Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

An Improved Cutting Plane Method for Convex Optimization, Convex-Concave Games and its Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.04250 v1 pith:PYV34C4Q submitted 2020-04-08 cs.DS cs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.DScs.LGstat.ML
keywords kappatimealgorithmcuttingevaluationmatrixmultiplicationomega
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Given a separation oracle for a convex set $K \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ that is contained in a box of radius $R$, the goal is to either compute a point in $K$ or prove that $K$ does not contain a ball of radius $\epsilon$. We propose a new cutting plane algorithm that uses an optimal $O(n \log (\kappa))$ evaluations of the oracle and an additional $O(n^2)$ time per evaluation, where $\kappa = nR/\epsilon$. $\bullet$ This improves upon Vaidya's $O( \text{SO} \cdot n \log (\kappa) + n^{\omega+1} \log (\kappa))$ time algorithm [Vaidya, FOCS 1989a] in terms of polynomial dependence on $n$, where $\omega < 2.373$ is the exponent of matrix multiplication and $\text{SO}$ is the time for oracle evaluation. $\bullet$ This improves upon Lee-Sidford-Wong's $O( \text{SO} \cdot n \log (\kappa) + n^3 \log^{O(1)} (\kappa))$ time algorithm [Lee, Sidford and Wong, FOCS 2015] in terms of dependence on $\kappa$. For many important applications in economics, $\kappa = \Omega(\exp(n))$ and this leads to a significant difference between $\log(\kappa)$ and $\mathrm{poly}(\log (\kappa))$. We also provide evidence that the $n^2$ time per evaluation cannot be improved and thus our running time is optimal. A bottleneck of previous cutting plane methods is to compute leverage scores, a measure of the relative importance of past constraints. Our result is achieved by a novel multi-layered data structure for leverage score maintenance, which is a sophisticated combination of diverse techniques such as random projection, batched low-rank update, inverse maintenance, polynomial interpolation, and fast rectangular matrix multiplication. Interestingly, our method requires a combination of different fast rectangular matrix multiplication algorithms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LazyDiT: Lazy Learning for the Acceleration of Diffusion Transformers

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LazyDiT learns small gates that decide when to reuse cached layer outputs, cutting diffusion transformer compute by up to half while matching or beating DDIM quality.

  2. Numerical Pruning for Efficient Autoregressive Models

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Newton's method derived importance score plus a constrained least-squares compensation prunes LLaMA and LlamaGen models with reported gains over LLM-Pruner, SliceGPT, and FLAP.

Pith tools