Pith. sign in

REVIEW

GRB 210217A: A short or a long GRB?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.01191 v1 pith:Q3UPO4HI submitted 2022-02-02 astro-ph.HE

GRB 210217A: A short or a long GRB?

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords shortburstlongclassifieddifferentgrbsburstsclass
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Gamma-ray bursts are traditionally classified as short and long bursts based on their $T_{\rm 90}$ value (the time interval during which an instrument observes $5\%$ to $95\%$ of gamma-ray/hard X-ray fluence). However, $T_{\rm 90}$ is dependent on the detector sensitivity and the energy range in which the instrument operates. As a result, different instruments provide different values of $T_{\rm 90}$ for a burst. GRB 210217A is detected with different duration by {\it Swift} and {\it Fermi}. It is classified as a long/soft GRB by {\it Swift}-BAT with a $T_{\rm 90}$ value of 3.76 sec. On the other hand, the sub-threshold detection by {\it Fermi}-GBM classified GRB 210217A as a short/hard burst with a duration of 1.024 sec. We present the multi-wavelength analysis of GRB 210217A (lying in the overlapping regime of long and short GRBs) to identify its actual class using multi-wavelength data. We utilized the $T_{\rm 90}$-hardness ratio, $T_{\rm 90}$-\Ep, and $T_{\rm 90}$-$t_{\rm mvts}$ distributions of the GRBs to find the probability of GRB 210217A being a short GRB. Further, we estimated the photometric redshift of the burst by fitting the joint XRT/UVOT SED and place the burst in the Amati plane. We found that GRB 210217A is an ambiguous burst showing properties of both short and long class of GRBs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.