Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Electron-Phonon Coupling in Correlated Metals: A Dynamical Mean-Field Theory Study

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper defines electron-phonon coupling beyond DFT as the phonon derivative of the Kohn-Sham potential plus the DMFT self-energy, and shows that in SrVO3 correlation nearly doubles a Jahn-Teller coupling while in CaCuO2 it creates a…

desk verdict First direct DFT+DMFT electron-phonon matrix elements, with a clean definition — but the headline frequency dependence rests on Padé continuation of noisy self-energy differences, so treat the omega-dependent curves as provisional. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.03958 v2 pith:QDJF4BZJ submitted 2025-05-06 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 71.38.-k71.27.+a
keywords electron-phononcouplingdynamicalmean-fieldtheoryDFT+DMFTfrequency-dependentSrVO3CaCuO2Jahn-Tellerphononlinewidth
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a practical definition of electron-phonon coupling for strongly correlated metals, going beyond density functional theory by treating the coupling as the phonon derivative of the Kohn-Sham potential plus the dynamical mean-field self-energy. It claims that this quantity can be computed by finite-difference DFT+DMFT, and applies the method to two materials. In SrVO3, local correlation nearly doubles the Wannier-local coupling of an M-point Jahn-Teller mode (44 meV in DFT to 87 meV at $\omega=0$ in DFT+DMFT) while slightly reducing the R-point breathing mode (58 to 50 meV). In CaCuO2 the zero-frequency couplings change only moderately, but the frequency dependence is strong, grows with $U$, and changes sign with doping. The paper's conclusion is that static correlation corrections such as DFT+U and hybrid functionals miss a genuinely dynamical piece of electron-phonon physics.

What carries the argument

The central object is the frequency-dependent many-body coupling $g(\omega)$, defined as the phonon derivative of $\hat V_{\mathrm{KS}}+\hat\Sigma(\omega)$ projected onto Kohn-Sham states. The machinery that carries the argument is a finite-difference DFT+DMFT workflow: a supercell is distorted along a DFPT phonon eigenvector by a scale $\alpha=1/2$, the impurity self-energies on the inequivalent sites are recomputed, and the difference $\hat\Sigma_{\mathrm{ph}}-\hat\Sigma_{\mathrm{cn}}$ is upfolded to the band basis and added to the DFPT Kohn-Sham derivative. The frequency dependence of the self-energy difference, converted to real frequencies by analytic continuation, is what produces the claimed dynamical renormalization of the coupling.

What would settle it

Repeat the finite-difference DFT+DMFT calculation for the CaCuO2 M-mode with $\alpha$ reduced to 1/4 and 1/8, and substitute a real-frequency impurity solver (or a second analytic-continuation scheme) for the Padé step; if $g(\omega=0)$ or the sign and slope of the frequency dependence near the Fermi level change substantially, the claimed dynamical renormalization is an artifact of the numerical continuation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the many-body electron-phonon coupling defined as $g_{mn\nu}^{\mathbf{k}\mathbf{q}}(\omega)=\langle\phi_{m\mathbf{k}+\mathbf{q}}|\partial_{\nu\mathbf{q}}[\hat V_{\mathrm{KS}}+\hat\Sigma(\omega)]|\phi_{n\mathbf{k}}\rangle$ can be evaluated from first principles by subtracting DFT+DMFT self-energies on phonon-perturbed and unperturbed supercells and upfolding the difference into the band basis. In SrVO3 the local coupling of the M-point Jahn-Teller mode rises from 44 meV in DFT to 87 meV at $\omega=0$ in DFT+DMFT, while the R-point breathing coupling drops from 58 to 50 meV. In CaCuO2 the zero-frequency couplings of the X half-breathing and M full-breathing modes are moderately changed, but the frequency dependence becomes very strong, with the coupling at $U=4.7$ eV varying from near zero to roughly twice the zero-frequency value within about one phonon energy. The paper additionally computes electron scattering rates and phonon linewidths from these couplings and finds both correspondingly modified.

Load-bearing premise

The real-frequency couplings and their frequency dependence are obtained by analytic continuation of Matsubara self-energy differences, and the finite difference uses a fixed perturbation scale $\alpha=1/2$; if the continuation distorts the low-frequency structure or the response is not linear in $\alpha$, the central numbers change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In SrVO3, the mode-specific renormalization means that orbital-splitting Jahn-Teller phonons scatter electrons more strongly than DFT predicts, while charge-coupled breathing phonons scatter them slightly less.
  • The frequency-dependent couplings make electron scattering rates particle-hole asymmetric near the Fermi energy, a feature that can show up in thermoelectric transport of correlated metals.
  • In CaCuO2, the strong variation of $g(\omega)$ on the scale of the phonon energy at larger $U$ indicates that static-phonon approximations may be insufficient for phonon lifetimes and for estimates of phonon-mediated superconductivity.
  • The computed linewidths respond oppositely to correlation for the two CCO modes: stronger $U$ suppresses the M full-breathing linewidth and enhances the X half-breathing linewidth.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: If the frequency dependence survives more detailed checks, a systematic comparison of these finite-difference DFT+DMFT couplings with Hubbard-Holstein model results at matched parameters could separate the local vertex contribution from the nonlocal hybridization response.
  • Inference: The particle-hole asymmetric scattering implied by the frequency-dependent coupling in hole-doped CaCuO2 offers a phonon-based explanation of the measured positive Seebeck coefficient in hole-doped cuprates, a connection the paper raises but does not establish.
  • Inference: Phonon linewidth measurements across a series of cuprates with varying correlation strength could directly test the predicted opposite $U$ trends of the half-breathing and full-breathing modes, since the two should respond oppositely as the Mott transition is approached.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper defines a many-body electron-phonon coupling as the phonon-induced change of V_KS + Σ(ω), evaluates it with finite-difference DFT+DMFT calculations on supercells, and applies the method to two phonon modes in SrVO3 (M-point Jahn-Teller and R-point breathing) and two breathing modes in CaCuO2 (X-point half-breathing and M-point full-breathing). The central results are mode-specific correlation renormalizations at ω=0 (in SrVO3, 44→87 meV for the M mode and 58→50 meV for the R mode) and, most prominently, a strong frequency dependence of the coupling that grows with U in CaCuO2 and changes sign with doping, together with corresponding modifications to electron scattering rates and phonon linewidths.

Significance. If validated, this work would provide the first direct DFT+DMFT calculation of electron-phonon coupling in realistic materials, with a clean conceptual definition that reduces to standard DFPT when the self-energy vanishes. The mode-specific comparison between orbital-splitting and charge-coupling phonons, and the prediction of a strong dynamical frequency dependence with consequences for transport and phonon lifetimes, are of genuine interest and are stated in a falsifiable way. The paper also gives explicit formulae for electron and phonon self-energies, and it openly identifies several approximations. However, the numerical machinery that produces the central frequency-dependent results is not validated to the standard needed for the paper's main conclusion, so the significance is currently conditional on additional convergence and continuation checks.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II.D and Figs. 2, 5] The real-frequency EPC g(ω) is obtained by Padé analytic continuation of a small difference between two independent CTHYB self-energies, δΣ(iω_n) = Σ_ph − Σ_cn, and the manuscript reports no Monte Carlo error bars, no consistency check against an independent continuation method, and no direct comparison with a real-frequency solver for the actual g(ω). Because the paper's central claim—a strong, U- and doping-dependent frequency dependence of the coupling—rests entirely on this continuation, this issue is load-bearing. Please quantify the noise on δΣ, show that the Padé result is stable with respect to the number of Matsubara frequencies and to alternative continuation schemes, or clearly restrict the quantitative claims to ω=0 and label the frequency dependence as provisional.
  2. [Sec. II.B and Eq. (6)] The finite-difference derivative in Eq. (6) is evaluated with a single perturbation scale α=1/2 for all modes, and the manuscript does not provide a linear-response convergence check. If δΣ(α) is not linear at α=1/2, then the derivative itself is biased in addition to any continuation error. Please show results for at least two additional values of α, or provide a quantitative argument (e.g., from the size of the phonon displacement and the smoothness of the self-energy) that α=1/2 lies in the linear regime.
  3. [Sec. V, Eq. (11)] The interpretive model with parameters A, ω0, and dA is fitted to Matsubara-axis data and is said to be "conceptually confirmed by preliminary data from real frequency solvers to be published elsewhere." An unpublished, inaccessible result cannot serve as validation of the actual g(ω) used in the paper, and the model fit does not by itself establish the reliability of the Padé-continued difference δΣ. Please either include the real-frequency solver data, cite a published source, or explicitly label the model as an illustrative interpretation rather than a numerical validation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains a duplicated phrase: "studied are indicated are indicated" should be "studied are indicated."
  2. [Sec. I] The Introduction contains the typo "DFMT calculations" where "DFT+DMFT calculations" is intended.
  3. [Sec. VII] The Conclusion contains a duplicated word: "which competes with with correlation" should be "which competes with correlation."
  4. [Reference [38]] Reference [38] misspells "Jahn-Teller" as "Janh-Teller."
  5. [Secs. II.B and II.D] The symbol α is described as the ratio of effective atomic displacements to phonon eigen-displacements in Sec. II.B but as a "scale factor" in Sec. II.D; please use consistent terminology.
  6. [General] The manuscript would benefit from a data availability statement specifying input files and analysis scripts, since no repository or code release is mentioned.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the DFT+DMFT EPC is a finite-difference output of independent perturbed and unperturbed calculations; self-citations are contextual and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central quantity g(ω) is defined in Eq. 3 as the phonon derivative of V_KS + Σ(ω) and evaluated in Eq. 6 by a finite difference between two separately converged DFT+DMFT self-energies (Σ_ph and Σ_cn). This is a direct computation, not a fit: U, J, lattice parameters, DFPT phonons, and Wannier orbitals are inputs taken from standard codes and prior literature, and none is adjusted to reproduce the reported g(ω) values. The strong frequency dependence is produced by Padé continuation of the Matsubara-axis self-energy difference, not by the interpretive two-peak model in Sec. V; that model is fitted after the fact to already-computed Matsubara quantities, is explicitly described as qualitative, and does not generate the EPC predictions. Self-citations (e.g., Ref. 12 for the SVO DFT+DMFT setup and Ref. 42 for a Hubbard-Holstein comparison) are used for parameter conventions and agreement checks, not as load-bearing justification of the central claim. The skeptic's numerical concerns—possible Padé artifacts and the lack of an α→0 convergence check for α=1/2—are correctness/reliability issues about the numerical machinery, not instances of a derivation reducing to its own inputs, and therefore do not constitute circularity under the stated criteria.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central EPC values depend on several empirically chosen inputs (U, J, double counting, filling) and on numerical choices (alpha, Pade). Most are standard in DFT+DMFT, and none is fitted to the EPC result itself, so the ledger is moderate rather than heavy. The paper fully discloses most of these choices.

free parameters (6)
  • Hubbard U (SVO) = 4.5 eV
    Empirical interaction strength for V t2g orbitals, taken from prior work (Ref. 12); central results depend on this choice.
  • Hund coupling J (SVO) = 0.675 eV
    Empirical; sets ratio J/U used in prior DFT+DMFT of SrVO3.
  • Hubbard U (CCO) = 3.1, 3.9, 4.7 eV
    Varied to scan correlation strength; results depend strongly on U for the frequency dependence.
  • Finite-difference scale alpha = 0.5
    Ratio of applied atomic displacements to phonon eigen-displacement; no convergence test shown in main text.
  • Double-counting correction = Held formula
    Choice of double-counting scheme changes the Hartree/DC part of the EPC, especially omega->infinity limits (Sec. VI, Tables I-II).
  • Hole doping (CCO) = 0.15 holes/unit cell
    Carrier concentration used for the main CCO results; filling controls the sign and magnitude of the frequency dependence.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer approximation: EPC from static ionic displacements (Sec. II.A)
    Standard and stated; breaks for very light atoms or degenerate electronic states.
  • domain assumption DMFT locality: self-energy is site-local in the Wannier basis (Eq. 5)
    The central approximation of DMFT; assumes momentum-independent self-energy, expected to be accurate for the local orbitals studied.
  • ad hoc to paper Interaction parameters U and J are unchanged by the phonon displacement (Sec. II.B)
    Neglects the derivative of the screened Coulomb interaction with bond length; the paper acknowledges this for simplicity.
  • domain assumption Phonon frequencies and eigenvectors from DFPT are used without renormalization (Eq. 4 and Sec. III.B)
    DFPT phonons are used in the normalization of g and in the scattering formulae; prior work suggests moderate correlation-induced phonon hardening in SVO.
  • domain assumption Vertex corrections beyond lowest-order electron-phonon self-energies are neglected (Sec. II.C)
    Standard Fan-Migdal-level approximation; the paper notes differences from Hedin-Baym and cites evidence that two-vertex approximations are reasonable.
  • ad hoc to paper Pade analytic continuation gives quantitatively reliable real-frequency self-energy differences
    All real-frequency EPC curves rely on continuation of Matsubara data; the paper gives no convergence or uncertainty analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electron-Phonon Coupling in Correlated Metals: A Dynamical Mean-Field Theory Study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QDJF4BZJ

@misc{pith2026250503958,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electron-Phonon Coupling in Correlated Metals: A Dynamical Mean-Field Theory Study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QDJF4BZJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.03958}
}
abstract

Strong electron-electron interactions are known to significantly modify the electron-phonon coupling relative to the predictions of density functional theory, but this effect is challenging to calculate with realistic theories of strongly correlated materials. Here we define and calculate a version of the EPC applicable beyond band theory by combining first principles density functional theory plus dynamical mean-field theory with finite difference phonon perturbations, presenting results for several representative phonon modes in two materials of interest. In the three-orbital correlated metal SrVO$_3$, we find that intra-V-$t_{2g}$ band correlation significantly increases the coupling of these electrons to a Jahn-Teller phonon mode that splits the degenerate orbital energies, while slightly reducing the coupling associated with a breathing phonon that couples to the charge on each V atom. In the infinite layer cuprate CaCuO$_2$, we find that local correlation within the $d_{x^2-y^2}$ orbital derived band has a modest effect on coupling of near-Fermi surface electrons to optical breathing modes. In both cases, the interaction correction to the electron-phonon coupling predicted by dynamical mean-field theory has a significant dependence on the electronic frequency, arising from a lattice-distortion dependence of the correlated electron dynamics, showing the inadequacy of the simple picture in which correlations change static local susceptibilities. We also show that the electron-phonon scattering and phonon lifetimes associated with these phonon modes are modified by the electronic correlation. Our findings shed light on the material- and mode-specific role of dynamical electronic correlation in electron-phonon coupling and highlight the importance of developing efficient computational methods for treating electron-phonon coupling in correlated materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.03958 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Band structure of SrVO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. EPC in SVO with DFT and DFT+DMFT. (a) Local EPC in the Wannier basis for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Contribution to the electron scattering rates in SVO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Band structure of CaCuO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. EPC in CCO with DFT and DFT+DMFT. (a) Local EPC in the Wannier basis for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Phonon linewidth in CCO (a) as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Impurity problem self-energy and hybridization on the Matsubara axis. (a) Impurity hybridization and (b) impurity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Electron-phonon coupling in correlated materials: insights from the Hubbard-Holstein model

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a model of correlated electrons coupled to phonons, electronic repulsion suppresses the effective electron-phonon coupling by a factor of roughly 2 to 4 at U=2t, while the Fermi-liquid correlation strength is left ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Grimvall, The Electron-phonon Interaction in Metals (North-Holland Publishing Company, 1981)

    G. Grimvall, The Electron-phonon Interaction in Metals (North-Holland Publishing Company, 1981)

  2. [2]

    Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first principles, Rev

    F. Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first principles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015003 (2017)

  3. [3]

    Lanzara, P

    A. Lanzara, P. Bogdanov, X. Zhou, S. Kellar, D. Feng, E. Lu, T. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, A. Fujimori, K. Kishio, et al. , Evidence for ubiquitous strong electron–phonon coupling in high-temperature superconductors, Nature 412, 510 (2001)

  4. [4]

    Z. Li, M. Wu, Y.-H. Chan, and S. G. Louie, Unmasking the Origin of Kinks in the Photoemission Spectra of Cuprate Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 146401 (2021)

  5. [5]

    Merritt, A

    A. Merritt, A. Christianson, A. Banerjee, G. Gu, A. Mishchenko, and D. Reznik, Giant electron–phonon coupling of the breathing plane oxygen phonons in the dynamic stripe phase of La1.67Sr0.33NiO4, Scientific Re- ports 10, 11426 (2020)

  6. [6]

    A. B. Georgescu and A. J. Millis, Quantifying the role of the lattice in metal–insulator phase transitions, Com- munications Physics 5, 135 (2022)

  7. [7]

    Li and S

    Z. Li and S. G. Louie, Two-gap superconductivity and the decisive role of rare-earthd electrons in infinite-layer nickelates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 126401 (2024)

  8. [8]

    Electronically Amplified Electron-Phonon Interaction and Metal-Insulator Transition in Perovskite Nickelates

    Y. Zhong, K. Lee, R. Bhatta, Y. Lee, M. Gonza- lez, J. Li, R. Wang, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, S.-K. Mo, et al. , Electronically amplified electron-phonon interac- tion and metal-insulator transition in perovskite nicke- lates, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.14682 (2024)

Show all 101 references
  1. [9]

    A. J. Millis, B. I. Shraiman, and R. Mueller, Dy- namic jahn-teller effect and colossal magnetoresistance in La1−xSrxMnO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 175 (1996)

  2. [10]

    Quijada, J

    M. Quijada, J. ˇCerne, J. R. Simpson, H. D. Drew, K. H. Ahn, A. J. Millis, R. Shreekala, R. Ramesh, M. Rajeswari, and T. Venkatesan, Optical conductivity of manganites: Crossover from jahn-teller small polaron to coherent transport in the ferromagnetic state, Phys. Rev. B 58, ...

  3. [11]

    G.-M. Zhao, V. Smolyaninova, W. Prellier, and H. Keller, Electrical transport in the ferromagnetic state of manganites: Small-polaron metallic conduction at low temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 6086 (2000)

  4. [12]

    D. J. Abramovitch, J. Mravlje, J.-J. Zhou, A. Georges, and M. Bernardi, Respective roles of electron-phonon and electron-electron interactions in the transport and quasiparticle properties of SrVO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 186501 (2024). 14

  5. [13]

    Coulter, F

    J. Coulter, F. B. Kugler, H. LaBollita, A. Georges, and C. E. Dreyer, Mechanisms for the ultralow room-temperature resistivity of srmoo 3 (2025), arXiv:2506.10143 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

  6. [14]

    Z. P. Yin, A. Kutepov, and G. Kotliar, Correlation- Enhanced Electron-Phonon Coupling: Applications of GW and Screened Hybrid Functional to Bismuthates, Chloronitrides, and Other High- T c Superconductors, Phys. Rev. X 3, 021011 (2013)

  7. [15]

    Z. Li, G. Antonius, M. Wu, F. H. da Jornada, and S. G. Louie, Electron-phonon coupling from ab ini- tio linear-response theory within the GW method: Correlation-enhanced interactions and superconductiv- ity in Ba 1−xKxBiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 186402 (2019)

  8. [16]

    X. Xu, S. Zhang, X. Zhu, and J. Guo, Superconduc- tivity enhancement in FeSe/SrTiO 3: a review from the perspective of electron–phonon coupling, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 32, 343003 (2020)

  9. [17]

    Mandal, R

    S. Mandal, R. E. Cohen, and K. Haule, Strong pressure- dependent electron-phonon coupling in FeSe, Phys. Rev. B 89, 220502 (2014)

  10. [18]

    Gerber, S.-L

    S. Gerber, S.-L. Yang, D. Zhu, H. Soifer, J. A. Sobota, S. Rebec, J. J. Lee, T. Jia, B. Moritz, C. Jia, A. Gau- thier, Y. Li, D. Leuenberger, Y. Zhang, L. Chaix, W. Li, H. Jang, J.-S. Lee, M. Yi, G. L. Dakovski, S. Song, J. M. Glownia, S. Nelson, K. W. Kim, Y.-D. Chuang, Z. Hu...

  11. [19]

    W. Ding, Y. Wang, T. Wei, J. Gao, P. Cui, and Z. Zhang, Correlation-enhanced electron-phonon cou- pling for accurate evaluation of the superconducting transition temperature in bulk fese, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 65, 267412 (2022)

  12. [20]

    Reznik, G

    D. Reznik, G. Sangiovanni, O. Gunnarsson, and T. De- vereaux, Photoemission kinks and phonons in cuprates, Nature 455, E6 (2008)

  13. [21]

    Laflamme Janssen, M

    J. Laflamme Janssen, M. Cˆ ot´ e, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen, Electron-phonon coupling in C 60 using hybrid functionals, Phys. Rev. B 81, 073106 (2010)

  14. [22]

    Komelj and H

    M. Komelj and H. Krakauer, Electron-phonon cou- pling and exchange-correlation effects in superconduct- ing H 3S under high pressure, Phys. Rev. B 92, 205125 (2015)

  15. [23]

    Y. Wang, M. Engel, C. Lane, H. Miranda, L. Hou, B. Barbiellini, R. S. Markiewicz, J.-X. Zhu, G. Kresse, A. Bansil, et al. , Accurate electron-phonon interactions from advanced density functional theory, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08192 (2024)

  16. [24]

    Floris, I

    A. Floris, I. Timrov, B. Himmetoglu, N. Marzari, S. de Gironcoli, and M. Cococcioni, Hubbard-corrected density functional perturbation theory with ultrasoft pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B 101, 064305 (2020)

  17. [25]

    J.-J. Zhou, J. Park, I. Timrov, A. Floris, M. Cococ- cioni, N. Marzari, and M. Bernardi, Ab Initio Electron- Phonon Interactions in Correlated Electron Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 126404 (2021)

  18. [26]

    B. K. Chang, I. Timrov, J. Park, J.-J. Zhou, N. Marzari, and M. Bernardi, First-principles electron-phonon inter- actions and polarons in the parent cuprate La 2CuO4, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L012073 (2025)

  19. [27]

    Attaccalite, L

    C. Attaccalite, L. Wirtz, M. Lazzeri, F. Mauri, and A. Rubio, Doped graphene as tunable electron- phonon coupling material, Nano letters 10, 1172 (2010)

  20. [28]

    Faber, J

    C. Faber, J. L. Janssen, M. Cˆ ot´ e, E. Runge, and X. Blase, Electron-phonon coupling in the C 60 fullerene within the many-body GW approach, Phys. Rev. B 84, 155104 (2011)

  21. [29]

    Antonius, S

    G. Antonius, S. Ponc´ e, P. Boulanger, M. Cˆ ot´ e, and X. Gonze, Many-body effects on the zero-point renor- malization of the band structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 215501 (2014)

  22. [30]

    Z. Li, G. Antonius, Y.-H. Chan, and S. G. Louie, Electron-phonon coupling from GW perturbation the- ory: Practical workflow combining BerkeleyGW, ABINIT, and EPW, Computer Physics Communica- tions 295, 109003 (2024)

  23. [31]

    Georges, G

    A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozen- berg, Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly corre- lated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimen- sions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996)

  24. [32]

    Z. B. Huang, W. Hanke, E. Arrigoni, and D. J. Scalapino, Electron-phonon vertex in the two- dimensional one-band hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 68, 220507 (2003)

  25. [33]

    M. L. Kuli´ c and R. Zeyher, Influence of strong electron correlations on the electron-phonon coupling in high- tc oxides, Phys. Rev. B 49, 4395 (1994)

  26. [34]

    Deppeler and A

    A. Deppeler and A. J. Millis, Dynamical mean-field the- ory of electron-phonon interactions in correlated sys- tems: Application to isotope effects on electronic prop- erties, Phys. Rev. B 65, 224301 (2002)

  27. [35]

    Sangiovanni, M

    G. Sangiovanni, M. Capone, C. Castellani, and M. Grilli, Electron-phonon interaction close to a mott transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 026401 (2005)

  28. [36]

    Sangiovanni, O

    G. Sangiovanni, O. Gunnarsson, E. Koch, C. Castellani, and M. Capone, Electron-phonon interaction and anti- ferromagnetic correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 046404 (2006)

  29. [37]

    Bauer, J

    J. Bauer, J. E. Han, and O. Gunnarsson, Quantita- tive reliability study of the migdal-eliashberg theory for strong electron-phonon coupling in superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 84, 184531 (2011)

  30. [38]

    C. H. Kim and H. C. Lee, Interplay between local elec- tron correlation and Janh-Teller electron-phonon inter- action, Phys. Rev. B 73, 113109 (2006)

  31. [39]

    S. Li, E. Khatami, and S. Johnston, Competing phases and orbital-selective behaviors in the two-orbital Hubbard-Holstein model, Phys. Rev. B 95, 121112 (2017)

  32. [40]

    Scazzola, A

    A. Scazzola, A. Amaricci, and M. Capone, Competing correlated insulators in multiorbital systems coupled to phonons, Phys. Rev. B 107, 085131 (2023)

  33. [41]

    Moghadas, M

    E. Moghadas, M. Reitner, T. Wehling, G. Sangiovanni, S. Ciuchi, and A. Toschi, Effective enhancement of the electron-phonon coupling driven by nonperturbative electronic density fluctuations (2025), arXiv:2503.12113 [cond-mat.str-el]

  34. [42]

    Coulter and A

    J. Coulter and A. J. Millis, Electron-phonon coupling in correlated materials: insights from the hubbard-holstein model (2025), arXiv:2505.08081 [cond-mat.str-el]

  35. [43]

    Kotliar, S

    G. Kotliar, S. Y. Savrasov, K. Haule, V. S. Oudovenko, O. Parcollet, and C. A. Marianetti, Electronic structure calculations with dynamical mean-field theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 865 (2006). 15

  36. [44]

    Held, Electronic structure calculations using dynam- ical mean field theory, Advances in Physics 56, 829 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730701619647

    K. Held, Electronic structure calculations using dynam- ical mean field theory, Advances in Physics 56, 829 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730701619647

  37. [45]

    Hampel, J

    A. Hampel, J. Lee-Hand, A. Georges, and C. E. Dreyer, Correlation-induced octahedral rotations in SrMoO 3, Phys. Rev. B 104, 035102 (2021)

  38. [46]

    Wang, Hardening of Ni-O bond-stretching phonons in LaNiO2, Phys

    Y. Wang, Hardening of Ni-O bond-stretching phonons in LaNiO2, Phys. Rev. B 111, 085117 (2025)

  39. [47]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Giannozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001)

  40. [48]

    C. P. Ko¸ cer, K. Haule, G. L. Pascut, and B. Monserrat, Efficient lattice dynamics calculations for correlated ma- terials with DFT + DMFT, Phys. Rev. B 102, 245104 (2020)

  41. [49]

    However, for a general phonon, real atomic dis- placements q ℏ 2Maωνq 1 2(eiq·Rpeaµ νq +e−iq·Rpeaµ ν−q) must be used to obtain a physical perturbed Hamiltonian

    The phonon modes studied in this paper have q = −q and thus the corresponding atomic displacements uRpaµ = q ℏ 2Maωνq eiq·Rpeaµ νq can be written as fully real. However, for a general phonon, real atomic dis- placements q ℏ 2Maωνq 1 2(eiq·Rpeaµ νq +e−iq·Rpeaµ ν−q) must be used...

  42. [50]

    Giustino, M

    F. Giustino, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Electron- phonon interaction using wannier functions, Phys. Rev. B 76, 165108 (2007)

  43. [51]

    See Supplemental Material at link for derivations of e- ph contributions to self-energy, description of the finite difference workflow, additional computational details, additional information on scattering and local EPC, and further analysis of the impurity quantities

  44. [52]

    Migdal, Interaction between electrons and lattice vi- brations in a normal metal, Sov

    A. Migdal, Interaction between electrons and lattice vi- brations in a normal metal, Sov. Phys. JETP 7, 996 (1958)

  45. [53]

    D. J. Abramovitch, J.-J. Zhou, J. Mravlje, A. Georges, and M. Bernardi, Combining electron-phonon and dy- namical mean-field theory calculations of correlated ma- terials: Transport in the correlated metal Sr 2RuO4, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 093801 (2023)

  46. [54]

    P. B. Allen, Neutron spectroscopy of superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 6, 2577 (1972)

  47. [55]

    Park, Non-adiabatic phonon self-energy due to electrons with finite linewidths, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.12221 (2024)

    C.-H. Park, Non-adiabatic phonon self-energy due to electrons with finite linewidths, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.12221 (2024)

  48. [56]

    Hedin and S

    L. Hedin and S. Lundqvist, Solid state physics , Vol. 23 (Elsevier, 1970) pp. 1–181

  49. [57]

    Berges, N

    J. Berges, N. Girotto, T. Wehling, N. Marzari, and S. Ponc´ e, Phonon self-energy corrections: To screen, or not to screen, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041009 (2023)

  50. [58]

    Stefanucci and E

    G. Stefanucci and E. Perfetto, Exact formula with two dynamically screened electron-phonon couplings for positive phonon-linewidths approximations, Phys. Rev. B 111, 024307 (2025)

  51. [59]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Giron- coli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerst- mann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin- Samos, N. Marzari, F...

  52. [60]

    J.-J. Zhou, J. Park, I.-T. Lu, I. Maliyov, X. Tong, and M. Bernardi, Perturbo: A software package for ab initio electron–phonon interactions, charge transport and ul- trafast dynamics, Comput. Phys. Commun.264, 107970 (2021)

  53. [61]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, An updated version of Wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2309 (2014)

  54. [62]

    K. F. Garrity, J. W. Bennett, K. M. Rabe, and D. Van- derbilt, Pseudopotentials for high-throughput DFT cal- culations, Comput. Mater. Sci. 81, 446 (2014)

  55. [63]

    Parcollet, M

    O. Parcollet, M. Ferrero, T. Ayral, H. Hafermann, I. Krivenko, L. Messio, and P. Seth, TRIQS: A toolbox for research on interacting quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun. 196, 398 (2015)

  56. [64]

    Aichhorn, L

    M. Aichhorn, L. Pourovskii, P. Seth, V. Vildosola, M. Zingl, O. E. Peil, X. Deng, J. Mravlje, G. J. Kraberger, C. Martins, et al. , TRIQS/DFTTools: A TRIQS application for ab initio calculations of cor- related materials, Comput. Phys. Commun. 204, 200 (2016)

  57. [65]

    M. E. Merkel, A. Carta, S. Beck, and A. Hampel, solid dmft: gray-boxing DFT+DMFT materials simu- lations with TRIQS, Journal of Open Source Software 7, 4623 (2022)

  58. [66]

    E. Gull, A. J. Millis, A. I. Lichtenstein, A. N. Rubtsov, M. Troyer, and P. Werner, Continuous-time monte carlo methods for quantum impurity models, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 349 (2011)

  59. [67]

    P. Seth, I. Krivenko, M. Ferrero, and O. Parcollet, TRIQS/CTHYB: A continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo hybridisation expansion solver for quantum im- purity problems, Comput. Phys. Commun. 200, 274 (2016)

  60. [68]

    Y. Lan, X. Chen, and M. He, Structure, magnetic sus- ceptibility and resistivity properties of SrVO3, J. Alloys Compd. 354, 95 (2003)

  61. [69]

    G. Ahn, M. Zingl, S. J. Noh, M. Brahlek, J. D. Roth, R. Engel-Herbert, A. J. Millis, and S. J. Moon, Low- energy interband transition in the infrared response of the correlated metal SrVO 3 in the ultraclean limit, Phys. Rev. B 106, 085133 (2022)

  62. [70]

    Brahlek, J

    M. Brahlek, J. D. Roth, L. Zhang, M. Briggeman, P. Irvin, J. Lapano, J. Levy, T. Birol, and R. Engel- Herbert, Hidden transport phenomena in an ultraclean correlated metal, Nature Communications 15, 5304 (2024)

  63. [71]

    Grilli, B

    M. Grilli, B. G. Kotliar, and A. J. Millis, Mean-field the- ories of cuprate superconductors: A systematic analysis, Phys. Rev. B 42, 329 (1990)

  64. [72]

    A. I. Lichtenstein and M. I. Katsnelson, Antiferromag- netism and d-wave superconductivity in cuprates: A cluster dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B 62, R9283 (2000)

  65. [73]

    Capriotti, A

    L. Capriotti, A. L¨ auchli, and A. Paramekanti, Effect of local charge fluctuations on spin dynamics in La 2CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 72, 214433 (2005). 16

  66. [74]

    S´ en´ echal, P.-L

    D. S´ en´ echal, P.-L. Lavertu, M.-A. Marois, and A.- M. S. Tremblay, Competition between antiferromag- netism and superconductivity in high-Tc cuprates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 156404 (2005)

  67. [75]

    Haule and G

    K. Haule and G. Kotliar, Strongly correlated super- conductivity: A plaquette dynamical mean-field theory study, Phys. Rev. B 76, 104509 (2007)

  68. [76]

    Sordi, P

    G. Sordi, P. S´ emon, K. Haule, and A. M. S. Tremblay, Pseudogap temperature as a widom line in doped mott insulators, Scientific Reports 2, 547 (2012)

  69. [77]

    E. Gull, O. Parcollet, and A. J. Millis, Superconductiv- ity and the pseudogap in the two-dimensional hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 216405 (2013)

  70. [78]

    V. J. Emery and G. Reiter, Mechanism for high- temperature superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 38, 4547 (1988)

  71. [79]

    Weber, K

    C. Weber, K. Haule, and G. Kotliar, Apical oxygens and correlation strength in electron- and hole-doped copper oxides, Phys. Rev. B 82, 125107 (2010)

  72. [80]

    X. Wang, L. de’ Medici, and A. J. Millis, Role of oxygen-oxygen hopping in the three-band copper-oxide model: Quasiparticle weight, metal insulator and mag- netic phase boundaries, gap values, and optical conduc- tivity, Phys. Rev. B 83, 094501 (2011)

  73. [81]

    S. Choi, A. Kutepov, K. Haule, M. Van Schilfgaarde, and G. Kotliar, First-principles treatment of mott insu- lators: linearized QSGW+DMFT approach, npj Quan- tum Materials 1, 1 (2016)

  74. [82]

    Song and J

    J. Song and J. F. Annett, Electron-phonon coupling and d-wave superconductivity in the cuprates, Phys. Rev. B 51, 3840 (1995)

  75. [83]

    S. Y. Savrasov and O. K. Andersen, Linear-response calculation of the electron-phonon coupling in doped CaCuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4430 (1996)

  76. [84]

    Y.-C. Yam, G. A. Sawatzky, and M. Berciu, Dress- ing due to correlations strongly reduces the effect of electron-phonon coupling, Phys. Rev. B 106, 075152 (2022)

  77. [85]

    Giustino, M

    F. Giustino, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Small phonon contribution to the photoemission kink in the copper oxide superconductors, Nature 452, 975 (2008)

  78. [86]

    R. J. McQueeney, Y. Petrov, T. Egami, M. Yethiraj, G. Shirane, and Y. Endoh, Anomalous dispersion of LO phonons in La 1.85Sr0.15CuO4 at low temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 628 (1999)

  79. [87]

    Pintschovius and M

    L. Pintschovius and M. Braden, Anomalous dispersion of LO phonons in La 1.85Sr0.15CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 60, R15039 (1999)

  80. [88]

    Falter and G

    C. Falter and G. A. Hoffmann, Effect of the insulator- metal transition on the phonon anomalies in La 2CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 61, 14537 (2000)

  81. [89]

    Zhang, S

    P. Zhang, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen, Electron- phonon renormalization in cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 067005 (2007)

  82. [90]

    Reznik, Giant electron-phonon anomaly in doped La2CuO4 and other cuprates, Advances in Condensed Matter Physics 2010, 523549 (2010)

    D. Reznik, Giant electron-phonon anomaly in doped La2CuO4 and other cuprates, Advances in Condensed Matter Physics 2010, 523549 (2010)

  83. [91]

    Mansart, M

    B. Mansart, M. J. G. Cottet, G. F. Mancini, T. Jarl- borg, S. B. Dugdale, S. L. Johnson, S. O. Mariager, C. J. Milne, P. Beaud, S. Gr¨ ubel, J. A. Johnson, T. Kubacka, G. Ingold, K. Prsa, H. M. Rønnow, K. Conder, E. Pom- jakushina, M. Chergui, and F. Carbone, Temperature- depe...

  84. [92]

    Azuma, Z

    M. Azuma, Z. Hiroi, M. Takano, Y. Bando, and Y. Takeda, Superconductivity at 110 k in the infinite- layer compound (Sr 1−xCax)1−yCuO2, Nature 356, 775 (1992)

  85. [93]

    Karpinski, H

    J. Karpinski, H. Schwer, I. Mangelschots, K. Conder, A. Morawski, T. Lada, and A. Paszewin, Single crys- tals of Hg 1−xPbxBa2Can−1CunO2n+2+δ and infinite- layer CaCuO2. synthesis at gas pressure 10 kbar, prop- erties and structure, Physica C: Superconductivity 234, 10 (1994)

  86. [94]

    In the present dis- cussion we consider Vloc to be part of the hybridization as both it and the frequency-dependent part of ∆( iωn) contribute an EPC in the impurity model

    In some formulations of DMFT the hybridization func- tion is defined to vanish in the infinite frequency limit and the infinite frequency limit is included in the static Hamiltonian of the impurity model. In the present dis- cussion we consider Vloc to be part of the hybridiza...

  87. [95]

    For all of the phonon modes considered, the change in phonon frequency between DFPT and DFPT+ U is small (a few meV or less)

    For consistency with the DFT+DMFT values, the DFPT+U local coupling listed here is calculated with DFPT phonon frequencies and eigendisplacements. For all of the phonon modes considered, the change in phonon frequency between DFPT and DFPT+ U is small (a few meV or less)

  88. [96]

    Carta, A

    A. Carta, A. Panda, and C. Ederer, Emergence of a potential charge-disproportionated insulating state in SrCrO3, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023240 (2024)

  89. [97]

    Boehnke, F

    L. Boehnke, F. Nilsson, F. Aryasetiawan, and P. Werner, When strong correlations become weak: Consistent merging of GW and DMFT, Physical Re- view B 94, 201106 (2016)

  90. [98]

    Zhu and G

    T. Zhu and G. K.-L. Chan, Ab initio full cell GW +DMFT for correlated materials, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021006 (2021)

  91. [99]

    Gourgout, G

    A. Gourgout, G. Grissonnanche, F. Lalibert´ e, A. Ataei, L. Chen, S. Verret, J.-S. Zhou, J. Mravlje, A. Georges, N. Doiron-Leyraud, and L. Taillefer, Seebeck coefficient in a cuprate superconductor: Particle-hole asymmetry in the strange metal phase and fermi surface transform...

  92. [100]

    Doiron-Leyraud, S

    N. Doiron-Leyraud, S. Lepault, O. Cyr-Choini` ere, B. Vignolle, G. Grissonnanche, F. Lalibert´ e, J. Chang, N. Bariˇ si´ c, M. K. Chan, L. Ji, X. Zhao, Y. Li, M. Greven, C. Proust, and L. Taillefer, Hall, Seebeck, and Nernst coefficients of underdoped HgBa 2CuO4+δ: Fermi-surfa...

  93. [101]

    Cyr-Choini` ere, S

    O. Cyr-Choini` ere, S. Badoux, G. Grissonnanche, B. Mi- chon, S. A. A. Afshar, S. Fortier, D. LeBoeuf, D. Graf, J. Day, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, R. Liang, N. Doiron- Leyraud, and L. Taillefer, Anisotropy of the Seebeck coefficient in the cuprate superconductor YBa 2Cu3Oy: Ferm...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.