Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 70 references

Generative AI in Modern Education Society

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that generative AI has become a deeply integrated part of education worldwide, with defined roles for students, teachers, and researchers.

desk verdict A serviceable but method-less narrative review whose abstract overclaims what its own mixed evidence shows; fine as an orientation, not as a research contribution. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08666 v1 pith:PYEJMF3E submitted 2024-12-10 cs.CY

Sanjay Chakraborty This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CY
keywords generativeAIeducation5.0ChatGPTliteraturereviewsmartlearninghigheracademicintegritypersonalized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that generative AI has already become a working part of the world's education systems, from primary school through higher education and research. It maps how tools such as ChatGPT, large language models, and adaptive systems now serve students, teachers, and researchers in roles from personalized tutoring to automated grading and administrative support. The paper contends that the literature shows GenAI has been successfully incorporated globally, while also cataloging challenges such as overreliance, privacy, and threats to social interaction. If the review is right, the main question is no longer whether to adopt GenAI but how to govern it responsibly.

What carries the argument

The organizing device is the Education 1.0-to-5.0 timeline, which locates GenAI as the defining technology of Education 5.0, together with a stakeholder-based taxonomy that assigns each GenAI tool (GAN, VAE, diffusion model, transformer, LLM, ChatGPT) a specific educational function. This mapping carries the argument that GenAI is already integrated across content creation, tutoring, assessment, collaboration, accessibility, and research analytics.

What would settle it

A bibliometric audit of the 70 cited papers—counting countries, sample sizes, and educational levels—could settle whether 'global incorporation' is supported; if a majority of evidence comes from a few high-income English-speaking settings, the global claim fails. Separately, replicating the reported 0.86 correlation between ChatGPT and human grading on a new essay dataset would test a specific numeric claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim, stated on its own terms, is that the transition from Education 1.0 to Education 5.0 has made generative AI a normal component of the learning environment, evidenced by a survey of recent literature. The review catalogs GenAI roles for students, teachers, and researchers and contends that the literature shows GenAI has been effectively incorporated into global educational systems, while also listing challenges such as overreliance, privacy, and threat to social interaction. The paper identifies roles in teaching and learning, higher education, and research and development, and it proposes future directions for expanding and governing these uses.

Load-bearing premise

The review assumes that its 70 references, selected without a stated search or inclusion protocol, reflect the global state of GenAI in education rather than a convenience sample.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Students can expect personalized, adaptive instruction and automated feedback from GenAI tutors to become a standard part of coursework.
  • Teachers' routine tasks—lesson planning, grading, and administrative paperwork—can be offloaded to GenAI, freeing time for mentoring and higher-order instruction.
  • Assessment practices will likely shift from static quizzes toward performance-based, AI-generated tasks and instant feedback.
  • Institutions will need explicit policies on academic integrity, data privacy, and equitable access to keep GenAI use aligned with educational goals.
  • Research pipelines will speed up as LLMs assist with literature synthesis, data analysis, and report generation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper itself does not quantify the geographic or methodological distribution of the studies it cites; a systematic audit of the 70 references would likely show heavy weighting toward a few regions and English-language venues, so the 'global' claim is stronger than the evidence.
  • The reported 0.86 correlation between ChatGPT and human grading is a single number often repeated; if it fails to replicate at scale, the case for automated grading weakens even as the rest of the review's main claims stand.
  • The review's challenge taxonomy could be repurposed as a checklist for institutions designing GenAI pilot programs, since it names concrete risks such as overconfidence, privacy, and teacher-student relationship strain.
  • A direct comparison of learning outcomes between classrooms that use GenAI tutors and those that do not would offer a testable extension of the 'revolutionizes learning' claim.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper is a narrative literature review of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in education, situated within the Education 1.0 to Education 5.0 framing. It surveys GenAI tools and models, describes applications in teaching, higher education, and research and development, and lists challenges and future directions. The abstract makes a strong claim that the findings of the literature study 'demonstrate how well GenAI has been incorporated into the global educational system.'

Significance. If the central claim were adequately supported, the paper would offer a useful synthesis of a fast-moving area, and it does compile a substantial number of recent references, presents informative tables and figures, and covers the perspectives of students, teachers, and researchers. However, the lack of a documented review methodology and the overgeneralized conclusion from an unspecified literature sample substantially limit the paper's contribution. The paper is best regarded as a preliminary narrative overview rather than a definitive demonstration of global integration.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III and Abstract] The central claim in the Abstract, that 'the findings of the literature study demonstrate how well GenAI has been incorporated into the global educational system,' is not supported by the methodology described in Section III. The section provides no search strategy, inclusion criteria, quality appraisal, or synthesis method, so the 70 cited references cannot be assumed to form a representative global sample. Generalizing from an unspecified literature set to a global conclusion is an inferential leap that needs either a documented systematic review methodology or a more limited claim about reported applications and challenges.
  2. [Abstract and Section IV.B] The Abstract's claim that the literature demonstrates successful incorporation is internally contradicted by evidence cited later in the paper. Section IV.B cites reference [41] reporting that 90% of students say their teachers do not encourage GenAI use in classrooms, and Section IV.A lists overreliance, plagiarism, and diminished social interaction as risks. These findings indicate mixed or poor incorporation at best. The paper should either revise the Abstract to reflect that the literature shows both promise and significant barriers, or provide a structured argument for why the positive evidence outweighs the negative.
  3. [References, entry [63]] Reference [63] is corrupted: the entry for Tafazoli (2024) is followed by an unrelated citation to Stuchlikova and Marek (2022) appended without separation. This appears to be a formatting or merging error, and it undermines confidence in the reliability of the reference list. The entry should be corrected and the reference list carefully checked for similar issues.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section II.B.3] There is a typo: 'ChagGPT is merely an example' should read 'ChatGPT is merely an example.'
  2. [Section IV.B] The bullet 'Training Educators to Integrate Generative AI in Classrooms' reports a current challenge (the 90% statistic from reference [41]) rather than a future direction; this placement makes the distinction between challenges and future directions less clear.
  3. [Section I and Section V] The four research questions listed in Section I are not explicitly answered point-by-point in Section V; the conclusion would be stronger if it mapped each question to the findings.
  4. [References] Reference [67] appears in the reference list but does not appear to be cited in the text, and the in-text citation numbering should be checked for consistency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a narrative literature review whose conclusions summarize external cited sources; there is no fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or derived quantity that reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

This manuscript is a narrative literature review, not a derivation. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, no model outputs, and no quantitative predictions that could reduce to inputs by construction. The central claim that GenAI is well incorporated into global education is presented as a synthesis of 70 external references; even if that synthesis is methodologically fragile because the selection protocol is unspecified, that is a validity and generalizability concern, not a circularity concern. The paper introduces no new quantities defined in terms of the conclusions, renames no known result, and invokes no uniqueness theorem. I found no author self-citations at all: the reference list contains no works by Sanjay Chakraborty, so the self-citation-load-bearing pattern does not arise. Accordingly, the paper has no derivation chain to walk, and the honest finding is no significant circularity with a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities; its only structural assumption is the Education 1.0-5.0 periodization borrowed from cited sources.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The Education 1.0 through 5.0 progression is a coherent and accepted framework for describing educational evolution.
    The paper's taxonomy is taken from cited prior work (e.g., [10], [11]) and is assumed to be accurate without argument or derivation; it frames the entire review.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generative AI in Modern Education Society." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PYEJMF3E

@misc{pith2026241208666,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generative AI in Modern Education Society},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PYEJMF3E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08666}
}
read the original abstract

Transitioning from Education 1.0 to Education 5.0, the integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) revolutionizes the learning environment by fostering enhanced human-machine collaboration, enabling personalized, adaptive and experiential learning, and preparing students with the skills and adaptability needed for the future workforce. Our understanding of academic integrity and the scholarship of teaching, learning, and research has been revolutionised by GenAI. Schools and universities around the world are experimenting and exploring the integration of GenAI in their education systems (like, curriculum design, teaching process and assessments, administrative tasks, results generation and so on). The findings of the literature study demonstrate how well GenAI has been incorporated into the global educational system. This study explains the roles of GenAI in the schooling and university education systems with respect to the different stakeholders (students, teachers, researchers etc,). It highlights the current challenges of integrating Generative AI into the education system and outlines future directions for leveraging GenAI to enhance educational practices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08666 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Evolution of Education 1.0 to Education 5.0 in the context of AI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Transition in Learning Methodologies over the Past Years [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Conceptual framework of the study II. BACKGROUND This section discusses the fundamental aspects of Education 5.0 and the generative AI tools that can be utilized to enhance the education system [61]. A. Education 5.0 The term ”education 5.0” describes a new stage in education where cutting-edge technologies and flexible teaching ap￾proaches are combined to improve student outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI), bloc… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Roles of GenAI in Education Because this type of chatbot is not from a wide cultural background, some of its viewpoints and ideas may be constrained [35]. • Importance of Emotional Connection and Holistic Ed￾ucation in the Age of AI: Interactions between humans and AI …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [63]

    Tafazoli, D. (2024). Exploring the Potential of Generative AI in De- mocratizing English Language Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100275. L. Stuchlikova and J. Marek,(Oct 2022) Academy phoenix: Will universities reborn in Industry 5.0 era, or will they lie down in ashes? in Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Emerg. eLearning Technol. Appl....

    work page 2024

  2. [41]

    Qualitative and quantitative analysis of student's perceptions in the use of generative AI in educational environments

    Altares-L ´opez, S., Bengochea-Guevara, J. M., Ranz, C., Montes, H., & Ribeiro, A. (2024). Generative AI: The power of the new education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.13487

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    Shailendra, S., Kadel, R., & Sharma, A. (2024). Framework for Adop- tion of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Education. IEEE Transactions on Education

    work page 2024

  4. [2]

    A., & Baiz, C

    Alasadi, E. A., & Baiz, C. R. (2023). Generative AI in education and research: Opportunities, concerns, and solutions. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(8), 2965-2971

    work page 2023

  5. [3]

    Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). Unlocking the power of ChatGPT: A framework for applying generative AI in education. ECNU Review of Education, 6(3), 355-366

    work page 2023

  6. [4]

    Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of gen- erative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62

    work page 2023

  7. [5]

    Holmes, W., & Miao, F. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO Publishing

    work page 2023

  8. [6]

    Wu, Y . (2023). Integrating generative AI in education: how ChatGPT brings challenges for future learning and teaching. Journal of Advanced Research in Education, 2(4), 6-10

    work page 2023

Show all 70 references
  1. [7]

    E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F

    Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and oppor- tunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856

    2023

  2. [8]

    Sharples, M. (2023). Towards social generative AI for education: theory, practices and ethics. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 159-167

    2023

  3. [9]

    A., Bai, J., & Xiao, H

    Okaiyeto, S. A., Bai, J., & Xiao, H. (2023). Generative AI in educa- tion: To embrace it or not?. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 16(3), 285-286

    2023

  4. [10]

    Babu, B. V . (2024). Education 5.0: An overview. Advances in Techno- logical Innovations in Higher Education, 168-243

    2024

  5. [11]

    Alharbi, A. M. (2023). Implementation of Education 5.0 in developed and developing countries: A comparative study. Creative Education, 14(5), 914-942

    2023

  6. [12]

    Mao, J., Chen, B., & Liu, J. C. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in education and its implications for assessment. TechTrends, 68(1), 58- 66

    2024

  7. [13]

    M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J

    Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnar ¨ok or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The international journal of management education, 21(2), 100790

    2023

  8. [14]

    Chan, C. K. Y ., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43

    2023

  9. [15]

    Giannini, S. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education. UN- ESCO

    2023

  10. [16]

    R., Gillick, D., Zhu, S., Wiltberger, S., & Ibrahim, L

    Jurenka, I., Kunesch, M., McKee, K. R., Gillick, D., Zhu, S., Wiltberger, S., & Ibrahim, L. (2024). Towards responsible development of gener- ative AI for education: An evaluation-driven approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12687

    2024

  11. [17]

    Chiu, T. K. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and Education: Artifi- cial Intelligence, 6, 100197

    2024

  12. [18]

    Chiu, T. K. (2023). The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-17

    2023

  13. [19]

    Griffiths, D., Fr ´ıas-Mart´ınez, E., Tlili, A., & Burgos, D. (2024). A Cy- bernetic Perspective on Generative AI in Education: From Transmission to Coordination

    2024

  14. [20]

    J., & Chen, N

    Hwang, G. J., & Chen, N. S. (2023). Exploring the potential of generative artificial intelligence in education: applications, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(2)

    2023

  15. [21]

    Alier, M., Garc ´ıa-Pe˜nalvo, F., & Camba, J. D. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: From Deceptive to Disruptive

    2024

  16. [22]

    Hashmi, N., & Bal, A. S. (2024). Generative AI in higher education and beyond. Business Horizons

    2024

  17. [23]

    Farrelly, T., & Baker, N. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence: Implications and considerations for higher education practice. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1109

    2023

  18. [24]

    (2023, August)

    Wang, T. (2023, August). Navigating generative AI (ChatGPT) in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. In International Conference on Smart Learning Environments (pp. 215-225). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore

    2023

  19. [25]

    Smolansky, A., Cram, A., Raduescu, C., Zeivots, S., Huber, E., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2023, July). Educator and student perspectives on the impact of generative AI on assessments in higher education. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 378-382)

    2023

  20. [26]

    Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V ., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming education: A comprehensive review of generative artificial intelligence in educational settings through bibliometric and content analysis. Sus- tainability, 15(17), 12983

    2023

  21. [27]

    George, A. S. (2023). The Potential of Generative AI to Reform Graduate Education. Partners Universal International Research Journal, 2(4), 36-50

    2023

  22. [28]

    Dai, Y ., Liu, A., & Lim, C. P. (2023). Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education. Procedia CIRP, 119, 84-90

    2023

  23. [29]

    S., & Guerra, A

    Jauhiainen, J. S., & Guerra, A. G. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT in school children’s education: Evidence from a school lesson. Sustain- ability, 15(18), 14025. 10

    2023

  24. [30]

    I., Acosta-Vargas, P., De-Moreta-Llovet, J., & Gonzalez- Rodriguez, M

    Ruiz-Rojas, L. I., Acosta-Vargas, P., De-Moreta-Llovet, J., & Gonzalez- Rodriguez, M. (2023). Empowering education with generative artificial intelligence tools: Approach with an instructional design matrix. Sus- tainability, 15(15), 11524

    2023

  25. [31]

    Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powered conversational educational agents: The inevitable paradigm shift. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1)

    2023

  26. [32]

    H., & Kidman, G

    Chang, C. H., & Kidman, G. (2023). The rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) language models-challenges and opportunities for geographical and environmental education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 32(2), 85-89

    2023

  27. [33]

    F., Freitas, E., Pereira, F

    Mello, R. F., Freitas, E., Pereira, F. D., Cabral, L., Tedesco, P., & Ramalho, G. (2023). Education in the age of Generative AI: Context and Recent Developments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12332

    2023 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Noroozi, O., Soleimani, S., Farrokhnia, M., & Banihashem, S. K. (2024). Generative AI in education: Pedagogical, theoretical, and methodologi- cal perspectives. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(3), 373-385

    2024

  29. [35]

    Han, A., Zhou, X., Cai, Z., Han, S., Ko, R., Corrigan, S., & Pep- pler, K. A. (2024, May). Teachers, Parents, and Students’ perspectives on Integrating Generative AI into Elementary Literacy Education. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ...

    2024

  30. [36]

    D., Alario-Hoyos, C., Est ´evez-Ayres, I., Callejo-Pinardo, P., Hombrados-Herrera, M

    Kloos, C. D., Alario-Hoyos, C., Est ´evez-Ayres, I., Callejo-Pinardo, P., Hombrados-Herrera, M. A., Mu˜noz-Merino, P. J. & Ib´a˜nez, M. B. (2024, May). How can Generative AI Support Education?. In 2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1-7). IEEE

    2024

  31. [37]

    Deng, X., & Joshi, K. D. (2024). Promoting Ethical Use of Generative AI in Education. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 55(3), 6-11

    2024

  32. [38]

    Chan, C. K. Y ., & Colloton, T. (2024). Generative AI in Higher Education: The ChatGPT Effect (p. 287). Taylor & Francis

    2024

  33. [39]

    Nikolopoulou, K. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Exploring ways of harnessing pedagogical Practices with the assistance of ChatGPT. International Journal of Changes in Education, 1(2), 103-111

    2024

  34. [40]

    Leelavathi, R., & Surendhranatha, R. C. (2024). ChatGPT in the classroom: navigating the generative AI wave in management education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning

    2024

  35. [42]

    X., Buhl, A., Sharma, A., & Bearman, M

    Jensen, L. X., Buhl, A., Sharma, A., & Bearman, M. (2024). Generative AI and higher education: a review of claims from the first months of ChatGPT. Higher Education, 1-17

    2024

  36. [43]

    Preiksaitis, C., & Rose, C. (2023). Opportunities, challenges, and future directions of generative artificial intelligence in medical education: scoping review. JMIR medical education, 9, e48785

    2023

  37. [44]

    Jiayu, Y . (2023). Challenges and Opportunities of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education Student Educational Management. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology, 7(9), 92-96

    2023

  38. [45]

    J., & Sabapathy, D

    Ibodulla o’gli, M. J., & Sabapathy, D. (2024). GENERATIVE AI IN EDUCATION: TECHNICAL FOUNDATIONS, APPLICATIONS, AND CHALLENGES. THEORY AND ANALYTICAL ASPECTS OF RECENT RESEARCH, 3(27), 98-101

    2024

  39. [46]

    & Romero-Hall, E

    Bozkurt, A., Junhong, X., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S. & Romero-Hall, E. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(...

    2023

  40. [47]

    H., & Ubhe, N

    Krause, S., Panchal, B. H., & Ubhe, N. (2024). The Evolution of Learning: Assessing the Transformative Impact of Generative AI on Higher Education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10551

    2024 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative AI, synthetic contents, open educational resources (OER), and open educational practices (OEP): A new front in the openness landscape. Open Praxis, 15(3), 178-184

    2023

  42. [49]

    K., Ghai, D., Cheema, G

    Sandhu, R., Channi, H. K., Ghai, D., Cheema, G. S., & Kaur, M. (2024). An Introduction to Generative AI Tools for Education 2030. Integrating Generative AI in Education to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals, 1-28

    2024

  43. [50]

    Wood, D., & Moss, S. H. (2024). Evaluating the impact of students’ generative AI use in educational contexts. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning

    2024

  44. [51]

    & Wen, Q

    Li, H., Xu, T., Zhang, C., Chen, E., Liang, J., Fan, X. & Wen, Q. (2024). Bringing generative AI to adaptive learning in education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.14601

    2024 arXiv

  45. [52]

    M., Ramana, K

    Sharma, D. M., Ramana, K. V ., Jothilakshmi, R., Verma, R., Maheswari, B. U., & Boopathi, S. (2024). Integrating Generative AI Into K-12 Curriculums and Pedagogies in India: Opportunities and Challenges. Facilitating Global Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing in Higher Educati...

    2024

  46. [53]

    Kurtz, G., Amzalag, M., Shaked, N., Zaguri, Y ., Kohen-Vacs, D., Gal, E.& Barak-Medina, E. (2024). Strategies for Integrating Generative AI into Higher Education: Navigating Challenges and Leveraging Oppor- tunities. Education Sciences, 14(5), 503

    2024

  47. [54]

    D., Golchinfar, D., Schreiber, D., & Stevens, G

    Hennekeuser, D., Vaziri, D. D., Golchinfar, D., Schreiber, D., & Stevens, G. (2024). Enlarged Education–Exploring the Use of Generative AI to Support Lecturing in Higher Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-33

    2024

  48. [55]

    (2023, June)

    Hacker, P., Engel, A., & Mauer, M. (2023, June). Regulating ChatGPT and other large generative AI models. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 1112- 1123)

    2023

  49. [56]

    H., & Looi, C

    Wong, L. H., & Looi, C. K. (2024). Advancing the generative AI in education research agenda: Insights from the Asia-Pacific region. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 1-7

    2024

  50. [57]

    K., & Chitra, E

    Mitra, N. K., & Chitra, E. (2024). Glimpses of the Use of Generative AI and ChatGPT in Medical Education. Education in Medicine Journal, 16(2), 155-164

    2024

  51. [58]

    A., Sayeed, M

    Bukar, U. A., Sayeed, M. S., Razak, S. F. A., Yogarayan, S., & Sneesl, R. (2024). Decision-Making Framework for the Utilization of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Case Study of ChatGPT. IEEE Access

    2024

  52. [59]

    S., & Kumar, S

    Babu, C. S., & Kumar, S. B. (2024). Navigating the Terrain: Current Challenges and Solutions in Integrating Generative AI Into Education. In Generative AI in Teaching and Learning (pp. 274-290). IGI Global

    2024

  53. [60]

    Baidoo-Anu, D., Asamoah, D., Amoako, I., & Mahama, I. (2024). Exploring student perspectives on generative artificial intelligence in higher education learning. Discover Education, 3(1), 98

    2024

  54. [61]

    (2023, September)

    Kumar, T., Kait, R., Ankita, & Malik, A. (2023, September). The Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in Education: A Detailed Review for Enhanced Learning Experiences. In International Conference on Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Leadership (pp. 195-207). Singap...

    2023

  55. [62]

    (2023, May)

    Qadir, J. (2023, May). Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education. In 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1-9). IEEE

    2023

  56. [64]

    K., Upreti, Y

    Kodali, R. K., Upreti, Y . P., & Boppana, L. (2023, November). Gener- ative AI in Education. In 2023 IEEE 15th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM) (pp. 1-6). IEEE

    2023

  57. [65]

    (2023, April)

    Yu, H., Liu, Z., & Guo, Y . (2023, April). Application Status, Problems and Future Prospects of Generative ai in education. In 2023 5th Interna- tional Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE) (pp. 1-7). IEEE

    2023

  58. [66]

    Amoozadeh, M., Daniels, D., Nam, D., Kumar, A., Chen, S., Hilton, M., & Alipour, M. A. (2024, March). Trust in Generative AI among students: An exploratory study. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V . 1 (pp. 67-73)

    2024

  59. [67]

    Abunaseer, H. (2023). The use of generative AI in education: Applica- tions, and impact. Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2023

    2023

  60. [68]

    Wang, H., Du, W., Zhao, Y ., Wang, Y ., Hao, R., & Yang, M. (2021). Joints for treelike column structures based on generative design and additive manufacturing. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 184, 106794, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106794

    2021

  61. [69]

    F., & Sun, J

    Choi, E., Schuetz, A., Stewart, W. F., & Sun, J. (2020). Using machine learning and artificial intelligence to advance biomedical research. Nature Medicine

    2020

  62. [70]

    Kamilaris, A., & Prenafeta-Bold ´u, F. X. (2018). Deep learning in agriculture: A survey. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 147, 70-90, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.02.016

    2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.