Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Twist-tuned exchange and hysteresis in a bilayer van der Waals magnet

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A small (~3°) twist between the two layers of bilayer CrSBr lowers the effective interlayer antiferromagnetic exchange, stabilizing both parallel and antiparallel spin configurations and producing magnetic hysteresis along the easy axis tha

desk verdict Real twist-induced hysteresis in CrSBr, but the model's only independent prediction (h_AP+) is off by ~1.7× and excluded from the fit, so the quantitative exchange-reduction claim is not yet supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.08018 v1 pith:QALXNVUX submitted 2025-10-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Priyanka Mondal , Sonu Verma , Wenze Lan , Lukas Krelle , Ryan Tan , Regine von Klitzing , Kenji Watanabe , Takashi Taniguchi
show 4 more authors
Kseniia Mosina Zdenek Sofer Akashdeep Kamra Bernhard Urbaszek
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords twistedbilayerCrSBrvanderWaalsmagnetmagnetichysteresisinterlayerexchangemoirésuperlatticeexcitonspectroscopyantiferromagnetism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that twisting two monolayers of CrSBr by about three degrees reduces the effective interlayer antiferromagnetic exchange, turning the bilayer into a system that can hold both parallel and antiparallel layer magnetizations as stable states over a range of magnetic field along the easy axis. This produces pronounced magnetic hysteresis—seen as a hysteretic shift of the exciton energy in photoluminescence—that the pristine bilayer does not show. A two-sublattice free-energy model with a spatially averaged interlayer exchange captures the switching fields and lets the authors extract the tuned exchange strength and anisotropies. They further show that the hysteresis varies from spot to spot, indicating local modulation of the average exchange, and argue for coherent moiré averaging rather than spin textures. If correct, twist engineering becomes a route to programmable two-dimensional magnetic memories.

What carries the argument

The central device is a two-sublattice free-energy model for a collinear antiferromagnet with easy-axis anisotropy, F/M_s = h_E m_A·m_B + (h_x/2)(m_Ax²+m_Bx²) + (h_y/2)(m_Ay²+m_By²) − h_ext·(m_A+m_B). For a field along the easy axis, the model yields multiple local minima (antiparallel, canted, and parallel) over a field range when 2h_E − h_x < h_AP+, giving hysteresis; the twist reduces h_E, moving the system into this bistable regime. The key simplification is that the moiré-modulated, position-dependent interlayer exchange is replaced by its spatial average, J*_inter, justified by the strong intralayer ferromagnetic exchange in CrSBr and the small moiré wavelength.

What would settle it

Perform the same easy-axis field sweep on a pristine bilayer with a verified single domain and directly measure its switching fields: the model predicts hysteresis with h_P− = 2h_E − h_x and h_AP+ = sqrt(h_x(2h_E+h_x)); observing no hysteresis (or h_AP+ equal to the model's value) would contradict the claim that hysteresis is a twist-induced effect. Likewise, scanning a series of twisted samples with independently verified angles between 0° and 5° would show whether hysteresis width and extracted h_E scale smoothly with twist angle, as the coherent-averaging picture implies.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In bilayer CrSBr, a torque-controlled twist of approximately 3° between the two monolayers reduces the effective interlayer exchange field h_E from about 0.27 T in the pristine bilayer to about 0.14 T at one probed spot. With this reduced exchange, the model predicts—and the experiment shows—that for magnetic field along the easy b-axis, both the antiparallel and parallel magnetization configurations are local energy minima over a finite field range, so the system exhibits hysteresis as it switches between them. The authors map this hysteresis by tracking the A-exciton energy, which depends on the angle between the two layer magnetizations, and they extract h_E, the in-plane anisotropy h_x,

Load-bearing premise

The entire analysis rests on treating the twisted bilayer as a coherent monodomain with a spatially averaged interlayer exchange; if the two layers instead form local domains or the local twist angle deviates from the nominal 3°, the extracted exchange values and the attribution of hysteresis to twist-induced exchange reduction would not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Twist angle becomes a control knob for the magnetic state of a bilayer magnet: a few degrees of misalignment can switch the system from non-hysteretic to hysteretic behavior along the easy axis.
  • The extracted exchange and anisotropy values provide a quantitative benchmark for theories of moiré magnetism in CrSBr and related van der Waals magnets.
  • Spatially varying hysteresis across a single twisted sample enables the design of magnetic domains with tailored switching fields, useful for reconfigurable spintronic devices.
  • The monodomain behavior, with coherent averaging of the moiré exchange, means such twisted magnets can be treated as effective single antiferromagnetic domains, simplifying device modeling.
  • The model's prediction of hysteresis in pristine bilayers, despite its absence in experiments, points to an open question about the switching dynamics in layered antiferromagnets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the twist angle could be tuned continuously, the hysteresis loop width should track the predicted reduction of h_E; measuring a series of samples with different angles would test the causal link between twist and exchange reduction.
  • The unexplained h_AP+ discrepancy suggests that the static free-energy model misses something—possibly domain nucleation, nonlocal damping, or a field-dependent exchange—that also explains why pristine CrSBr and CrI3 bilayers show no hysteresis despite the same model predicting it.
  • A direct structural verification of the twist angle (e.g., via atomic-resolution imaging) combined with local hysteresis mapping would confirm that the observed hysteretic response is caused by the twist rather than by local defects or strain.
  • The claim of coherent moiré averaging implies that the effective exchange should scale with the moiré wavelength; experiments on samples with different twist angles could check whether the extracted h_E changes accordingly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports magneto-optical (PL) measurements on a bilayer CrSBr sample with a nominal ~3° twist, showing pronounced hysteresis in the A-exciton energy vs. magnetic field along the easy b-axis, whereas a pristine bilayer shows none. The authors interpret this with a two-sublattice mean-field model (Eq. S1) in which the moiré modulation of interlayer exchange is replaced by a spatially averaged effective exchange J*_inter. Using three measured switching fields h_P-, h⊥x, h⊥y (Supplementary Note 2), they extract h_E, h_x, h_y for pristine and twisted samples, and conclude that the twist reduces the effective interlayer exchange from ~0.27 T to ~0.14 T, stabilizing coexisting antiparallel and parallel states and producing hysteresis. They explicitly acknowledge that the fourth observable, h_AP+, is not captured by the model and is excluded from the parameter extraction, and that the same model predicts (unobserved) hysteresis for the pristine bilayer.

Significance. If the twist-induced exchange reduction were independently confirmed, this would provide a useful new tuning knob for vdW magnets and support the idea of coherent moiré averaging in a system with strong intralayer exchange. The experimental core is attractive: hysteresis is reproduced at three spatial positions, is specific to the easy-axis direction, and is absent along the a and c axes. The theoretical treatment is transparent, and the authors are candid about the model's limitations. However, the central quantitative claim—a ~47% reduction in interlayer exchange—rests on inverting the model against the same switching fields that the model is invoked to explain, and the one genuinely predictive quantity (h_AP+) fails badly. The paper is therefore significant but currently does not substantiate the mechanistic attribution.

major comments (4)
  1. [Supplementary Note 2, Table S2] The only model prediction not used in parameter extraction, h_AP+ = sqrt(h_x(2h_E+h_x)), fails badly. For twisted Spot 1 it gives 0.407 T against a measured 0.237 T; for the pristine bilayer it gives 0.569 T against 0.180 T. Since the stated errors are ±15–25 mT, this is not a small discrepancy. Because h_E, h_x, and h_y are extracted from h_P-, h⊥x, and h⊥y (Eqs. S8–S10), the coexistence of AP and P local minima—the hysteresis mechanism—is never validated by an independent observable; it is simply assumed. Discarding h_AP+ from the fit removes the one quantity that could confirm the model's bistability, so the quoted exchange reduction is not independently supported.
  2. [Supplementary Note 1 (Anomaly), main text Fig. 2a, Methods] The same model with the extracted pristine parameters predicts a hysteresis loop between h_P- = 0.18 T and h_AP+ = 0.569 T for the pristine bilayer. The pristine b-axis data (Fig. 2a) show a symmetric switch at 0.18 T and no hysteresis, but the sweeps were only taken up to ±0.3 T (Methods). The observed 0.18 T feature cannot be the model's h_AP+ (0.569 T), and the assignment h_P- = 0.18 T is inconsistent with the model's requirement that AP remain stable up to 0.569 T. The authors acknowledge this anomaly, but the consequence is that the pristine baseline—against which the twisted sample is compared—is not explained by the same model.
  3. [Supplementary Note 2, Eqs. S8–S9; main text Fig. 3] The headline reduction in h_E is a parameter read-off, not a predictive test. h_E is obtained from h_E = (h_P- + h⊥x)/4, i.e., from the very switching fields whose existence the model is meant to explain. For twisted Spot 1, h_P- = 0, so the model's predicted loop width (h_AP+ - h_P- = 0.407 T) does not match the measured 0.237 T. Thus the statement that the model 'captures' the hysteresis is only qualitative; alternative mechanisms—local strain, stacking defects, or a missing canted-state/domain-nucleation term—could produce the same phenomena without twist-tuned exchange.
  4. [Methods; Fig. 4] The 3° twist angle is inferred from a rotation stage setting, not from direct structural characterization (no electron diffraction or atomic-scale imaging is presented), and the moiré wavelength is not measured. Only one twisted sample is studied and compared to a different pristine flake. The three positions in Fig. 4 show strongly different h_P- (0–0.16 T), but no structural map correlates these positions with moiré registry, so the spatial variation is not causally tied to the twist. This weakens the central attribution to twist-induced exchange averaging.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1d and Fig. 2] The grey switching-field lines in Fig. 2 are unlabeled; adding h_P- and h_AP+ values would help the reader connect to Table S2. Also the axis label in Fig. 1d is simply 'B'; specify the b-axis direction.
  2. [Table S2] The columns h_C- and h_C are not defined in the main text. Please define them in the table caption or refer explicitly to the corresponding equations in Supplementary Note 1.
  3. [Methods] The vector-magnet description uses x and z as in-plane and y as out-of-plane, while the main text uses a, b, c crystallographic axes. Clarify the mapping once at first use to avoid confusion.
  4. [References] Reference [41] is cited as 'Krelle et al., ACS nano (2025)' in Methods but is not given a full citation in the reference list; please update.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the switching-field parameters are explicitly extracted rather than presented as predictions, and the model's one genuinely independent prediction (h_AP+) is reported as failing and excluded, not repurposed as support.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is: (i) measure exciton-energy switching fields in pristine and twisted bilayers; (ii) write a standard two-sublattice free energy; (iii) solve the local-minimum conditions to express characteristic fields h_P-, h_perp_x, h_perp_y in terms of h_E, h_x, h_y; (iv) invert those three equations to extract h_E, h_x, h_y; (v) compare the measured h_AP+ with the value computed from the extracted parameters. Steps (iii)-(iv) are parameter extraction, not prediction: the paper says "switching fields ... can be read off from the experimental data and employed to calculate the local interlayer exchange" (Supp. Note 2, Eqs. S8-S10). The one quantity not used in the extraction, h_AP+, is a genuine prediction; the paper reports that it disagrees: "switching away from the AP configuration at the field of h_AP+ does not agree with our theoretical analysis. This is the only deviation from our model in a wide range of experiments. We presently do not understand the reasons for this." It also states that using h_AP+ in the extraction "produces unphysical and anomalous field values" (Supp. Note 2). This is a failed prediction and a validity risk, but not a circular reduction. The paper likewise explicitly acknowledges that the same model predicts pristine-bilayer hysteresis that is not observed ("our theoretical analysis and established parameters predict a hysteresis that is, however, not observed in experiments"), so the twist-induced-exchange attribution is not being protected by excluding counterevidence. The spatial-averaging/monodomain assumption is stated as a model premise justified by strong intralayer exchange and small moiré wavelength, not derived from the fit; while this weakens the 'coherent averaging' claim as independent evidence, it is an assumption, not an input renamed as an output. The few self-citations ([29], [41]) concern Raman methods and spectrometer setup details and are not load-bearing. No equation in the paper equals its own input by construction, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. Therefore no significant circularity is present; the relevant concerns are model-validation/correctness issues, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative claims rest on three field parameters per spot extracted from the measured switching fields using the model's equations; the key parameter h_E is inferred, not directly measured. The coherent-averaging assumption is plausible but unverified, and the model's own prediction for h_AP+ is excluded from the extraction. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • h_E (interlayer exchange field) = Twisted Spot1 0.144 T; Spot2 0.160 T; Spot3 0.190 T; pristine 0.270 T
    Extracted from measured h_P- and h_⊥x via h_P- = 2h_E - h_x and h_⊥x = 2h_E + h_x (Table S2). This is the central quantity whose twist-induced reduction is the paper's main claim.
  • h_x (intermediate-axis anisotropy field) = Twisted Spot1 0.288 T; Spot2 0.180 T; Spot3 0.220 T; pristine 0.360 T
    Solved from the same two equations as h_E; not independently measured.
  • h_y (hard-axis anisotropy field) = Twisted Spot1 1.612 T; Spot2 1.480 T; Spot3 1.420 T; pristine 1.060 T
    Obtained from h_⊥y = 2h_E + h_y using the fitted h_E; not independently measured.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Intralayer ferromagnetic exchange is much stronger than interlayer exchange and anisotropies, justifying homogeneous layer magnetizations and a two-sublattice model with spatially averaged interlayer exchange J*_inter.
    Invoked in the main text ('the intralayer ferromagnetic exchange in CrSBr is much larger than the interlayer exchange and anisotropies... reduces to a simple two-sublattice model'); not verified for the twisted sample via local magnetization imaging.
  • domain assumption The exciton energy shift is proportional to cos²(θ/2), where θ is the angle between the two layer magnetizations.
    Taken from prior CrSBr literature (Refs. [8,34]) and used to map PL energy to magnetic configuration; the proportionality constant and offset are not needed for switching-field analysis.
  • standard math The magnetic free energy has the two-sublattice form of Eq. (S1) with collinear anisotropies h_x, h_y and interlayer exchange h_E.
    Standard antiferromagnet free energy used in prior CrSBr studies (Refs. [28,42]); the parametrization of magnetization via angles φ and β (Fig. S1) covers AP, C, and P states.
  • ad hoc to paper On lowering the field from the P state, the system switches stochastically to AP rather than C, and this asymmetry is outside the model.
    Introduced in SI Note 1 to reconcile observed P→AP switching with the model's multiple local minima; the model itself only specifies stability boundaries, not which minimum the system selects.
  • domain assumption The moiré wavelength is small enough (θ≈3°) that the optical probe averages over many supercells, yielding an effective monodomain response.
    Stated in the main text ('coherent averaging across the moiré supercell'); moiré period is not directly measured, and no magnetic imaging confirms the absence of domains.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Twist-tuned exchange and hysteresis in a bilayer van der Waals magnet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QALXNVUX

@misc{pith2026251008018,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Twist-tuned exchange and hysteresis in a bilayer van der Waals magnet},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QALXNVUX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.08018}
}
read the original abstract

Moir\'e superlattices in twisted bilayers enable profound reconstructions of the electronic bandstructure, giving rise to correlated states with remarkable tunability. Extending this paradigm to van der Waals magnets, twisting creates spatially varying interlayer exchange interactions that stabilize emergent spin textures and the coexistence of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic domains. Here, we demonstrate the emergence of robust magnetic hysteresis in bilayer CrSBr upon twisting by an angle of ~ 3{\deg}. This is observed as the corresponding hysteretic evolution of the exciton energy, that directly correlates with the bilayer magnetic state, in magnetic field dependent photoluminescence measurements. A two-sublattice model captures this behavior, attributing it to the twist-induced reduction of interlayer exchange that stabilizes both parallel and antiparallel spin configurations across a broad field range. Comparison with experiment enables quantitative extraction of the effective exchange strength. Remarkably, the system exhibits coherent averaging across the moir\'e supercell, yielding an effective monodomain response characterized by switching into the antiferromagnetic state, rather than forming spin textures or fragmented domains. Spatially resolved measurements further uncover local variations in hysteresis loops, consistent with position-dependent modulation of the average exchange interaction. Our results establish twist engineering as a powerful route to programmable magnetic memories in two-dimensional magnets, harnessing the robustness of antiferromagnetic order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.08018 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Ferromagnetic interlayer exchange coupling in a few layers of CrSBr on a gold thin film

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Thin CrSBr on gold shows ferromagnetic interlayer coupling stabilized by electron transfer from the substrate, confirmed by direct magnetic imaging and supported by DFT and spectroscopy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Cao, Y.et al.Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices.Nature556, 43–50 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    & MacDonald, A

    Bistritzer, R. & MacDonald, A. H. Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene.Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences108, 12233–12237 (2011)

    2011

  3. [3]

    Nature637, 833–838 (2025)

    Xia, Y.et al.Superconductivity in twisted bilayer WSe 2. Nature637, 833–838 (2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    & Balents, L

    Hejazi, K., Luo, Z.-X. & Balents, L. Noncollinear phases in moir´ e magnets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 10721–10726 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Song, T.et al.Direct visualization of magnetic domains and moir´ e magnetism in twisted 2D magnets.Science 374, 1140–1144 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Xu, Y.et al.Coexisting ferromagnetic–antiferromagnetic state in twisted bilayer CrI3.Nature Nanotechnology17, 143–147 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Cheng, G.et al.Electrically tunable moir´ e magnetism in twisted double bilayers of chromium triiodide.Nature Electronics6, 434–442 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    P.et al.Interlayer electronic coupling on de- mand in a 2D magnetic semiconductor.Nature Materials 20, 1657–1662 (2021)

    Wilson, N. P.et al.Interlayer electronic coupling on de- mand in a 2D magnetic semiconductor.Nature Materials 20, 1657–1662 (2021)

    2021

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Carr, S.et al.Twistronics: Manipulating the electronic properties of two-dimensional layered structures through their twist angle.Physical Review B95, 075420 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    Liao, M.et al.Precise control of the interlayer twist angle in large scale MoS 2 homostructures.Nature Communi- cations11, 2153 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Choi, J.et al.Twist angle-dependent interlayer exciton lifetimes in van der waals heterostructures.Physical Re- view Letters126, 047401 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Chen, Y.et al.Twist-assisted all-antiferromagnetic tun- nel junction in the atomic limit.Nature632, 1045–1051 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Inbar, A.et al.The quantum twisting microscope.Nature 614, 682–687 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    M.et al.Quantum cascade of correlated phases in trigonally warped bilayer graphene.Nature608, 298– 302 (2022)

    Seiler, A. M.et al.Quantum cascade of correlated phases in trigonally warped bilayer graphene.Nature608, 298– 302 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Huang, B.et al.Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der waals crystal down to the monolayer limit.Nature 546, 270–273 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Park, J.-G.et al.2D van der Waals magnets: from fundamental physics to applications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.02355(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    & Tong, Q

    Xiao, F., Chen, K. & Tong, Q. Magnetization textures in twisted bilayer CrX 3 (X= Br, I).Physical Review Research3, 013027 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Klein, J.et al.Control of structure and spin texture in the van der Waals layered magnet CrSBr.Nature Com- munications13, 5420 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Boix-Constant, C.et al.Programmable Magnetic Hys- teresis in Orthogonally-Twisted 2D CrSBr Magnets via Stacking Engineering.Advanced Materials37, 2415774 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    & Liu, C.-C

    Liu, Y., Yu, J. & Liu, C.-C. Twisted magnetic van der Waals bilayers: An ideal platform for altermagnetism. Physical Review Letters133, 206702 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    J.et al.Layered antiferromagnetism induces large negative magnetoresistance in the van der Waals semiconductor CrSBr.Advanced Materials32, 2003240 (2020)

    Telford, E. J.et al.Layered antiferromagnetism induces large negative magnetoresistance in the van der Waals semiconductor CrSBr.Advanced Materials32, 2003240 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Lee, K.et al.Magnetic order and symmetry in the 2D semiconductor CrSBr.Nano Letters21, 3511–3517 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    J.et al.Exciton-coupled coherent magnons in a 2D semiconductor.Nature609, 282–286 (2022)

    Bae, Y. J.et al.Exciton-coupled coherent magnons in a 2D semiconductor.Nature609, 282–286 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    E.et al.CrSBr: An Air-Stable, Two- Dimensional Magnetic Semiconductor.Nano Letters24, 4319 (2024)

    Ziebel, M. E.et al.CrSBr: An Air-Stable, Two- Dimensional Magnetic Semiconductor.Nano Letters24, 4319 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    & Kahle, H

    G¨ oser, O., Paul, W. & Kahle, H. Magnetic properties of CrSBr.Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 92, 129–136 (1990)

    1990

  18. [26]

    A.et al.Dynamic magnetic crossover at the origin of the hidden-order in van der Waals antiferro- magnet CrSBr.Nature Communications13, 4745 (2022)

    L´ opez-Paz, S. A.et al.Dynamic magnetic crossover at the origin of the hidden-order in van der Waals antiferro- magnet CrSBr.Nature Communications13, 4745 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Scheie, A.et al.Spin Waves and Magnetic Exchange Hamiltonian in CrSBr.Advanced Science9, 2202467 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Dirnberger, F.et al.Magneto-optics in a van der waals magnet tuned by self-hybridized polaritons.Nature620, 533–537 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    npj 2D Materials and Applications9, 22 (2025)

    Mondal, P.et al.Raman polarization switching in CrSBr. npj 2D Materials and Applications9, 22 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    I.et al.Interplay of vibrational, elec- tronic, and magnetic states in crsbr.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.10267(2025)

    Markina, D. I.et al.Interplay of vibrational, elec- tronic, and magnetic states in crsbr.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.10267(2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    Lin, K.et al.Strong exciton–phonon coupling as a fin- gerprint of magnetic ordering in van der Waals layered CrSBr.ACS Nano18, 2898–2905 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Tabataba-Vakili, F.et al.Doping-control of excitons and magnetism in few-layer CrSBr.Nature Communications 15, 4735 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Liu, J., Zhang, X. & Lu, G. Moir´ e magnetism and moir´ e excitons in twisted CrSBr bilayers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122, e2413326121 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    Heißenb¨ uttel, M.-C.et al.Quadratic optical response to a magnetic field in the layered magnet CrSBr.Physical Review B111, 075107 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    Nano Letters23, 11073–11081 (2023)

    Serati de Brito, C.et al.Charge transfer and asymmetric 8 coupling of MoSe2 valleys to the magnetic order of CrSBr. Nano Letters23, 11073–11081 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    & Coronado, E

    Marques-Moros, F., Boix-Constant, C., Ma˜ nas-Valero, S., Canet-Ferrer, J. & Coronado, E. Interplay between optical emission and magnetism in the van der Waals magnetic semiconductor CrSBr in the two-dimensional limit.ACS Nano17, 13224–13231 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    & Zhang, X

    Gong, C. & Zhang, X. Two-dimensional magnetic crys- tals and emergent heterostructure devices.Science363, eaav4450 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Zhong, D.et al.Layer-resolved magnetic proximity effect in van der waals heterostructures.Nature Nanotechnology 15, 187–191 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    & Ur- baszek, B

    Shree, S., Paradisanos, I., Marie, X., Robert, C. & Ur- baszek, B. Guide to optical spectroscopy of layered semi- conductors.Nature Reviews Physics3, 39–54 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Nature Materials23, 212–218 (2024)

    Boix-Constant, C.et al.Multistep magnetization switch- ing in orthogonally twisted ferromagnetic monolayers. Nature Materials23, 212–218 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Krelle, L.et al.Magnetic correlation spectroscopy in crsbr.ACS nano(2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Cham, T. M. J.et al.Anisotropic gigahertz antiferro- magnetic resonances of the easy-axis van der Waals anti- ferromagnet CrSBr.Nano Letters22, 6716–6723 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Henr ´ ıquez-Guerra, E.et al.Strain Engineering of Mag- netoresistance and Magnetic Anisotropy in CrSBr.Ad- vanced Materials2506695 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Song, T.et al.Switching 2D magnetic states via pressure tuning of layer stacking.Nature Materials18, 1298–1302 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Li, T.et al.Pressure-controlled interlayer magnetism in atomically thin CrI 3.Nature Materials18, 1303–1308 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    & Melkov, G.Magnetization Oscillations and Waves(Taylor & Francis, 1996)

    Gurevich, A. & Melkov, G.Magnetization Oscillations and Waves(Taylor & Francis, 1996). URLhttps:// books.google.de/books?id=YgQtSvFIvFQC

    1996

  39. [47]

    Possible ground states and parallel magnetic- field-driven phase transitions of collinear antiferromag- nets.npj Computational Materials2, 16032 (2016)

    Li, H.-F. Possible ground states and parallel magnetic- field-driven phase transitions of collinear antiferromag- nets.npj Computational Materials2, 16032 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    URLhttps:// books.google.de/books?id=eNHhKxXCJaEC

    Stewart, J.Multivariable Calculus: Concepts and Con- texts(Thomson Brooks/Cole, 2005). URLhttps:// books.google.de/books?id=eNHhKxXCJaEC. 1 SUPPLEMENT AR Y INFORMA TION Supplementary Note 1: Theoretical description of the magnetic state and hysteresis In this section, we detai...

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.