Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

DESI data confirm membership in 16 Local Group galaxies and reveal two kinematic components in Sextans.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

DESI DR1 radial velocities confirm members in 16 Local Group dwarf galaxies; in Sextans they reveal a steep inner metallicity gradient, a flat outer gradient, and differing kinematics between metal-poor and metal-rich stars.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-03 challenge →

load-bearing objection Useful DESI DR1 membership catalog for Local Group dwarfs, but the Sextans headline claim flips when the paper's own new members are included—needs an honest re-analysis before the science is trusted. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2512.13783 v2 pith:PYJPGDCG submitted 2025-12-15 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

Confirming membership in Local Group galaxies with the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Data Release 1

Federico Sestito , Chiaki Kobayashi This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR
keywords DESI DR1Local Group dwarf galaxiesstellar membershipSextans dwarf galaxyvelocity dispersionmetallicity gradientultra metal-poor starsGaia proper motions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that adding precise radial velocities from DESI DR1 to Gaia-based candidate lists confirms stellar membership with high purity in 16 dwarf galaxies of the Local Group, including ultra-faint dwarfs, classical dwarfs, and M33. The key astrophysical result is in Sextans, where for the first time kinematics are traced to about 10 half-light radii: the very metal-poor population is kinematically hot and extends to the outskirts, while the more metal-rich population is cold and centrally concentrated, with a steep inner metallicity gradient flattening to zero beyond about three half-light radii. This supports an 'outside-in' star formation scenario or an accreted ex-situ halo. The paper also cautions that DESI's elemental abundances at [Fe/H] below -2 show large scatter and strong anti-correlation with metallicity, and re-examines 16 ultra-metal-poor candidates, leaving one promising candidate in Canes Venatici I.

Core claim

Using DESI DR1 radial velocities and metallicities cross-matched with Gaia-based candidate member catalogues, the paper establishes secure membership in 16 Local Group systems and validates that Gaia proper-motion, position, and photometry selection already minimises foreground contamination. For Sextans, the paper derives systemic velocity and velocity dispersion consistent with literature values, traces kinematics to about 10 half-light radii, and finds a chemo-dynamical bimodality: stars with [Fe/H] below -2 have higher velocity dispersion and extend further out, while stars with [Fe/H] above -2 are kinematically colder and centrally concentrated. The metallicity gradient is steep in the

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the cross-match between three membership sources: Gaia-based candidate member catalogues (which use proper motions, positions, and photometry) and DESI DR1 radial velocities and metallicities. The selection applies parallax, surface-gravity, and astrometric quality cuts, then restricts stars to isochrone, proper motion, and 5-sigma radial-velocity windows, and finally requires a membership probability above 50 percent from the candidate catalogues. For Sextans, the analysis uses a Markov-chain Monte Carlo fit (Metropolis-Hastings) to derive systemic velocity and velocity dispersion, splitting the sample at [Fe/H] = -2.0 into very metal-poor and more metal-rich popula

Load-bearing premise

The Sextans chemo-dynamical split rests on DESI metallicities being reliable below [Fe/H] ~ -2, yet the paper itself shows DESI elemental abundances are unreliable there; if the [Fe/H] values of the metal-poor members are systematically wrong, the kinematic difference could be an artifact.

What would settle it

Take the 16 stars designated very metal-poor in Sextans and measure their [Fe/H] with high-resolution spectroscopy; if most turn out to be -1.5 to -2, the bimodality disappears. Also, re-derive Sextans velocity dispersion using only stars with spectroscopic [Fe/H] uncertainties below 0.2 dex; if the metal-rich population no longer shows a colder, more central component, the claim fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the Sextans bimodality is real, the galaxy preserves distinct stellar components tracing different formation paths: metal-rich stars formed centrally after gas cooled and sank, while metal-poor stars formed earlier at all radii or were accreted externally.
  • The flattening metallicity gradient at large radius supports 'outside-in' star formation or an ex-situ halo for Sextans, which can be tested with detailed elemental abundances of the outermost stars.
  • The high purity of Gaia-based membership selection, confirmed by DESI radial velocities, means that future large-area surveys can map dwarf galaxy outskirts efficiently without requiring prohibitively deep spectroscopy for every star.
  • The confirmation of one promising ultra-metal-poor candidate in Canes Venatici I, if followed up with high-resolution spectroscopy, would add a rare fossil of early chemical enrichment in a dwarf galaxy.
  • The documented breakdown of DESI elemental abundances below [Fe/H] ~ -2 establishes a boundary for using DESI [X/Fe] in the very metal-poor regime, while validating DESI radial velocities and [Fe/H] for membership work.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the paper's logic: the velocity-dispersion inversion when the 12 new DESI members are included suggests the cold metal-rich core may partly be a selection effect of which stars are counted; a larger, unbiased RV sample would settle whether the bimodality is robust.
  • The paper's own finding of scatter up to 2.5 dex and anticorrelation in DESI [X/Fe] below [Fe/H] = -2 implies that any VMP/MMR split made with DESI [Fe/H] alone should be re-tested with high-resolution metallicities before firm conclusions are drawn about Sextans's chemodynamics.
  • One could test the outside-in interpretation by checking whether the outer metal-poor stars show alpha-enhancement consistent with early, pre-SNeIa enrichment, using the high-resolution literature data the paper compares against.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper cross-matches DESI DR1 radial velocities and metallicities with Gaia-based candidate member catalogs (Battaglia et al. 2022 and Pace et al. 2022) to confirm or reject stellar membership in Local Group dwarf galaxies. The authors report confirmed members in 15 or 16 systems (the count differs between abstract and body) and focus on Sextans, where they derive the systemic velocity, velocity dispersion, metallicity gradient, and alpha-element abundances using DESI data. Their central astrophysical claim is that Sextans' very metal-poor population ([Fe/H] < -2.0) is kinematically hotter and more extended than the more metal-rich population. They also present a sample of candidate ultra-metal-poor stars and inspect their calcium triplet spectra.

Significance. The membership-confirmation exercise is useful and generally supports the effectiveness of Gaia-based selection algorithms, which is a valuable cross-check for the community. The Sextans kinematics out to ~10 half-light radii is new with DESI and, if robust, would be an interesting probe of a possible chemo-dynamical bimodality. However, the headline claim is not robust as presented: the velocity-dispersion ordering between the metal-poor and metal-rich samples reverses when the 12 newly identified DESI members are included, and the authors discard those stars without a statistically or physically justified reason. The paper's own warnings about DESI metallicity reliability in the very metal-poor regime further undermine the VMP/MMR split. The manuscript would need substantial revision to support its main conclusion.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.1, Figure 2] The central claim that the metal-poor population is kinematically hotter than the metal-rich population is obtained only from the B22+P22 subsample. The reported values in Figure 2 show sigma_VMP = 8.94+0.83/-0.76 vs sigma_MMR = 7.22+1.0/-0.86 km/s for B22+P22, but sigma_VMP = 8.94+0.85/-0.75 vs sigma_MMR = 11.55+1.32/-1.15 km/s when the 12 new DESI members are included (B22+P22+New). The ordering reverses. The text acknowledges this and then states 'In the following we use [B22+P22] only,' without providing a statistical test, a contamination analysis, or a physical argument for why the DESI-confirmed members, which pass the paper's own selection criteria, should be excluded. This sample selection directly undermines the headline result; the authors must either include all members and reinterpret the reversal, or justify the exclusion with a transparent criterion.
  2. [Section 3 vs Section 5.1] The membership selection (selection 2) requires stars to lie within 5 times the literature velocity dispersion of the literature systemic velocity (Battaglia et al. 2022; McConnachie & Venn 2020b). The same stars are then used in Section 5.1 to re-derive the systemic velocity and velocity dispersion via MCMC. While a 5-sigma cut is broad, the re-derived kinematics are not fully independent of the selection: any velocity cut can bias the inferred dispersion, especially for small samples. The paper should quantify the effect of this selection, e.g., by comparing with an unbounded likelihood or by using a mock catalog. This is not necessarily fatal, but it matters for a claim that rests on a ~1-2 km/s difference in dispersions.
  3. [Section 5.2, Figure 4] The VMP/MMR kinematic split is defined using DESI DR1 [Fe/H] with a threshold at -2.0, yet the paper itself demonstrates that DESI elemental abundances and metallicities in the [Fe/H] ≲ -2.0 regime show large scatter, strong anti-correlation with metallicity, and values inconsistent with high-resolution literature data (e.g., up to ~2.3 dex scatter in [Mg/Fe]). The paper even cautions against physical interpretation of DESI abundances in this regime. The possibility that the VMP/MMR split is an artifact of systematic [Fe/H] errors is therefore not addressed. The authors should cross-validate the split against high-resolution literature metallicities for the overlapping stars (e.g., Theler et al. 2020; Roederer et al. 2023) or at least demonstrate that the kinematic result is robust to plausible metallicity offsets.
  4. [Abstract vs. body] Several quantitative statements in the abstract are inconsistent with the body. The abstract states secure membership in '15 systems,' while the body (Section 4 and Conclusions) states '16 galaxies/systems.' The abstract reports 'Two stars are found to be associated with DES J0225+0304' and gives a systemic RV, but this object appears nowhere in the main text, figures, or Table 1. The abstract also claims '8 ultra metal-poor ([Fe/H] < -4) candidates,' while Section 6 reports 16 stars with [Fe/H] ≲ -3.5 and about 6 with [Fe/H] < -4.0, and after spectral inspection only one promising UMP candidate remains. These discrepancies must be reconciled; as written, the abstract presents results that are not supported by the body.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure 1 caption] Typo: 'Fist column' should be 'First column'.
  2. [Section 5.2] Duplicate phrase: 'median values of the elemental abundances for both DESI DR1 (red) and the literature (olive) are are shown' — remove the second 'are'.
  3. [Section 6 / Table 2] The table caption says 'We report the DESI DR1 ID, the Gaia DR3 designation, the calibrated metallicity and its uncertainty, the catalogue from which the star has been confirmed or unconfirmed as a member, and the qualitative results from the comparison with synthetic spectra.' However, the column `Catalogue` uses abbreviations (B22 uns, B22 and P22, etc.) that are not defined in the table footnote; please define them.
  4. [Section 4.4] The subsection is titled 'Canes Venatici II' but the galaxy name is commonly 'Canes Venatici II' (CVn II). The same abbreviation inconsistency appears in Figure 1; this is purely cosmetic.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged

Partially circular: RV-membership cut guarantees some of the 'agreement' with literature; GCE agreement fits the α-knee; Sextans dichotomy reverses when new DESI members are included.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Section 3 (Selection criteria, selection 2) and Section 5.1 (Velocities and metallicities, Figure 2)]
    "line-of-sight velocities around the mean systemic velocity (values from Battaglia et al. 2022; McConnachie & Venn 2020b) and within 5 times of its velocity dispersion. ... The systemic velocity and the velocity dispersion obtained in this work, either for all three sources (B22+P22+New) or only two sources (B22+P22), are in agreement with the literature values from Battaglia et al. (2011)."

    The member sample used to re-derive RVsys and σ is pre-selected to lie within a 5σ window around the adopted literature systemic velocity and dispersion. The re-derived values are therefore constrained by construction to fall in that window, so the later statement that the derived values 'are in agreement with the literature' is in part a restatement of the selection cut rather than an independent confirmation. The literature values used for the comparison are the same system parameters used for the cut.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 5.2 (Elemental abundances of the α-elements), GCE model paragraph; Figure 4 caption]
    "The model parameters of star formation, inflow, outflows are basically chosen for Sextans in Kobayashi et al. (2020a), but are revised to match the position of the α−knee as discussed in Theler et al. (2020), which should appear at −2.0≲[Fe/H]≲−1.5. ... The new version of the model is in excellent agreement with the high-resolution elemental abundances from the literature."

    The 'excellent agreement' is obtained after explicitly adjusting the star-formation timescale, outflow timescale, and sub-Ch SNe Ia rate to place the α-knee at the literature position. Reproducing the α-knee is therefore a fit, not a prediction. Only features not used in the tuning, such as the relative Mg/Ca 'shin' slope, can provide independent model support.

  3. other [Section 5.1, Figure 2 text following the derived values]
    "For the velocity dispersion, we note and interesting trend; the MMR σRV for [B22+P22+New] is larger than the VMP value, although we find the opposite behaviour for [B22+P22]. ... In the following we use [B22+P22] only."

    The headline claim that the metal-poor population is kinematically hotter and the metal-rich colder is computed after discarding the 12 DESI-confirmed new members. With them included, the reported dispersions are σ_VMP=8.94 vs σ_MMR=11.55 km/s, reversing the ordering. The claim is therefore an output of the chosen subsample, not of the full DESI-confirmed dataset, and the paper gives no statistical criterion for dropping the reversing stars.

full rationale

The paper's membership-identification core is largely independent: DESI RVs are external data applied to Gaia-based candidate lists, and the high-resolution literature abundances provide an external benchmark for the Sextans abundance comparison. However, several load-bearing steps reduce to their own inputs. First, the member sample is defined by a 5σ RV window around the literature systemic velocity and dispersion, so the subsequent 'agreement' of the re-derived kinematics with the same literature values is partially a selection effect. Second, the GCE model is explicitly revised to match the literature α-knee position, making the 'excellent agreement' of the knee a fitted result rather than a prediction. Third, the central Sextans kinematic dichotomy is asserted only after excluding the newly confirmed DESI members that reverse the velocity-dispersion ordering. These issues are partial — the paper still contains genuinely new member identifications and outer-halo kinematics — but the central astrophysical claim and two validation checks are weaker than presented.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central membership claim rests on public DESI/Gaia data and on the B22/P22 candidate lists; the Sextans kinematic dichotomy adds hand-chosen cuts (RV 5σ, [Fe/H] split, probability >50%) and a model tuned to the literature α-knee. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • VMP/MMR metallicity split = -2.0 dex
    The kinematic comparison divides Sextans members at [Fe/H]=-2.0; the result (which population is hotter) depends on this hand-chosen threshold and on the reliability of DESI metallicities near it (Section 5.1, Figure 2).
  • RV membership cut = 5 times the literature velocity dispersion
    Selection 2 accepts stars within 5σ of the literature systemic velocity; this cut defines 'confirmed' members and feeds the MCMC estimate of the dispersion (Section 3, Section 5.1).
  • Membership probability threshold from B22/P22 = >50%
    Selection 3 imposes a >50% member probability from the Gaia-based catalogs; final sample purity depends on this threshold (Section 3).
  • GCE star formation timescale = 200 Gyr (revised from 100 Gyr)
    The Kobayashi et al. (2020a) model is revised 'to match the position of the α-knee' as in Theler et al. (2020), so the model-literature agreement is a fit, not a prediction (Section 5.2).
  • GCE gas outflow timescale = 1.6 Gyr (revised from 1.4 Gyr)
    Revised by hand to match the α-knee; affects the model track in Figure 4 (Section 5.2).
  • GCE sub-Ch SNe Ia contribution factor = 1.5× increase
    Adjusted so the model reproduces the observed α-knee position; this parameter supports the sub-Ch SNe Ia interpretation (Section 5.2).
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption DESI DR1 radial velocities and metallicities are accurately calibrated after the Koposov et al. (2025) polynomial correction and 0.9 km/s error inflation.
    All membership and kinematic results inherit DESI pipeline calibration (Section 2).
  • domain assumption Gaia DR3 astrometry and the B22/P22 Bayesian membership probabilities are correct enough to define the candidate pool.
    Selection 1 and 3 rely on Gaia parallax/pm cuts and on B22/P22 probabilities (Section 3).
  • domain assumption The old, very metal-poor 10 Gyr PARSEC isochrone is an appropriate CMD reference for all systems except M33 and IC1613.
    Selection 2 places stars within 0.2 mag of this isochrone; a wrong age/metallicity assumption biases membership (Section 3, Figure 1).
  • domain assumption The line-of-sight velocity distribution of Sextans members is Gaussian, with priors 150<RV<300 km/s and σ<30 km/s.
    The MCMC fit in Section 5.1 uses a Gaussian likelihood and step-function priors; non-Gaussianity or tidal debris would bias the dispersion.
  • domain assumption MARCS model atmospheres and CaT synthetic spectra with [Ca/Fe]=+0.4 are reliable for judging UMP candidates.
    Section 6 uses these to reclassify 16 UMP candidates; low-SNR and hot stars are deemed unclassifiable.
  • domain assumption Sextans is not tidally perturbed, so comparison with a non-perturbed simulated dwarf is meaningful.
    Section 5.1 invokes Sextans' distant pericentre (~70 kpc) and distance from the Magellanic Clouds to justify the simulation comparison.

reviewed 2026-08-03 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Confirming membership in Local Group galaxies with the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Data Release 1." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PYJPGDCG

@misc{pith2026251213783,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Confirming membership in Local Group galaxies with the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Data Release 1},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PYJPGDCG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.13783}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

We use the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Data Release 1 (DESI DR1) to identify stellar members of the Local Group dwarf galaxies. We cross-match DESI targets with candidate members that are based on Gaia proper motions, positions, and photometry. The addition of DESI radial velocities enables secure membership determination in 15 systems. Our results confirm that Gaia-based selection algorithms are effective in minimising foreground contamination. Two stars are found to be associated with DES~J0225$+$0304; if this is the case, then it leads to the first determination of the systemic radial velocity (RV$_{\rm{sys}}=-150.0\pm7.0$~km~s$^{-1}$). Draco and Sextans are the galaxies with the largest number of members. We focus on Sextans and, for the first time with DESI, trace its stellar kinematics to large radii (up to $\sim$10~half-light radii). We find that the metal-poor population exhibits a higher velocity dispersion and extends to larger radii, whereas the metal-rich population is kinematically colder and centrally concentrated. The metallicity gradient is steeper in the inner regions of Sextans ($\sim -12\times 10^{-3}$~dex~arcmin$^{-1}$ or $\sim -0.36$~dex~kpc$^{-1}$), while almost no gradient in the outskirts, hinting for an ex-situ halo or for an ``outside-in'' star formation. Although DESI [$\alpha$/Fe] ratios for Sextans stars with $\FeH\gtrsim-2.0$ are in line with literature values, those for very metal-poor stars ($\FeH\lesssim-2.0$) present a large scatter and strong anti-correlation with metallicity, warranting a caution for using DESI abundances in this regime. With a less strict selection, we identify 8 ultra metal-poor ([Fe/H]~$< -4$) candidates that require higher signal-to-noise ratio spectroscopic observations to determine their metallicities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.13783 by Chiaki Kobayashi, Federico Sestito.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Properties of the Local Group galaxies seen in DESI DR1. Fist column: projected on sky position. Two black ellipses represent 5 and 10 half-light radii. Black markers denote the position of the system’s centre. Second column: Gaia’s colour magnitude diagram. An old (10 Gyr) very metal-poor ([Fe/H] = −2.0) PARSEC isochrone (Bressan et al. 2012) is represented with a black dashed line. Third column: Gaia pro… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (continued) Properties of the Local Group galaxies seen in DESI DR1. 4.4 Canes Venatici II Three likely candidate members from B22 are confirmed to be mem￾bers with DESI DR1 RVs. 4.5 Coma Berenice 5 likely candidate members, that are in common in B22 and in P22, are confirmed to be members. 4.6 Draco We confirm 226 and 171 stars from B22 and P22, respectively, with 166 in common, to be members of Draco. On… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (continued) Properties of the Local Group galaxies seen in DESI DR1. within the first half-light radius, while it flattens in the outskirts of the system (Ding et al. 2025). 4.7 Hercules Three out of 6 candidate members from B22 are confirmed to be members. Two of them are also candidates from P22. The three remaining stars from B22 have RVs that are ∼ 12, ∼ 16, and ∼ 30 times 𝜎RV, making them extremely un… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (continued) Properties of the Local Group galaxies seen in DESI DR1. 4.10 Leo IV There was only one candidate member in B22, given its photometric and proper motion properties. However, its velocity is ∼ 26𝜎RV from the system’s RV and we do not consider it as a member. 4.11 Leo V The two B22 candidates are not confirmed members, given their DESI DR1 RVs (90 − 100𝜎RV from the system’s RV). 4.12 M33 Similarl… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Radial velocities and metallicities in Sextans. Panels A: RVs as a function of the projected elliptical distance. Panels B: [Fe/H] as a function of the projected elliptical distance. Panels C: [Fe/H] vs RVs. Panels D: RVs’ histogram. Panels E: metallicities’ histogram. Upper five panels are for the sample−1, i.e. Sextans members as described in Section 3. Lower panels are for the sample−2, similar but excl… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Mean metallicity (top) and velocity dispersion (bottom) as a func￾tion of the projected elliptical distance in Sextans. Blue circles mark the median values calculated with the sample from B22 and P22. Black cir￾cles represent the median values calculated with the sample from Battaglia et al. (2011). Orange line represents the values derived from our simulated dwarf satellite galaxy, with stellar mass of 4.… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Elemental abundances of 𝛼−elements in Sextans for [𝛼/Fe] vs [Fe/H] (top), [Mg/Fe] vs [Fe/H] (middle), and [Ca/Fe] vs [Fe/H] (bottom). DESI DR1 and their median values are shown with blue + grey errorbars (left panels) and red markers (right panels), respectively. DESI stars with 𝜎[Fe/H] > 0.5 dex have been removed from the plot. Members stars are selected from B22 and P22. For comparison, black circles (le… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Calcium II Triplet lines for three UMP candidates in Canes Venatici I (top), Draco (middle), and in M33 (bottom). Blue lines are the normalised DESI DR1 spectra. Olive, red, and black dashed lines are synthetic spectra generated from MARCS models adopting [Ca/Fe] = +0.4 and [Fe/H] = −4.0, −3.0, −2.0, respectively. The star in Canes Venatici I is a promising UMP star candidate. The star in Draco has CaT lin… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Galactic Archaeology with the Subaru `\=Onohi`ula Prime Focus Spectrograph Strategic Program

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 accept novelty 5.5

    Subaru PFS will obtain velocities and abundances for ~18k stars in six dwarfs, 30k in M31, and tens of thousands of outer-MW main-sequence stars to test dark-matter profiles and Local Group assembly.

  2. Galactic Archaeology with the Subaru `\=Onohi`ula Prime Focus Spectrograph Strategic Program

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The PFS Galactic Archaeology survey will observe thousands of stars in Local Group systems to measure density profiles in dwarfs and compare assembly histories of M31 and the Milky Way.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

1 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    C., Wilhelm R., Newberg H

    Abdurro’uf et al., 2022, ApJS, 259, 35 Allende Prieto C., Beers T. C., Wilhelm R., Newberg H. J., Rockosi C. M., Yanny B., Lee Y. S., 2006, ApJ, 636, 804 Aoki W., et al., 2009, A&A, 502, 569 Armandroff T. E., Da Costa G. S., 1991, AJ, 101, 1329 Arroyo-Polonio J. M., Pascale R., Battaglia G., Thomas G. F., Nipoti C., Vasiliev E., Tolstoy E., 2025, A&A, 699...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 3, 2026.