REVIEW 2 cited by
mLUKE: The Power of Entity Representations in Multilingual Pretrained Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recent studies have shown that multilingual pretrained language models can be effectively improved with cross-lingual alignment information from Wikipedia entities. However, existing methods only exploit entity information in pretraining and do not explicitly use entities in downstream tasks. In this study, we explore the effectiveness of leveraging entity representations for downstream cross-lingual tasks. We train a multilingual language model with 24 languages with entity representations and show the model consistently outperforms word-based pretrained models in various cross-lingual transfer tasks. We also analyze the model and the key insight is that incorporating entity representations into the input allows us to extract more language-agnostic features. We also evaluate the model with a multilingual cloze prompt task with the mLAMA dataset. We show that entity-based prompt elicits correct factual knowledge more likely than using only word representations. Our source code and pretrained models are available at https://github.com/studio-ousia/luke.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Comparative Performance of Advanced NLP Models and LLMs in Multilingual Geo-Entity Detection
Across a small multilingual Telegram corpus, GPT-4 and XLM-RoBERTa achieve the best geo-entity F1 scores, while SpaCy and mLUKE score zero on Arabic and GeoLM collapses outside English.
-
Can bidirectional encoder become the ultimate winner for downstream applications of foundation models?
A review of bidirectional encoder models (BERT and variants) and their performance on GLUE and SQuAD relative to one-way generative models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.