Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Incompatibility robustness of quantum measurements: a unified framework

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.00448 v5 pith:Q3ZJFM2J submitted 2019-06-02 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords measurementsincompatiblemeasuresquantumincompatibilitysomefindframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In quantum mechanics performing a measurement is an invasive process which generally disturbs the system. Due to this phenomenon, there exist incompatible quantum measurements, i.e., measurements that cannot be simultaneously performed on a single copy of the system. It is then natural to ask what the most incompatible quantum measurements are. To answer this question, several measures have been proposed to quantify how incompatible a set of measurements is, however their properties are not well-understood. In this work, we develop a general framework that encompasses all the commonly used measures of incompatibility based on robustness to noise. Moreover, we propose several conditions that a measure of incompatibility should satisfy, and investigate whether the existing measures comply with them. We find that some of the widely used measures do not fulfil these basic requirements. We also show that when looking for the most incompatible pairs of measurements, we obtain different answers depending on the exact measure. For one of the measures, we analytically prove that projective measurements onto two mutually unbiased bases are among the most incompatible pairs in every dimension. However, for some of the remaining measures we find that some peculiar measurements turn out to be even more incompatible.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Pretty-good simulation of all quantum measurements by projective measurements

    quant-ph 2025-01 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    Every POVM on C^d becomes projectively simulable after depolarizing with dimension-independent visibility c = 0.02, and can be simulated with postselection probability 1/8 using only a single auxiliary qubit.

  2. Measurement incompatibility and quantum steering via linear programming

    quant-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A hierarchy of linear programs computes provable upper and lower bounds on measurement incompatibility and quantum steering, scaling polynomially with the number of measurements.

Pith tools