Probing Pre-Trained Language Models for Cross-Cultural Differences in Values
Reviewed by Pithpith:Q4JMSS52open to challenge →
read the original abstract
Language embeds information about social, cultural, and political values people hold. Prior work has explored social and potentially harmful biases encoded in Pre-Trained Language models (PTLMs). However, there has been no systematic study investigating how values embedded in these models vary across cultures. In this paper, we introduce probes to study which values across cultures are embedded in these models, and whether they align with existing theories and cross-cultural value surveys. We find that PTLMs capture differences in values across cultures, but those only weakly align with established value surveys. We discuss implications of using mis-aligned models in cross-cultural settings, as well as ways of aligning PTLMs with value surveys.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Geographic Blind Spots in AI Control Monitors: A Cross-National Audit of Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 fabricates more answers on Global North AI contexts than Global South ones, creating an exploitable vulnerability in AI control monitors.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.