Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 32 references

Differential forms, open-closed maps, and Gromov-Witten axioms

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper builds open-closed maps from Hochschild and cyclic homology of a curved Fukaya A∞ algebra to the de Rham current cohomology of the ambient symplectic manifold, and proves they satisfy chain-level Gromov-Witten axioms.

desk verdict A serious, technically detailed paper that builds chain-level open-closed maps for curved Fukaya A-infinity algebras and descends them to cyclic homology; the main theorems are conditional on a regularity assumption verified only for homogeneous spaces, with the general VFC extension deferred. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.06034 v2 pith:QDM4FR3Y submitted 2025-09-07 math.SG hep-thmath.AG

Pavel Giterman , Jake P. Solomon , Sara B. Tukachinsky This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.SGhep-thmath.AG MSC 53D3753D4519D5558A1032Q65
keywords open-closedmapHochschildhomologycyclicFukayaA-infinityalgebracurvedGromov-Wittenaxiomsdifferentialformscurrents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs, on the chain level, open-closed maps from Hochschild and cyclic homologies of the A∞ algebra of differential forms on a Lagrangian submanifold to the de Rham current cohomology of the ambient symplectic manifold. The construction works for possibly curved A∞ algebras and covers several homology variants: ordinary Hochschild, normalized Hochschild, Connes cyclic, reduced cyclic, and extended cyclic homology, with a codomain adjustment or an extra sphere contribution when the Lagrangian is homologically trivial. The authors verify that these operations satisfy analogues of the Gromov-Witten axioms—vanishing on the fundamental class, the divisor equation, and the energy-zero identification with ordinary push-forward of forms. If correct, this yields a differential-form model for open-closed string maps and a foundation intended for gravitational descendants and obstruction theory in open Gromov-Witten theory.

What carries the argument

The central object is the open-closed map p^γ_{k,l}(α;γ) = (-1)^ε (evi_0)_*(∧_j evi_j^* γ_j ∧ evb_j^* α_j), a current on X obtained by integrating over the moduli space of genus-zero stable disks with k boundary and l+1 interior marked points. The interior marked point 0 is the output; boundary inputs are forms on L and interior inputs are forms on X. The defining structure equation (Proposition 4.1) describes the boundary of these moduli spaces in terms of the closed-open q-operator and sphere contributions, and it is this equation that yields the chain-map property and all the homological descents.

What would settle it

Find a Lagrangian (X,L) outside the homogeneous class where some moduli space M_{k,l+1}(β) has a non-trivial singular stratum or an evaluation map that is not a proper submersion; then the pushforward defining p^γ is not a current as defined, and the Stokes proof of Proposition 4.1 would need virtual-fundamental corrections not supplied by the paper.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the operator p^γ = Σ_k p^γ_k, defined by pushing forward, along the interior evaluation map of moduli spaces of stable disks, the exterior product of boundary evaluation pullbacks of differential forms and interior insertions of a closed two-form γ, is a degree n+1 chain map from the Hochschild complex of the curved A∞ algebra C = A*(L;R) to the complex of currents on X. The proof applies Stokes' theorem to the codimension-one boundary of these moduli spaces: the boundary strata produce exactly the A∞-type structure equation that makes d∘p^γ and p^γ∘∂_hoch agree up to the stated sign. The same structure equation, together with unit and cyclic-symmetry properties, yi

Load-bearing premise

Every moduli space of stable disks and spheres used in the construction is assumed to be a smooth orbifold with corners and to have evaluation maps that are proper submersions, so that Stokes' theorem and pushforwards of currents apply; the paper verifies this assumption only for homogeneous targets such as projective spaces and their products.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The open-closed map gives chain-level maps from Hochschild and cyclic homology of the Fukaya A∞ algebra to quantum cohomology, so open-string invariants can be compared with closed-string constraints without passing directly to cohomology.
  • The normalized, reduced, and extended variants make the construction compatible with unit insertions, the empty list, and curved A∞ algebras, widening the class of Lagrangians and bulk deformations to which the method applies.
  • The Gromov-Witten axioms verified at chain level—fundamental class, divisor, and energy zero—provide the structural input needed for defining open gravitational descendants.
  • The pseudoisotopy version gives families of such maps as the almost complex structure or the bulk constraint varies, allowing comparison of the resulting invariants across a one-parameter family.
  • Under homological triviality of the Lagrangian, the extended cyclic map uses sphere contributions weighted by a bounding chain, linking the construction to obstruction theory and the space of bounding chains.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the regularity assumption on the moduli spaces could be replaced by virtual fundamental class techniques, the same structure equations and Gromov-Witten axioms should hold for general symplectic targets; the paper states this extension is expected but does not prove it.
  • The chain-level Gromov-Witten axioms may provide a direct route to open gravitational descendants without first passing to cohomology, which the authors plan in a future work.
  • The dependence of the extended cyclic map on the choice of the bounding chain η suggests a concrete interplay between open-closed maps and the obstruction-theoretic bounding-chain formalism used for genus-zero open Gromov-Witten invariants.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs chain-level open-closed maps p^γ from the Hochschild and cyclic chain complexes of the de Rham model C = A^*(L;R) of a (possibly curved) Fukaya A∞ algebra to the complex of de Rham currents on X, with degree shift n+1. Under a standing regularity assumption on the disk moduli spaces, Theorem 1 proves the structure equation d∘p^γ − (−1)^{n+1}p^γ∘∂_hoch = 0. Theorems 2–4 descend the map to normalized Hochschild, Connes cyclic, and reduced cyclic complexes, the last after quotienting the codomain by the current ζ_L. Theorem 5 extends the construction to extended cyclic homology under the homological triviality assumption i_*([L]) = 0, using the sphere operator q^γ_{∅,1}(η) to cancel the boundary-collapse term. Section 6 sketches pseudoisotopy analogues. The paper also proves GW-like axioms: fundamental class, divisor, and energy zero.

Significance. If the results are accepted under the stated regularity hypotheses, the paper gives a detailed, geometric, chain-level construction of open-closed maps for curved A∞ algebras, with explicit signs and a clean derivation of the structure equation from Stokes' theorem and boundary stratification. The treatment of cyclic and reduced cyclic variants is thorough, and the divisor/fundamental-class/energy-zero properties are exactly the axioms needed for later applications to gravitational descendants and obstruction theory. The paper is not circular: the p-operators are defined geometrically and the chain map property is proved, not assumed. The main weakness is the scope of the regularity assumption: the smoothness of all moduli spaces and the submersion properties of evaluations are verified only for homogeneous spaces and products, while the general symplectic-manifold statement is explicitly deferred to virtual fundamental class techniques. The pseudoisotopy section, moreover, omits the necessary base-dga machinery.

major comments (3)
  1. [§1.2.1, Eq. (3), Proposition 4.1] The central construction and the proof of Proposition 4.1 require every moduli space M_{k,l+1}(β) to be a smooth orbifold with corners and the relevant evaluation maps to be proper submersions. Strictly speaking, Section 4.1 only needs ev^i_0 to be a current pushforward, so ev^i_0 itself need not be a submersion; the load-bearing hypotheses are smoothness of the moduli spaces and the submersion property for the evaluation maps entering the closed-open q-operators and the gluing analysis. The paper verifies these hypotheses only for homogeneous spaces and products, and states that the general case is 'expected to extend' via virtual fundamental cycles. This is not a proof. As written, Theorems 1–5 are theorems conditional on a regularity assumption that is verified in a limited class; the unqualified wording of the abstract and of the theorem statements should be corrected, or the VFC ext
  2. [§6.3] The pseudoisotopy section asserts 'analogs of Theorems 1-5' for the maps ˜p, but immediately says 'we omit the details here.' The extension requires (i) Hochschild and cyclic complexes for A∞ algebras over the base dga R = A^*(I;R), for which the only reference is the unpublished '[14] in preparation', and (ii) a proof that the operators ˜q endow C := A^*(I×L;R) with an A∞ structure over this base dga. Neither is supplied. Consequently the pseudoisotopy analogues are not established by this manuscript. The section should either be expanded to a full proof or explicitly labelled as a program/future work rather than a result.
  3. [§5.2, proof of Theorem 5] The extension to extended cyclic homology depends on the identity d(p^γ_0(1)) = (−1)^{n+1}p^γ_1(m^γ_0(1)) + q^γ_{∅,1}(i_*1_L), obtained by summing the k=0 case of Proposition 4.1 over l. The displayed derivation in the proof of Theorem 5 is terse: it is easy to misread the notation p^γ_0(1;γ^⊗l), since p^γ_0 has no first input. Please rewrite this computation with the precise definition of p^γ_0(1) and the summation over l, so the sign and the factorial factors are checkable. This is a local issue, but it is load-bearing for Theorem 5.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.3.2] The notation in the display defining C^{λ,+}_* mixes the full tensor algebra T(A[1]) with the reduced tensor algebra T(A[1]). Since the distinction between the two is important for the extended cyclic complex, please use different symbols or explicitly say that the equality is after identifying R with the empty tensor factor.
  2. [Proposition 4.10, proof] The proof says 'For (k+1,l+1,β) ≠ (1,1,β0)' where the statement concerns (k+1,l,β) ≠ (1,0,β0). These are consistent after translating l, but the reader has to pause; please align the indices.
  3. [Proposition 4.15, proof] The forgetful map in the proof is written as π : M_{k,l+2}(β) → M_{k,l+1}(β), but for p_{k,l} the relevant forgetful map should be π : M_{k,l+1}(β) → M_{k,l}(β). Please correct the dimensions.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typos: 'Hichschild' in §5.2, 'neccesarily' in §2.4, 'quotieting' in §5.2, and 'identify'/'identity' slips. None affect the mathematics, but they should be cleaned up.
  5. [§3.1 and Theorem 5] Section 3.1 records dζ_S = (−1)^n ζ_L for a chain S with ∂S = L, while Theorem 5 chooses η with dη = −ζ_L. The sign convention is consistent if η is normalized appropriately, but an explicit sentence connecting ζ_S and η would prevent sign confusion in the proof of Theorem 5.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the p-operators are defined geometrically and the chain-map theorem is proved from Stokes' theorem; self-citations to [28] and [29] are to published prior work and are not circular.

full rationale

The central object p^gamma is defined in Eq. (3) as a pushforward of a wedge product of evaluation pullbacks over the moduli space M_{k,l+1}(beta); it is not fitted to, or defined as, the solution of the desired chain-map equation. Theorem 1 (Eq. (5)) is derived from Proposition 4.1, whose proof applies Stokes' theorem (Proposition 3.3, quoted from [29]) to the boundary of these moduli spaces and identifies the two types of boundary strata via Propositions 4.5 and 4.7 and Lemmas 4.6 and 4.8. This is a geometric derivation, not a renaming or a tautology. The A_infinity structure on C = A*(L;R) is an input, imported from [28], and the A_infinity relations are not the target result; they make the Hochschild differential well-defined. [28] and [29] are published journal papers, so these citations count as independent support under the rules even though they share authors with the present paper. The regularity assumption in Section 1.2.1 is exactly an assumption: it is verified only for homogeneous spaces, and the promised virtual fundamental class extension for general targets is deferred ('our results are expected to extend'). Section 6.3 explicitly omits the proof of the pseudoisotopy analogs of Theorems 1-5 ('we omit the details here') and refers to the in-preparation work [14]. These are correctness/completeness gaps, not circularity: the chain-map claim does not reduce to its inputs by construction. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work to force a choice. Accordingly the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted numerical parameters. Its free inputs are geometric choices: a closed two-form gamma, a Lagrangian L with relative spin structure, and a tame almost complex structure J. The main axioms it relies on are the smooth-orbifold regularity assumption, orientation data from relative spin structures, the imported closed-open A-infinity structure from [28], and, for Theorem 5, homological triviality of L together with a chosen bounding current eta.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Moduli spaces M_{k,l+1}(beta) are smooth orbifolds with corners and the evaluation maps ev^b0, ev^i0 are proper submersions when defined.
    Stated in Section 1.2.1 as the running regularity assumption. It underlies the definition of pushforwards of currents, Stokes' theorem, orientation gluing, and the chain map proof in Proposition 4.1.
  • domain assumption The moduli spaces carry orientations induced by a relative spin structure on (X,L).
    Used throughout Section 4 and Lemma 4.6 to control signs in boundary contributions. The paper cites [8, Chapter 8] for this nonstandard background fact.
  • standard math Standard background in A-infinity algebras, Hochschild and Connes cyclic complexes, and de Rham/currents duality.
    Invoked in Sections 2 and 3, with references to [21], [14], [5], and [29]. These are standard tools in the field and are not derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption The Fukaya A-infinity algebra C is defined by the closed-open operators q^{b,gamma} from [28].
    Equation (19) and Section 3.5 import the geometric A-infinity structure from the authors' prior paper [28]. The current paper assumes that structure as input rather than re-proving it.
  • domain assumption In Theorem 5, the Lagrangian L is homologically trivial in X and one chooses a current eta with d eta = -zeta_L.
    This assumption is explicit in the statement of Theorem 5 and Section 3.1. It is needed to cancel the boundary-collapse contribution to the extended cyclic chain map.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Differential forms, open-closed maps, and Gromov-Witten axioms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QDM4FR3Y

@misc{pith2026250906034,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Differential forms, open-closed maps, and Gromov-Witten axioms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QDM4FR3Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.06034}
}
abstract

We construct open-closed maps on various versions of Hochschild and cyclic homology of the Fukaya $A_\infty$ algebra of a Lagrangian submanifold modeled on differential forms. The $A_\infty$ algebra may be curved. Properties analogous to Gromov-Witten axioms are verified. The paper is written with applications in mind to gravitational descendants and obstruction theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.06034 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A stable curve with two disk components, together with the distribution of inputs for each marked point. Therefore, X k−t j=1 X k i=k−t+1 (|ασ(i) | − |ασ(j) |) = X j<i σ(j)>σ(i) (|ασ(i) | − |ασ(j) |). □ We decompose ε(α) into the part that depends on the elements αj and the part that depends only on the number of inputs. Namely, for k ∈ Z≥0 and α = (α1, . . . , αk) we set ε ′ (k) = 1 +X k j=1 j = k(k + 1) 2 + 1, ε′′… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The domain of an element of B3,1;{2},{1,3} ⊂ ∂M3,4(β). Lemma 4.6. Let k, l, β, ki, βi, I, and J, be as in Lemma 4.5, and let σ ∈ Z/kZ. Write l1 := |I|, l2 := |J|. Let α = (α1, . . . , αk) ∈ A∗ (L; R) ⊗k and γ = (γ1, . . . , γl) ∈ A∗ (X; R) ⊗l . Take a splitting α σ = α σ ⟨1⟩ ⊗ α σ ⟨2⟩ in which α σ ⟨j⟩ has length kj for j = 1, 2. Let B ⊂ Mk,l+1(β) be the boundary component described as follows. A generic point of B i… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    Giterman and J

    P. Giterman and J. P. Solomon,The total complex of cyclic codifferential forms and homotopy inner products, in preparation

    work page

  2. [1]

    Abouzaid,A geometric criterion for generating the Fukaya category, Publ

    M. Abouzaid,A geometric criterion for generating the Fukaya category, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. (2010), no. 112, 191–240,doi:10.1007/s10240-010-0028-5

    doi:10.1007/s10240-010-0028-5 2010

  3. [2]

    Abouzaid, M

    M. Abouzaid, M. McLean, and I. Smith,Complex cobordism, Hamiltonian loops and global Kuranishi charts, arXiv e-prints (2021),arXiv:2110.14320

    arXiv 2021

  4. [3]

    Abouzaid, M

    M. Abouzaid, M. McLean, and I. Smith,Gromov-Witten invariants in complex and Morava-local K-theories, Geom. Funct. Anal.34(2024), no. 6, 1647–1733,doi:10.1007/s00039-024-00697-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s00039-024-00697-4 2024

  5. [4]

    Cieliebak and E

    K. Cieliebak and E. Goldstein,A note on the mean curvature, Maslov class and symplectic area of Lagrangian immersions, J. Symplectic Geom.2(2004), no. 2, 261–266

    work page 2004

  6. [5]

    de Rham,Differentiable manifolds, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Funda- mental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol

    G. de Rham,Differentiable manifolds, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Funda- mental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 266, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984, doi:10.1007/ 978-3-642-61752-2

    work page 1984

  7. [6]

    Fukaya,Cyclic symmetry and adic convergence in Lagrangian Floer theory, Kyoto J

    K. Fukaya,Cyclic symmetry and adic convergence in Lagrangian Floer theory, Kyoto J. Math.50(2010), no. 3, 521–590,doi:10.1215/0023608X-2010-004

    doi:10.1215/0023608x-2010-004 2010

  8. [7]

    Fukaya,Counting pseudo-holomorphic discs in Calabi-Yau 3-folds, Tohoku Math

    K. Fukaya,Counting pseudo-holomorphic discs in Calabi-Yau 3-folds, Tohoku Math. J. (2)63(2011), no. 4, 697–727,doi:10.2748/tmj/1325886287

    arXiv 2011

Show all 32 references
  1. [8]

    Fukaya, Y.-G

    K. Fukaya, Y.-G. Oh, H. Ohta, and K. Ono,Lagrangian intersection Floer theory: anomaly and obstruction. Parts I,II, AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 46, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; International Press, Somerville, MA, 2009

    2009

  2. [9]

    Fukaya, Y.-G

    K. Fukaya, Y.-G. Oh, H. Ohta, and K. Ono,Lagrangian Floer theory on compact toric manifolds, I, Duke Math. J.151(2010), no. 1, 23–174,doi:10.1215/00127094-2009-062. 45

    2010 doi

  3. [10]

    Fukaya, Y.-G

    K. Fukaya, Y.-G. Oh, H. Ohta, and K. Ono,Lagrangian Floer theory on compact toric manifolds II: bulk deformations, Selecta Math. (N.S.)17(2011), no. 3, 609–711,doi:10.1007/s00029-011-0057-z

    2011 doi

  4. [11]

    Fukaya, Y.-G

    K. Fukaya, Y.-G. Oh, H. Ohta, and K. Ono,Lagrangian Floer theory and mirror symmetry on compact toric manifolds, Ast´ erisque (2016), no. 376, vi+340

    2016

  5. [12]

    Ganatra,Symplectic cohomology and duality for the wrapped Fukaya category, arXiv e-prints (2013), arXiv:1304.7312

    S. Ganatra,Symplectic cohomology and duality for the wrapped Fukaya category, arXiv e-prints (2013), arXiv:1304.7312

    2013 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Giterman and J

    P. Giterman and J. P. Solomon,Gravitational descendants in open Gromov-Witten theory, in preparation

  7. [15]

    Hirschi and K

    A. Hirschi and K. Hugtenburg,An open-closed Deligne-Mumford field theory associated to a Lagrangian submanifold, arXiv e-prints (2025),arXiv:2501.04687

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Hofer, K

    H. Hofer, K. Wysocki, and E. Zehnder,A general Fredholm theory. I. A splicing-based differential geometry, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)9(2007), no. 4, 841–876,doi:10.4171/JEMS/99

    2007 doi

  9. [17]

    Hofer, K

    H. Hofer, K. Wysocki, and E. Zehnder,A general Fredholm theory. II. Implicit function theorems, Geom. Funct. Anal.19(2009), no. 1, 206–293,doi:10.1007/s00039-009-0715-x

    2009 doi

  10. [18]

    Hofer, K

    H. Hofer, K. Wysocki, and E. Zehnder,A general Fredholm theory. III. Fredholm functors and polyfolds, Geom. Topol.13(2009), no. 4, 2279–2387,doi:10.2140/gt.2009.13.2279

    2009 doi

  11. [19]

    Hofer, K

    H. Hofer, K. Wysocki, and E. Zehnder,Integration theory on the zero sets of polyfold Fredholm sections, Math. Ann.346(2010), no. 1, 139–198,doi:10.1007/s00208-009-0393-x

    2010 doi

  12. [20]

    Li and K

    J. Li and K. Wehrheim,A ∞ structures from Morse trees with pseudoholomorphic disks, preprint

  13. [21]

    Loday,Cyclic homology, second ed., Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fun- damental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol

    J.-L. Loday,Cyclic homology, second ed., Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fun- damental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 301, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998, Appen- dix E by Mar ´ ıa O. Ronco, Chapter 13 by the author in collaboration with Teimuraz Piras...

    1998 doi

  14. [22]

    Loday and B

    J.-L. Loday and B. Vallette,Algebraic operads, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 346, Springer, Heidelberg, 2012, doi:10.1007/ 978-3-642-30362-3

    2012

  15. [23]

    McDuff and D

    D. McDuff and D. Salamon,Introduction to symplectic topology, third ed., Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017,doi:10.1093/oso/9780198794899.001.0001

    2017

  16. [24]

    A. F. Ritter and I. Smith,The monotone wrapped Fukaya category and the open-closed string map, Selecta Math. (N.S.)23(2017), no. 1, 533–642,doi:10.1007/s00029-016-0255-9

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    Seidel,Fukaya categories and deformations, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathemati- cians, Vol

    P. Seidel,Fukaya categories and deformations, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathemati- cians, Vol. II (Beijing, 2002), Higher Ed. Press, Beijing, 2002, pp. 351–360

    2002

  18. [26]

    Seidel,Symplectic homology as Hochschild homology, Algebraic geometry—Seattle 2005

    P. Seidel,Symplectic homology as Hochschild homology, Algebraic geometry—Seattle 2005. Part 1, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 80, Part 1, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2009, pp. 415–434, doi:10.1090/pspum/080.1/2483942

    2005 doi

  19. [27]

    Sheridan,On the Fukaya category of a Fano hypersurface in projective space, Publ

    N. Sheridan,On the Fukaya category of a Fano hypersurface in projective space, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci.124(2016), 165–317,doi:10.1007/s10240-016-0082-8

    2016 doi

  20. [28]

    J. P. Solomon and S. B. Tukachinsky,Differential forms, Fukaya A∞ algebras, and Gromov-Witten axioms, J. Symplectic Geom.20(2022), no. 4, 927–994,doi:10.4310/JSG.2022.v20.n4.a5

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    J. P. Solomon and S. B. Tukachinsky,Differential forms on orbifolds with corners, J. Topol. Anal.16 (2024), no. 4, 561–615,doi:10.1142/S1793525323500048

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    J. P. Solomon and S. B. Tukachinsky,Relative quantum cohomology, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)26 (2024), no. 9, 3497–3573,doi:10.4171/jems/1337

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    S. B. Tukachinsky,Open Gromov-Witten theory for cohomologically incompressible Lagrangians, arXiv e-prints (2023),arXiv:2311.18511

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Wehrheim and C

    K. Wehrheim and C. Woodward,Orientations for pseudoholomorphic quilts, arXiv e-prints (2015), arXiv:1503.07803. 46 Institute of Mathematics, Hebrew University, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, 9190401, Israel Email address:pavel.giterman@mail.huji.ac.il Institute of Mathematics, Hebrew U...

    2015 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.