pith. sign in

arxiv: 1306.1773 · v1 · pith:PZRVPNG5new · submitted 2013-06-07 · 💻 cs.SE

Making Sense out of a Jungle of JavaScript Frameworks: towards a Practitioner-friendly Comparative Analysis

classification 💻 cs.SE
keywords javascriptneedspractitionersanalysiscomparativeframeworkframeworkssuitable
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:PZRVPNG5 Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{PZRVPNG5}

Prints a linked pith:PZRVPNG5 badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

The field of Web development is entering the HTML5 and CSS3 era and JavaScript is becoming increasingly influential. A large number of JavaScript frameworks have been recently promoted. Practitioners applying the latest technologies need to choose a suitable JavaScript framework (JSF) in order to abstract the frustrating and complicated coding steps and to provide a cross-browser compatibility. Apart from benchmark suites and recommendation from experts, there is little research helping practitioners to select the most suitable JSF to a given situation. The few proposals employ software metrics on the JSF, but practitioners are driven by different concerns when choosing a JSF. As an answer to the critical needs, this paper is a call for action. It proposes a re-search design towards a comparative analysis framework of JSF, which merges researcher needs and practitioner needs.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.