Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Worldline formalism in phase space

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Noncompact worldline topologies implement LSZ reduction automatically, turning scattering amplitudes into boundary-to-boundary propagators.

desk verdict A genuinely useful phase-space worldline formalism with credible low-order Compton results, but the automated-LSZ claim rests on a moduli-space step (Sec. 3.4) that is a projection onto complete metrics, not a derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.06058 v1 pith:PVABM3EK submitted 2025-09-07 hep-th

Joon-Hwi Kim This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords worldlineformalismphasespaceLSZreductionscatteringamplitudessymplecticperturbationtheoryeinbeinmoduliComptonnoncompacttopologies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The central claim is that the external-leg amputation procedure of quantum field theory known as LSZ reduction is already contained in the geometry of the first-quantized worldline, provided the particle is described in phase space. The paper shows that the partition function of a relativistic particle on an interval gives an off-shell propagator, on a half-line gives a partly on-shell propagator, and on a full line gives a scattering amplitude, where the last two cases require specific identifications of the moduli space of one-dimensional metrics. On these noncompact topologies, the usual LSZ post-processing—Fourier transforms, amputation, and on-shell limits—is replaced by choosing the worldline that ends at the appropriate asymptotic boundary. The framework is demonstrated on classical multi-photon Compton amplitudes in electromagnetism up to six points, and on two-photon Compton amplitudes in Yang-Mills and gravity, with phase-space Feynman rules in which the propagator encodes the Poisson bracket and gauge invariance is manifest.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are three. First, the phase-space action S = ∫(θᵢ ζ̇ⁱ − H), viewed as a sigma model to a symplectic manifold, whose Feynman rules are universal: the propagator is the inverse of the free symplectic form (the Poisson bracket), and interactions arise either from a perturbed Hamiltonian or a perturbed symplectic form, the latter giving symplectic vertices including pinched vertices that cancel propagators. Second, noncanonical coordinates (kinetic momentum p = P − qA) cubicize photon and graviton couplings and make gauge invariance manifest by moving interactions into the symplectic form. Third, the moduli-space identifications for one-dimensional worldline geometries—t

What would settle it

Perform the einbein path integral on the full line with a strict Faddeev-Popov or BRST treatment, or with a finite-volume regulator, and check whether the quotient measure is exactly (1/δ̄(0))δ[κ−κ∞]; if the regulated limit produces a different factor or an additional integral over a noncompact modulus, the automated-LSZ claim fails. A simpler probe is to evaluate the half-line partition function at one-loop order in a constant background field and test whether the residue at the on-shell pole equals the LSZ-reduced amplitude, as the δ[κ−κ∞] measure predicts.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's discovery is that a scattering amplitude is a boundary-to-boundary propagator inside the first-quantized path integral. Formally, for a relativistic particle with einbein κ, the partition function Z = ∫Dκ/vol(Gauge) ∫Dx Dp e^{iS} yields three identities: on the interval, Z(x2,x1)=∫dT K(x2,T|x1,0); on the half-line, Z(p2,x1)=K(p2,∞|x1,0); and on the full line, Z(p2,p1)=(1/δ̄(0))K(p2,+∞|p1,−∞). The half-line and full-line equalities follow from the moduli-space claims that all half-lines are diffeomorphic and that the full line retains only the group of constant translations as residual gauge redundancy. This is presented as a top-down derivation of the observatio

Load-bearing premise

The central claim depends on the assumption that the gauge-fixed einbein path-integral measure on a half-line is just δ[κ−κ∞], and on a full line is (1/δ̄(0))δ[κ−κ∞]—that is, that the moduli space of one-dimensional metrics is trivial on these noncompact topologies and the only residual redundancy on the full line is the group of constant translations; if additional moduli or a different residual group exist, the claimed equalities between partition functions and propagators

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Tree-level scattering amplitudes can be obtained from worldline path integrals without importing LSZ as an external field-theoretic step: choose the worldline topology that ends in the asymptotic state being measured.
  • The half-line computation removes the Schwinger proper-time integral entirely, since all half-lines are diffeomorphic; the remaining external leg is amputated by a single on-shell limiting factor.
  • The full-line computation eliminates all amputations but acquires a 1/δ̄(0) normalization, which the paper identifies as the residual constant-translation gauge volume, making first-quantized and second-quantized amplitudes agree exactly.
  • The phase-space Feynman rules are universal: the propagator encodes the Poisson bracket, symplectic vertices generalize the Lorentz force, and the same rules apply to in-in worldline frameworks, not only the in-out formalism.
  • The method reproduces classical multi-photon Compton amplitudes through six points in scalar QED and gives a uniform two-photon Compton treatment for Yang-Mills and gravity via an isomorphism between color charge/gauge field and kinetic momentum/tetrad perturbation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the moduli-space identification survives a strict BRST treatment, the topology/LSZ correspondence should also reorganize loop-level worldline calculations: external legs would be attached at boundaries from the outset rather than amputated at the end.
  • The half-line/full-line construction suggests a first-quantized definition of asymptotic states in curved or time-dependent backgrounds, replacing 'definite momentum at infinity' with whatever conserved charges the asymptotic geometry admits; the paper itself works in a sandwich geometry with plane-wave backgrounds.
  • The 1/δ̄(0) normalization connects worldline reparametrization gauge fixing to standard S-matrix normalization conventions; one could test whether a finite-volume regulator of the full-line quotient reproduces the usual momentum-conserving delta functions exactly.
  • The symplectic-structure isomorphism between Yang-Mills and gravity hints at a worldline-level double copy that generates all-multiplicity Compton amplitudes; the paper demonstrates only the two-photon case.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a phase-space (first-order) worldline formalism and argues that noncompact worldline topologies automate LSZ reduction. It introduces a distinction between Hamiltonian and symplectic perturbation theories, derives universal Feynman rules in which the propagator encodes the Poisson bracket and vertices are Hamiltonian or symplectic, and then claims that the interval, half-line, and full-line topologies respectively produce off-shell propagators, partly on-shell propagators, and on-shell scattering amplitudes directly from the first-quantized path integral. The central technical step is the moduli-space treatment of the einbein integral: the interval retains the Schwinger proper-time modulus, while the half-line and full line are claimed to have trivial moduli spaces, with the full line having only a constant-translation residual gauge redundancy. The formalism is then applied to scalar QED, where classical multi-photon Compton amplitudes are computed up to six points in an eikonalized limit, and to Yang-Mills and gravity, where two-photon/graviton Compton amplitudes are obtained from nonlinearly superposed plane-wave backgrounds.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper would provide a genuinely useful simplification: tree-level scattering amplitudes would be extracted from worldline path integrals without a separate LSZ post-processing step, and the phase-space formulation makes gauge invariance manifest at intermediate stages. The low-order Compton computations in Sec. 4.3 are explicit and the y, the Yang-Mills/gravity treatment in Sec. 5 is a nontrivial demonstration of the formalism. The paper also contains useful conceptual observations about symplectic perturbation theory and its relation to worldline field redefinitions. However, the advertised "top-down derivation" is presently conditional on an unproven restriction of the einbein path integral to complete metrics, and the full-line normalization involves a formal ratio of distributions. The high-multiplicity verification is also asserted rather than shown. These issues are load-bearing for the paper's main novelty, so the paper needs substantive revision before it can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. The half-line moduli-space identification is not derived from the partition-function definition in Eq. (3.43); it assumes a particular truncation. The text explicitly says, after Eq. (3.45), "This yet assumes that we sum over complete metrics." For a general einbein on [0,∞), the total length L = ∫₀^∞ κ(σ)dσ is finite for non-complete metrics and is diffeomorphism-invariant. Such metrics are not in the gauge orbit of the constant einbein κ∞, whose total length is infinite. A faithful gauge-fixing over all einbeins would retain L as a modulus and would produce Z(p₂,x₁) = ∫ dL K(p₂,L|x₁,0), which is an off-shell quantity, not the on-shell K(p₂,∞|x₁,0) claimed in Eq. (3.40). Thus Eq. (3.40), and hence the automated-LSZ claim of Sec. 3.3 and the amplitude formula Eq. (4.11), rest on an unproven projection onto complete metrics. The paper needs either a justification that the physical path in
  2. The full-line normalization is a formal ratio of distributions. The computation in Sec. 3.2 produces a factor δ̄(0)δ̄⁽ᵈ⁾(−p₂+p₁+k), and Sec. 3.5 identifies δ̄(K) with δ̄(0) by setting K=0. But δ̄(K) is a distribution, and the quotient δ̄(K)/δ̄(0) is not well-defined without a regulator. The paper's statement in Eq. (3.49c) that I_full = (1/δ̄(0))δ̄(K) and then equals 1 relies on evaluating the delta function at zero before dividing. A consistent treatment would need to specify how the volume of the residual translation group, vol(R)=δ̄(0), is regularized and how the same regulator controls the support condition K=0. The paper's claim that this is a "strict derivation" of the observation of Ref. [33] is therefore not yet justified; at present it is a normalization convention.
  3. The verification of the 3- and 4-Compton amplitudes against second-quantized scalar QED is asserted rather than demonstrated. After Eq. (4.49) the text says "Straightforward algebra then equates Eq. (4.49) with Eq. (4.50)," but the algebra is not shown. For the 4-Compton amplitude, the text says "one can readily check" that Eq. (4.60) matches the second-quantized result, without presenting the comparison. Since the abstract and Sec. 6 claim that the formalism is "explicitly verified" up to six points, this missing support is material. The relevant algebra, including the other SQED diagrams in the axial gauge, should be included in an appendix or the claim should be softened to a spot-check.
minor comments (5)
  1. There are many typographical errors and grammatical slips, e.g., "neccessitated," "respectivley," "paritition," "clasical," "seems to be seems to be ideal." The manuscript needs a careful proofreading pass.
  2. The symbol δ is overloaded: it denotes the delta function in earlier sections and also a dimensionless parameter in Eq. (5.19). This is potentially confusing, especially in equations like Eqs. (5.24) and (5.29). Please use a different symbol for the parameter.
  3. The statement that all half-lines are diffeomorphic is true for the underlying smooth manifold but not for metric geometries unless one explicitly restricts to complete metrics. The table and surrounding text should carry this qualifier to avoid misleading readers who do not track the later assumption.
  4. The six-term identity (4.61) is used to rewrite the amplitude, but it is stated without derivation. Since it is central to the 4-Compton comparison, a short derivation or reference would help the reader verify the step.
  5. The background field solutions for Yang-Mills and gravity are presented as results of Berends-Giele recursion, but the derivation is not shown; in particular, the gravitational configuration is introduced with "it can be shown that." For a self-contained paper, either the derivation should be sketched or references should be provided.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; the moduli-space LSZ derivation is an independent path-integral argument and the amplitudes are checked against second-quantized benchmarks.

full rationale

The central claim—that noncompact worldline topologies automate LSZ reduction—is derived from the explicit einbein path integral (3.43) together with the moduli-space identifications in Eqs. (3.44)–(3.46). The half-line and full-line measures are justified by the stated completeness assumption and by the residual-gauge analysis (constant translations after fixing κ to κ∞), rather than by defining Z to equal K or by fitting parameters. The resulting amplitudes are benchmarked against independent second-quantized scalar QED (Sec. 4.3) and against Yang-Mills/gravity results (Sec. 5.4), so the low-order predictions are externally verified. The author's self-citations ([30]–[32], [41], [85], [86] and Eq. (1.1)) concern background material and are not load-bearing for the central argument. The δ̄(0) normalization follows from quotienting by the volume of constant translations, and δ̄(K)=δ̄(0) at K=0 is a delta-function evaluation rather than an identification of input with output. The only contestable point—restriction to complete metrics and the ignored Faddeev-Popov determinant in Sec. 3.4/footnote 3—is an explicit assumption whose falsity would weaken correctness, but it is not a circular step: the paper does not define the partition function in terms of the result it purports to derive, nor does it rename a fitted quantity as a prediction. No specific circular reduction can be exhibited, so the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper fits no constants; its central object-level results (the amplitudes) are parameter-free. The non-trivial inputs are the moduli-space identifications of the einbein path integral on noncompact topologies (which carry the LSZ claim), the asymptotic sandwich-geometry assumption, the classical-limit truncation, and the YM/gravity plane-wave backgrounds imported from prior machinery (Ref. [57], Berends-Giele recursion). Two gauge choices (kappa_infinity, eta) are present but drop out of final results. No new particles, fields, or mediators are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Einbein gauge constant kappa_infinity (half-line and full line) = arbitrary nonzero constant, rescaled to set the Hamiltonian coefficient to (p^2 + m^2)
    Gauge-fixing value for kappa on noncompact topologies (Eq. 3.45); the paper argues results are kappa_infinity-independent, so it is a gauge choice rather than a fitted parameter.
  • Axial gauge reference vector eta (Yang-Mills/gravity) = set to p2 in Sec. 5.4 for the final amplitudes
    Gauge choice for the plane-wave backgrounds (App. B); the paper shows the gauge-dependent terms cancel, so eta does not affect the final result.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Sandwich geometry: external fields have finite support, so A_alpha(x(infinity)) -> 0 and definite-momentum states are well-defined at the boundaries.
    Sec. 3.3, Fig. 1; the mixed boundary condition delta_p(infinity)=0 of Sec. 3.2 (Eq. 3.27) requires the potential to vanish at infinity.
  • ad hoc to paper The einbein quotient measure on noncompact worldlines is delta[kappa-kappa_infinity] for the half-line and (1/delta_bar(0)) delta[kappa-kappa_infinity] for the full line, with trivial half-line moduli space and residual redundancy exactly R for the full line, and with the Faddeev-Popov determinant d
    Sec. 3.4, Eqs. (3.45)-(3.46), Table 1, footnote 3. This is the load-bearing premise of the automated-LSZ claim; it is argued qualitatively, not computed.
  • standard math Free particle propagator and interval quantization: Schwinger representation and the interval moduli integral over T in (0,infinity) (Eq. 3.44) from Refs. [3,5].
    Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.1); the interval case is the accepted baseline the noncompact cases are meant to parallel.
  • standard math Symplectic geometry toolkit: closed nondegenerate omega, symplectic potential theta, Darboux coordinates for the free theory, Poisson bracket (omega^{-1})^{ij} satisfying the Jacobi identity.
    Sec. 2.1; used in the all-order variation (Sec. 2.3) and the Feynman rules (Sec. 2.4).
  • domain assumption Classical/eikonal truncation: amplitudes are computed to leading order in hbar with on-shell identities sum K_I = 0 at O(hbar) and the six-term identity (Eq. 4.61) at O(hbar^2).
    Sec. 4.1, Eqs. (4.11)-(4.13); Sec. 4.3.4. The demonstrated results are classical-limit results only.
  • domain assumption Nonlinear plane-wave background configurations for YM (Eq. B.8) and gravity (Eq. B.13) obtained from Berends-Giele recursion and the covariant color-kinematics formulation of Ref. [57] and the Penrose wave equation [73,74].
    App. B; these backgrounds are inputs to the Sec. 5 Compton computations, derived up to O(g^2) with details omitted.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Worldline formalism in phase space." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PVABM3EK

@misc{pith2026250906058,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Worldline formalism in phase space},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PVABM3EK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.06058}
}
read the original abstract

We implement the worldline formalism in phase space to compute scattering amplitudes. First, the Feynman rules exhibit several useful universal features, reflecting elements of the symplectic geometry of the phase space target. Next, noncompact worldline topologies automate LSZ reductions in accordance with the boundary conditions available in phase space, provided correct identifications of the associated moduli spaces. Further, employing noncanonical coordinates cubicizes the Feynman rules and manifests gauge invariance. As a result, our phase space implementation could provide a framework optimized for computing scattering amplitudes while retaining the nice features of the original formalism. For an explicit demonstration, we compute the multi-photon Compton amplitudes up to six points in the classical limit. Compton amplitudes in Yang-Mills theory and gravity are also computed in a uniform fashion by supposing the backgrounds of nonlinearly superposed plane waves.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Manifest symplecticity in classical scattering

    hep-th 2025-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The on-shell action and the exponential scattering generator differ as functions, but the on-shell action of the true Hamiltonian equals the on-shell action of the generator treated as a unit-time effective Hamiltonian.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [33]

    Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory.JHEP, 02:048, 2021

    Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, and Jan Steinhoff. Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory.JHEP, 02:048, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [61]

    Worldline geometries for scattering amplitudes.JHEP, 06:167, 2025

    Roberto Bonezzi and Maria Foteini Kallimani. Worldline geometries for scattering amplitudes.JHEP, 06:167, 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [2]

    R. P. Feynman. Mathematical formulation of the quantum theory of electromagnetic interaction.Phys. Rev., 80:440–457, 1950

    1950

  4. [3]

    Schwinger

    Julian S. Schwinger. On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization.Phys. Rev., 82:664–679, 1951

    1951

  5. [4]

    J. W. van Holten. Propagators and path integrals.Nucl. Phys. B, 457:375–407, 1995

    1995

  6. [5]

    Cohen, Gregory W

    Andrew G. Cohen, Gregory W. Moore, Philip C. Nelson, and Joseph Polchinski. An Off-Shell Propagator for String Theory.Nucl. Phys. B, 267:143–157, 1986

    1986

  7. [6]

    Zvi Bern and David A. Kosower. Efficient calculation of one loop QCD amplitudes.Phys. Rev. Lett., 66:1669–1672, 1991

    1991

  8. [7]

    Zvi Bern and David A. Kosower. The Computation of loop amplitudes in gauge theories. Nucl. Phys. B, 379:451–561, 1992. – 51 –

    1992

Show all 94 references
  1. [8]

    Strassler

    Matthew J. Strassler. Field theory without Feynman diagrams: One loop effective actions. Nucl. Phys. B, 385:145–184, 1992

    1992

  2. [9]

    Perturbative quantum field theory in the string inspired formalism

    Christian Schubert. Perturbative quantum field theory in the string inspired formalism. Phys. Rept., 355:73–234, 2001

    2001

  3. [10]

    C Schubert. Lectures on the worldline formalism.School on Spinning Particles in Quantum Field Theory: Worldline Formalism, Higher Spins and Conformal Geometry, Morelia, Michoac´ an, M´ exico, 19, 2012

    2012

  4. [11]

    Schwartz.Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model

    Matthew D. Schwartz.Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014

    2014

  5. [12]

    What every physicist should know about string theory.Physics Today, 68(11):38–43, 2015

    Edward Witten. What every physicist should know about string theory.Physics Today, 68(11):38–43, 2015

    2015

  6. [13]

    Kosower, Ben Maybee, and Donal O’Connell

    David A. Kosower, Ben Maybee, and Donal O’Connell. Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering.JHEP, 02:137, 2019

    2019

  7. [14]

    Rothstein, and Mikhail P

    Clifford Cheung, Ira Z. Rothstein, and Mikhail P. Solon. From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion.Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(25):251101, 2018

    2018

  8. [15]

    Solon, and Mao Zeng

    Zvi Bern, Clifford Cheung, Radu Roiban, Chia-Hsien Shen, Mikhail P. Solon, and Mao Zeng. Scattering Amplitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order.Phys. Rev. Lett., 122(20):201603, 2019

    2019

  9. [16]

    Solon, and Mao Zeng

    Zvi Bern, Clifford Cheung, Radu Roiban, Chia-Hsien Shen, Mikhail P. Solon, and Mao Zeng. Black Hole Binary Dynamics from the Double Copy and Effective Theory.JHEP, 10:206, 2019

    2019

  10. [17]

    Ruf, Chia-Hsien Shen, Mikhail P

    Zvi Bern, Julio Parra-Martinez, Radu Roiban, Michael S. Ruf, Chia-Hsien Shen, Mikhail P. Solon, and Mao Zeng. Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G 4). Phys. Rev. Lett., 126(17):171601, 2021

    2021

  11. [18]

    Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order.Phys

    Mathias Driesse, Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, Benjamin Sauer, and Johann Usovitsch. Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order.Phys. Rev. Lett., 132(24):241402, 2024

    2024

  12. [19]

    Completing the fifth PN precision frontier via the EFT of spinning gravitating objects.JHEP, 04:079, 2023

    Mich` ele Levi and Zhewei Yin. Completing the fifth PN precision frontier via the EFT of spinning gravitating objects.JHEP, 04:079, 2023

    2023

  13. [20]

    Spinning gravitating objects in the effective field theory in the post-Newtonian scheme.JHEP, 09:219, 2015

    Michele Levi and Jan Steinhoff. Spinning gravitating objects in the effective field theory in the post-Newtonian scheme.JHEP, 09:219, 2015

    2015

  14. [21]

    Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review

    Mich` ele Levi. Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review. Rept. Prog. Phys., 83(7):075901, 2020

    2020

  15. [22]

    Rafael A. Porto. The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics.Phys. Rept., 633:1–104, 2016

    2016

  16. [23]

    Porto and Ira Z

    Rafael A. Porto and Ira Z. Rothstein. Spin(1)Spin(2) Effects in the Motion of Inspiralling Compact Binaries at Third Order in the Post-Newtonian Expansion.Phys. Rev. D, 78:044012, 2008. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 81, 029904 (2010)]

    2008

  17. [24]

    Porto and Ira Z

    Rafael A. Porto and Ira Z. Rothstein. The Hyperfine Einstein-Infeld-Hoffmann potential. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97:021101, 2006. – 52 –

    2006

  18. [25]

    Rafael A. Porto. Post-Newtonian corrections to the motion of spinning bodies in NRGR. Phys. Rev. D, 73:104031, 2006

    2006

  19. [26]

    Goldberger and Ira Z

    Walter D. Goldberger and Ira Z. Rothstein. An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects.Phys. Rev. D, 73:104029, 2006

    2006

  20. [27]

    Scattering of spinning compact objects from a worldline EFT.JHEP, 03:108, 2024

    Maor Ben-Shahar. Scattering of spinning compact objects from a worldline EFT.JHEP, 03:108, 2024

    2024

  21. [28]

    Dynamical implications of the Kerr multipole moments for spinning black holes.JHEP, 12:060, 2024

    Trevor Scheopner and Justin Vines. Dynamical implications of the Kerr multipole moments for spinning black holes.JHEP, 12:060, 2024

    2024

  22. [29]

    A worldsheet for Kerr.JHEP, 03:201, 2021

    Alfredo Guevara, Ben Maybee, Alexander Ochirov, Donal O’Connell, and Justin Vines. A worldsheet for Kerr.JHEP, 03:201, 2021

    2021

  23. [30]

    The relativistic spherical top as a massive twistor.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 54(33), 2021

    Joon-Hwi Kim, Jung-Wook Kim, and Sangmin Lee. The relativistic spherical top as a massive twistor.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 54(33), 2021

    2021

  24. [31]

    An ambitwistor for Kerr I: Zig-zag symplectic perturbation theory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.06203, 2023

    Joon-Hwi Kim and Sangmin Lee. An ambitwistor for Kerr I: Zig-zag symplectic perturbation theory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.06203, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Massive twistor worldline in electromagnetic fields.JHEP, 08:080, 2024

    Joon-Hwi Kim, Jung-Wook Kim, and Sangmin Lee. Massive twistor worldline in electromagnetic fields.JHEP, 08:080, 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    PhD thesis, Humboldt U., Berlin (main), 2022

    Raphael Kopp.Relations between the Worldline Quantum Field Theory and scattering amplitudes for particles with spin. PhD thesis, Humboldt U., Berlin (main), 2022

    2022

  27. [35]

    Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in Black-Hole Scattering atO(G 3): Quadratic-in-Spin Effects

    Lara Bohnenblust, Harald Ita, Manfred Kraus, and Johannes Schlenk. Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in Black-Hole Scattering atO(G 3): Quadratic-in-Spin Effects. 5 2025

    2025

  28. [36]

    Classical Double Copy of Spinning Worldline Quantum Field Theory.JHEP, 04:008, 2023

    Francesco Comberiati and Canxin Shi. Classical Double Copy of Spinning Worldline Quantum Field Theory.JHEP, 04:008, 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Binary dynamics from worldline QFT for scalar QED.Phys

    Tianheng Wang. Binary dynamics from worldline QFT for scalar QED.Phys. Rev. D, 107(8):085011, 2023

    2023

  30. [38]

    Spinning bodies in general relativity from bosonic worldline oscillators.JHEP, 02:019, 2025

    Kays Haddad, Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, and Jan Plefka. Spinning bodies in general relativity from bosonic worldline oscillators.JHEP, 02:019, 2025

    2025

  31. [39]

    SUSY in the sky with gravitons.JHEP, 01:027, 2022

    Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, and Jan Steinhoff. SUSY in the sky with gravitons.JHEP, 01:027, 2022

    2022

  32. [40]

    Classical double copy of worldline quantum field theory.Phys

    Canxin Shi and Jan Plefka. Classical double copy of worldline quantum field theory.Phys. Rev. D, 105(2):026007, 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    Classical eikonal from Magnus expansion.JHEP, 01:111, 2025

    Joon-Hwi Kim, Jung-Wook Kim, Sungsoo Kim, and Sangmin Lee. Classical eikonal from Magnus expansion.JHEP, 01:111, 2025

    2025

  34. [42]

    Radiation eikonal for post-Minkowskian observables.Phys

    Jung-Wook Kim. Radiation eikonal for post-Minkowskian observables.Phys. Rev. D, 111(12):L121702, 2025

    2025

  35. [43]

    Scattering and Bound Observables for Spinning Particles in Kerr Spacetime with Generic Spin Orientations.Phys

    Riccardo Gonzo and Canxin Shi. Scattering and Bound Observables for Spinning Particles in Kerr Spacetime with Generic Spin Orientations.Phys. Rev. Lett., 133(22):221401, 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    Damgaard, Ludovic Plante, and Pierre Vanhove

    Poul H. Damgaard, Ludovic Plante, and Pierre Vanhove. On an exponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix.JHEP, 11:213, 2021. – 53 –

    2021

  37. [45]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(6):061102, 2016

    2016

  38. [46]

    B. P. Abbott et al. GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral.Phys. Rev. Lett., 119(16):161101, 2017

    2017

  39. [47]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star–Black Hole Coalescences.Astrophys. J. Lett., 915(1):L5, 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    Alessandra Buonanno and B. S. Sathyaprakash.Sources of Gravitational Waves: Theory and Observations. 10 2014

    2014

  41. [49]

    Brink, Stanley Deser, B

    L. Brink, Stanley Deser, B. Zumino, P. Di Vecchia, and Paul S. Howe. Local Supersymmetry for Spinning Particles.Phys. Lett. B, 64:435, 1976. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 68, 488 (1977)]

    1976

  42. [50]

    Brink, P

    L. Brink, P. Di Vecchia, and Paul S. Howe. A Lagrangian Formulation of the Classical and Quantum Dynamics of Spinning Particles.Nucl. Phys. B, 118:76–94, 1977

    1977

  43. [51]

    F. A. Berezin and M. S. Marinov. Particle Spin Dynamics as the Grassmann Variant of Classical Mechanics.Annals Phys., 104:336, 1977

    1977

  44. [52]

    Olindo Corradini and James P. Edwards. Mixed symmetry tensors in the worldline formalism.JHEP, 05:056, 2016

    2016

  45. [53]

    Edwards and Olindo Corradini

    James P. Edwards and Olindo Corradini. Worldline colour fields and non-Abelian quantum field theory.EPJ Web Conf., 182:02038, 2018

    2018

  46. [54]

    A worldline approach to colored particles.J

    Fiorenzo Bastianelli, Roberto Bonezzi, Olindo Corradini, Emanuele Latini, and Khaled Hassan Ould-Lahoucine. A worldline approach to colored particles.J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1208(1):012004, 2019

    2019

  47. [55]

    Dressed scalar propagator in a non-Abelian background from the worldline formalism.Phys

    Naser Ahmadiniaz, Fiorenzo Bastianelli, and Olindo Corradini. Dressed scalar propagator in a non-Abelian background from the worldline formalism.Phys. Rev. D, 93(2):025035, 2016. [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 93, 049904 (2016)]

    2016

  48. [56]

    G. W. Gibbons, R. H. Rietdijk, and J. W. van Holten. SUSY in the sky.Nucl. Phys. B, 404:42–64, 1993

    1993

  49. [57]

    Covariant color-kinematics duality.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2021(11):1–46, 2021

    Clifford Cheung and James Mangan. Covariant color-kinematics duality.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2021(11):1–46, 2021

    2021

  50. [58]

    Rothstein, Nabha Shah, and Jordan Wilson-Gerow

    Clifford Cheung, Julio Parra-Martinez, Ira Z. Rothstein, Nabha Shah, and Jordan Wilson-Gerow. Effective Field Theory for Extreme Mass Ratios. 8 2023

    2023

  51. [59]

    Conservative Scattering of Reissner-Nordstr¨ om Black Holes at Third Post-Minkowskian Order

    Jordan Wilson-Gerow. Conservative Scattering of Reissner-Nordstr¨ om Black Holes at Third Post-Minkowskian Order. 10 2023

    2023

  52. [60]

    Rothstein, Nabha Shah, and Jordan Wilson-Gerow

    Clifford Cheung, Julio Parra-Martinez, Ira Z. Rothstein, Nabha Shah, and Jordan Wilson-Gerow. Gravitational scattering and beyond from extreme mass ratio effective field theory.JHEP, 10:005, 2024

    2024

  53. [62]

    On-shell correlators and color-kinematics duality in curved symmetric spacetimes.JHEP, 05:027, 2022

    Clifford Cheung, Julio Parra-Martinez, and Allic Sivaramakrishnan. On-shell correlators and color-kinematics duality in curved symmetric spacetimes.JHEP, 05:027, 2022

    2022

  54. [63]

    Feynman’s proof of the maxwell equations.American Journal of Physics, 58(3):209–211, 1990

    Freeman J Dyson. Feynman’s proof of the maxwell equations.American Journal of Physics, 58(3):209–211, 1990. – 54 –

    1990

  55. [64]

    Structure des systemes dynamiques dunod.Paris, 1970

    Jean-Marie Souriau. Structure des systemes dynamiques dunod.Paris, 1970. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 1N4, 1970

    1970

  56. [65]

    Sur le probleme de pfaff.Bulletin des sciences math´ ematiques et astronomiques, 6(1):14–36, 1882

    Gaston Darboux. Sur le probleme de pfaff.Bulletin des sciences math´ ematiques et astronomiques, 6(1):14–36, 1882

  57. [66]

    R. P. Feynman. Space-time approach to nonrelativistic quantum mechanics.Rev. Mod. Phys., 20:367–387, 1948

    1948

  58. [67]

    Oxford university press, 1997

    Nicholas Michael John Woodhouse.Geometric quantization. Oxford university press, 1997

    1997

  59. [68]

    Classical and prequantized mechanics without Lagrangians or hamiltonians.Hadronic J.;(United States), 1(1), 1978

    Shlomo Sternberg and Thomas Ungar. Classical and prequantized mechanics without Lagrangians or hamiltonians.Hadronic J.;(United States), 1(1), 1978

    1978

  60. [69]

    Cambridge university press, 1990

    Victor Guillemin and Shlomo Sternberg.Symplectic techniques in physics. Cambridge university press, 1990

    1990

  61. [70]

    Field and particle equations for the classical Yang-Mills field and particles with isotopic spin.Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970), 65(4):689–694, 1970

    SK Wong. Field and particle equations for the classical Yang-Mills field and particles with isotopic spin.Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970), 65(4):689–694, 1970

    1965

  62. [71]

    University of Chicago press, 2010

    Robert M Wald.General relativity. University of Chicago press, 2010. Chapter 4.4

    2010

  63. [72]

    Berends and W

    Frits A. Berends and W. T. Giele. Recursive Calculations for Processes with n Gluons.Nucl. Phys. B, 306:759–808, 1988

    1988

  64. [73]

    R. Penrose. A Spinor approach to general relativity.Annals Phys., 10:171–201, 1960

    1960

  65. [74]

    Michael P. Ryan. Teukolsky equation and Penrose wave equation.Phys. Rev. D, 10:1736–1740, 1974

    1974

  66. [75]

    J. E. Moyal. Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory.Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 45:99–124, 1949

    1949

  67. [76]

    H. J. Groenewold. On the Principles of elementary quantum mechanics.Physica, 12:405–460, 1946

    1946

  68. [77]

    Cattaneo and Giovanni Felder

    Alberto S. Cattaneo and Giovanni Felder. A Path integral approach to the Kontsevich quantization formula.Commun. Math. Phys., 212:591–611, 2000

    2000

  69. [78]

    Deformation quantization of poisson manifolds.Letters in Mathematical Physics, 66(3):157–216, 2003

    Maxim Kontsevich. Deformation quantization of poisson manifolds.Letters in Mathematical Physics, 66(3):157–216, 2003

    2003

  70. [79]

    Kawai, D

    H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen, and S. H. H. Tye. A Relation Between Tree Amplitudes of Closed and Open Strings.Nucl. Phys. B, 269:1–23, 1986

    1986

  71. [80]

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, and Henrik Johansson. New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes.Phys. Rev. D, 78:085011, 2008

    2008

  72. [81]

    Carrasco, and Henrik Johansson

    Zvi Bern, John Joseph M. Carrasco, and Henrik Johansson. Perturbative Quantum Gravity as a Double Copy of Gauge Theory.Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:061602, 2010

    2010

  73. [82]

    Black holes and the double copy

    Ricardo Monteiro, Donal O’Connell, and Chris D White. Black holes and the double copy. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2014(12):1–23, 2014

    2014

  74. [83]

    Andr´ es Luna, Ricardo Monteiro, Donal O’Connell, and Chris D. White. The classical double copy for Taub–NUT spacetime.Phys. Lett. B, 750:272–277, 2015

    2015

  75. [84]

    Berman, Erick Chac´ on, Andr´ es Luna, and Chris D

    David S. Berman, Erick Chac´ on, Andr´ es Luna, and Chris D. White. The self-dual classical double copy, and the Eguchi-Hanson instanton.JHEP, 01:107, 2019. – 55 –

    2019

  76. [85]

    Single Kerr-Schild metric for Taub-NUT instanton.Phys

    Joon-Hwi Kim. Single Kerr-Schild metric for Taub-NUT instanton.Phys. Rev. D, 111(2):L021703, 2025

    2025

  77. [86]

    Newman-Janis Algorithm from Taub-NUT Instantons

    Joon-Hwi Kim. Newman-Janis Algorithm from Taub-NUT Instantons. 12 2024

    2024

  78. [87]

    The duality between color and kinematics and its applications.J

    Zvi Bern, John Joseph Carrasco, Marco Chiodaroli, Henrik Johansson, and Radu Roiban. The duality between color and kinematics and its applications.J. Phys. A, 57(33):333002, 2024

    2024

  79. [88]

    The Kinematic Algebra From the Self-Dual Sector

    Ricardo Monteiro and Donal O’Connell. The Kinematic Algebra From the Self-Dual Sector. JHEP, 07:007, 2011

    2011

  80. [89]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, Poul H. Damgaard, Ricardo Monteiro, and Donal O’Connell. Algebras for Amplitudes.JHEP, 06:061, 2012

    2012

  81. [90]

    The Kinematic Algebras from the Scattering Equations.JHEP, 03:110, 2014

    Ricardo Monteiro and Donal O’Connell. The Kinematic Algebras from the Scattering Equations.JHEP, 03:110, 2014

    2014

  82. [91]

    On the kinematic algebra for BCJ numerators beyond the MHV sector.JHEP, 11:055, 2019

    Gang Chen, Henrik Johansson, Fei Teng, and Tianheng Wang. On the kinematic algebra for BCJ numerators beyond the MHV sector.JHEP, 11:055, 2019

    2019

  83. [92]

    Self-dual gravity as a large-Nlimit of the 2D non-linear sigma model.Physics Letters B, 238(2-4):287–290, 1990

    Q Han Park. Self-dual gravity as a large-Nlimit of the 2D non-linear sigma model.Physics Letters B, 238(2-4):287–290, 1990

    1990

  84. [93]

    Self-dual gravity as a two-dimensional theory and conservation laws.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 11(4):927, 1994

    Viqar Husain. Self-dual gravity as a two-dimensional theory and conservation laws.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 11(4):927, 1994

    1994

  85. [94]

    From self-dual Yang-Mills fields to self-dual gravity.Acta physica Polonica

    JF Plebanski, M Przanowski, and H Garcia-Compean. From self-dual Yang-Mills fields to self-dual gravity.Acta physica Polonica. B, 25(7):1079–1085, 1994

    1994

  86. [95]

    Some solutions of complex einstein equations.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 16(12):2395–2402, 1975

    Jerzy F Plebanski. Some solutions of complex einstein equations.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 16(12):2395–2402, 1975. – 56 –

    1975

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.