Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

The fuzzy Landau equation: global well-posedness and Fisher information

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Global smooth solutions are proven for the fuzzy Landau equation.

desk verdict Honest and substantial on existence and Fisher information, but the advertised smooth well-posedness is explicitly formal in §2.3, so Theorem 1 is not yet proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08689 v2 pith:PZUDEOGR submitted 2025-07-11 math.AP math-phmath.MP

Maria Pia Gualdani , Nestor Guillen , Nataša Pavlović , Maja Tasković , Nicola Zamponi This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath-phmath.MP MSC 35Q2035Q8235B4535B6582C40
keywords fuzzyLandauequationdelocalizedcollisionsglobalwell-posednessmoderatelysoftpotentialsFisherinformationkineticequationsGENERICformalism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a 'fuzzy' Landau equation in which particles at different positions $x$ and $x_*$ can collide, weighted by a nonnegative spatial kernel $\kappa(x-x_*)$ that is positive everywhere. Its central claim is that this spatial delocalization prevents singularity formation: for moderately soft potentials $\gamma\in(-2,0]$, every nonnegative initial datum with finite moments and weighted $L^2$ derivatives produces a unique global strong solution, with the weighted derivatives $\langle v\rangle^{s-|\alpha|-|\beta|}D_v^\alpha D_x^\beta f$ in $L^\infty(0,T;L^2)$ and the weighted velocity gradient in $L^2(0,T;L^2)$. The proof's engine is a uniform lower bound on the diffusion matrix $A[f]$, which holds at every spatial point because the positive kernel transmits mass and diffusive effects instantly. A second result, for $\kappa\equiv 1$ and $\gamma\in[-3,1]$, shows that the spatial Fisher information $\int |\nabla_x f|^2/f\,dx\,dv$ is nonincreasing in time and the full Fisher information remains bounded. The caveat is that the higher-regularity half of the well-posedness theorem is presented as a formal bootstrap whose rigorous completion is said to be standard but is not written out.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the diffusion matrix $A[f](x,v)=\int N(v-v_*)\kappa(x-x_*)f(x_*,v_*)\,dx_*\,dv_*$, with $N$ the Landau kernel. The key estimate is the uniform ellipticity lower bound (2.4): there is $\alpha>0$ such that $\xi\cdot A[f]\xi \ge \alpha\langle x\rangle^{-\lambda}\langle v\rangle^{\gamma}|\xi|^2$ for every $\xi$, proved through the spatially averaged function $H(x,v)=\int\kappa(x-y)f(y,v)\,dy$. Once this lower bound is available, the collision term behaves like a nondegenerate diffusion in $v$ with a mild spatial weight, which drives the $L^p$, $L^\infty$ and $H^s$ iteration. For the Fisher-information result, the machinery is the lifting of the two-particle phase space to $\mathbb{R}^{12}$: one works with $F(x,v,y,w)=f(x,v)f(y,w)$ and the degenerate elliptic operator $Q(F)=\kappa(x-y)\sum_k \sqrt{\alpha}\,\tilde b_k\cdot\nabla(\sqrt{\alpha}\,\tilde b_k\cdot\nabla F)$, whose associated squares make the time derivative of $\int |\nabla_x f|^2/f$ a sum of nonpositive terms plus a commutator controlled by the integral inequality developed for the homogeneous Landau equation.

What would settle it

The decisive check is to carry out the omitted bootstrap for Lemma 6 and Theorem 3: prove (2.48) with constants uniform in $p$ and then take $p\to\infty$. If the required interpolation forces an a priori $L^\infty$ bound that is exactly what is being proven, the argument is circular; a concrete failure would appear as admissible initial data (satisfying (2.1) and (2.52)) whose approximate solutions have $L^\infty$ norms growing without bound as $\varepsilon\to 0$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, on the authors' own terms, is that the fuzzy Landau equation is globally well posed in smooth classes: Theorem 1 asserts existence and uniqueness of strong solutions for $\gamma\in(-2,0]$, given kernels $\kappa$ satisfying (1.2) and (2.3) and initial data with the moments and weighted Sobolev regularity of (2.1) and (2.52), with the estimates (2.53). Theorem 2 gives global H-solutions conserving mass, momentum and energy for the same potential range, and Theorem 4 asserts that for $\kappa\equiv 1$ and $\gamma\in[-3,1]$ the spatial Fisher information is monotone decreasing and the full Fisher information is bounded on finite time intervals. The discovery these results encode is that delocalization is regularizing: because $\kappa>0$ everywhere, the collision operator's diffusion is felt immediately at every point of space, so the equation sits between the spatially homogeneous and inhomogeneous Landau regimes and soft-potential singularities do not form.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's strongest claim depends on an unproved regularity bootstrap: the higher-regularity proof is only sketched as formal, with the authors saying the rigorous completion is standard and omitting it, so if those omitted estimates cannot be closed, the global strong-solution theorem is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Theorem 1 is correct, every admissible nonnegative initial datum yields a unique strong solution for all time in the range $\gamma\in(-2,0]$; choosing $s=5$ upgrades this to classical solutions.
  • The weighted estimates (2.53) imply that no singularity forms in the solution's derivatives up to order $s$, so finite-time blow-up, the open problem for the classical inhomogeneous Landau equation, is ruled out for this delocalized model.
  • Since the diffusion lower bound (2.4) holds at every spatial point, the equation's dissipative action is felt instantly even where $f$ is very small; this is the mechanism the authors identify for the absence of vacuum-region difficulties.
  • For $\kappa\equiv 1$ and $\gamma\in[-3,1]$, the spatial Fisher information $\int |\nabla_x f|^2/f$ is nonincreasing, while the full Fisher information with the velocity term stays bounded on $[0,T]$; this gives quantitative control on spatial concentration.
  • The GENERIC variational formulation identifies the dissipative part of the dynamics with the entropy gradient, so the equation inherits the standard energy-conservation and entropy-production structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the omitted bootstrap can be closed, the same strategy is likely to extend to very soft potentials $\gamma\in(-3,0)$ and, as the authors suggest, to fuzzy Boltzmann equations; that extension is not proven in this paper.
  • The monotonicity of the spatial Fisher information suggests a compactness tool that could be used to study the delocalization limit $\kappa\to\delta_0$, recovering the classical Landau equation; the paper does not take this limit.
  • A numerical test of Theorem 4 is direct: simulate solutions of (1.1) with $\kappa\equiv 1$ and $\gamma\in[-3,1]$ and monitor $\int |\nabla_x f|^2/f$; its monotone decay would confirm the Lyapunov structure, while any sustained increase would indicate a missing commutator bound.
  • Because the authors state they know no physical derivation of (1.1), the main import is mathematical: if the theorem is right, it shows that delocalization alone, not the precise collision rate, can suppress singularity formation in Landau-type dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the fuzzy Landau equation (1.1), a spatially delocalized variant of the inhomogeneous Landau equation with kernel κ satisfying (1.2). The main results are: (i) Theorem 1, which claims global existence and uniqueness of strong solutions for γ∈(−2,0] under moment, L∞, and weighted H^s assumptions on the initial data, with the proof split between Theorem 2 (global H-solutions) and Theorem 3 (H^s regularity); and (ii) Theorem 4, which claims for κ≡1 and γ∈[−3,1] that the spatial Fisher information ∫|∇_x f|²/f is nonincreasing in time and that the full Fisher information ∫(|∇_x f|²+|∇_v f|²)/f remains bounded. The paper also includes a formal GENERIC variational formulation of (1.1). The existence proof for H-solutions follows a recognizable approximation chain (τ, δ, ε), and the ellipticity lower bound Lemma 2 is a substantial contribution. However, the regularity part of Theorem 1 is explicitly declared formal in §2.3, and several load-bearing estimates in that section are only asserted, so the advertised smooth well-posedness result is not proved as written.

Significance. If the omitted regularity bootstrap can be made rigorous, the paper would establish global smooth well-posedness for a nontrivial class of inhomogeneous kinetic equations with delocalized collisions, and it would add a new structural Lyapunov functional: monotone decay of the spatial Fisher information for κ≡1. The paper also gives a useful ellipticity estimate with explicit ⟨x⟩^{-λ}⟨v⟩^γ lower bound, which is the key mechanism distinguishing the fuzzy model from the classical inhomogeneous Landau equation. Credit is due for presenting the approximation chain and for clearly citing the independent Fisher-information inequality of Guillen and Silvestre [16] rather than deriving it. Nevertheless, the central theorem on smooth solutions rests on the deferred formal regularity argument in §2.3; as it stands, the manuscript does not fully deliver that claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.3 (Lemma 6)] The opening of §2.3 states that the L∞ and H^N regularity arguments are formal and that the rigorous procedure is 'rather standard and therefore we omit it.' This is not a minor omission: Lemma 6 is the only source of the L∞ bound (2.42), and Corollary 1 and Theorem 3—both needed for Theorem 1—depend on it. The proof tests (1.1) with f^{p−1}, which is not admissible for the H-solutions constructed in Theorem 2, and the passage from p-dependent L^p bounds to L∞ requires a Moser-type iteration in which the Gronwall constant grows at most linearly in p. The manuscript only asserts this in the sentence 'It is now easy to see that f is bounded.' Without a rigorous version of these steps, the L∞ bound is not established.
  2. [§2.3.2 (Theorem 3)] The H^s regularity proof is a sketch whose decisive estimates are asserted rather than proved. For |α| ≥ 2, the estimate |D_v^θ D_x^σ A[f]| ≤ C∥D_v^{θ−θ′} f∥_{L²} + C⟨v⟩^{γ+1} is used, but the spatial convolution with κ(x−y) is not controlled by an unweighted L² norm in y when κ is nonintegrable, as occurs under (1.2) for λ ∈ (0,3]. The proof also relies on the L∞ bound of Lemma 6 and on Corollary 1, both of which inherit the formal gap described above. Since the regularity gains (2.53) that constitute Theorem 1 are exactly the content of Theorem 3, the global smooth well-posedness claim is not proven as written.
  3. [Theorem 1 (uniqueness)] Theorem 1 asserts the existence of a unique strong solution, but the manuscript contains no uniqueness proof. The estimates in §2.3 are a priori bounds for a fixed solution and do not compare two solutions with the same initial data. If uniqueness is intended to follow from the regularity estimates, that argument should be written out; if it is considered standard, a reference or a detailed sketch should be supplied.
  4. [Theorem 3 (hypotheses)] The statement of Theorem 3 assumes only the weighted H^s condition (2.52) on the initial datum, while the proof of Lemma 6 uses the high spatial and velocity moments of (2.1) and Corollary 1 explicitly requires m ≥ 12 and m > max{12, λ+2}. The hypotheses of Theorem 3 either need to include the moment condition on f^in, or the proof must show that the conditions stated in Theorem 3 suffice. As written, the theorem is not matched to its proof.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sections 1 and 2.1] The kernel is denoted κ in (1.2) and throughout most of the paper, but the text in Section 1 and in the proof of Lemma 2 refers to 'k'; please unify the notation.
  2. [References] Reference [10] contains a duplicated URL prefix ('https://https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.10288'); please correct it.
  3. [Lemma 5, Eq. (2.8)] In the derivation of (2.8), the second term contains ⟨x⟩^{-m} T^{m/λ−1}; substituting T = T̃⟨x⟩^{-λ} gives ⟨x⟩^{λ−2m}, not ⟨x⟩^{-λ} as displayed. Since m > λ this is a stronger decay, so the final conclusion may be repairable, but the displayed estimate should be corrected.
  4. [Theorem 4] Theorem 4 is stated for an arbitrary smooth solution of (1.1), which is fine, but the paper should explicitly remind the reader that it does not prove existence of such smooth solutions for the full range γ ∈ [−3,1], since Theorem 1 covers only γ ∈ (−2,0]. This would prevent a misreading of the abstract.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the well-posedness proof is built from stated a priori estimates and independent published inequalities; the explicitly omitted bootstrap in §2.3 is a rigor gap, not circular reuse.

full rationale

The main derivation chain is not circular. Theorem 1 is assembled from Theorem 2 (existence of H-solutions) and Theorem 3 (H^s regularity), each proved from the stated assumptions on the initial datum, the kernel κ, and the a priori moment/entropy estimates; no theorem is invoked in a way that presupposes the claimed conclusion. The ellipticity lower bound (Lemma 2) is derived from the mass, second-moment, and entropy bounds in Lemmas 3-5, not from the target regularity. The H^s induction in §2.3.2 proceeds from lower-order derivative estimates to higher-order ones using commutator estimates and the ellipticity bound; the unproved bootstrap is explicitly acknowledged at the start of §2.3: 'We provide a formal argument for the L∞ bound and H^N regularity for f. The procedure to make this argument precise and rigorous is rather standard and therefore we omit it.' This is an omitted proof and a completeness risk for the advertised smooth well-posedness, especially because Lemma 6 uses f^{p-1} as a test function and the passage from L^p bounds to L∞ is only sketched, but it is not circular: the omitted arguments are not replaced by assuming the theorem. The Fisher information section invokes the inequality 'obtained in [16]' where [16] is Guillen and Silvestre, a paper coauthored by one of the present authors. Although this citation is load-bearing for Theorem 4, it is a published, independently proved result (the Landau equation does not blow up), not a restatement of the present paper's conclusion, and the present section adds a genuinely new transport contribution handled by Young and Gronwall inequalities. There are no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no self-definitional identifications, and no known result merely relabeled. Accordingly, the paper shows no significant circularity; the only caution is that the claimed global smooth well-posedness depends on a bootstrap that the manuscript leaves as a standard but omitted formal argument, which is a correctness concern rather than a circularity concern.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the standard PDE toolbox (compactness, fixed point, Sobolev embedding) and on the domain assumptions listed. The highest-risk entry is the unproven 'standard' formalization of Section 2.3's regularity bootstrap. No free parameters are fitted, and no new entities are invented.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The spatial kernel κ satisfies κ1⟨x⟩^-λ ≤ κ(x) ≤ κ2⟨x⟩^-λ for some λ≥0 and κ1,κ2>0, so κ>0 everywhere.
    Used throughout; positivity of κ is essential for the uniform ellipticity bound Lemma 2 (equation 2.4), which drives all subsequent regularity.
  • domain assumption Initial data f_in is nonnegative, in L1∩L∞, and has finite moments ⟨|x|^m+|v|^m⟩ for m>max{12,λ+2} (equation 2.1).
    The moment bounds are used in Lemma 1 and in the weighted Sobolev estimates to close the a priori estimates.
  • domain assumption Theorem 4 assumes f is a smooth solution of (1.1) with κ≡1.
    The Fisher information computation requires derivatives of f that are only proven to exist for γ∈(−2,0] by Theorem 1; for γ∈[−3,−2] the theorem is conditional on smoothness.
  • domain assumption The integral inequality from Guillen-Silvestre [16], valid for |γ|≤√22, bounds the singular commutator term by the dissipation terms.
    Invoked in the proof of Theorem 4 (Section 3) to control the γ² term. It is an external theorem, not reproven here.
  • ad hoc to paper The formal L∞ and H^s regularity arguments of Section 2.3 can be made rigorous by standard procedures.
    The paper explicitly states the argument is formal and the rigorous procedure is omitted. The central smooth well-posedness claim depends on this being fillable.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The fuzzy Landau equation: global well-posedness and Fisher information." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PZUDEOGR

@misc{pith2026250708689,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The fuzzy Landau equation: global well-posedness and Fisher information},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PZUDEOGR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08689}
}
read the original abstract

We study a fuzzy variant of the inhomogeneous Landau equation and establish global-in-time existence and uniqueness of smooth solutions for moderately soft potentials. The spatial delocalization introduced in the collision operator not only enhances regularity and prevents singularity formation, but also reveals additional structural properties of the model. In particular, we show that several forms of the Fisher information decay monotonically or remain uniformly bounded in time.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On a fuzzy Landau Equation: Part II. Solvability results

    math.AP 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Global existence of entropy-dissipating H-solutions is established for the fuzzy Landau equation with power-law and very-soft kernels, together with a priori propagation estimates for moments and Lp norms.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [16]

    Guillen and L

    N. Guillen and L. Silvestre. The Landau equation does not blow up. Acta Matematica, 243 Number 2, 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [1]

    L. Arkeryd. Global existence in L1 for the Enskog equation and convergence of the solutions to solutions of the Boltzmann equation. J. Statist. Phys. 59 (1990), no. 3-4, 845-867

    work page 1990

  3. [2]

    L. Arkeryd. On the Enskog equation in two space variables. Transport Theory Statist. Phys. 15 (1986), no. 5, 673-691

    work page 1986

  4. [3]

    Caffarelli, M

    L. Caffarelli, M. Gualdani, and N. Zamponi. Existence of weak solutions to a continuity equation with space time nonlocal Darcy law. Comm. Partial Differential Equations 45 (2020), no. 12, 1799-1819

    work page 2020

  5. [4]

    Cameron, L

    S. Cameron, L. Silvestre, and S. Snelson. Global a priori estimates for the inhomogeneous Landau equation with moderately soft potentials. Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Anal. Non Lineaire , (3):625–642, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [5]

    Cercignani

    C. Cercignani. The grad limit for a system of soft spheres. Communications on pure and applied mathe- matics, 36(4):479–494, 1983

    work page 1983

  7. [6]

    X. Chen, A. Juengel, and J.G. Liu. A note on Aubin-Lions-Dubinskii lemmas. Acta Appl. Math. 133 (2014), 33-43

    work page 2014

  8. [7]

    Desvillettes, W

    L. Desvillettes, W. Golding, , M. Gualdani, and A. Loher. Production of the Fisher information for the Landau-Coulomb equation with L1 initial data. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.10765

    arXiv

Show all 34 references
  1. [8]

    R. Duan, S. Liu, S. Sakamoto, and R. M. Strain. Global mild solutions of the Landau and non-cutoff Boltzmann equations. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 74(5):932–1020, 2020

    2020

  2. [9]

    Duong and Z

    M.H. Duong and Z. He. On a fuzzy Landau equation: Part I. a variational approach. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.07666

  3. [10]

    Duong and Z

    M.H. Duong and Z. He. On a fuzzy Landau equation: Part II. solvability results. https://https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.10288

    arXiv

  4. [11]

    Erbar and Z

    M. Erbar and Z. He. Passing to the limit in fuzzy Boltzmann equations. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.05838

    arXiv

  5. [12]

    Erbar and Z

    M. Erbar and Z. He. A variational approach to the fuzzy Boltzmann equation. Nonlinearity 38 (2025), no. 5, Paper No. 055019, 36 pp

    2025

  6. [13]

    Golding, M

    W. Golding, M. Gualdani, and A. Loher. Global smooth solutions to the Landau-Coulomb equation in L3/2. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 249 (2025), no. 3, Paper No. 34

    2025

  7. [14]

    Grmela and H.C

    M. Grmela and H.C. ¨Ottinger. Dynamics and thermodynamics of complex fluids. II. illustration of a general formalism. Phys. Rev. E56 (1997), 6620-6632

    1997

  8. [15]

    Guillen and L

    N. Guillen and L. Silvestre. The Landau equation and Fisher information. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.05167, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Y. Guo. The Landau equation in a periodic box. Communications in mathematical physics , 231(3):391– 434, 2002

    2002

  10. [18]

    Ji, and Y

    L.B He, J. Ji, and Y. Luo. Existence, uniqueness and smoothing estimates for spatially homogeneous Landau-Coulomb equation in H −1/2 space with polynomial tail, arXiv.2412.07287. 2024

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Henderson and S

    C. Henderson and S. Snelson. C ∞ smoothing for weak solutions of the inhomogeneous Landau equation. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 236(1) 113-143, 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    Henderson, S

    C. Henderson, S. Snelson, and A. Tarfulea. Local existence, lower mass bounds, and smoothing for the Landau equation. Journal of Differential Equations 266(2-3) 1536-1577, 2019

    2019

  13. [21]

    Imbert and L

    C. Imbert and L. Silvestre. Global regularity estimates for the Boltzmann equation without cut-off. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 35 (2022), no. 3, 625-703. 42 Fuzzy Landau equation. Existence and uniqueness of global smooth solutions

    2022

  14. [22]

    Imbert and L

    C. Imbert and L. Silvestre. Weak Harnack inequality for the Boltzmann equation without cut-off. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 22 (2020), no. 2, 507-592. , 2020

    2020

  15. [23]

    Imbert, L

    C. Imbert, L. Silvestre, and C. Villani. On the monotonicity of the Fisher information for the Boltzmann equation. Preprint https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.01183

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    S. Ji. Bounds for the optimal constant of the Bakry- ´Emery Γ 2 criterion inequality on RP d−1. ArXiv:2408.13954

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    S. Ji. Dissipation estimates of the Fisher information for the Landau equation. Arxiv 2410.09035

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    J. Kim, Y. Guo, and H.J. Hwang. A L2 to L∞ approach for the Landau equation. Peking Math J. 3, 131-202, 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    On Boltzmann and Landau equations

    PL Lions. On Boltzmann and Landau equations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Lon- don. Series A: Physical and Engineering Sciences , 346(1679):191–204, 1994

    1994

  20. [28]

    Merle, P

    F. Merle, P. Raphael, I. Rodnianski, and J. Szeftel. On the implosion of a compressible fluid i: Smooth self-similar inviscid profiles. Ann. of Math. (2)196(2022), no.2, 567-778

    2022

  21. [29]

    Merle, P

    F. Merle, P. Raphael, I. Rodnianski, and J. Szeftel. On the implosion of a compressible fluid ii: Singularity formation. Ann. of Math. (2)196(2022), no.2, 779-889

    2022

  22. [30]

    Morgenstern

    D. Morgenstern. Analytical studies related to the Maxwell-Boltzmann equation. J. Rational Mech. Anal. 4 (1955), 533-555

    1955

  23. [31]

    A. Povzner. On the Boltzmann equation in the kinetic theory of gases. Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 58 (100) (1962), 65-86

    1962

  24. [32]

    A. Povzner. On the Boltzmann equation in the kinetic theory of gases. Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. 47, Ser. 2 (1965), 193–214

    1965

  25. [33]

    Snelson and C

    S. Snelson and C. Solomon. A continuation criterion for the Landau equation with very soft and Coulomb potentials. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.15690

  26. [34]

    C. Villani. Fisher information in kinetic theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.00925 , 2025. Email address : gualdani@math.utexas.edu Email address : nestor@txstate.edu Email address : natasa@math.utexas.edu Email address : maja.taskovic@emory.edu Email address : nicola.zamponi@a...

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.