Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

How Can Recommender Systems Benefit from Large Language Models: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.05817 v6 pith:PZWMEWAP submitted 2023-06-09 cs.IR cs.AI

classification cs.IRcs.AI
keywords modelsrecommendersystemsknowledgepipelinerecommendationsurveywhether
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the rapid development of online services, recommender systems (RS) have become increasingly indispensable for mitigating information overload. Despite remarkable progress, conventional recommendation models (CRM) still have some limitations, e.g., lacking open-world knowledge, and difficulties in comprehending users' underlying preferences and motivations. Meanwhile, large language models (LLM) have shown impressive general intelligence and human-like capabilities, which mainly stem from their extensive open-world knowledge, reasoning ability, as well as their comprehension of human culture and society. Consequently, the emergence of LLM is inspiring the design of recommender systems and pointing out a promising research direction, i.e., whether we can incorporate LLM and benefit from their knowledge and capabilities to compensate for the limitations of CRM. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive survey on this research direction from the perspective of the whole pipeline in real-world recommender systems. Specifically, we summarize existing works from two orthogonal aspects: where and how to adapt LLM to RS. For the WHERE question, we discuss the roles that LLM could play in different stages of the recommendation pipeline, i.e., feature engineering, feature encoder, scoring/ranking function, user interaction, and pipeline controller. For the HOW question, we investigate the training and inference strategies, resulting in two fine-grained taxonomy criteria, i.e., whether to tune LLM or not, and whether to involve conventional recommendation models for inference. Then, we highlight key challenges in adapting LLM to RS from three aspects, i.e., efficiency, effectiveness, and ethics. Finally, we summarize the survey and discuss the future prospects. We actively maintain a GitHub repository for papers and other related resources: https://github.com/CHIANGEL/Awesome-LLM-for-RecSys/.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Ocean4Rec: Offline LLM-Derived OCEAN Profiles for Request-Time VOD Reranking

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Ocean4Rec uses offline LLM to create OCEAN profiles for items and time-decayed user profiles for request-time numeric reranking, improving NDCG@20 by 7.6% and 61.5% over base+recency in offline VOD evaluations.

  2. Benchmark Leakage Trap: Can We Trust LLM-based Recommendation?

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning an LLM recommender on a slice of the benchmark inflates AUC/UAUC for in-domain leakage and degrades it for out-of-domain leakage, showing benchmark contamination can distort LLM-based recommendation evaluation.

  3. A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agents

    cs.AI 2024-04 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    A systematic review of memory designs, evaluation methods, applications, limitations, and future directions for LLM-based agents.

Pith tools