Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Active phase separation: new phenomenology from non-equilibrium physics

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that active phase separation is governed by several distinct interfacial tensions, some negative, which can reverse Ostwald ripening, destabilize capillary waves, and create microphase-separated and foam states.

desk verdict Authoritative synthesis of the multiple-interfacial-tension framework for active phase separation; the generic transfer to real systems rests on the ζ term, whose bottom-up status remains shaky. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.02854 v3 pith:PX5ZL5Y2 submitted 2024-12-03 cond-mat.soft

M. E. Cates , C. Nardini This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords activematterphaseseparationdetailedbalanceinterfacialtensionOstwaldripeningmicrophaseModelB+H
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that, when microscopic detailed balance is broken, a fluid-fluid interface no longer has a single positive interfacial tension. Instead, different properties—Ostwald ripening, capillary-wave relaxation, mechanical forcing—are controlled by different tensions, and some of those can become negative while the interface remains stable. From this starting point, the review builds a unified account of phenomena that are impossible in equilibrium: reverse Ostwald ripening, microphase separation, bubbly phase separation, and active foams. These phenomena are shown to follow from minimal continuum field theories for a conserved scalar order parameter, extended by the lowest-order terms that break time-reversal symmetry. The review matters because it proposes that a wide range of active systems, from self-propelled colloids to biomolecular condensates and ecological patterns, share a generic nonequilibrium mechanism rather than requiring separate explanations for each.

What carries the argument

The workhorse is Active Model B+ (AMB+), the minimal extension of conserved Model B obtained by adding the two lowest-order time-reversal-symmetry-breaking terms, λ|∇ϕ|² and ζ(∇²ϕ)∇ϕ, to the diffusive current while keeping mobility and noise constant. The key identity is the decomposition of interfacial physics into separate tensions: σ_B and σ_D governing the Ostwald process for bubbles and droplets, σ_cw governing capillary waves, and σ_M governing mechanical forcing, with σ_cw given by the symmetric average of σ_B and σ_D for constant mobility. A nonlinear change of variables (ϕ to ψ) and a pseudo-pressure construction fix the binodals without solving the full interfacial profile, and a quasi-static sharp-interface ansatz yields the droplet growth law and capillary-wave dispersion. In the wet case, AMH couples the same diffusive current to a Navier-Stokes equation with an active deviatoric stress ∝ (K̃−K)S, whose sign controls the mechanical tension σ_M.

What would settle it

Measure, in the same active phase-separating suspension, the growth/evaporation dynamics of droplets and bubbles together with the relaxation of imposed interface height perturbations: if a single positive interfacial tension governs both processes and no regime shows reverse Ostwald ripening or capillary-wave destabilization as activity increases, the multiple-negative-tension picture is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that activity, by breaking detailed balance at the microscale, splits the equilibrium concept of a single positive interfacial tension into several distinct nonequilibrium tensions. For a dry active system described by Active Model B+ (AMB+), the droplet and bubble Ostwald tensions σ_D and σ_B can each become negative, reversing the Ostwald process so that small droplets or bubbles grow rather than shrink; the capillary-wave tension σ_cw = (σ_B + σ_D)/2 can also become negative, destabilizing height fluctuations while the interface remains stable to normal perturbations. These negative tensions give rise, respectively, to microphase separation, bubbly phase separation, and the active foam state. In wet systems the momentum-conserving extension, Active Model H (AMH), introduces a further independent mechanical tension σ_M, which when negative causes droplets to split by self-shearing, producing additional microphase-separated steady states. The review argues that these effects are generic, and that minimal single-scalar field theories capture the essential phenomenology, with further new behaviour appearing in multi-species, non-conserved, and orientational systems.

Load-bearing premise

The whole edifice rests on the premise that realistic active suspensions can be described, at the scales of interest, by a local Markovian field theory of a single conserved density with constant mobility, white noise, and only the lowest-order gradient terms; if density-dependent mobility, memory, or additional slow fields are generically important, the specific predictions about negative tensions and reverse Ostwald need not transfer to real systems.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Where the nonequilibrium tension σ_D or σ_B is negative, Ostwald ripening is reversed and the system reaches a microphase-separated state of finite-size droplets or bubbles instead of full phase separation.
  • When σ_cw becomes negative, the liquid-vapour interface is linearly unstable to height fluctuations yet remains stable to normal ones, producing an active foam state with system-spanning liquid filaments.
  • Bubbly phase separation arises when a microphase-separated region at density φ_BL coexists with excess bulk vapour, with φ_BL lying above the mean binodal density; the bubble size distribution is set by competition between reverse Ostwald, nucleation, and coalescence.
  • In momentum-conserving Active Model H, a negative mechanical tension σ_M makes droplets split by self-shearing, and balancing this splitting against forward or reverse Ostwald sets a finite steady-state droplet size.
  • For the critical point of active phase separation between two uniform phases, the active nonlinearities are irrelevant to one-loop order, so the static critical exponents remain those of the equilibrium Model B/Ising class despite broken detailed balance.
  • The multiplicity of tensions means that measuring only one interfacial quantity in an active emulsion, for example the amplitude of capillary fluctuations, does not determine the coarsening or nucleation behaviour, which are governed by separate tensions.
  • Tests in particle simulations and experiments should look for the signature competition between reversed Ostwald, nucleation, and coalescence in bubble-size distributions, with near-monodisperse sizes when reverse Ostwald dominates.
  • For systems with multiple species or with chemical reactions, the same logic suggests that nonreciprocal interactions or birth-death dynamics can independently reverse Ostwald or stabilize finite domains, potentially producing hierarchical microphase-separated structures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the framework is correct, reporting a single 'surface tension' for an active interface is incomplete; tensions should be defined operationally per phenomenon, and mismatches between them are direct signatures of broken detailed balance.
  • Editorial inference: the same negative-tension logic should generalize to nonreciprocal multi-species mixtures and reaction-coupled condensates; the review's own NRCHM and Model AB+ extensions already show reverse-Ostwald-like mechanisms, suggesting a common principle beyond the single-scalar case.
  • Editorial inference: the theory implies that finite-size clusters in active colloids, currently often attributed to long-ranged interactions or arrests, could instead be steady states maintained by negative Ostwald tensions; this is testable by checking whether cluster size stays finite when system size is increased and whether bubbles nucleate inside dense clusters.
  • Editorial inference: a concrete experimental probe would be to measure the relaxation of an imposed sinusoidal height perturbation on an active interface and independently measure the growth rate of droplets; equality of the extracted tensions would support the equilibrium-like picture, whereas a discrepancy would support the multiple-tension scenario.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This review article argues that phase separation in active matter is governed not by a single positive interfacial tension, as in equilibrium fluids, but by several distinct nonequilibrium tensions that control different phenomena and can individually become negative. The authors develop this claim within Active Model B+ (AMB+) for a single conserved scalar field, and its momentum-conserving counterpart Active Model H (AMH), showing how negative values of the Ostwald tensions σD, σB and of the capillary-wave tension σcw generate reverse Ostwald ripening, microphase separation, bubbly phase separation, and active foam states. They then survey the connection to particle-based models, emphasizing that only some microscopic coarse-graining procedures produce the crucial ζ term, and close with extensions to multiple species, nonconserved dynamics, flocking, and active nematics.

Significance. The review's central synthesis—that activity splits the equilibrium interfacial tension into independent nonequilibrium tensions, some of which can be negative—provides a coherent and falsifiable framework for a wide range of active phase separation phenomena. Its strengths include the explicit derivation of coexistence conditions and Ostwald dynamics from AMB+, the candid discussion of numerical and conceptual limitations (e.g., no d=3 AMB+ simulations, unresolved coarsening exponents, undetermined signs in the bottom-up ζ term, absence of vapour bubbles in 3D repulsive ABPs), and the careful comparison of field-theoretic predictions with particle-model and experimental observations. If the microscopic-transfer questions are resolved in the directions suggested by the paper, the review will have identified a generic, low-order route to finite-length-scale patterning in active matter that is distinct from Turing mechanisms. The paper is a review rather than a source of new derivations, but its pedagogical value and its honest demarcation of open problems justify publication after correction of the technical issues below.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II.C, Eq. (15)] The two expressions for the transformation ψ(φ) in Eq. (15) are inconsistent by an overall sign. With A=(ζ−2λ)φ/K, the first expression reads K/(ζ−2λ)(1−e^A), while the second reads K/(ζ−2λ)(e^A−1). Since Eqs. (17) and (21) rely on ψ, a reader using the second form would obtain binodals and interfacial tensions with the wrong sign. Please correct the second equality or, if that form is intended, adjust the first and verify the λ̄→0 limit.
  2. [Sec. II.E, Eq. (19); Sec. II.I, Eqs. (28)–(32)] Eq. (19) gives Ṙ=(d−1)Mσne/(R(Δφ)²)(1/Rs−1/R), but the derivation using (28), (31), and (32) yields a prefactor (d−1)(d−2), not (d−1). The sentence 'The factor (d−2) in eq. (19) and (32) was omitted in [177]' does not resolve the issue because (19) as printed still lacks the (d−2) factor. This alters the d-dependence of the Ostwald rate and is especially important because many numerical tests of the new states are performed in d=2, where the formula requires a logarithmic correction.
  3. [Abstract and Sec. III] The abstract states as a generic property that 'the fluid-fluid interfaces created by active phase separation can have several distinct interfacial tensions... some of which can be negative.' The bottom-up evidence reviewed in Secs. IIIA, IIID, and IIIH is more guarded: the quorum-sensing model has no ζ term and gives σne>0; the coarse-graining of repulsive ABPs that does produce a ζ term has undetermined signs and 'several uncontrolled approximations'; and 3D repulsive ABP simulations do not show vapour bubbles. Please qualify the abstract and the introductory claim to distinguish the AMB+-internal prediction from the still-incomplete microscopic-transfer argument.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II.E, paragraph before Sec. II.F] The phrase 'we discuss the impact of activity on nucleation in Sec. III and on interfacial roughening in Sec. IIJ' contains a wrong cross-reference: nucleation kinetics is treated in Sec. II.I, not Sec. III.
  2. [Sec. II.A] There is a typo: 'is called Acitve Model B (AMB)' should read 'Active Model B'.
  3. [Sec. II.G] In the sentence 'andsσcw also becomes negative', the word 'ands' appears to be a typographical artifact; it should read 'and σcw'.
  4. [Sec. III.E] The text contains 'based on a a quasi-equilibrium approximation'; the doubled article 'a a' should be corrected.
  5. [Sec. I.B] The phrase 'borne out by particle-baseds models' contains a typo: 'particle-baseds' should be 'particle-based'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: AMB+ predictions are derived from stated equations, and the microscopic status of the zeta term is openly flagged rather than assumed.

full rationale

This is a review, not a paper claiming a new first-principles derivation. The central multi-tension claim (negative sigma_B, sigma_D, sigma_cw) is derived internally from the stated AMB+ equations in Sections IIE-IIG: the Ostwald tension is computed from (19)-(21), the capillary tension follows as sigma_cw = (sigma_B + sigma_D)/2 in (24), and the reverse-Ostwald regime is traced explicitly to the zeta term. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no quantity is defined in terms of the result it is said to explain. The paper honestly marks the weakest link: the bottom-up status of the zeta term is left unresolved. Section IIIA states that the quorum-sensing model has no zeta term and gives sigma_ne > 0, and Section IIIH says the coarse-grained expressions for K, lambda, zeta 'do not allow for easily assessing their signs' and involve 'several uncontrolled approximations.' That is an acknowledged limitation, not a circular reduction. The abundant self-citations ([161,166,177,182,228]) supply the calculations being reviewed, but the key equations are reproduced in the text and the argument does not rest on asserting those citations as external authority; independent particle simulations ([227,258,292]) and experiments are cited for comparison. No uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked to forbid alternatives, and no known result is merely renamed. The failure to transfer negative-tension phenomenology to a specific microscopic model would be a correctness or scope concern, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no new entities or fitted parameters. It borrows models from prior work (AMB+, AMH, NRCHM, Model AB+) whose parameters and axioms are restated here. The ledger reflects the model assumptions that the review's narrative depends on.

free parameters (4)
  • lambda (λ)
    Activity parameter in AMB+; the review's phase diagram depends on its sign, but no microscopic derivation fixes its value generically (Sec IIA).
  • zeta (ζ)
    Second activity parameter in AMB+; reverse Ostwald and negative tensions require it to be nonzero. Values are model inputs, not fitted here (Sec IIA, IIE).
  • noise amplitude D
    Sets fluctuation level in AMB+; phase boundaries such as phi_BL and bubble size distributions depend on D, and simulations use for example D=0.2 (Sec IIH).
  • global density phi0
    Thermodynamic variable that selects phase-separated, microphase, bubbly, or foam states in the AMB+ phase diagram (Fig 2).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The minimal active extension of Model B consists of all terms at order O(∇^4 φ^2) that break detailed balance, with constant mobility and white noise.
    Invoked in Sec IIA to justify AMB+ as the generic scalar conserved-order-parameter theory. This is not proven in the review and excludes density-dependent mobility and coloured noise as leading effects.
  • domain assumption Coarse-grained field theories are local in space and time when length scales exceed the persistence length/time and the interaction range.
    Stated in the opening of Section III; if nonlocality or memory matters at the scales of interest, the predictions may not transfer to particle systems.
  • standard math The nonlinear change of variables φ→ψ and the pseudo-pressure construction gives the correct binodals for AMB+ without solving the interfacial profile.
    Used in Sec IIC to derive binodals; the proof is cited to [161,178,179] rather than reproduced, and the review relies on it for the shifted binodals.
  • domain assumption Orientational order parameters of active particles relax quickly and can be ignored for a single conserved scalar density unless long-range order exists.
    Stated in the opening of Section II; this sets the scope and allows scalar field theories. It is relaxed in Section IV.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Active phase separation: new phenomenology from non-equilibrium physics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PX5ZL5Y2

@misc{pith2026241202854,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Active phase separation: new phenomenology from non-equilibrium physics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PX5ZL5Y2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.02854}
}
read the original abstract

In active systems, whose constituents have non-equilibrium dynamics at local level, fluid-fluid phase separation is widely observed. Examples include the formation of membraneless organelles within cells; the clustering of self-propelled colloidal particles in the absence of attractive forces, and some types of ecological segregation. A schematic understanding of such active phase separation was initially borrowed from what is known for the equilibrium case, in which detailed balance holds at microscopic level. However it has recently become clear that in active systems the absence of detailed balance, although it leave phase separation qualitatively unchanged in some regimes (for example domain growth driven by interfacial tension via Ostwald ripening), can in other regimes radically alter its phenomenology at mechanistic level. For example, microphase separation can be caused by reverse Ostwald ripening, a process that is hard to imagine from an equilibrium perspective. This and other new phenomena arise because, instead of having a single, positive interfacial tension like their equilibrium counterparts, the fluid-fluid interfaces created by active phase separation can have several distinct interfacial tensions governing different properties, some of which can be negative. These phenomena can be broadly understood by studying continuum field theories for a single conserved scalar order parameter (the fluid density), supplemented with a velocity field in cases where momentum conservation is also present. More complex regimes arise in systems described by multiple scalar order parameters (especially with nonreciprocal interactions between these); or when an order parameter undergoes both conserved and non-conserved dynamics; or in systems that support orientational long-range order in one or more of the coexisting phases. In this Review [...]

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.02854 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental observation of phase separation in active systems. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure adapted from [161, 166]. Panel (a): Phases of Active Model B+ found by numerical simulations on varying the global density ϕ0. Phase separations arise when this lies between the binodals, ϕ1, ϕ2. The colour scale is dark for positive ϕ (‘liquid’) and light for negative ϕ (‘vapour’), or vice versa depending on the sign of the activity parameters (see text for discussion). Each row exemplifies a different regim… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Mechanism leading to the instability of capil [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a,b) The distribution of bubble sizes in the mi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulations of AMB+ in a rectangular geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Mechanism of droplet instability by self-shearing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Coexisting densities in the QSM with isotropic ker [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Bubbly phase separation in simulations of self [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Microphase-separated state in simulations of self [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Percolating networks of dense particles were ob [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Travelling patterns found numerically in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Panel (a): Phase diagram of a model of phase sep [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Panel (a): Phase diagram of systems in which [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Panel (a): Two-dimensional dry active nemat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stochastic bubble dynamics in phase-separated scalar active matter

    cond-mat.soft 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bubble areas in phase-separated active Brownian particles obey a Langevin equation with constant negative drift and noise proportional to the perimeter, reproducing area and lifetime statistics.

  2. Kardar-Parisi-Zhang scaling in time-crystalline matter

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The Goldstone mode of spontaneously broken time-translation symmetry obeys compact Kardar-Parisi-Zhang dynamics, predicting universal KPZ scaling in time-crystalline and limit-cycle phases.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [177]

    Cates M and Nardini C 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 098203

    2023

  2. [1]

    Cates M E and Tailleur J 2015Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6 219–244

  3. [2]

    Steinberg M 1963Science 141 401–408

  4. [3]

    Biol.278 255–263

    Foty R A and Steinberg M 2005Dev. Biol.278 255–263

  5. [4]

    Hyman A A, Weber C A and Jülicher F 2014Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.30 39–58

  6. [5]

    Banani S F, Lee H O, Hyman A A and Rosen M K 2017 Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.18 285–298

    2017

  7. [6]

    Weber C A, Zwicker D, Jülicher F and Lee C F 2019 Rep. Prog. Phys.82 064601

    2019

  8. [7]

    Berry J, Brangwynne C P and Haataja M 2018Rep. Prog. Phys.81 046601

Show all 300 references
  1. [8]

    J.114 2262–2270

    Erdel F and Rippe K 2018Biophys. J.114 2262–2270

  2. [9]

    Cook P R and Marenduzzo D 2018Nucleic acids re- search 46 9895–9906

  3. [10]

    Mirny L A, Imakaev M and Abdennur N 2019Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.58 142–152

  4. [11]

    Oyarte L, Gutiérrez P, Aumaître S and Mujica N 2013 Phys. Rev. E87 022204

    2013

  5. [12]

    Phys.4 249–254

    Clerc M G, Cordero P, Dunstan J, Huff K, Mujica N, Risso D and Varas G 2008Nat. Phys.4 249–254

  6. [13]

    Prevost A, Melby P, Egolf D A and Urbach J S 2004 Phys. Rev. E70 050301

    2004

  7. [14]

    Schelling T C 1971J. Math. Sociol.1 143–186

  8. [15]

    Schelling T C 1969Am. Econ. Rev.59 488–493

  9. [16]

    Sen P and Chakrabarti B K 2014Sociophysics: an in- troduction (OUP Oxford)

  10. [17]

    Rietkerk M and Van de Koppel J 2008 Trends Ecol. Evol. 23 169–175

    2008

  11. [18]

    Chaikin P M and Lubensky T C 2000Principles of con- densed matter physicsvol 1 (Cambridge Univ Press)

  12. [19]

    Van Der Linden M N, Alexander L C, Aarts D G and Dauchot O 2019Phys. Rev. Lett.123 098001

  13. [20]

    Feric M, Vaidya N, Harmon T S, Mitrea D M, Zhu L, Richardson T M, Kriwacki R W, Pappu R V and Brang- wynne C P 2016Cell 165 1686–1697

  14. [21]

    Mater.20 1156–1166

    Balasubramaniam L, Doostmohammadi A, Saw T B, Narayana G H N S, Mueller R, Dang T, Thomas M, Gupta S, Sonam S, Yap A Set al.2021 Nat. Mater.20 1156–1166

    2021

  15. [22]

    Liu G, Patch A, Bahar F, Yllanes D, Welch R D, Marchetti M C, Thutupalli S and Shaevitz J W 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett.122 248102

    2019

  16. [23]

    Lemma B, Mitchell N P, Subramanian R, Needleman D J and Dogic Z 2022Phys. Rev. X12 031006

  17. [24]

    Siteur K, Liu Q X, Rottschäfer V, van der Heide T, Rietkerk M, Doelman A, Boström C and van de Koppel J 2023PNAS 120 e2202683120

  18. [25]

    Life Rev.19 107– 121

    Liu Q X, Rietkerk M, Herman P M, Piersma T, Fryxell J M and van de Koppel J 2016Phys. Life Rev.19 107– 121

  19. [26]

    Marchetti M C, Joanny J F, Ramaswamy S, Liverpool T B, Prost J, Rao M and Simha R A 2013Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 1143

  20. [27]

    Gompper G, Winkler R G, Speck T, Solon A, Nardini C, Peruani F, Löwen H, Golestanian R, Kaupp U B, Al- varez Let al.2020 J. Phys. Condens. Matter32 193001

    2020

  21. [28]

    Poon W C 2002J. Phys. Condens. Matter14 R859

  22. [29]

    Turing A M 1952Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 237 37–72

  23. [30]

    Cross M C and Hohenberg P C 1993Rev. Mod. Phys. 40 65 851

  24. [31]

    Cross M and Greenside H 2009Pattern formation and dynamics in nonequilibrium systems (Cambridge Uni- versity Press)

  25. [32]

    Brauns F, Halatek J and Frey E 2020Phys. Rev. X10 041036

  26. [33]

    Weyer H, Roth T A and Frey E 2024arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.2007

    2007

  27. [34]

    Theurkauff I, Cottin-Bizonne C, Palacci J, Ybert C and Bocquet L 2012Phys. Rev. Lett.108(26) 268303

  28. [35]

    Palacci J, Sacanna S, Steinberg A P, Pine D J and Chaikin P M 2013Science 339 936–940

  29. [36]

    Buttinoni I, Bialké J, Kümmel F, Löwen H, Bechinger C and Speck T 2013Phys. Rev. Lett.110(23) 238301

  30. [37]

    Thutupalli S, Geyer D, Singh R, Adhikari R and Stone H A 2018PNAS 115 5403–5408

  31. [38]

    Phys.17 961–967

    Zhang J, Alert R, Yan J, Wingreen N S and Granick S 2021 Nat. Phys.17 961–967

    2021

  32. [39]

    Commun.11 2628

    Vutukuri H R, Lisicki M, Lauga E and Vermant J 2020 Nat. Commun.11 2628

    2020

  33. [40]

    Commun.9 696

    Ginot F, Theurkauff I, Detcheverry F, Ybert C and Cottin-Bizonne C 2018Nat. Commun.9 696

  34. [41]

    Schwarz-Linek J, Valeriani C, Cacciuto A, Cates M, Marenduzzo D, Morozov A and Poon W 2012PNAS 109 4052–4057

  35. [42]

    Cates M E, Marenduzzo D, Pagonabarraga I and Tailleur J 2010PNAS 107 11715–11720

  36. [43]

    Liu C, Fu X, Liu L, Ren X, Chau C K, Li S, Xiang L, Zeng H, Chen G, Tang L Het al.2011 Science 334 238–241

    2011

  37. [44]

    Demir E, Yaman Y I, Basaran M and Kocabas A 2020 Elife 9 e52781

    2020

  38. [45]

    Model.222 1897– 1911

    Schellinck J and White T 2011Ecol. Model.222 1897– 1911

    1911

  39. [46]

    Com- mun

    Anderson C and Fernandez-Nieves A 2022Nat. Com- mun. 13 6710

  40. [47]

    Grobas I, Polin M and Asally M 2021Elife 10 e62632

  41. [48]

    Worlitzer V M, Jose A, Grinberg I, Bar M, Heidenre- ich S, Eldar A, Ariel G and Beer A 2022Sci. Adv. 8 eabn8152

  42. [49]

    Phys.16 1152–1157

    Curatolo A, Zhou N, Zhao Y, Liu C, Daerr A, Tailleur J and Huang J 2020Nat. Phys.16 1152–1157

  43. [50]

    Akam M 1989Nature 341 282–283

  44. [51]

    Krens S G and Heisenberg C P 2011Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 95 189–213

  45. [52]

    Christian J L, McMahon J A, McMahon A P and Moon R T 1991Development 111 1045–1055

  46. [53]

    Cell Biol.211 219–231

    Heller E and Fuchs E 2015J. Cell Biol.211 219–231

  47. [54]

    Lowengrub J, Frieboes H, Jin F, Chuang Y, Li X, Mack- lin P, Wise S and Cristini V 2009Nonlinearity 23 R1

  48. [55]

    Wise S M, Lowengrub J S, Frieboes H B and Cristini V 2008 J. Theor. Biol.253 524–543

    2008

  49. [56]

    Byrne H and Preziosi L 2003Math. Med. Biol.20 341– 366

  50. [57]

    KangW,FerruzziJ,SpatareluCP,HanYL,SharmaY, Koehler S A, Mitchel J A, Khan A, Butler J P, Roblyer D et al.2021 iScience 24

    2021

  51. [58]

    Cell Biol.22 1103–1115

    Ilina O, Gritsenko P G, Syga S, Lippoldt J, La Porta C, Chepizhko O, Grosser S, Vullings M, Bakker G, Starruß J et al.2020 Nat. Cell Biol.22 1103–1115

    2020

  52. [59]

    Biol.9 016010

    Szabó A, Varga K, Garay T, Hegedűs B and Czirók A 2012 Phys. Biol.9 016010

    2012

  53. [60]

    Basan M, Risler T, Joanny J F, Sastre-Garau X and Prost J 2009HFSP J.3 265–272

  54. [61]

    Brodland G W 2002J. Biomech. Eng.124 188–197

  55. [62]

    Harris A K 1976J. Theor. Biol.61 267–285

  56. [63]

    Glazier J A and Graner F 1993Phys. Rev. E47 2128

  57. [64]

    Nagai T and Honda H 2001Philos. Mag. B81 699–719

  58. [65]

    oncol.3 87

    Szabó A and Merks R 2013Front. oncol.3 87

  59. [66]

    Biol.13 e1005569

    Barton D L, Henkes S, Weijer C and Sknepnek R 2017 PLoS Comput. Biol.13 e1005569

    2017

  60. [67]

    Krajnc M 2020Soft Matter 16 3209–3215

  61. [68]

    Ai B and Guo R 2021Phys. Rev. E104 064411

  62. [69]

    Sahu P, Sussman D, Rübsam M, Mertz A, Horsley V, Dufresne E, Niessen C, Marchetti M, Manning M and Schwarz J 2020Soft Matter 16 3325–3337

  63. [70]

    Sussman D M, Schwarz J, Marchetti M and Manning M 2018Phys. Rev. Lett.120 058001

  64. [71]

    McCarthy E, Manna R K, Damavandi O and Manning M L 2024Phys. Rev. Lett.132 098301

  65. [72]

    Matoz-Fernandez D, Martens K, Sknepnek R, Barrat J and Henkes S 2017Soft matter 13 3205–3212

  66. [73]

    J.107 1821–1828

    Delarue M, Montel F, Vignjevic D, Prost J, Joanny J F and Cappello G 2014Biophys. J.107 1821–1828

  67. [74]

    Phys.14 055008

    Montel F, Delarue M, Elgeti J, Vignjevic D, Cappello G and Prost J 2012New J. Phys.14 055008

  68. [75]

    Waclaw B, Bozic I, Pittman M E, Hruban R H, Vogel- stein B and Nowak M A 2015Nature 525 261–264

  69. [76]

    Sinha S and Thirumalai D 2020J. Chem. Phys.153

  70. [77]

    Sinha S, Malmi-Kakkada A N, Li X, Samanta H S and Thirumalai D 2020Soft matter 16 5294–5304

  71. [78]

    J.112 683 – 691

    Jacobs W M and Frenkel D 2017Biophys. J.112 683 – 691

  72. [79]

    Perspect

    Pederson T 2011Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.3 a000638

  73. [80]

    Gall J G 2000Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.16 273–300

  74. [81]

    Morris G E 2008Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Res. 1783 2108–2115

  75. [82]

    Machyna M, Heyn P and Neugebauer K M 2013Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA4 17–34

  76. [83]

    Cell 21 14–16

    Hyman A A and Brangwynne C P 2011Dev. Cell 21 14–16

  77. [84]

    Phys 11 899–904

    Brangwynne C P, Tompa P and Pappu R V 2015Nat. Phys 11 899–904

  78. [85]

    Cell 57 936–947

    Nott T J, Petsalaki E, Farber P, Jervis D, Fussner E, Plochowietz A, Craggs T D, Bazett-Jones D P, Pawson T, Forman-Kay J Det al.2015 Mol. Cell 57 936–947

    2015

  79. [86]

    Wolf N, Priess J and Hirsh D 1983 Development 73 297–306

    1983

  80. [87]

    Strome S and Wood W B 1983Cell 35 15–25

  81. [88]

    Michaels T C, Qian D, Šarić A, Vendruscolo M, Linse S and Knowles T P 2023Nat. Rev. Phys.5 379–397

  82. [89]

    Adv.9 eadg0432

    Law J O, Jones C M, Stevenson T, Williamson T A, Turner M S, Kusumaatmaja H and Grellscheid S N 2023 Sci. Adv.9 eadg0432

    2023

  83. [90]

    Garaizar A, Espinosa J R, Joseph J A, Krainer G, Shen Y, Knowles T P and Collepardo-Guevara R 2022PNAS 119 e2119800119

  84. [91]

    Folkmann A W, Putnam A, Lee C F and Seydoux G 2021 Science 373 1218–1224

    2021

  85. [92]

    Commun.12 2883

    Farr S E, Woods E J, Joseph J A, Garaizar A and Collepardo-Guevara R 2021Nat. Commun.12 2883

  86. [93]

    Cell Biol.ogy22 165–182

    Lafontaine D L, Riback J A, Bascetin R and Brang- wynne C P 2021Nature reviews Mol. Cell Biol.ogy22 165–182

  87. [94]

    Erkamp N A, Sneideris T, Ausserwöger H, Qian D, Qa- mar S, Nixon-Abell J, St George-Hyslop P, Schmit J D, Weitz D A and Knowles T P 2023Nat. Commun. 14 41 684

  88. [95]

    Shin Y and Brangwynne C P 2017Science357eaaf4382

  89. [96]

    Cohen S I, Linse S, Luheshi L M, Hellstrand E, White D A, Rajah L, Otzen D E, Vendruscolo M, Dobson C M and Knowles T P 2013PNAS 110 9758–9763

  90. [97]

    Jain A and Vale R D 2017Nature 546 243–247

  91. [98]

    54 753–762

    Derenzini M, Montanaro L and Treré D 2009 Histopathol. 54 753–762

    2009

  92. [99]

    Commun.8 1–13

    Buchwalter A and Hetzer M W 2017Nat. Commun.8 1–13

  93. [100]

    Phys.5 167

    Tanaka H 2022Commun. Phys.5 167

  94. [101]

    Phys.16 422– 425

    Rosowski K A, Sai T, Vidal-Henriquez E, Zwicker D, Style R W and Dufresne E R 2020Nat. Phys.16 422– 425

  95. [102]

    Style R W, Sai T, Fanelli N, Ijavi M, Smith-Mannschott K, Xu Q, Wilen L A and Dufresne E R 2018Phys. Rev. X 8 011028

  96. [103]

    Pappu R V, Cohen S R, Dar F, Farag M and Kar M 2023 Chemical Reviews123 8945–8987

    2023

  97. [104]

    Li T and Jacobs W M 2024PRX Life2 023013

  98. [105]

    Commun.11 5167

    Donau C, Späth F, Sosson M, Kriebisch B A, Schnit- ter F, Tena-Solsona M, Kang H S, Salibi E, Sattler M, Mutschler Het al.2020 Nat. Commun.11 5167

    2020

  99. [106]

    Cell 40 216–227

    Boulon S, Westman B J, Hutten S, Boisvert F M and Lamond A I 2010Mol. Cell 40 216–227

  100. [107]

    Ganai N, Sengupta S and Menon G I 2014Nucleic Acid Res.42 4145–4159

  101. [108]

    Brackley C A, Taylor S, Papantonis A, Cook P R and Marenduzzo D 2013PNAS 110 E3605–E3611

  102. [109]

    Brackley C A, Liebchen B, Michieletto D, Mouvet F, Cook P R and Marenduzzo D 2017 Biophys. J. 112 1085–1093

    2017

  103. [110]

    Brackley C A and Marenduzzo D 2020 Brief. Funct. Genom. 19 111–118

    2020

  104. [111]

    Phys.13 408–413

    Zwicker D, Seyboldt R, Weber C A, Hyman A A and Jülicher F 2017Nat. Phys.13 408–413

  105. [112]

    Li Y I and Cates M E 2021EPJE 44 119

  106. [113]

    Agrawal A, Ganai N, Sengupta S and Menon G I 2017 J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.2017 014001

    2017

  107. [114]

    Adame-Arana O, Bajpai G, Lorber D, Volk T and Safran S 2023Elife 12 e82983

  108. [115]

    Smrek J and Kremer K 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 098002

    2017

  109. [116]

    Goychuk A, Kannan D, Chakraborty A K and Kardar M 2023PNAS 120 e2221726120

  110. [117]

    Mahajan A, Yan W, Zidovska A, Saintillan D and Shel- ley M J 2022Phys. Rev. X12 041033

  111. [118]

    J.118 549a

    Bajpai G, Pavlov D A, Lorber D, Volk T and Safran S 2020 Biophys. J.118 549a

    2020

  112. [119]

    Okubo A, Levin S Aet al.2001 Diffusion and ecological problems: modern perspectivesvol 14 (Springer)

    2001

  113. [120]

    Klausmeier C A 1999Science 284 1826–1828

  114. [121]

    Sci.58 159–174

    Jokiel P L, Brown E K, Friedlander A, Rodgers S K and Smith W R 2004Pac. Sci.58 159–174

  115. [122]

    Nat.173 803–818

    Eppinga M B, De Ruiter P C, Wassen M J and Rietkerk M 2009Am. Nat.173 803–818

  116. [123]

    trends in invasive alien specieshttps:// www.cbd.int/ts32/ts32-chap-11.shtml#map_alie ac- cessed: 2024-03-27

    Chapter 11. trends in invasive alien specieshttps:// www.cbd.int/ts32/ts32-chap-11.shtml#map_alie ac- cessed: 2024-03-27

    2024

  117. [124]

    Nat.163 699–708

    Rietkerk M, Dekker S, Wassen M, Verkroost A and Bierkens M 2004Am. Nat.163 699–708

  118. [125]

    Liu Q X, Doelman A, Rottschäfer V, de Jager M, Her- man P M, Rietkerk M and van de Koppel J 2013PNAS 110 11905–11910

  119. [126]

    Couteron P 2023PNAS 120 e2221117120

  120. [127]

    Michaels T K, Eppinga M B and Bever J D 2020Ecology 101 e03099

  121. [128]

    Gandhi A, Levin S and Orszag S 1999J. Theor. Biol. 200 121–146

  122. [129]

    Rietkerk M, Dekker S C, De Ruiter P C and van de Koppel J 2004Science 305 1926–1929

    1926

  123. [130]

    Rietkerk M, Bastiaansen R, Banerjee S, van de Kop- pel J, Baudena M and Doelman A 2021Science 374 eabj0359

  124. [131]

    Vallespir Lowery N and Ursell T 2019PNAS 116 379– 388

  125. [132]

    Sakoda J M 1971J. Math. Sociol.1 119–132

  126. [133]

    Hegselmann R 2017J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.20

  127. [134]

    VinkovićDandKirmanA2006 PNAS 10319261–19265

  128. [135]

    GrauwinS,BertinE,LemoyRandJensenP2009 PNAS 106 20622–20626

  129. [136]

    Seara D S, Colen J, Fruchart M, Avni Y, Martin D and Vitelli V 2023arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17627

    arXiv

  130. [137]

    Zakine R, Garnier-Brun J, Becharat A C and Benza- quen M 2024Physical Review E109 044310

  131. [138]

    Clark W A and Fossett M 2008PNAS 105 4109–4114

  132. [139]

    Vicsek T, Czirók A, Ben-Jacob E, Cohen I and Shochet O 1995Phys. Rev. Lett.75 1226

  133. [140]

    Toner J and Tu Y 1995Phys. Rev. Lett.75 4326

  134. [141]

    Phys.318 170–244

    Toner J, Tu Y and Ramaswamy S 2005Ann. Phys.318 170–244

  135. [142]

    Grégoire G and Chaté H 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 025702

    2004

  136. [143]

    Mishra S, Baskaran A and Marchetti M C 2010Phys. Rev. E81 061916

  137. [144]

    Caussin J B, Solon A, Peshkov A, Chaté H, Dauxois T, Tailleur J, Vitelli V and Bartolo D 2014Phys. Rev. Lett.112 148102

  138. [145]

    Solon A P, Chaté H and Tailleur J 2015Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 068101

  139. [146]

    Geyer D, Martin D, Tailleur J and Bartolo D 2019Phys. Rev. X9 031043

  140. [147]

    Chaté H and Mahault B 2019 arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05542

    2019 arXiv

  141. [148]

    Martin D, Chaté H, Nardini C, Solon A, Tailleur J and Van Wijland F 2021Phys. Rev. Lett.126 148001

  142. [149]

    Anderson C J, Dauchot O and Fernandez-Nieves A 2024 Physical Review E109 054610

    2024

  143. [150]

    (Tolstoy, Anna Karenina)

    Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way. (Tolstoy, Anna Karenina)

  144. [151]

    Hohenberg P C and Halperin B I 1977Rev. Mod. Phys. 49 435

  145. [152]

    Phys.51 481–587

    Bray A J 2002Adv. Phys.51 481–587

  146. [153]

    Fluid Mech.836 P1

    Cates M E and Tjhung E 2018J. Fluid Mech.836 P1

  147. [154]

    Cates M E 2022Active matter and nonequilibrium sta- tistical physics: lecture notes of the Les Houches sum- mer school 2018180–216

  148. [155]

    Ramaswamy S 2010Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1 323–345

  149. [156]

    Golestanian R, Liverpool T B and Ajdari A 2005Phys. Rev. Lett.94 220801

  150. [157]

    Brown A and Poon W 2014Soft matter 10 4016–4027

  151. [158]

    Boniface D, Cottin-Bizonne C, Kervil R, Ybert C and Detcheverry F 2019Physical Review E99 062605

  152. [159]

    Carrasco C, Martinet Q, Shen Z, Lintuvuori J S, Palacci J and Aubret A 2024arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.01024

    arXiv

  153. [160]

    Bricard A, Caussin J B, Desreumaux N, Dauchot O and Bartolo D 2013Nature 503 95–98 42

  154. [161]

    Tjhung E, Nardini C and Cates M E 2018Phys. Rev. X 8 031080

  155. [162]

    Onuki A 2002Phase transition dynamics (Cambridge University Press)

  156. [163]

    Muratov C B 2002Phys. Rev. E66 066108

  157. [164]

    Gompper G, Schick M, Domb C and Lebowitz J 1994 Self-assembling amphiphilic systems1–181

    1994

  158. [165]

    Rowlinson J S and Widom B 2013Molecular theory of capillarity (Courier Corporation)

  159. [166]

    Fausti G, Tjhung E, Cates M and Nardini C 2021Phys. Rev. Lett.127 068001

  160. [167]

    Bray A J and Emmott C L 1995Phys. Rev. B52 R685

  161. [168]

    Wittkowski R, Tiribocchi A, Stenhammar J, Allen R J, Marenduzzo D and Cates M E 2014Nat. Comms.5

  162. [169]

    Nardini C, Fodor E, Tjhung E, van Wijland F, Tailleur J and Cates M E 2017Phys. Rev. X7 021007

  163. [170]

    Cates M E, Fodor É, Markovich T, Nardini C and Tjhung E 2022Entropy 24 254

  164. [171]

    Markovich T, Fodor É, Tjhung E and Cates M E 2021 Physical Review X11 021057

    2021

  165. [172]

    Stenhammar J, Tiribocchi A, Allen R J, Marenduzzo D and Cates M E 2013Phys. Rev. Lett.111 145702

  166. [173]

    Paoluzzi M, Maggi C, Marconi U M B and Gnan N 2016 Phys. Rev. E94 052602

    2016

  167. [174]

    Phys.5 55

    Maggi C, Gnan N, Paoluzzi M, Zaccarelli E and Crisanti A 2022Commun. Phys.5 55

  168. [175]

    Paoluzzi M, Levis D, Crisanti A and Pagonabarraga I 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett.133(11) 118301

    2024

  169. [176]

    Paoluzzi M, Levis D, Crisanti A and Pagonabarraga I 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett.133 118301

    2024

  170. [178]

    Aifantis E C and Serrin J B 1983J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 96 517–529

  171. [179]

    Aifantis E C and Serrin J B 1983J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 96 530–547

  172. [180]

    Solon A P, Stenhammar J, Cates M E, Kafri Y and Tailleur J 2018Phys. Rev. E97 020602

  173. [181]

    Pure Appl

    Bricmont J, Kupiainen A and Taskinen J 1999Com- mun. Pure Appl. Math.52 839–871

  174. [182]

    Fausti G, Cates M E and Nardini C 2024Phys. Rev. E 110 L042103

  175. [183]

    LifshitzIMandSlyozovVV1961 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 19 35–50

  176. [184]

    Elektrochem65 581–591

    Wagner C 1961Z. Elektrochem65 581–591

  177. [185]

    Marqusee J 1984J. Chem. Phys.81 976–981

  178. [186]

    Zheng Q and Gunton J 1989Phys. Rev. A39 4848

  179. [187]

    Kawasaki K and Ohta T 1983 Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 118 175–190

    1983

  180. [188]

    Dikshit S, Pattanayak S, Mishra S and Puri S 2024 arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.18977

    2024 arXiv

  181. [189]

    Pattanayak S, Mishra S and Puri S 2021Phys. Rev. E 104 014606

  182. [190]

    Fluid Mech.440 147–203

    Kendon V M, Cates M E, Pagonabarraga I, Desplat J C and Bladon P 2001J. Fluid Mech.440 147–203

  183. [191]

    Ma Z and Torquato S 2017J. Appl. Phys.121

  184. [192]

    Tomita H 1991Prog. Theor. Phys.85 47–56

  185. [193]

    Zheng Y, Klatt M A and Löwen H 2024Phys. Rev. Res. 6 L032056

  186. [194]

    Luca F D, Ma X, Nardini C and Cates M E 2024J. Phys. Condens. Matter36 405101

  187. [195]

    Rep.745 1–95

    Torquato S 2018Phys. Rep.745 1–95

  188. [196]

    Padhan N B and Voigt A 2025Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter37 105101

  189. [197]

    Langer J S 1980Rev. Mod. Phys.52 1

  190. [198]

    thesis Université Paris- Saclay

    Fausti G 2021Phase separation in active systems: non- equilibrium fingerprints Ph.D. thesis Université Paris- Saclay

  191. [199]

    Sear R P and Cuesta J A 2001EPL 55 451

  192. [200]

    Thiele U, Archer A J, Robbins M J, Gomez H and Knobloch E 2013Phys. Rev. E87 042915

  193. [201]

    Debenedetti P G 2021 Metastable liquids Metastable Liquids (Princeton university press)

    2021

  194. [202]

    Oxtoby D W 1992J. Phys. Condens. Matter4 7627

  195. [203]

    Richard D, Löwen H and Speck T 2016Soft Matter12 5257–5264

  196. [204]

    Redner G S, Wagner C G, Baskaran A and Hagan M F 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett.117 148002

    2016

  197. [205]

    Levis D, Codina J and Pagonabarraga I 2017Soft Mat- ter 13 8113–8119

  198. [206]

    Rep.478 1–69

    Touchette H 2009Phys. Rep.478 1–69

  199. [207]

    Lutsko J F 2012J. Chem. Phys.136 034509

  200. [208]

    Zakine R, Simonnet E and Vanden-Eijnden E 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett.133 038301

    2024

  201. [209]

    Zakine R and Vanden-Eijnden E 2023Phys. Rev. X13 041044

  202. [210]

    Safran S 2018 Statistical thermodynamics of surfaces, interfaces, and membranes(CRC Press)

    2018

  203. [211]

    Aarts D G, Schmidt M and Lekkerkerker H N 2004Sci- ence 304 847–850

  204. [212]

    Patch A, Sussman D M, Yllanes D and Marchetti M C 2018 Soft matter 14 7435–7445

    2018

  205. [213]

    Bialké J, Siebert J T, Löwen H and Speck T 2015Phys. Rev. Lett.115 098301

  206. [214]

    Lee C F 2017Soft matter 13 376–385

  207. [215]

    BesseM,FaustiG,CatesME,DelamotteBandNardini C 2023Physical Review Letters130 187102

  208. [216]

    Täuber U C 2014Critical dynamics: a field theory ap- proach to equilibrium and non-equilibrium scaling behav- ior (Cambridge University Press)

  209. [217]

    Caballero F, Maitra A and Nardini C 2025Physical Re- view Letters134 087105

  210. [218]

    Wysocki A, Winkler R G and Gompper G 2016New J. Phys. 18 123030

  211. [219]

    Goldenfeld N 2018Lectures on phase transitions and the renormalization group(CRC Press)

  212. [220]

    Caballero F, Nardini C and Cates M E 2018J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.2018 123208

    2018

  213. [221]

    Belavin A A, Polyakov A M and Zamolodchikov A B 1984 Nucl. Phys. B241 333–380

    1984

  214. [222]

    Caballero F and Cates M E 2020Phys. Rev. Lett.124 240604

  215. [223]

    Maggi C, Paoluzzi M, Crisanti A, Zaccarelli E and Gnan N 2021Soft Matter 17 3807–3812

  216. [224]

    Partridge B and Lee C F 2019Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 068002

  217. [225]

    Dittrich F, Speck T and Virnau P 2021EPJE 44 1–10

  218. [226]

    Siebert J T, Dittrich F, Schmid F, Binder K, Speck T and Virnau P 2018Phys. Rev. E98 030601

  219. [227]

    Shi X q, Fausti G, Chaté H, Nardini C and Solon A 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett.125 168001

    2020

  220. [228]

    Singh R and Cates M E 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 148005

    2019

  221. [229]

    Landau L D and Lifshitz E M 1959Fluid Mechanics (Pergamon Press, New York, 1959)

    1959

  222. [230]

    Siggia E D 1979Phys. Rev. A20 595

  223. [231]

    San Miguel M, Grant M and Gunton J D 1985Phys. Rev. A31 1001 43

  224. [232]

    Gonnella G, Orlandini E and Yeomans J 1999 Phys. Rev. E59 R4741

    1999

  225. [233]

    Commun.6 7407

    Shimizu R and Tanaka H 2015Nat. Commun.6 7407

  226. [234]

    Wagner A J and Yeomans J 1998Phys. Rev. Lett.80 1429

  227. [235]

    Tiribocchi A, Wittkowski R, Marenduzzo D and Cates M E 2015Phys. Rev. Lett.115 188302

  228. [236]

    Grosberg A Y and Joanny J F 2015Phys. Rev. E 92 032118

  229. [237]

    Matas-Navarro R, Golestanian R, Liverpool T B and Fielding S M 2014Phys. Rev. E90 032304

  230. [238]

    Caballero F and Marchetti M C 2022Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 268002

  231. [239]

    Padhan N B, Kiran K V and Pandit R 2024Soft Matter 20 3620–3627

  232. [240]

    Schnitzer M J 1993Phys. Rev. E48 2553

  233. [241]

    Tailleur J and Cates M E 2008Phys. Rev. Lett.100(21) 218103

  234. [242]

    Fily Y and Marchetti M C 2012Phys. Rev. Lett.108 235702

  235. [243]

    Stenhammar J, Marenduzzo D, Allen R J and Cates M E 2014Soft Matter 10 1489–1499

  236. [244]

    Redner G S, Hagan M F and Baskaran A 2013Phys. Rev. Lett.110(5) 055701 URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.055701

    doi

  237. [245]

    Stenhammar J 2021arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.05024

    arXiv

  238. [246]

    O’Byrne J, Solon A, Tailleur J and Zhao Y 2021 An introduction to motility-induced phase separationOut- of-equilibrium Soft Matter: Active Fluids(RoyalSociety of Chemistry)

    2021

  239. [247]

    Commun.9 768

    Arlt J, Martinez V A, Dawson A, Pilizota T and Poon W C 2018Nat. Commun.9 768

  240. [248]

    Frangipane G, Dell’Arciprete D, Petracchini S, Maggi C, Saglimbeni F, Bianchi S, Vizsnyiczai G, Bernardini M L and Di Leonardo R 2018Elife 7 e36608

  241. [249]

    Redner G S, Baskaran A and Hagan M F 2013Phys. Rev. E88 012305

  242. [250]

    Alarcón F, Valeriani C and Pagonabarraga I 2017Soft matter 13 814–826

  243. [251]

    Ray C G, Mukherjee I and Mohanty P 2024J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.2024 093207

    2024

  244. [252]

    Liebchen B, Marenduzzo D, Pagonabarraga I and Cates M E 2015Phys. Rev. Lett.115 258301

  245. [253]

    Liebchen B and Loöwen H 2018Acc. Chem. Res.51 2982–2990

  246. [254]

    Fluid Mech.980 A28

    Škultéty V, Bárdfalvy D, Stenhammar J, Nardini C and Morozov A 2024J. Fluid Mech.980 A28

  247. [255]

    Alston H, Parry A O, Voituriez R and Bertrand T 2022 Phys. Rev. E106 034603

    2022

  248. [256]

    Bonazzi D, Schiavo V L, Machata S, Djafer-Cherif I, Nivoit P, Manriquez V, Tanimoto H, Husson J, Henry N, Chaté Het al.2018 Cell 174 143–155

    2018

  249. [257]

    Digregorio P, Levis D, Suma A, Cugliandolo L F, Gonnella G and Pagonabarraga I 2018Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 098003

  250. [258]

    Caporusso C B, Digregorio P, Levis D, Cugliandolo L F and Gonnella G 2020Phys. Rev. Lett.125 178004

  251. [259]

    MukhopadhyayAK,SchmelcherPandLiebchenB2023 arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.08438

  252. [260]

    Martin-Roca J, Martinez R, Alexander L C, Diez A L, Aarts D G, Alarcon F, Ramírez J and Valeriani C 2021 J. Chem. Phys.154

    2021

  253. [261]

    Adkins R, Kolvin I, You Z, Witthaus S, Marchetti M C and Dogic Z 2022Science 377 768–772

  254. [262]

    Tayar A M, Caballero F, Anderberg T, Saleh O A, Cristina Marchetti M and Dogic Z 2023Nature Materi- als 22 1401–1408

  255. [263]

    Miller M B and Bassler B L 2001Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55 165–199

  256. [264]

    Speck T, Bialké J, Menzel A M and Löwen H 2014Phys. Rev. Lett.112 218304

  257. [265]

    Commun.9 3232

    Bäuerle T, Fischer A, Speck T and Bechinger C 2018 Nat. Commun.9 3232

    2018

  258. [266]

    Cates M E and Tailleur J 2013EPL 101 20010

  259. [267]

    Phys.20 075001

    Solon A P, Stenhammar J, Cates M E, Kafri Y and Tailleur J 2018New J. Phys.20 075001

  260. [268]

    Dean D S 1996J. Phys. A Math. Gen.29 L613

  261. [269]

    PavliotisGandStuartA2008 Multiscale methods: aver- aging and homogenization(Springer Science & Business Media)

  262. [270]

    Bialké J, Löwen H and Speck T 2013EPL 103 30008

  263. [271]

    O’Byrne J and Tailleur J 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 208003

    2020

  264. [272]

    Häunggi P and Jung P 1994Adv. Chem. Phys.89 239– 326

  265. [273]

    Cao L, Wu D j and Luo X l 1993Phys. Rev. A47 57

  266. [274]

    Maggi C, Marini Bettolo Marconi U, Gnan N and Di Leonardo R 2015Sci. Rep.5

  267. [275]

    Wittmann R, Maggi C, Sharma A, Scacchi A, Brader J M and Marconi U M B 2017J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2017 113207

    2017

  268. [276]

    Wittmann R, Marconi U M B, Maggi C and Brader J M 2017 J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.2017 113208

    2017

  269. [277]

    Marconi U M B and Maggi C 2015Soft matter11 8768– 8781

  270. [278]

    Fox R F 1986Phys. Rev. A33 467

  271. [279]

    Fox R F 1986Phys. Rev. A34 4525

  272. [280]

    Farage T F F, Krinninger P and Brader J M 2015Phys. Rev. E91(4) 042310

  273. [281]

    Rein M and Speck T 2016EPJE 39 1–9

  274. [282]

    Martin D, O’Byrne J, Cates M E, Fodor É, Nardini C, Tailleur J and van Wijland F 2021Phys. Rev. E 103 032607

  275. [283]

    Fodor E, Nardini C, Cates M E, Tailleur J, Visco P and van Wijland F 2016Phys. Rev. Lett.117 038103

  276. [284]

    Korean Phys

    Baek Y 2023J. Korean Phys. Soc.1–13

  277. [285]

    Li Y I, Garcia-Millan R, Cates M E and Fodor É 2023 EPL 142 57004

    2023

  278. [286]

    Bickmann J and Wittkowski R 2020J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32 214001

  279. [287]

    Bickmann J and Wittkowski R 2020Phys. Rev. Res.2 033241

  280. [288]

    Jeggle J, Stenhammar J and Wittkowski R 2020 J. Chem. Phys.152

    2020

  281. [289]

    Bröker S, Te Vrugt M, Jeggle J, Stenhammar J and Wittkowski R 2024Soft Matter 20 224–244

  282. [290]

    Hermann S, de las Heras D and Schmidt M 2021Mol. Phys. 119 e1902585

  283. [291]

    Hermann S, Krinninger P, de Las Heras D and Schmidt M 2019Phys. Rev. E100 052604

  284. [292]

    Caporusso C B, Cugliandolo L F, Digregorio P, Gonnella G, Levis D and Suma A 2023Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 068201

  285. [293]

    Omar A K, Klymko K, GrandPre T and Geissler P L 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett.126 188002

    2021

  286. [294]

    Langford L and Omar A K 2024Physical Review E110 054604

  287. [295]

    Turci F and Wilding N B 2021Physical Review Letters 44 126 038002

  288. [296]

    Nakano H and Adachi K 2024Phys. Rev. Res.6 013074

  289. [297]

    Bröker S, Bickmann J, Te Vrugt M, Cates M E and Wittkowski R 2023Phys. Rev. Lett.131 168203

  290. [298]

    Mognetti B M, Šarić A, Angioletti-Uberti S, Cacciuto A, Valeriani C and Frenkel D 2013Phys. Rev. Lett.111 245702

  291. [299]

    Harder J, Mallory S, Tung C, Valeriani C and Cacciuto A 2014J. Chem. Phys.141

  292. [300]

    Marsden E J, Valeriani C, Sullivan I, Cates M and Marenduzzo D 2014Soft Matter 10 157–165

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.