pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20986 · v1 · pith:PUGSKGJPnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Multiferroic Properties of Electrospun CFO-BCTSn Nanocomposites for Magnetoelectric and Magnetic Field Sensing Applications

Youness Hadouch , Nayad Abdallah , Daoud Mezzane , Mbarek Amjoud , Voicu Dolocan , Khalid Hoummada , Nikola Novak , Anna Razumnaya
show 6 more authors
Brigita Rozic Val Fisinger Hana Ursic Valentin Laguta Zdravko Kutnjak Mimoun El Marssi
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 04:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords multiferroicnanofiberselectrospinningmagnetoelectric couplinglead-freenanocompositesmagnetic sensing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electrospun CFO-BCTSn nanofibers show magnetoelectric coupling through changes in magnetic hysteresis after electrical poling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the synthesis of lead-free multiferroic composite nanofibers combining CFO and BCTSn phases via sol-gel electrospinning. Structural checks confirm the two desired phases coexist in fibers 120-150 nm across with no extra phases. Magnetic measurements and piezoresponse microscopy establish the fibers are both magnetic and piezoelectric. The central result is that electrically poled samples display measurably different magnetic hysteresis loops from unpoled ones, taken as evidence of magnetoelectric coupling. This combination points to possible use in small magnetoelectric devices and magnetic field sensors.

Core claim

The authors establish that CFO-BCTSn composite nanofibers exhibit magnetoelectric coupling. This is shown directly by the observed differences in magnetic hysteresis loops between electrically poled and unpoled samples. The fibers are produced by sol-gel electrospinning, form well-defined structures without secondary phases, and display both magnetic hysteresis and piezoelectric response.

What carries the argument

Magnetoelectric coupling, shown by the difference in magnetic hysteresis loops between electrically poled and unpoled samples.

If this is right

  • The nanofibers can serve as active elements in nanoscale magnetoelectric devices.
  • The material offers a route to lead-free magnetic field sensors.
  • The electrospinning route produces fibers that combine magnetic and electric functions in one structure.
  • Absence of secondary phases supports direct use of the two-phase coexistence for coupling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The fiber geometry may allow easier integration into flexible or textile-based sensors than bulk composites.
  • Quantitative measurement of the coupling coefficient would be a direct next step to assess device performance.
  • Similar electrospinning of other lead-free pairs could test whether the observed coupling is general or specific to this combination.

Load-bearing premise

The differences in magnetic hysteresis loops between poled and unpoled samples are caused by magnetoelectric coupling and not by sample degradation or measurement effects.

What would settle it

Repeat the magnetic hysteresis measurements on the same poled and unpoled fiber samples after a waiting period or after confirming no chemical or structural change; if the loop differences disappear, the coupling claim is falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20986 by Anna Razumnaya, Brigita Rozic, Daoud Mezzane, Hana Ursic, Khalid Hoummada, Mbarek Amjoud, Mimoun El Marssi, Nayad Abdallah, Nikola Novak, Valentin Laguta, Val Fisinger, Voicu Dolocan, Youness Hadouch, Zdravko Kutnjak.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: SEM images: (a) as-spun NFs. (b) calcined CFO–BCTSn composite NFs, (c) surface CFO–BCTSn NF, and (d) fiber diameter distribution. The crystalline phases of CFO-BCTSn composite NFs were examined by XRD, as shown in Fig. 3a, where two distinct types of diffraction peaks are seen, corresponding to perovskite BCTSn (indicated by +) and spinel CFO phases (indicated by *), respectively, that agree with the stand… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Room-temperature (a) XRD pattern, (b) Raman spectra of CFO–BCTSn composite NFs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the HRTEM image of the CFO–BCTSn composite NFs. The image reveals lattice fringes with distinct interplanar spacings of 0.406 nm and 0.289 nm, corresponding to the (100) and (110) planes of the BCTSn perovskite phase, respectively. Additionally, spacings of 0.292 nm, 0.478 nm, and 0.261 nm correspond to the (220), (111), and (311) planes of the CFO phase, respectively. It is evident that the CFO and … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Magnetic hysteresis loops of both electrically poled and unpoled samples for CFO– BCTSn composite NFs. 4. CONCLUSION In this paper, multiferroic properties of CoFe2O4–Ba0.95Ca0.05Ti0.89Sn0.11O3 composite NFs synthesized by sol-gel based electrospinning method were investigated. XRD, Raman spectroscopy, and SAED analysis confirm the presences of both perovskite and spinel structures in the CFO–BCTSn composi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Multiferroic CFO-BCTSn composite nanofibers were synthesized using a sol-gel electrospinning method. Electron microscopy revealed well-defined fibers with diameters of 120-150 nm. Structural analyses using X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy confirmed the coexistence of the spinel CFO phase and the perovskite BCTSn phase without detectable secondary phases. Magnetic hysteresis measurements demonstrated the magnetic behavior of the nanofibers, while piezoresponse force microscopy confirmed their piezoelectric properties. Magnetoelectric coupling was evidenced by differences between the magnetic hysteresis loops of electrically poled and unpoled samples. These lead-free composite nanofibers show potential for nanoscale magnetoelectric devices and magnetic field sensing applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the synthesis of lead-free CFO-BCTSn composite nanofibers via sol-gel electrospinning, with fiber diameters of 120-150 nm confirmed by electron microscopy. Structural characterization by XRD, Raman spectroscopy, and HRTEM establishes the coexistence of spinel CFO and perovskite BCTSn phases without secondary phases. Magnetic hysteresis and piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) measurements demonstrate ferromagnetic and piezoelectric responses, respectively. The central claim is that magnetoelectric coupling is evidenced by differences in the magnetic hysteresis loops measured on electrically poled versus unpoled samples, with suggested applications in nanoscale magnetoelectric devices and magnetic field sensing.

Significance. If the hysteresis-loop differences are shown to arise specifically from reversible magnetoelectric strain coupling rather than from poling-induced degradation or measurement artifacts, the work would add a lead-free nanofiber platform to the multiferroic literature and support sensing applications. The use of standard characterization techniques is appropriate, but the absence of quantitative magnetoelectric coefficients, error bars on loop shifts, and controls for sample integrity after poling reduces the immediate impact and reproducibility of the central result.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Magnetic hysteresis measurements] Abstract and magnetic-properties section: The claim that differences between poled and unpoled magnetic hysteresis loops constitute evidence of magnetoelectric coupling is load-bearing for the central result, yet the manuscript provides no controls for irreversible changes (fiber cracking, interface oxidation, or poling-induced damage) nor repeated measurements on the identical specimen to test reversibility. Without these, the observed loop shifts remain compatible with non-ME explanations such as sample degradation.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: No quantitative magnetoelectric voltage coefficient, coupling strength, or error bars on the reported loop differences are supplied, making it impossible to assess the magnitude or statistical significance of the claimed coupling relative to typical values in CFO-perovskite composites.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that PFM confirmed piezoelectric properties but does not report the applied voltage range, amplitude, or phase contrast values that would allow readers to judge the strength of the piezoelectric response.
  2. [Electron microscopy] Fiber-diameter range (120-150 nm) is given without accompanying statistics (mean, standard deviation, or number of fibers measured), which would strengthen the morphological characterization.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help clarify the strength of our evidence for magnetoelectric coupling in the CFO-BCTSn nanofibers. We respond point by point to the major comments and indicate the revisions we will incorporate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Magnetic hysteresis measurements] Abstract and magnetic-properties section: The claim that differences between poled and unpoled magnetic hysteresis loops constitute evidence of magnetoelectric coupling is load-bearing for the central result, yet the manuscript provides no controls for irreversible changes (fiber cracking, interface oxidation, or poling-induced damage) nor repeated measurements on the identical specimen to test reversibility. Without these, the observed loop shifts remain compatible with non-ME explanations such as sample degradation.

    Authors: We agree that explicit controls for sample integrity after poling would strengthen the interpretation. Post-poling SEM imaging in our experiments showed no detectable fiber cracking or morphological changes, and the piezoelectric response measured by PFM remained consistent, supporting that the hysteresis shifts are not due to degradation. However, we did not perform repeated measurements on the identical specimen to demonstrate full reversibility. We will revise the manuscript to include these post-poling integrity checks, a discussion of why degradation is unlikely given the unchanged structural and piezoelectric data, and any available reversibility tests. We maintain that the phase coexistence confirmed by XRD, Raman, and HRTEM makes non-ME explanations less probable, but we accept the need to address this more rigorously. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No quantitative magnetoelectric voltage coefficient, coupling strength, or error bars on the reported loop differences are supplied, making it impossible to assess the magnitude or statistical significance of the claimed coupling relative to typical values in CFO-perovskite composites.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative metrics would allow better comparison to the literature. The central evidence is the observed shift in magnetic hysteresis upon electrical poling, which we interpret as strain-mediated coupling in these lead-free nanofibers. We will revise the manuscript to include error bars on the loop differences, estimated coupling strengths derived from the observed shifts and known magnetostrictive/piezoelectric coefficients of the phases, and a direct comparison to reported values in bulk or thin-film CFO-perovskite composites. Direct measurement of the magnetoelectric voltage coefficient was outside the scope of this synthesis-focused study but can be discussed as a future direction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental evidence with no derivations or self-referential fits

full rationale

The manuscript describes synthesis of CFO-BCTSn nanofibers via electrospinning, followed by structural (XRD, Raman, HRTEM) and functional (magnetic hysteresis, piezoresponse force microscopy) characterization. The central claim of magnetoelectric coupling rests on a direct empirical comparison of hysteresis loops measured on electrically poled versus unpoled samples. No equations, parameter fits, predictions, or derivation steps appear; the result is an observation, not a computed quantity obtained from prior outputs of the same work. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for any mathematical claim. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard materials-science assumptions for phase identification and property interpretation rather than introducing new free parameters or entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Differences in magnetic hysteresis after electrical poling indicate magnetoelectric coupling
    Invoked when interpreting the poled versus unpoled loop comparison as evidence of coupling.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5713 in / 1200 out tokens · 26777 ms · 2026-05-21T04:05:52.901488+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. Baji, Y. -W. Mai, Q. Li, S. -C. Wong, Y. Liu, et Q. W. Yao, « One-dimensional multiferroic bismuth ferrite fibers obtained by electrospinni ng techniques », Nanotechnology, vol. 22, n o 23, p. 235702, juin 2011, doi: 10.1088/0957 - 4484/22/23/235702

    work page doi:10.1088/0957 2011

  2. [2]

    , « A Review on Low -Dimensional Nanomaterials: Nanofabrication, Characterization and Applications », Nanomaterials, vol

    Paras et al. , « A Review on Low -Dimensional Nanomaterials: Nanofabrication, Characterization and Applications », Nanomaterials, vol. 13, no 1, p. 160, déc. 2022, doi: 10.3390/nano13010160

    work page doi:10.3390/nano13010160 2022

  3. [3]

    Zong et al., « Magnetoelectric coupling in nanoscale 0 –1 connectivity », Nanoscale, vol

    Y. Zong et al., « Magnetoelectric coupling in nanoscale 0 –1 connectivity », Nanoscale, vol. 10, no 36, p. 17370‑17377, 2018, doi: 10.1039/C8NR05182H

    work page doi:10.1039/c8nr05182h 2018

  4. [4]

    Wang et al., « Preparation of One-Dimensional CoFe 2 O 4 Nanostructures and Their Magnetic Properties », J

    Z. Wang et al., « Preparation of One-Dimensional CoFe 2 O 4 Nanostructures and Their Magnetic Properties », J. Phys. Chem. C, vol. 112, no 39, p. 15171‑15175, oct. 2008, doi: 10.1021/jp802614v

    work page doi:10.1021/jp802614v 2008

  5. [5]

    H. Wu, R. Zhang, X. Liu, D. Lin, et W. Pan, « Electrospinning of Fe, Co, and Ni Nanofibers: Synthesis, Ass embly, and Magnetic Properties », Chem. Mater., vol. 19, n o 14, p. 3506‑3511, juill. 2007, doi: 10.1021/cm070280i

    work page doi:10.1021/cm070280i 2007

  6. [6]

    T. Hu et E. Kan, « Progress and prospects in low‐dimensional multiferroic materials », WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci., vol. 9, no 5, p. e1409, sept. 2019, doi: 10.1002/wcms.1409

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.1409 2019

  7. [7]

    You et al., « The preparation and characterization of 1D multiferroic BFO/P(VDF - TrFE) composite nanofibers using electrospinning », Mater

    S. You et al., « The preparation and characterization of 1D multiferroic BFO/P(VDF - TrFE) composite nanofibers using electrospinning », Mater. Lett., vol. 130, p. 157‑159, sept. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.05.118

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2014.05.118 2014

  8. [8]

    Prashanthi, P

    K. Prashanthi, P. M. Shaibani, A. Sohrabi, T. S. Natarajan, et T. Thundat, « Nanoscale magnetoelectric coupling in multiferroic BiFeO 3 nanowires », Phys. Status Solidi RRL – Rapid Res. Lett., vol. 6, no 6, p. 244‑246, juin 2012, doi: 10.1002/pssr.201206135

    work page doi:10.1002/pssr.201206135 2012

  9. [9]

    Liu et N

    M. Liu et N. X. Sun, « Voltage control of magnetism in multiferroic heterostructures », Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. , vol. 372, no 2009, p. 20120439, févr. 2014, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0439

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0439 2009

  10. [10]

    Lawes et G

    G. Lawes et G. Srinivasan, « Introduction to magnetoelectric coupling and multiferroic films », J. Phys. Appl. Phys. , vol. 44, n o 24, p. 243001, juin 2011, doi: 10.1088/0022 - 3727/44/24/243001

    work page doi:10.1088/0022 2011

  11. [11]

    Zhang, R

    W. Zhang, R. Ramesh, J. L. MacManus -Driscoll, et H. Wang, « Multifunctional, self- assembled oxide nanocomposite thin films and devices », MRS Bull. , vol. 40, n o 9, p. 736‑745, sept. 2015, doi: 10.1557/mrs.2015.198

    work page doi:10.1557/mrs.2015.198 2015

  12. [12]

    D. A. Pan, Y. Bai, W. Y. Chu, et L. J. Qiao, « Magnetoelectric effect in a Ni –PZT–Ni cylindrical layered composite synthesized by electro -deposition », J. Phys. Appl. Phys. , vol. 41, no 2, p. 022002, janv. 2008, doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/41/2/022002

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/41/2/022002 2008

  13. [13]

    A. Baji, Y. -W. Mai, R. Yimnirun, et S. Unruan, « Electrospun barium titanate/cobalt ferrite composite fibers with improved magnetoelectric performance », RSC Adv, vol. 4, no 98, p. 55217‑55223, 2014, doi: 10.1039/C4RA09449B

    work page doi:10.1039/c4ra09449b 2014

  14. [14]

    J. F. Scott, « Room-temperature multiferroic magnetoelectrics », NPG Asia Mater. , vol. 5, no 11, p. e72‑e72, nov. 2013, doi: 10.1038/am.2013.58

    work page doi:10.1038/am.2013.58 2013

  15. [15]

    J.-P. Zhou, L. Lv, Q. Liu, Y.-X. Zhang, et P. Liu, « Hydrothermal synthesis and properties of NiFe 2 O 4 @BaTiO 3 composites with well -matched interface », Sci. Technol. A dv. Mater., vol. 13, no 4, p. 045001, août 2012, doi: 10.1088/1468-6996/13/4/045001

    work page doi:10.1088/1468-6996/13/4/045001 2012

  16. [16]

    Liu et al., « Synthesis of ordered arrays of multiferroic NiFe2O4-Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 core-shell nanowires », Appl

    M. Liu et al., « Synthesis of ordered arrays of multiferroic NiFe2O4-Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 core-shell nanowires », Appl. Phys. Lett. , vol. 90, n o 15, p. 152501, avr. 200 7, doi: 10.1063/1.2722043

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2722043

  17. [17]

    J. Xue, T. Wu, Y. Dai, et Y. Xia, « Electrospinning and Electrospun Nanofibers: Methods, Materials, and Applications », Chem. Rev., vol. 119, n o 8, p. 5298‑5415, avr. 2019, doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00593

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00593 2019

  18. [18]

    Valizadeh et S

    A. Valizadeh et S. Mussa Farkhani, « Electrospinning and electrospun nanofibres », IET Nanobiotechnol., vol. 8, no 2, p. 83‑92, juin 2014, doi: 10.1049/iet-nbt.2012.0040

    work page doi:10.1049/iet-nbt.2012.0040 2014

  19. [19]

    Cernea et al., « Piezoelectric/ferromagnetic BNT-BT0.08/CoFe2O4 coaxial core–shell composite nanotubes for nanoelectronic devices », J

    M. Cernea et al., « Piezoelectric/ferromagnetic BNT-BT0.08/CoFe2O4 coaxial core–shell composite nanotubes for nanoelectronic devices », J. Alloys Compd., vol. 752, p. 381‑388, juill. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.146

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.146 2018

  20. [20]

    Hadouch et al., « Multiferroic CoFe 2 O 4 –Ba 0.95 Ca 0.05 Ti 0.89 Sn 0.11 O 3 Core–Shell Nanofibers for Magnetic Field Sensor Applications », ACS Appl

    Y. Hadouch et al., « Multiferroic CoFe 2 O 4 –Ba 0.95 Ca 0.05 Ti 0.89 Sn 0.11 O 3 Core–Shell Nanofibers for Magnetic Field Sensor Applications », ACS Appl. Nano Mater., vol. 6, no 12, p. 10236‑10245, juin 2023, doi: 10.1021/acsanm.3c01101

    work page doi:10.1021/acsanm.3c01101 2023

  21. [21]

    A. M. Molavi et P. Alizadeh, « Electrospinning of multiferroic CoFe2O4@ Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3–0.5(Ba0.7Ca0.3)TiO3 nano -structured fibers via two different routes », Mater. Charact. , vol. 172, p. 110880, févr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2021.110880

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2021.110880 2021

  22. [22]

    S. H. Xie, J. Y. Li, Y. Y. Liu, L. N. Lan, G. Jin, et Y. C. Zhou, « Electrospinning and multiferroic properties of NiFe2O4–Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 composite nanofibers », J Appl Phys

    work page

  23. [23]

    B. Fu, R. Lu, K. Gao, Y. Yang, et Y. Wang, « Magnetoelectric coupling in multiferroic BaTiO 3 -CoFe 2 O 4 composite nanofibers via electrospinning », EPL Europhys. Lett. , vol. 111, no 1, p. 17007, juill. 2015, doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/111/17007

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/111/17007 2015

  24. [24]

    Fu et al

    B. Fu et al. , « Variations of local piezoelectricity in multiferroic CoFe2O4 – Pb(Zr0.3,Ti0.7)O3 composite nanofibers », Mater. Lett., vol. 157, p. 311‑314, oct. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.05.149

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2015.05.149 2015

  25. [25]

    B. Li, C. Wang, W. Zhang, C. Hang, J. Fei, et H. Wang, « Fabrication of multiferroic Ba0.7Sr0.3TiO3–Ni0.8Zn0.2Fe2O4 composite nan ofibers by electrospinning », Mater. Lett., vol. 91, p. 55‑58, janv. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.09.060

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2012.09.060 2013

  26. [26]

    Amiri et H

    S. Amiri et H. Shokrollahi, « The role of cobalt ferrite magnetic nanoparticles in medical science », Mater. Sci. Eng. C , vol. 33, n o 1, p. 1 ‑8, janv. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2012.09.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msec.2012.09.003 2013

  27. [27]

    R. Safi, A. Ghasemi, R. Shoja -Razavi, E. Ghasemi, et T. Sodaee, « Rietveld structure refinement, cations distribution and magnetic features of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles synthesized by co -precipitation, hydrothermal, and combustion methods », Ceram. Int., vol. 42, no 5, p. 6375‑6382, avr. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.032

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.032 2016

  28. [28]

    Q. Lin, J. Lin, Y. He, R. Wang, et J. Dong, « The Structural and Magnetic Properties of Gadolinium Doped CoFe 2 O 4 Nanoferrites », J. Nanomater., vol. 2015, p. 1‑6, 2015, doi: 10.1155/2015/294239

    work page doi:10.1155/2015/294239 2015

  29. [29]

    Liu et X

    W. Liu et X. Ren, « Large Piezoelectric Effect in Pb -Free Ceramics », Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 103, no 25, p. 257602, déc. 2009, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.257602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.257602 2009

  30. [30]

    L. Zhu, B. Zhang, X. Zhao, L. Zhao, P. Zhou, et J. Li, « Enhanced Piezoelectric Properties of ( Ba 1− x Ca x )( Ti 0.92 Sn 0.08 ) O 3 Lead‐Free Ceramics », J. Am. Ceram. Soc., vol. 96, no 1, p. 241‑245, janv. 2013, doi: 10.1111/jace.12038

    work page doi:10.1111/jace.12038 2013

  31. [31]

    M. U. D. Rather et al., « Unravelling the linear and biquadratic magnetoelectric coupling in Ba0.95Sn0.05Ti0.95 Ga0.05O3 – CoFe1.8Ga0.2O4 particulate multiferroic composites », J. Alloys Compd. , vol. 946, p. 169266, juin 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169266

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169266 2023

  32. [32]

    A. Jain, Y. G. Wang, N. Wang, Y. Li, et F. L. Wang, « Tuning the dielectric, ferroelectric and electromechanical properties of Ba0.83Ca0.10Sr0.07TiO3 –MnFe2O4 multiferroic composites », Ceram. Int. , vol. 46, n o 6, p. 7576‑7585, avr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.257

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.257 2020

  33. [33]

    Koner, P

    S. Koner, P. Deshmukh, A. K. Karnal, et S. Satapathy, « Angular dependent magnetoelectric effect of La0.7Ba0.3MnO3(LBMO) embedded P(VDF-TrFE) particulate multiferroic nanocomposite », J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. , vol. 33, n o 11, p. 8534‑8541, avr. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10854-021-06440-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s10854-021-06440-1 2022

  34. [34]

    B. Kar, P. Kumar, S. Panigrahi, R. Ghosh, et A. Singh, « Effect of sintering temperature on structural, electrical, magnetic and magnetoelectric properties of lead -free [85 wt% Ba0.95Ca0.05Ti0.95Sn0.05O3–15 wt% Ni0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4] particulate composite », J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron., vol. 34, no 30, p. 2007, oct. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10854-023- 11374-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s10854-023- 2007

  35. [35]

    Shara Sowmya et al., « Studies on magnetoelectric coupling in lead -free [(0.5) BCT- (0.5) BZT] -NiFe2O4 laminated composites at low and EMR frequencies », J

    N. Shara Sowmya et al., « Studies on magnetoelectric coupling in lead -free [(0.5) BCT- (0.5) BZT] -NiFe2O4 laminated composites at low and EMR frequencies », J. Alloys Compd., vol. 743, p. 240‑248, avr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.402

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.402 2018

  36. [36]

    Pandey et al

    A. Pandey et al. , « Temperature-dependent magnetoelectric response of lead -free Na0.4K0.1Bi0.5TiO3/NiFe2O4-laminated composites », Appl. Phys. A, vol. 129, no 12, p. 843, déc. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00339-023-07125-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s00339-023-07125-8 2023

  37. [37]

    Shi et al., « Lead-free BLTO/NMFO magnetoelectric composite films prepared by the sol-gel method », Ceram

    M. Shi et al., « Lead-free BLTO/NMFO magnetoelectric composite films prepared by the sol-gel method », Ceram. Int. , vol. 44, n o 1, p. 409‑415, janv. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.192

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.192 2018

  38. [38]

    Paul Praveen et al., « Enhanced magnetoelectric coupling in Ti and Ce substituted lead free CFO-BCZT laminate composites », J

    J. Paul Praveen et al., « Enhanced magnetoelectric coupling in Ti and Ce substituted lead free CFO-BCZT laminate composites », J. Alloys Compd., vol. 750, p. 392‑400, juin 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.026 2018

  39. [39]

    L. Kola, A. B. Swain, V. Subramanian, et P. Murugavel, « Large magnetoelectric response in lead free BaTi1−xSnxO3/NiFe2O4 bilayer laminated composites », J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron., vol. 30, no 7, p. 6725‑6733, avr. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10854-019-00984- z

    work page doi:10.1007/s10854-019-00984- 2019

  40. [40]

    Betal, M

    S. Betal, M. Dutta, L. F. Cotica, A. Bhalla, et R. Guo, « BaTiO 3 Coated CoFe 2 O 4 – Core-Shell Magnetoelectric Nanoparticles (CSMEN) Characterization », Integr. Ferroelectr., vol. 166, no 1, p. 225‑231, oct. 2015, doi: 10.1080/10584587.2015.1092653

    work page doi:10.1080/10584587.2015.1092653 2015

  41. [41]

    Sun et al., « Enhanced magnetoelectric coupling performance in CoFe2O4 @BaTiO3 multiferroic liquid by tuning the CoFe2O4 morphology », Mater

    G. Sun et al., « Enhanced magnetoelectric coupling performance in CoFe2O4 @BaTiO3 multiferroic liquid by tuning the CoFe2O4 morphology », Mater. Today Commun. , vol. 37, p. 107423, déc. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107423

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107423 2023

  42. [42]

    Ahmed et al., « Enhancement in the magnetoelectric and energy storage properties of core-shell-like CoFe 2 O 4 − BaTi O 3 multiferroic nanocomposite », J

    S. Ahmed et al., « Enhancement in the magnetoelectric and energy storage properties of core-shell-like CoFe 2 O 4 − BaTi O 3 multiferroic nanocomposite », J. Alloys Compd., vol. 883, p. 160875, nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160875

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160875 2021

  43. [43]

    C. Li, C. Zhou, Y. G. Jang, Q. Wang, G. Huang, et Y. Lin, « The study of CoFe2O4/Ba0.85Ca0.15Zr0.1Ti0.9O3-laminated composite ceramic on dielectric, relaxation, ferroelectric, and magnetoelectric coupling properties », J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron., vol. 33, no 25, p. 20068‑20080, sept. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10854-022-08824-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10854-022-08824-3 2022

  44. [44]

    Hadouch et al., « Piezoelectric, magnetic and magnetoelectric properties of a new lead- free multiferroic (1 -x) Ba0.95Ca0.05Ti0.89Sn0.11O3 —(x) CoFe2O4 particulate composites », J

    Y. Hadouch et al., « Piezoelectric, magnetic and magnetoelectric properties of a new lead- free multiferroic (1 -x) Ba0.95Ca0.05Ti0.89Sn0.11O3 —(x) CoFe2O4 particulate composites », J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. , vol. 34, n o 8, p. 725, mars 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10854-023-10145-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s10854-023-10145-y 2023

  45. [45]

    Hadouch et al., « Enhanced Relative cooling Power and large inverse magnetocaloric effect of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles synthesized by auto -combustion method », J

    Y. Hadouch et al., « Enhanced Relative cooling Power and large inverse magnetocaloric effect of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles synthesized by auto -combustion method », J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 563, p. 169925, déc. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169925

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169925 2022

  46. [46]

    Zahid et al., « Enhanced near-ambient temperature energy storage and electrocaloric effect in the lead -free BaTi0.89Sn0.11O3 ceramic synthesized by sol –gel method », J

    M. Zahid et al., « Enhanced near-ambient temperature energy storage and electrocaloric effect in the lead -free BaTi0.89Sn0.11O3 ceramic synthesized by sol –gel method », J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. , vol. 33, n o 16, p. 12900‑12911, juin 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10854-022-08233-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s10854-022-08233-6 2022

  47. [47]

    Walker, P

    M. Walker, P. I. Mayo, K. O’Grady, S. W. Charles, et R. W. Chantrell, « The magnetic properties of single-domain particles with cubic anisotropy. I. Hysteresis loops », J. Phys. Condens. Matter , vol. 5, n o 17, p. 2779‑2792, avr. 1993, doi: 10. 1088/0953- 8984/5/17/012

    work page 1993

  48. [48]

    Fu et al., « Unique magnetic properties and magnetization reversal process of CoFe2O4 nanotubes fabricated by electrospinning », Nanoscale, vol

    J. Fu et al., « Unique magnetic properties and magnetization reversal process of CoFe2O4 nanotubes fabricated by electrospinning », Nanoscale, vol. 4, n o 13, p. 3932, 2012, doi: 10.1039/c2nr30487b

    work page doi:10.1039/c2nr30487b 2012

  49. [49]

    S. T. Xu, Y. Q. Ma, G. H. Zheng, et Z. X. Dai, « Simultaneous effects of surface spins: rarely large coercivity, high remanence magnetization and jumps in the hysteresis loops observed in CoFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles », Nanoscale, vol. 7, no 15, p. 6520‑6526, 2015, doi: 10.1039/C5NR00582E

    work page doi:10.1039/c5nr00582e 2015

  50. [50]

    Pahuja, R

    P. Pahuja, R. Sharma, C. Prakash, et R. P. Tandon, « Synthesis and characterization of Ni0.8Co0.2Fe2O4–Ba0.95Sr0.05TiO3 multiferroic composites », Ceram. Int., vol. 39, no 8, p. 9435‑9445, déc. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.05.061

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.05.061 2013

  51. [51]

    Singh et al., « Optimal multiferroic properties and enhanced magnetoelectric coupling in SmFeO3–PbTiO3 solid solutions », J

    A. Singh et al., « Optimal multiferroic properties and enhanced magnetoelectric coupling in SmFeO3–PbTiO3 solid solutions », J. Appl. Phys., vol. 107, no 8, p. 084106, avr. 2010, doi: 10.1063/1.3380596

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3380596 2010

  52. [52]

    R. Rani, J. K. Juneja, S. Singh, K. K. Raina, et C. Prakash, « Study of 0.1Ni0.8Zn0.2Fe2O4−0.9Pb1−3x/2LaxZr0.65Ti0.35O3 magnetoelectric composites », J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 325, p. 47‑51, janv. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.08.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.08.011 2013