Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 53 references

Multi-Modal Semantic Segmentation of Electrolyzer Components for Sustainable Hydrogen Technologies: A Dual-Branch Deep Learning Approach

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read HREM-Net, a dual-branch network combining hyperspectral and RGB images, claims 98.62% pixel accuracy and 0.8211 mIoU for segmenting electrolyzer materials, aiming to automate recycling in hydrogen technologies.

desk verdict The electrolyzer numbers look plausible, but the 'cross-dataset generalization' claim is an overstatement — Table 6 is just per-dataset five-fold CV. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.16056 v1 pith:QCU27VHY submitted 2026-07-17 cs.CV

Wasimul Karim , Nur Mohammad Fahad , Abdul Hasib Siddique , Md Rafiqul Islam , Hooman Mehdizadeh-Rad , Asif Karim , Sami Azam This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords electrolyzerhyperspectralimagingsemanticsegmentationcross-modalfusionattentionmechanismclassimbalancecompositelossrecycling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

HREM-Net is a deep-learning architecture that processes hyperspectral and RGB images in parallel to label electrolyzer components — mesh, steel variants, and HTEL electrodes — at the pixel level. The paper's central claim is that this dual-branch approach, with attention-based gating and a composite loss, reaches 98.62% pixel accuracy and 0.8211 mean IoU on the Electrolyzers-HSI dataset, sharply above standard segmentation baselines. If true, it would give recycling robots a way to tell apart visually similar materials such as Steel-Black and Steel-Grey, which RGB alone cannot reliably separate. The authors also report 96.91% accuracy on the PCB-Vision dataset and call this cross-dataset generalization, though the paper's protocol for that evaluation is ambiguous.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is an adaptive gated cross-modal fusion module that projects hyperspectral and RGB features into a shared space, applies coordinate attention to let them interact, then computes scene-dependent weights (α, β) from global pooling so the network can favor the more informative modality per image. Around that pivot sit a spectral compression stage (1×1 convolutions with Efficient Channel Attention), MBConv blocks with squeeze-excitation, atrous spatial pyramid pooling for multi-scale context, and a composite loss combining PolyLoss, Tversky loss, and auxiliary deep supervision.

What would settle it

Train HREM-Net on Electrolyzers-HSI only, freeze the weights, and evaluate on PCB-Vision; if mIoU falls far below the reported 0.9396, the cross-dataset generalization claim collapses. A secondary check: repeat five-fold cross-validation multiple times and see whether mIoU values as low as fold 4's 0.6676 recur; if they do, the 0.8211 average is not stable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that a dual-branch encoder–decoder — a spectral branch that compresses 36-band hyperspectral input with channel attention, and a spatial branch that processes RGB with efficient mobile blocks — fused through a gated cross-modal module, can label five electrolyzer material classes with high regional overlap. The discriminating power comes from letting each modality specialize: spectral signatures separate chemically different but visually similar materials, while RGB provides boundary detail. The composite loss (PolyLoss weighted with Tversky and auxiliary deep supervision) is what allows the model to keep minority classes visible under severe class imb

Load-bearing premise

The claim that HREM-Net generalizes across datasets rests on the unstated assumption that the PCB-Vision evaluation was a transfer experiment — model trained only on Electrolyzers-HSI then evaluated on PCB-Vision — whereas the paper actually reports five-fold cross-validation on PCB-Vision itself; the strong headline numbers also assume that five-fold averages over 55 scenes are representative despite a fold with 0.6676 mIoU.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the performance holds, robotics disassembly lines could use HSI+RGB cameras to separate electrolyzer materials by pixel-level labels, avoiding cross-material contamination during recycling.
  • The gated fusion suggests that scene-adaptive modality weighting can be applied to other close-range industrial sorting tasks where material appearance varies with lighting or oxidation.
  • The composite loss recipe (PolyLoss + Tversky + auxiliary supervision) is a portable answer to class imbalance in fine-grained material segmentation.
  • The reported PCB-Vision numbers, if they reflect genuine transfer, would imply the architecture can generalize to other e-waste streams with no retraining.
  • Because the model compresses 360 spectral bands to 36, the method is computationally plausible for real-time sorting if the spatial branch is light.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A true transfer test — training strictly on Electrolyzers-HSI and freezing weights before evaluating on PCB-Vision — would be the clean way to validate the generalization claim; the current five-fold cross-validation on PCB-Vision does not itself show cross-dataset transfer.
  • The large fold-to-fold swing (mIoU 0.6676 to 0.9004) hints that 55 scenes is a thin basis for a headline number; a leave-dataset-out or bootstrapped confidence interval would give a more honest uncertainty estimate.
  • The gating weights α and β are interpretable per scene: inspecting them could reveal when spectral information carries the decision (e.g., Steel-Black vs Steel-Grey) versus when RGB boundaries dominate, potentially guiding sensor selection or active illumination.
  • The architecture is not tied to electrolyzers: the same dual-branch + gated fusion recipe could be benchmarked on other HSI-RGB industrial datasets (e.g., minerals, textiles, food sorting) where spectral overlap and class imbalance co-occur.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes HREM-Net, a dual-branch encoder-decoder for semantic segmentation of electrolyzer materials from co-registered hyperspectral (HSI) and RGB images. The HSI branch uses spectral compression with ECA, MBConv blocks, Coordinate Attention, and ASPP; the RGB branch uses MBConv and Coordinate Attention. The branches are fused with a coordinate-attention gated module, and training uses a composite loss of PolyLoss, Tversky loss, and auxiliary deep supervision. On Electrolyzers-HSI, five-fold cross-validation yields 98.62% pixel accuracy, 91.66% mean class accuracy, and 0.8211 mIoU, which the authors claim outperforms U-Net, U-Net++, DeepLabV3+, and TransUNet. The paper also reports 96.91% mean class accuracy and 0.9396 mIoU on PCB-Vision and presents this as 'cross-dataset validation' demonstrating strong generalization.

Significance. If the central claims hold, HREM-Net would be a practically useful model for automated electrolyzer disassembly and recycling, a relevant sustainability application. The paper has several strengths: it uses two public datasets, reports per-fold tables and confusion matrices, and includes an ablation study. The claimed core improvement on Electrolyzers-HSI is plausible and worth pursuing. However, the 'strong generalization' claim is not supported by the stated protocol, the baseline comparison is under-specified, and the reported averages lack error bars. These issues prevent the paper from being accepted in its current form, but they are addressable with a properly designed transfer experiment or a re-scoped claim, plus clearer experimental reporting.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.4, Table 6, §4.3] The title 'Cross Dataset Validation' and the Abstract's claim that 'Cross-dataset validation on the PCB-Vision dataset demonstrates strong generalization' are not supported by the described protocol. Section 4.3 says five-fold cross-validation is adopted for both datasets, and Table 6 reports per-fold results on PCB-Vision (folds 1–5). Nowhere does the text state that HREM-Net was trained on Electrolyzers-HSI and then evaluated on PCB-Vision. Moreover, the datasets have different spectral ranges: Electrolyzers-HSI is preprocessed to 36 bands over 400–2500 nm while PCB-Vision is VNIR 400–1000 nm (§4.1–4.2), so a genuine transfer would require an explicit band-matching or adaptation step that is never described. Please either conduct a real cross-dataset transfer experiment with a documented band-selection protocol, or rephrase Section 5.4 and the Abstract as 'evaluation on a second datase
  2. [§5.2, Table 4] The claim that HREM-Net 'outperforms' SOTA baselines depends on the baseline input protocol, which is not specified. U-Net, U-Net++, DeepLabV3+, and TransUNet are standard RGB architectures, but no sentence describes what inputs they received: RGB only, 36-band HSI only, or both modalities. If the baselines were trained on RGB only, the comparison conflates the dual-modality input with the architecture, making the result unsurprising; if they were adapted for HSI, the adaptation is not described. In addition, Table 4 reports only single aggregate numbers without per-fold means, standard deviations, or significance tests, which is especially important given the large fold variance in Table 3. Please specify the exact input configuration and training setup for each baseline and add per-fold statistics or significance tests.
  3. [Table 3] The overall Electrolyzers-HSI numbers are less robust than the text suggests. Fold 4 has mIoU 0.6676 and mean class accuracy 79.10%, versus overall values of 0.8211 and 91.66%; the paper provides no standard deviations or confidence intervals across the five folds. With only 55 scenes, statements such as 'the remaining folds show consistently strong results, confirming the overall robustness' are not justified from the reported table. Please report per-fold variance or confidence intervals, and preferably a paired statistical test comparing HREM-Net with baselines across folds.
  4. [§5.5, Table 7] The ablation study is incomplete relative to the claimed contributions. Table 7 toggles only MBConv, ECA, ASPP, and Tversky loss. It never ablates PolyLoss, auxiliary deep supervision, Coordinate Attention, or the gated cross-modal fusion module, although these are described as core components in Sections 3.3–3.6. Consequently, the sentence 'the strong performance ... arises from the effective integration of all architectural elements' is not supported by the data. Please add ablations for each loss term and for the gated fusion, and report mean class accuracy and per-fold variance in addition to mIoU.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§5.1 vs §4.1] Section 5.1 says there are 'six classes, including the background class,' while Section 4.1 and Table 2 list five material classes. Clarify whether background is a class and update all counts consistently.
  2. [Figure 5] The confusion matrices label classes as 'Class 1', 'Class 2', etc., without mapping to the actual material names (Mesh, Steel-Black, etc.). Add a legend or axis labels.
  3. [§5.1, Table 3] mAP@0.5 is reported as a segmentation metric, but no object-detection head is described anywhere in the architecture. Define how mAP@0.5 is computed for pixel-wise segmentation masks.
  4. [§3.6] The composite-loss weights and the PolyLoss epsilon are fixed manually (w_poly=1.0, w_tv=0.5, w_aux=0.4, epsilon=1.0) without sensitivity analysis. A brief sensitivity study or justification would strengthen the claim that the composite loss is beneficial.
  5. [§3.1, Table 7] Typos: 'extebded' in Section 3.1 and 'MBCov' in Table 7 should be 'MBConv'. Please proofread.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the paper reports empirical benchmark results with no fit-to-target or self-citation chain.

full rationale

This paper is an empirical deep-learning systems paper: HREM-Net is trained on public datasets (Electrolyzers-HSI, PCB-Vision) and evaluated with five-fold cross-validation. There is no theoretical derivation in which a predicted quantity is defined in terms of the quantity it claims to predict, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Loss weights (wpoly=1.0, wtv=0.5, waux=0.4) and loss hyperparameters (epsilon=1.0, alpha=0.7, beta=0.3) are fixed by hand rather than optimized against the test targets, so the reported mIoU/accuracy numbers are genuine empirical outputs. The paper contains no load-bearing self-citations: the reference list does not reveal the present authors citing their own prior work as the basis for the architecture or the results. The only notable issue is in Section 5.4, where the phrase 'cross-dataset validation' in the Abstract is used to describe five-fold cross-validation on PCB-Vision (per Table 6 and Section 4.3), rather than a transfer of weights trained on Electrolyzers-HSI to PCB-Vision. That is a protocol-claim mismatch and a correctness/generalization concern, but it is not circularity: evaluating the same architecture on a second dataset with its own training folds does not make the result equivalent to the input by construction. Similarly, the high fold-4 variance on Electrolyzers-HSI is a robustness concern, not a circularity. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 13 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contains no theoretical derivation; all conclusions rest on the empirical training/evaluation configuration. The ledger lists the hand-set hyperparameters and dataset assumptions on which the reported performance depends. No new physical or architectural entities are invented beyond an artless combination of existing modules.

free parameters (13)
  • PolyLoss weight w_poly = 1.0
    Term weight in composite loss (Eq. 16); fixed without sensitivity analysis.
  • Tversky loss weight w_tv = 0.5
    Term weight in composite loss (Eq. 16); fixed without sensitivity analysis.
  • Auxiliary loss weight w_aux = 0.4
    Term weight in composite loss (Eq. 16); fixed without sensitivity analysis.
  • Tversky alpha = 0.7
    False-positive penalty in Eq. 18; chosen to emphasize recall, no ablation.
  • Tversky beta = 0.3
    False-negative penalty in Eq. 18; chosen, no ablation.
  • PolyLoss epsilon = 1.0
    Strength of polynomial term in Eq. 17; chosen, no sensitivity study.
  • Coordinate Attention reduction ratio r = 8
    Channel reduction in Eq. 7 and Eq. 11; chosen for both HSI and RGB branches.
  • MBConv expansion factor = 4
    Channel expansion used in Algorithm 1 and Algorithm 2; chosen without discussion.
  • ASPP dilation rates = Eq. 9: {1,3,6,9}; Algorithm 1: [3,6,9]
    Multi-scale context rates; inconsistent between Eq. 9 and Algorithm 1.
  • Spectral binning group size = 10
    Averaging bands to obtain 36 bands (Section 4.2); pre-processing choice affecting input features.
  • Noisy band removal = first 50, last 40
    Reduces 450 bands to 360 before binning (Section 4.2); choice not justified quantitatively.
  • Percentile clipping bounds = 1st and 99th
    Normalization bound in Section 4.2; choice not justified quantitatively.
  • Base embedding dimension Dbase
    Defined in algorithms but never given a numeric value; a free architectural constant the reader cannot reproduce.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Hyperspectral and RGB images are spatially co-registered; the only spatial alignment step is resizing RGB to HSI resolution.
    Section 3.1 assumes aligned x_h and x_r; Section 4.2 describes resizing but no registration or correction.
  • domain assumption Averaging bands in groups of 10, after removing 50+40 bands, preserves material-discriminative spectral information.
    Section 4.2 pre-processing relies on this; no spectral-quality comparison is provided.
  • domain assumption Five-fold cross-validation on 55 scenes is representative despite large fold-to-fold variance.
    Section 5.1 and Table 3 show fold-4 mIoU 0.6676 vs overall 0.8211; the headline averages assume this variance is acceptable.
  • ad hoc to paper Composite loss hyperparameters (w_poly, w_tv, w_aux, alpha, beta, epsilon) are valid without sensitivity analysis.
    Section 3.6 fixes them; no ablation varies these weights to show robustness.
  • domain assumption Standard backpropagation with unspecified optimizer, learning rate, epochs, batch size, and seed converges to the reported optimum.
    Section 4.3 gives hardware and OS but omits all optimization details, so the reported numbers rest on an unstated training protocol.
  • domain assumption The comparison metrics are computed under the same protocol for HREM-Net and all baselines.
    Section 5.2 states 'same evaluation metrics' but does not state whether baselines receive RGB, HSI, or both inputs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-Modal Semantic Segmentation of Electrolyzer Components for Sustainable Hydrogen Technologies: A Dual-Branch Deep Learning Approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QCU27VHY

@misc{pith2026260716056,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-Modal Semantic Segmentation of Electrolyzer Components for Sustainable Hydrogen Technologies: A Dual-Branch Deep Learning Approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QCU27VHY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.16056}
}
read the original abstract

Accurate segmentation of electrolyzer materials is essential for automated disassembly, sustainable recycling, and circular manufacturing in hydrogen technologies. However, this task is challenging due to strong visual similarity between materials, spectral overlap, irregular shapes, and severe class imbalance. To address these challenges, we propose an AI-driven dual-branch framework, Hyperspectral-RGB Electrolyzer Materials Network (HREM-Net), that combines hyperspectral imaging (HSI) and RGB images for electrolyzer material segmentation. We implemented several innovative modules, including Efficient Channel Attention, Coordinate Attention, Mobile Inverted Bottleneck blocks, and Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling to capture spectral and spatial features from HSI, and RGB images. With an adaptive gated cross-modal fusion module and composite loss function, HREM-Net achieves a mean class accuracy of 91.66% and a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 0.82 on the Electrolyzers-HSI dataset, outperforming baseline segmentation models. Cross-dataset validation on the PCB-Vision dataset demonstrates strong generalization with 96.91% accuracy and 0.93 mIoU. This work poses its potential as an industrial application to improve electrolyzer efficiency, thereby improving the predictive maintenance of hydrogen production.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pcb-vision: A multiscene rgb-hyperspectral benchmark dataset of printed circuit boards

    Elias Arbash, Margret Fuchs, Behnood Rasti, Sandra Lorenz, Pedram Ghamisi, and Richard Gloaguen. Pcb-vision: A multiscene rgb-hyperspectral benchmark dataset of printed circuit boards. IEEE Sensors Journal, 24 0 (10): 0 17140--17158, 2024. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2024.3380826. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2024.3380826

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Electrolyzers-hsi: Close-range multi-scene hyperspectral imaging benchmark dataset

    Elias Arbash, Ahmed Jamal Afifi, Ymane Belahsen, Margret Fuchs, Pedram Ghamisi, Paul Scheunders, and Richard Gloaguen. Electrolyzers-hsi: Close-range multi-scene hyperspectral imaging benchmark dataset. Scientific Data, 12 0 (1): 0 1818, 2025. doi:10.1038/s41597-025-06279-9. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-06279-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41597-025-06279-9 2025

  3. [3]

    Towards greater circularity in the hydrogen technology value chain

    Marie Axt, Brian Baldassarre, and Julian Kirchherr. Towards greater circularity in the hydrogen technology value chain. Ecological Economics, 236: 0 108679, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108679. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108679

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Wastegan: Data augmentation for robotic waste sorting through generative adversarial networks

    Alberto Bacchin, Leonardo Barcellona, Matteo Terreran, Stefano Ghidoni, Emanuele Menegatti, and Takuya Kiyokawa. Wastegan: Data augmentation for robotic waste sorting through generative adversarial networks. In 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 5080--5087. IEEE, 2024. doi:10.1109/IROS58592.2024.10802403...

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Transunet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation

    Jieneng Chen, Yongyi Lu, Qihang Yu, Xiangde Luo, Ehsan Adeli, Yan Wang, Le Lu, Alan L Yuille, and Yuyin Zhou. Transunet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04306, 2021. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2102.04306. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.04306

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.04306 2021

  6. [6]

    Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation

    Liang-Chieh Chen, Yukun Zhu, George Papandreou, Florian Schroff, and Hartwig Adam. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 801--818, 2018. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_49. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_49

    doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_49 2018

  7. [7]

    Domestic waste detection and grasping points for robotic picking up

    V De Gea, S Puente, and P Gil. Domestic waste detection and grasping points for robotic picking up. arXiv preprint arXiv.2105.06825, 2021. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2105.06825. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.06825

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.06825 2021

  8. [8]

    End-of-life of fuel cell and hydrogen products: A state of the art

    Ana Mar \' a F \'e rriz, Alfonso Bernad, Mitja Mori, and Sabina Fiorot. End-of-life of fuel cell and hydrogen products: A state of the art. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44 0 (25): 0 12872--12879, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.176. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.176

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.176 2019

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Vision based process monitoring in wire arc additive manufacturing (waam)

    Jan Franke, Florian Heinrich, and Raven T Reisch. Vision based process monitoring in wire arc additive manufacturing (waam). Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 36 0 (3): 0 1711--1721, 2025. doi:10.1007/s10845-023-02287-x. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-023-02287-x

    2025 doi

  2. [10]

    Dual attention network for scene segmentation

    Jun Fu, Jing Liu, Haijie Tian, Yong Li, Yongjun Bao, Zhiwei Fang, and Hanqing Lu. Dual attention network for scene segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3146--3154, 2019. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2019.00326. URL https...

    2019

  3. [11]

    Cafnet: Cross-modal adaptive fusion network with attention and gated weighting for rgb-t semantic segmentation

    Meili Fu, Huanliang Sun, Zhihan Chen, and Lulin Wei. Cafnet: Cross-modal adaptive fusion network with attention and gated weighting for rgb-t semantic segmentation. IEEE Access, 2025. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3595811. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3595811

    2025

  4. [12]

    u hmstedt, Gunther Notni, and Andreas T \

    Stefan Heist, Chen Zhang, Karl Reichwald, Peter K \"u hmstedt, Gunther Notni, and Andreas T \"u nnermann. 5d hyperspectral imaging: fast and accurate measurement of surface shape and spectral characteristics using structured light. Optics express, 26 0 (18): 0 23366--23379, 20...

    2018 doi

  5. [13]

    Coordinate attention for efficient mobile network design

    Qibin Hou, Daquan Zhou, and Jiashi Feng. Coordinate attention for efficient mobile network design. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 13713--13722, 2021. doi:10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01350. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR...

    2021

  6. [14]

    Data-centric approach for instance segmentation in optical waste sorting

    Anna Iliushina, Gleb Mazanov, Sergey Nesteruk, Andrey Pimenov, Anton Stepanov, Nadezhda Mikhaylova, Anna Baldycheva, and Andrey Somov. Data-centric approach for instance segmentation in optical waste sorting. Waste Management, 191: 0 70--80, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2024.11....

    2025 doi

  7. [15]

    A survey of hydrogen electrolyzer technologies for canada’s clean energy transition

    Shafay Ishtiaq, Luiz AC Lopes, and Yanick Paquet. A survey of hydrogen electrolyzer technologies for canada’s clean energy transition. Energies, 19 0 (1): 0 49, 2025. doi:10.3390/en19010049. URL https://doi.org/10.3390/en19010049

    2025 doi

  8. [16]

    Life-cycle analysis of hydrogen production from water electrolyzers

    Rakesh Krishnamoorthy Iyer, Jacob H Prosser, Jarod C Kelly, Brian D James, and Amgad Elgowainy. Life-cycle analysis of hydrogen production from water electrolyzers. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 81: 0 1467--1478, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.355. URL https:...

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    An ensemble learning approach towards waste segmentation in cluttered environment

    Maimoona Jafar, Syed Imran Ali, Ahsan Saadat, Muhammad Bilal, and Shah Khalid. An ensemble learning approach towards waste segmentation in cluttered environment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.13681, 2026. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.13681. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.13681

    2026 doi

  10. [18]

    Rednet: Residual encoder-decoder network for indoor rgb-d semantic segmentation

    Jindong Jiang, Lunan Zheng, Fei Luo, and Zhijun Zhang. Rednet: Residual encoder-decoder network for indoor rgb-d semantic segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.01054, 2018. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1806.01054. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1806.01054

    2018 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    Smfps: A semi-supervised multi-modal fusion method for rgbd particle segmentation of industrial materials

    Zhaohui Jiang, Nuoyahui Li, Haoyang Yu, Dong Pan, and Weihua Gui. Smfps: A semi-supervised multi-modal fusion method for rgbd particle segmentation of industrial materials. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 69: 0 103915, 2026. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2025.103915. URL https://doi.org...

    2026

  12. [20]

    Global-aware interaction network for rgb-d salient object detection

    Zijian Jiang, Ling Yu, Yu Han, Junru Li, and Fanglin Niu. Global-aware interaction network for rgb-d salient object detection. Neurocomputing, 621: 0 129204, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.129204. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.129204

    2025

  13. [21]

    u nner, Dominik Goes, Jeraldine Lastam, Shine-Od Mongoljiibuu, Stephan Sarner, Alexander Specht, J \

    Carlo Kaiser, Sohyun Ahn, Martin Br \"u nner, Dominik Goes, Jeraldine Lastam, Shine-Od Mongoljiibuu, Stephan Sarner, Alexander Specht, J \"u rgen Fleischer, Norbert H Menzler, et al. Recycling of solid oxide electrolyzer stacks. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, page e01...

    2025 doi

  14. [22]

    Strategies for life cycle impact reduction of green hydrogen production--influence of electrolyser value chain design

    Muhammad Haider Ali Khan, Tarun Sitaraman, Nawshad Haque, Greg Leslie, Serkan Saydam, Rahman Daiyan, Rose Amal, and Sami Kara. Strategies for life cycle impact reduction of green hydrogen production--influence of electrolyser value chain design. International Journal of Hydrog...

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    Multi-modal sorting in plastic and wood waste streams

    Fotios K Konstantinidis, Savvas Sifnaios, George Arvanitakis, Georgios Tsimiklis, Spyridon G Mouroutsos, Angelos Amditis, and Antonios Gasteratos. Multi-modal sorting in plastic and wood waste streams. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 199: 0 107244, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.r...

    2023

  16. [24]

    Robotic waste sorting technology: Toward a vision-based categorization system for the industrial robotic separation of recyclable waste

    Maria Koskinopoulou, Fredy Raptopoulos, George Papadopoulos, Nikitas Mavrakis, and Michail Maniadakis. Robotic waste sorting technology: Toward a vision-based categorization system for the industrial robotic separation of recyclable waste. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, ...

    2021

  17. [25]

    Deeply-supervised nets

    Chen-Yu Lee, Saining Xie, Patrick Gallagher, Zhengyou Zhang, and Zhuowen Tu. Deeply-supervised nets. In Artificial intelligence and statistics, pages 562--570. Pmlr, 2015

    2015

  18. [26]

    Polyloss: A polynomial expansion perspective of classification loss functions

    Zhaoqi Leng, Mingxing Tan, Chenxi Liu, Ekin Dogus Cubuk, Xiaojie Shi, Shuyang Cheng, and Dragomir Anguelov. Polyloss: A polynomial expansion perspective of classification loss functions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.12511, 2022. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2204.12511. URL https://doi.org/...

    2022 doi arXiv

  19. [27]

    Cascaded hierarchical atrous spatial pyramid pooling module for semantic segmentation

    Xuhang Lian, Yanwei Pang, Jungong Han, and Jing Pan. Cascaded hierarchical atrous spatial pyramid pooling module for semantic segmentation. Pattern Recognition, 110: 0 107622, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107622. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107622

    2021

  20. [28]

    Life-cycle assessment of hydrogen technologies with the focus on eu critical raw materials and end-of-life strategies

    Andrej Lotri c , Mihael Sekav c nik, Igor Ku s trin, and Mitja Mori. Life-cycle assessment of hydrogen technologies with the focus on eu critical raw materials and end-of-life strategies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46 0 (16): 0 10143--10160, 2021. doi:10.1016/j....

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    Using computer vision to recognize composition of construction waste mixtures: A semantic segmentation approach

    Weisheng Lu, Junjie Chen, and Fan Xue. Using computer vision to recognize composition of construction waste mixtures: A semantic segmentation approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 178: 0 106022, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106022. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/...

    2022

  22. [30]

    Loss odyssey in medical image segmentation

    Jun Ma, Jianan Chen, Matthew Ng, Rui Huang, Yu Li, Chen Li, Xiaoping Yang, and Anne L Martel. Loss odyssey in medical image segmentation. Medical image analysis, 71: 0 102035, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102035. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102035

    2021

  23. [31]

    Hyperspectral band selection for multispectral image classification with convolutional networks

    Giorgio Morales, John Sheppard, Riley Logan, and Joseph Shaw. Hyperspectral band selection for multispectral image classification with convolutional networks. In 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pages 1--8. IEEE, 2021. doi:10.1109/IJCNN52387.2021...

    2021

  24. [32]

    Hyperspectral dataset and deep learning methods for waste from electric and electronic equipment identification (weee)

    Artzai Picon, Pablo Galan, Arantza Bereciartua-Perez, and Leire Benito-del Valle. Hyperspectral dataset and deep learning methods for waste from electric and electronic equipment identification (weee). arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.04505, 2024. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.04505. URL h...

    2024 doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    Wasteinnet: Deep learning model for real-time identification of various types of waste

    Alam Rahmatulloh, Irfan Darmawan, Aldy Putra Aldya, and Firmansyah Maulana Sugiartana Nursuwars. Wasteinnet: Deep learning model for real-time identification of various types of waste. Cleaner Waste Systems, 10: 0 100198, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100198. URL https://doi....

    2025

  26. [34]

    U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation

    Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pages 234--241. Springer, 2015. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28. URL...

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    Tversky loss function for image segmentation using 3d fully convolutional deep networks

    Seyed Sadegh Mohseni Salehi, Deniz Erdogmus, and Ali Gholipour. Tversky loss function for image segmentation using 3d fully convolutional deep networks. In International workshop on machine learning in medical imaging, pages 379--387. Springer, 2017. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-6738...

    2017 doi

  28. [36]

    Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks

    Mark Sandler, Andrew Howard, Menglong Zhu, Andrey Zhmoginov, and Liang-Chieh Chen. Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4510--4520, 2018. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474. URL...

    2018

  29. [37]

    Automated electro-construction waste sorting: Computer vision for part-level segmentation

    Aseni Senanayake and Mehrdad Arashpour. Automated electro-construction waste sorting: Computer vision for part-level segmentation. Waste Management, 203: 0 114883, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114883. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114883

    2025

  30. [38]

    Expansion-squeeze-excitation fusion network for elderly activity recognition

    Xiangbo Shu, Jiawen Yang, Rui Yan, and Yan Song. Expansion-squeeze-excitation fusion network for elderly activity recognition. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 32 0 (8): 0 5281--5292, 2022. doi:10.1109/TCSVT.2022.3142771. URL https://doi.org/10.1...

    2022

  31. [39]

    Image analysis and quantification on solid oxide fuel cell anode through inspired cnn based u-net architecture

    Kar Shen Tan, Wee Choon Tan, Chee Kiang Lam, and Heap Sheng Ooi. Image analysis and quantification on solid oxide fuel cell anode through inspired cnn based u-net architecture. Results in Engineering, page 109037, 2026. doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2026.109037. URL https://doi.org/10....

    2026

  32. [40]

    Deep learning for full-feature x-ray microcomputed tomography segmentation of proton electron membrane fuel cells

    Kunning Tang, Quentin Meyer, Robin White, Ryan T Armstrong, Peyman Mostaghimi, Ying Da Wang, Shiyang Liu, Chuan Zhao, Klaus Regenauer-Lieb, and Patrick Kin Man Tung. Deep learning for full-feature x-ray microcomputed tomography segmentation of proton electron membrane fuel cel...

    2022

  33. [41]

    Electrolyzer and fuel cell recycling for a circular hydrogen economy

    Taylor Uekert, Hope M Wikoff, and Alex Badgett. Electrolyzer and fuel cell recycling for a circular hydrogen economy. Advanced Sustainable Systems, 8 0 (4): 0 2300449, 2024. doi:10.1002/adsu.202300449. URL https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202300449

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    End of life of fuel cells and hydrogen products: From technologies to strategies

    Antonio Valente, Diego Iribarren, and Javier Dufour. End of life of fuel cells and hydrogen products: From technologies to strategies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44 0 (38): 0 20965--20977, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.110. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.i...

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    Image segmentation network based on enhanced dual encoder

    Depeng Wang, Yibo Sun, Hong Chen, and Xiaolei Zhao. Image segmentation network based on enhanced dual encoder. Scientific Reports, 15 0 (1): 0 35983, 2025 a . doi:10.1038/s41598-025-15274-4. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15274-4

    2025 doi

  36. [44]

    Eca-net: Efficient channel attention for deep convolutional neural networks

    Qilong Wang, Banggu Wu, Pengfei Zhu, Peihua Li, Wangmeng Zuo, and Qinghua Hu. Eca-net: Efficient channel attention for deep convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 11534--11542, 2020. doi:10.110...

    2020

  37. [45]

    Cross-modal retrieval: a systematic review of methods and future directions

    Tianshi Wang, Fengling Li, Lei Zhu, Jingjing Li, Zheng Zhang, and Heng Tao Shen. Cross-modal retrieval: a systematic review of methods and future directions. Proceedings of the IEEE, 112 0 (11): 0 1716--1754, 2025 b . doi:10.1109/JPROC.2024.3525147. URL https://doi.org/10.1109...

    2025

  38. [46]

    Modelling and condition-based control of a flexible and hybrid disassembly system with manual and autonomous workstations using reinforcement learning

    Marco Wurster, Marius Michel, Marvin Carl May, Andreas Kuhnle, Nicole Stricker, and Gisela Lanza. Modelling and condition-based control of a flexible and hybrid disassembly system with manual and autonomous workstations using reinforcement learning. Journal of Intelligent Manu...

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    Complementary information-guided interactive fusion network for hsi and lidar data joint classification

    Shufang Xu, Qiyuan Xue, Zhonghao Chen, Shuyu Fei, and Hongmin Gao. Complementary information-guided interactive fusion network for hsi and lidar data joint classification. Expert Systems with Applications, page 129549, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129549. URL https://doi.org/...

    2025

  40. [48]

    Unified focal loss: Generalising dice and cross entropy-based losses to handle class imbalanced medical image segmentation

    Michael Yeung, Evis Sala, Carola-Bibiane Sch \"o nlieb, and Leonardo Rundo. Unified focal loss: Generalising dice and cross entropy-based losses to handle class imbalanced medical image segmentation. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 95: 0 102026, 2022. doi:10.1016/j....

    2022

  41. [49]

    Leveraging computer vision towards high-efficiency autonomous industrial facilities

    Ibrahim Yousif, Liam Burns, Fadi El Kalach, and Ramy Harik. Leveraging computer vision towards high-efficiency autonomous industrial facilities. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 36 0 (5): 0 2983--3008, 2025. doi:10.1007/s10845-024-02396-1. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s108...

    2025 doi

  42. [50]

    Hierarchical waste detection with weakly supervised segmentation in images from recycling plants

    Dmitry Yudin, Nikita Zakharenko, Artem Smetanin, Roman Filonov, Margarita Kichik, Vladislav Kuznetsov, Dmitry Larichev, Evgeny Gudov, Semen Budennyy, and Aleksandr Panov. Hierarchical waste detection with weakly supervised segmentation in images from recycling plants. Engineer...

    2024

  43. [51]

    Generative ai in industrial machine vision: a review

    Hans Aoyang Zhou, Dominik Wolfschl \"a ger, Constantinos Florides, Jonas Werheid, Hannes Behnen, Jan-Henrik Woltersmann, Tiago C Pinto, Marco Kemmerling, Anas Abdelrazeq, and Robert H Schmitt. Generative ai in industrial machine vision: a review. Journal of Intelligent Manufac...

    2026 doi

  44. [52]

    Unet++: A nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation

    Zongwei Zhou, Md Mahfuzur Rahman Siddiquee, Nima Tajbakhsh, and Jianming Liang. Unet++: A nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation. In International workshop on deep learning in medical image analysis, pages 3--11. Springer, 2018. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00889-5_...

    2018 doi

  45. [53]

    Hyperspectral image denoising and anomaly detection based on low-rank and sparse representations

    Lina Zhuang, Lianru Gao, Bing Zhang, Xiyou Fu, and Jos \'e M Bioucas-Dias. Hyperspectral image denoising and anomaly detection based on low-rank and sparse representations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60: 0 1--17, 2020. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2020.3040221. UR...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.