Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Deep Dive into Bitcoin Mining Pools: An Empirical Analysis of Mining Shares

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.05999 v1 pith:QDHEEZVO submitted 2019-05-15 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords miningpoolsbitcoinactorsanalysiscryptocurrenciesdistributioneconomic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Miners play a key role in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin: they invest substantial computational resources in processing transactions and minting new currency units. It is well known that an attacker controlling more than half of the network's mining power could manipulate the state of the system at will. While the influence of large mining pools appears evenly split, the actual distribution of mining power within these pools and their economic relationships with other actors remain undisclosed. To this end, we conduct the first in-depth analysis of mining reward distribution within three of the four largest Bitcoin mining pools and examine their cross-pool economic relationships. Our results suggest that individual miners are simultaneously operating across all three pools and that in each analyzed pool a small number of actors (<= 20) receives over 50% of all BTC payouts. While the extent of an operator's control over the resources of a mining pool remains an open debate, our findings are in line with previous research, pointing out centralization tendencies in large mining pools and cryptocurrencies in general.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SoK: Measuring Blockchain Decentralization

    cs.CR 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematization of blockchain decentralization measurement plus an empirical factor analysis suggesting that in PoW systems participation and decentralization are distinct signals, while in PoS they align.

Pith tools