Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fate of Duplicated Neural Structures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.00531 v3 pith:PW6QNVUU submitted 2020-08-02 q-bio.NC nlin.AO

classification q-bio.NCnlin.AO
keywords circuitsneuralduplicatedstatisticalcognitioncomplexmechanicscomputation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Statistical mechanics determines the abundance of different arrangements of matter depending on cost-benefit balances. Its formalism and phenomenology percolate throughout biological processes and set limits to effective computation. Under specific conditions, self-replicating and computationally complex patterns become favored, yielding life, cognition, and Darwinian evolution. Neurons and neural circuits sit at a crossroads between statistical mechanics, computation, and (through their role in cognition) natural selection. Can we establish a {\em statistical physics} of neural circuits? Such theory would tell what kinds of brains to expect under set energetic, evolutionary, and computational conditions. With this big picture in mind, we focus on the fate of duplicated neural circuits. We look at examples from central nervous systems, with a stress on computational thresholds that might prompt this redundancy. We also study a naive cost-benefit balance for duplicated circuits implementing complex phenotypes. From this we derive {\em phase diagrams} and (phase-like) transitions between single and duplicated circuits, which constrain evolutionary paths to complex cognition. Back to the big picture, similar phase diagrams and transitions might constrain I/O and internal connectivity patterns of neural circuits at large. The formalism of statistical mechanics seems a natural framework for thsi worthy line of research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 1,041 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Trust at Your Own Peril: A Mixed Methods Exploration of the Ability of Large Language Models to Generate Expert-Like Systems Engineering Artifacts and a Characterization of Failure Modes

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Closed-source LLMs can produce systems engineering artifact text that scores nearly identically to a human expert benchmark on MAUVE text similarity, but expert review of the best-scoring outputs reveals three failure...

Pith tools