REVIEW 2 cited by
Supporting Gig Worker Needs and Advancing Policy Through Worker-Centered Data-Sharing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The proliferating adoption of platform-based gig work increasingly raises concerns for worker conditions. Past studies documented how platforms leveraged design to exploit labor, withheld information to generate power asymmetries, and left workers alone to manage logistical overheads as well as social isolation. However, researchers also called attention to the potential of helping workers overcome such costs via worker-led datasharing, which can enable collective actions and mutual aid among workers, while offering advocates, lawmakers and regulatory bodies insights for improving work conditions. To understand stakeholders' desiderata for a data-sharing system (i.e. functionality and policy initiatives that it can serve), we interviewed 11 policy domain experts in the U.S. and conducted co-design workshops with 14 active gig workers across four domains. Our results outline policymakers' prioritized initiatives, information needs, and (mis)alignments with workers' concerns and desires around data collectives. We offer design recommendations for data-sharing systems that support worker needs while bringing us closer to legislation that promote more thriving and equitable gig work futures.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Gig2Gether: Data-sharing to Empower, Unify and Demystify Gig Work
A 7-day field study with 14 gig workers found that a cross-platform data-sharing tool supports mutual support, financial reflection, and worker willingness to share data with policymakers.
-
Digital Labor: Challenges, Ethical Insights, and Implications
A review of 143 papers from 2015 to 2024 finds digital gig workers are underpaid, invisible, and underrepresented in both platforms and the research about them, and it names the gaps researchers should fill next.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.