Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ComPO: Community Preferences for Language Model Personalization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.16027 v1 pith:Q6TEQEGI submitted 2024-10-21 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords preferencesmodelsfeedbacklanguagemodelpreferenceaveragecommunity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Conventional algorithms for training language models (LMs) with human feedback rely on preferences that are assumed to account for an "average" user, disregarding subjectivity and finer-grained variations. Recent studies have raised concerns that aggregating such diverse and often contradictory human feedback to finetune models results in generic models that generate outputs not preferred by many user groups, as they tend to average out styles and norms. To address this issue, we draw inspiration from recommendation systems and propose ComPO, a method to personalize preference optimization in LMs by contextualizing the probability distribution of model outputs with the preference provider. Focusing on group-level preferences rather than individuals, we collect and release ComPRed, a question answering dataset with community-level preferences from Reddit. This dataset facilitates studying diversity in preferences without incurring privacy concerns associated with individual feedback. Our experiments reveal that conditioning language models on a community identifier (i.e., subreddit name) during preference tuning substantially enhances model performance. Conversely, replacing this context with random subreddit identifiers significantly diminishes performance, highlighting the effectiveness of our approach in tailoring responses to communities' preferences.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Extended Inductive Reasoning for Personalized Preference Inference from Behavioral Signals

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 7B model trained with synthetic reasoning demonstrations plus reinforcement learning infers explicit user preference descriptions from behavioral signals, improving personalized response judging and generation.

Pith tools