topology in a multi-gap photonic lattice, e-print arXiv:2511.03894 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  21. [30]

    L. I. Mandelstam and I. E. Tamm, The uncertainty rela- tion between energy and time in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, Journal of Physics (USSR)9, 249 (1945)

    1945

  22. [31]

    Anandan and Y

    J. Anandan and Y. Aharonov, Geometry of quantum evo- lution, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 1697 (1990)

    1990

  23. [32]

    Margolus and L

    N. Margolus and L. B. Levitin, The maximum speed of dynamical evolution, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 120, 188 (1998)

    1998

  24. [33]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum lim- its to dynamical evolution, Phys. Rev. A67, 052109 (2003)

    2003

  25. [34]

    M. M. Taddei, B. M. Escher, L. Davidovich, and R. L. de Matos Filho, Quantum speed limit for physical pro- cesses, Physical Review Letters110, 050402 (2013)

    2013

  26. [35]

    del Campo, I

    A. del Campo, I. L. Egusquiza, M. B. Plenio, and S. F. Huelga, Quantum speed limits in open system dynamics, Physical Review Letters110, 050403 (2013)

    2013

  27. [36]

    Deffner and E

    S. Deffner and E. Lutz, Quantum speed limit for non-Markovian dynamics, Physical Review Letters111, 010402 (2013)

    2013

  28. [37]

    Deffner and S

    S. Deffner and S. Campbell, Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theo- retical50, 453001 (2017)

    2017

  29. [38]

    Shanahan, A

    B. Shanahan, A. Chenu, N. Margolus, and A. del Campo, Quantum speed limits across the quantum-to-classical transition, Physical Review Letters120, 070401 (2018)

    2018

  30. [39]

    Impens, F

    F. Impens, F. M. D’Angelis, F. A. Pinheiro, and D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, Time scaling and quantum speed limit in non-Hermitian hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. A104, 052620 (2021)

    2021

  31. [40]

    G. Ness, M. R. Lam, W. Alt, D. Meschede, Y. Sagi, and A. Alberti, Observing crossover between quantum speed limits, Science Advances7, eabj9119 (2021)

    2021

  32. [41]

    Impens and D

    F. Impens and D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, Approaching the quan- tum speed limit in quantum gates with geometric control, Phys. Rev. A112, 042614 (2025)

    2025

  33. [42]

    Nelson and E

    H. Nelson and E. Barnes, How fast can a quantum gate be? Exact speed limits from geometry, e-print: arXiv 2604.23031 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  34. [43]

    S¨ onnerborn, Isoholonomic inequalities and speed lim- its for cyclic quantum systems, e-print arXiv:2506.10215 (2025)

    O. S¨ onnerborn, Isoholonomic inequalities and speed lim- its for cyclic quantum systems, e-print arXiv:2506.10215 (2025)

    2025

  35. [44]

    M. B. Halpern, Field-strength and dual variable formu- lations of gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D19, 517 (1979)

    1979

  36. [46]

    Kondo, Wilson loop and magnetic monopole through a non-Abelian Stokes theorem, Phys

    K.-I. Kondo, Wilson loop and magnetic monopole through a non-Abelian Stokes theorem, Phys. Rev. D77, 085029 (2008)

    2008

  37. [47]

    Carlini, A

    A. Carlini, A. Hosoya, T. Koike, and Y. Okudaira, Time- optimal quantum evolution, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 060503 (2006)

    2006

  38. [48]

    Carlini, A

    A. Carlini, A. Hosoya, T. Koike, and Y. Okudaira, Time- optimal unitary operations, Phys. Rev. A75, 042308 (2007)

    2007

  39. [49]

    Mostafazadeh, Quantum brachistochrone problem and the geometry of the state space in pseudo-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys

    A. Mostafazadeh, Quantum brachistochrone problem and the geometry of the state space in pseudo-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 130502 (2007)

    2007

  40. [50]

    Fleischhauer, A

    M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Elec- tromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coher- ent media, Reviews of Modern Physics77, 633 (2005)

    2005

  41. [51]

    R. G. Unanyan, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Laser- driven population transfer in four-level atoms: Conse- quences of non-Abelian geometrical adiabatic phase fac- tors, Phys. Rev. A59, 2910 (1999)

    1999

  42. [52]

    Møller, L

    D. Møller, L. B. Madsen, and K. Mølmer, Geometric phase gates based on stimulated Raman adiabatic pas- sage in tripod systems, Phys. Rev. A75, 062302 (2007)

    2007

  43. [53]

    Sj¨ oqvist, D

    E. Sj¨ oqvist, D. M. Tong, L. M. Andersson, B. Hes- smo, M. Johansson, and K. Singh, Non-adiabatic holo- nomic quantum computation, New Journal of Physics14, 103035 (2012)

    2012

  44. [54]

    D. I. Diakonov and V. Y. Petrov, A formula for the Wil- son loop, Physics Letters B224, 131 (1989)

    1989

  45. [55]

    (2026), see Supplementary Material at [URL will be in- serted by publisher] for additional details on the ef- fective Stokes–Schr¨ odinger construction underlying the QGL framework, the derivation of the Mandelstam– Tamm, Hilbert–Schmidt, and operator-norm QGLs for non-Abelian...

    2026

  46. [56]

    Vaidman, Minimum time for the evolution to an or- thogonal quantum state, American Journal of Physics60, 182 (1992)

    L. Vaidman, Minimum time for the evolution to an or- thogonal quantum state, American Journal of Physics60, 182 (1992)

    1992

  47. [57]

    Ansel, E

    Q. Ansel, E. Dionis, F. Arrouas, B. Peaudecerf, S. Gu´ erin, D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, and D. Sugny, Introduction to theoretical and experimental aspects of quantum op- 7 timal control, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics57, 133001 (2024)

    2024

  48. [58]

    L. S. Pontryagin, V. G. Boltyanskii, R. V. Gamkrelidze, and E. F. Mishchenko,The Mathematical Theory of Op- timal Processes(Wiley, New York, 1962)

    1962

  49. [59]

    Pachos, P

    J. Pachos, P. Zanardi, and M. Rasetti, Non-Abelian Berry connections for quantum computation, Physical Review A61, 010305 (1999)

    1999

  50. [60]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Annals of Physics303, 2 (2003)

    2003

  51. [61]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topological quan- tum computation, Reviews of Modern Physics80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  52. [62]

    D. A. Ivanov, Non-Abelian statistics of half-quantum vor- tices inp-wave superconductors, Physical Review Letters 86, 268 (2001)

    2001

  53. [63]

    Alicea, Y

    J. Alicea, Y. Oreg, G. Refael, F. von Oppen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Non-Abelian statistics and topological quantum information processing in 1d wire networks, Na- ture Physics7, 412 (2011)

    2011

  54. [64]

    Das Sarma, M

    S. Das Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation, npj Quantum Information1, 15001 (2015)

    2015

  55. [65]

    Zhang, W

    S.-B. Zhang, W. B. Rui, A. Calzona, S.-J. Choi, A. P. Schnyder, and B. Trauzettel, Topological and holonomic quantum computation based on second-order topologi- cal superconductors, Physical Review Research2, 043025 (2020)

    2020

  56. [66]

    Calzona, N

    A. Calzona, N. P. Bauer, and B. Trauzettel, Holonomic implementation of CNOT gate on topological Majorana qubits, SciPost Physics Core3, 014 (2020)

    2020

  57. [67]

    Yu, X.-L

    R. Yu, X.-L. Qi, A. Bernevig, Z. Fang, and X. Dai, Equiv- alent expression ofZ 2 topological invariant for band insu- lators using the non-Abelian Berry connection, Physical Review B84, 075119 (2011)

    2011

  58. [68]

    A. A. Soluyanov and D. Vanderbilt, Computing topo- logical invariants without inversion symmetry, Physical Review B83, 235401 (2011)

    2011

  59. [69]

    Alexandradinata, X

    A. Alexandradinata, X. Dai, and B. A. Bernevig, Wilson- loop characterization of inversion-symmetric topological insulators, Physical Review B89, 155114 (2014)

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.